backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 149 comment(s) - last by DeepBlue1975.. on Jun 25 at 6:46 PM


Both Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates were on hand for the Windows 7 demonstration.  (Source: Microsoft)

Julie Larson-Green, Microsoft VP of Windows Experience Program Management, debuted Windows 7 at D6, including showing off its new touch capabilities.

Larson-Green shows off the multi input touch abilities of Windows 7 on a Dell Latitude XT, during the demo.  (Source: CNet)
The new OS made a surprise appearance that's got everyone talking

While Apple is known for stealing the show and anticipation has been building at a giddy pace for the new 3G iPhone, its long time rival Microsoft is not afraid to steal a bit of spotlight of its own.  After months of tight-lipped silence, even as recently as last week, about Window's Vista's successor Window 7 which is set to debut in 2009, Microsoft finally unveiled the work in progress to the press.

The place was Carlsbad, California at the sixth edition of the D Conference, known only as D6.  Julie Larson-Green, Microsoft's VP of Windows Experience Program Management gave a tantalizing brief demonstration of the new OS, which is showcasing strong support for the touch technology.  Steve Ballmer downplayed the demo as the "smallest snippet of Windows 7", but the crowd obviously knew the significance of the event.

The new OS was demonstrated on the Dell Latitude XT, a current model notebook with touch screen capabilities.  Julie said that touching is "super important" to the new interface.  And she knows what the customer wants.  She made a name for herself at Microsoft when she delivered the well received 2007 Microsoft Office UI, which featured marked improvements over past implementations both in style and feel.

"You will be able to do these things in Windows 7," Julie commented as she drew a picture in Microsoft Paint using only her fingers.  Further, she showcased how the system can accept multiple finger inputs, hence the "multi" part of the "multi-touch" technology title.  The new multi-touch technology will deploy on "all sizes and shapes of computers" according to Julie, but you would need the appropriate digitizer hardware.  Touching is "not complete replacement of the mouse", rather it’s a way to further your experience, she says.

Among other revelations is Microsoft's preliminary statement that Windows 7 will feature little if any general architecture changes from Vista.  Also the new OS featured, in the demo version, an OS X-like dock, unlike Vista's more traditional Windows UI, albeit prettied by the Aero Interface.  Other details on the new services remain scarce, but Microsoft promises big things in addition to its newfound touch abilities and UI.

Some note with curiosity the date that Ballmer reaffirmed for Windows 7 to ship -- 2009.  Previously, Microsoft had stated that the OS would like ship in 2010, giving Vista a 3 year window.  However, Microsoft Chairman and founder Bill Gates surprised the media this spring by announcing that it would likely ship in 2009.  With a confirmation from Microsoft Chief Executive, this seems to be an increasingly sure proposition.

The timing of the debut struck some journalists as a bit unusual, as Apple and Linux now have time to mount OS counteroffensives and work on some touching of their own.  Also some note that the continued trickle of news may only further many companies' "skip Vista and wait for Windows 7" mindset.

Despite its proponents' well-stated defenses of Vista, the likely reason for the debut is that Microsoft realizes that its current OS has fallen short.  For a company like Microsoft modest sales, failing to surpass your previous product, are not a victory but a loss.  Microsoft is eager to put this in the past by pushing out Windows 7 earlier than expected and generating a buzz with its strong push into emerging tactile technologies and more service to be unveiled in coming months.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Touch
By Spivonious on 5/28/2008 11:14:08 AM , Rating: 3
So we'll all have to buy new touch sensitive monitors now?

I think Microsoft really needs to just dive into the Win32 API and clean it up. Throw out the old 16-bit compatibility, and really streamline things at the most primitive level. New interfaces are nice, and easy to generate press about, but once that novelty wears off, we're still stuck with the designed-for-386 API functions.




RE: Touch
By 67STANG on 5/28/2008 11:21:22 AM , Rating: 3
I agree. However I believe that touch-screen technology is really mostly useful for notebooks and kiosks. Workstations I think would rarely benefit from this, barring the engineering software like solidworks that already allows you to draw components on special monitors.

I hope that this isn't the reason they say we need to upgrade, because to me... it's really a blah feature anyhow. What scares me is that they say the touch feature as "super important" to the system...

I hope they focus on slimming up the kernel like a previous article stated and actually go backwards in terms of system requirements from Vista.


RE: Touch
By Ammohunt on 5/28/2008 1:55:11 PM , Rating: 3
Touching a monitor all day doesn't make sense no howver think of the surface of your desk as a touch sensitive display!


RE: Touch
By retrospooty on 5/28/2008 4:55:42 PM , Rating: 4
Its a feature, for those that want it... You dont have to buy a touchscreen and you dont have to use it.


RE: Touch
By hr824 on 5/28/2008 5:50:47 PM , Rating: 5
I advise buying stock in windex and paper towel now.


RE: Touch
By noirsoft on 5/28/2008 6:29:32 PM , Rating: 5
Given how porn is still the #1 moneymaker on the internet, that's been a safe investment for years now.


RE: Touch
By saiga6360 on 5/28/2008 8:15:49 PM , Rating: 3
Sounds... messy.


RE: Touch
By Captin Crunch on 5/28/2008 8:04:24 PM , Rating: 3
I am an Industrial Designer, and for me the Multitouch revolution is brilliant idea with lots of potential. For anyone using Alias Sketchbook Pro, etc it will hopefully mean the capabilities of the Wacom drawing tablets built into the base unit. http://www.wacom.com.au/price/price.php obviously this is only one example, but its an important one. Also I am a PC/MAC user with a Multitouch MBP, Multitouch has changed how I interface with the computer, and I now prefer the track-pad over a mouse. Really looking forward to see how W7 implements Multitouch.


RE: Touch
By PrezWeezy on 5/28/2008 9:02:12 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
I hope they focus on slimming up the kernel like a previous article stated and actually go backwards in terms of system requirements from Vista.


Yeah I agree, let's just make it compatible with 1 mb video cards and Pentium II's.

I can't believe how people are bitching about Vista's hardware requirements. Think about it guys, the reality is that 1 gig of memory is 22 bucks. And hardware is only going to get better and faster, why would you go BACKWARDS? That's completely asinine. It doesn't even really take that much to run Vista. I have an Athalon 4200+ with 1 gig of memory and a $50 video card running it just fine in 64 bit mode. I don't play games on it, but I couldn't play games if it was XP either, at least nothing more than what I can now. If they don't design these systems for the future they are outdated by the time they hit the shelves. No one complains that Crysis takes a $3000 computer to run well, nor any of the other games out there. Lots of programs are hardware intensive and I don't think MS should be constantly blasted for thinking 6 months down the road. Don't run it on a POS PC, run it on a new PC and you will be just fine.


RE: Touch
By rudolphna on 5/29/08, Rating: 0
RE: Touch
By blckgrffn on 5/29/2008 9:15:11 AM , Rating: 2
Companies running P2 workstations? Are you kidding? Where?


RE: Touch
By Spivonious on 5/29/2008 9:54:28 AM , Rating: 2
We still have many 486 machines running NT 4. They work, and there's no reason to upgrade until they break.


RE: Touch
By lightfoot on 5/29/2008 11:36:31 AM , Rating: 5
By that logic, why do you even have 486's?

Did all your pencils break back in the early 90's?

What the hell are you doing upgrading your OS if you can't afford to upgrade from a 486???

I doubt that Windows 7 or Vista is even an issue for a company who hasn't even joined the internet age.


RE: Touch
By TomZ on 5/29/2008 10:09:17 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Many companies are running Pentium II workstations, and cant afford to upgrade. Thats millions of dollars.

Yeah, millions of dollars in lost productivity you mean. Unless an employee only uses the computer for a few minutes per week, or has a vanishingly small wage, upgrading the computer to a more modern one with up-to-date software will pay for itself pretty quickly.
quote:
Vista is a resource hog too. At idle, it uses over a Gig of memory, running nothing else! Its ridiculous!

Blah, blah, blah. People have said the same about every new Windows release since Windows 3.1 - so what. If a new version takes 2X the memory as the previous version, but memory costs 1/2 what it used to, then the cost is the same. Microsoft correctly anticipated that memory prices would continue to fall, and so it was able to tune Vista to use more RAM for Superfetch, etc.


RE: Touch
By ice456789 on 6/4/2008 12:20:14 AM , Rating: 2
While I couldn't even hope to debate with most of you about the technical aspects of computing, I can tell you that right now there are PLENTY of small-medium sized businesses that run on p2's or even less. I worked for an appliance company in the Southeast with over 20 locations... sales had to be entered into the computer by the salesperson. The computers were running Win98, and the software we used was a DOS emulation. The computers could not display more than 256 colors, and despite the T1 lines it took a full 38 seconds (I counted) just to load the company's own webpage. Many medium size distribution centers run systems that are 10 years old. They track all their sales and inventory on these computers. You'd be surprised how common it is.

All that said, it doesn't freaking matter. You don't design a new OS with these guys in mind, because they're not gonna buy it. It doesn't add to their productivity and neither would new computers unless they update all the software, which is a HUGE expense with questionable value especially when the existing system still works. It won't help the salesman who types with two fingers fill out a sales form any faster, and it won't help the warehouse guys manually scan inventory faster. So don't worry about those companies when designing a new OS.

If some companies use 10 year old computers, they are not going to be interested in buying the newest OS to put on them. Obviously they would rather invest somewhere else.


RE: Touch
By PrezWeezy on 6/4/2008 6:32:44 PM , Rating: 2
I'm the moron? If you are suggesting that a company can afford to buy all new operating systems, spend the time to upgrade, and not upgrade hardware, you should take a look in the mirror. I understand there are SOME places that still use old machines, as someone below commented there is no reason to run anything faster than a PII if you are typing in sales info. But there is almost 0 market for upgrades. That's part of why they are so cheap. MS knows they wont make their money there. The largest chunk of money comes from new hardware, and that's where Vista does great. No one ever suggested someone with a PII should upgrade. It would run slower than NT would anways, so it would be a huge waste of money. Think about what you are actually saying before you post next time.


RE: Touch
By mikeyD95125 on 5/29/2008 12:22:49 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I hope that this isn't the reason they say we need to upgrade, because to me... it's really a blah feature anyhow. What scares me is that they say the touch feature as "super important" to the system...


Apple seems to do well on this buisiness model.


RE: Touch
By freaqie on 5/28/2008 11:23:44 AM , Rating: 2
windows 7 and vista maybe too.. should have been 64 bit only... it would have meant only one driver had to be created from now on. and 32 bit could(should) just be emulated...

please drop 32 bit.. it's too slow. and supports too little ram etc...


RE: Touch
By