backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 42 comment(s) - last by root mean sq.. on Mar 26 at 6:47 PM

You may still be able to leech off other people's wireless networks for a little while longer thanks to the House Judiciary Committee

With growing concerns over internet security, one Maryland delegate decided to take action.  Brought before the Maryland General Assembly last week was a bill sponsored by LeRoy E. Myers, Jr. criminalizing unauthorized use of a wireless access point anywhere in the state.

The legislation was brought forth when Myers noticed his WiFi connection was being used by a neighbor without his permission. According to The Herald-Mail, the neighbor claims he bought a new laptop and thought he was accessing the internet through a cable TV hookup.

Under the legislation, House Bill 1377,  any person intentionally accessing another person’s computer or network without authorization will face up to three years imprisonment and up to a $1,000 fine. Any persons attempting to access an unauthorized network to cause harm to another person’s computer or cause harm on the internet could face charges up to ten years in prison and a $10,000 fine.

Several critics of the bill claim that: 1) To track who accesses another person’s network would be entirely too difficult and 2) owners should set passwords and secure their networks if they do not want someone else using it. 

"A technically unsophisticated user, such as a visiting parent, or simply a houseguest unfamiliar with the home's Internet could and probably would choose the first available network,” wrote a public defender’s office in a written testimony opposing the legislation. “A more effective way to prevent unauthorized access would be for owners' to secure their wireless networks with assistance where necessary from Internet service providers or Vendors."

Currently the House Judiciary Committee has deemed the bill an “unfavorable report”, so the likelihood if its passage is very unlikely.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I live in Maryland
By OrSin on 3/25/2008 9:34:59 AM , Rating: 4
This law is stupid. My neighbor uses my internet connection all the time and I dont care. If I cared I would block them (I have at times). I'm all for making it a law if they do something wrong to your system, but access a unsecure gatewall should be be against the law. Hacking a secure one even if you do nothing wrong should be illegal.

To me it like cutting though someone yard. Remember we all did it as kids. If they got no sign or no fence, then really its not against the law. IF they complain to police then you stop but no cop on this planet will arrest anyone for walking though a someone yards with no signs up.




RE: I live in Maryland
By tastyratz on 3/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: I live in Maryland
By FITCamaro on 3/25/2008 9:44:39 AM , Rating: 3
Well the big problem I think is that most people with wireless routers don't go buy them. They get the router from their cable company. And when the cable guy comes to set it up, they just plug it in without configuring any kind of wireless security because the cable company doesn't want support calls of "I turned on my laptop and I can't connect to the wireless router your guys set up. It says I need some kind of password."


RE: I live in Maryland
By darkpaw on 3/25/2008 10:26:43 AM , Rating: 2
That is true of the DSL companies from my experience, Qwest always provided a DSL modem with built in firewall/wireless capabilities. The cable companies still won't even support running a firewall at all. Cox in Phoenix (as of 2006 at least) and Comcast in VA (currently) both refuse to provide support unless a machine is plugged directly into the cable modem (as a security expert that very suggest made my skin crawl).

I think things have gotten better, it used to be that 90% of the wireless networks I saw were unsecured. Now, very few of the networks I can see from my apt are unsecured. That said, I put responsibility on securing those networks solely on the shoulders of whoever installs it. If it is installed by the ISP, they should configure and support it securely. If it's installed by the user, they should have that responsibility.


RE: I live in Maryland
By Vinnybcfc on 3/25/2008 1:42:29 PM , Rating: 2
Nice and everyone generally blames the users for the spread of viruses and worms.

Most companies in the UK (ADSL and Cable) offer free firewall software for a year, it normally tells you/asks to install during installation of the modem.

They are more sloppy with wireless security though that has been changing recently with routers being sent out with preinstalled keys.


RE: I live in Maryland
By artemicion on 3/25/2008 11:53:46 AM , Rating: 1
this is interesting - i would have assumed that the ISP's policy would be to set up security because if they set up an unauthorized wireless network in a fairly dense apartment building, there's 5-10 apartments getting free internet, hence 5-10 less subscribers.

I wonder if the non-secure wireless network policy is only for less dense residential areas, such as homes on fairly large properties so that neighbors are largely out of range of the network?

Reading the headline, I suspected maybe the law was being pushed by large internet provider companies in order to force leechers to open their own accounts.


RE: I live in Maryland
By Mojo the Monkey on 3/25/2008 4:02:39 PM , Rating: 2
well, you should consider that the law is more ambiguous than just trespassing here. If I tap into my neighbor's wifi, I'm accessing signals that are penetrating my apartment , right? Granted, I send some back, but I'm just saying its not as cut and dry.

Maybe its more like a fruit tree with a branch hanging over the fence.


RE: I live in Maryland
By BladeVenom on 3/25/2008 10:14:53 PM , Rating: 2
If I can hear my neighbors stereo, am I stealing music?


RE: I live in Maryland
By roadrun777 on 3/25/2008 11:27:01 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, and if you record your neighbors music with a digital device then the RIAA will come and arrest you then charge you $50,000 for each song as lost revenue.


RE: I live in Maryland
By JackBurton on 3/25/2008 9:53:25 AM , Rating: 2
Aircrack can crack WPA-PSK but it can't crack WPA-AES, let alone WPA2.

Lesson, if you don't know how to secure your AP, that's YOUR problem.


RE: I live in Maryland
By darkpaw on 3/25/2008 10:28:10 AM , Rating: 2
WPA isn't crackable, but given the passwords used by the average user it can often be brute-forced.

Even after all these years, people don't seem to understand that using password (or any other common word) for your password is a really lousy idea.


RE: I live in Maryland
By thornburg on 3/25/2008 10:40:00 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Aircrack can crack WPA-PSK but it can't crack WPA-AES, let alone WPA2.

Lesson, if you don't know how to secure your AP, that's YOUR problem.


Even if you just use "64bit" WEP, you still are doing something to secure your network against people using it. If someone cracks your password and uses your network, they are very clearly breaking the law, so WEP serves fine as a virtual "No Trespassing" sign. If your router keeps logs, it should even be fairly easy to prove, if the person ever gets caught.

Does this keep people who want your information from cracking into your network? NO. But unless you are a millionaire or some sizable company, your data shouldn't be valuable enough to warrant hacking, and should be secured with encryption on the computer (and use encrypted network protocols anytime it needs to be sent over the network).


RE: I live in Maryland
By rykerabel on 3/25/2008 4:45:36 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Morally I agree cutting across the lawn shouldn't land you in Juvi. Legally that thing you do is called trespassing.


Actually, most laws require posting before it can be considered tresspassing.


RE: I live in Maryland
By leexgx on 3/25/2008 10:10:53 AM , Rating: 2
but you know that your nextdoor neighbor is using your connection so that be ok then

going to jail for <unauthorised use> of an insecure access point is an little extreme ,
in the uk we have had only 1 user has been found using wireless point unauthorised and thay was fined for doing that (some random law about using free Internet 2006) he had his laptop out and just sayed he was connected to an open access point to the officer that he was using it and got arrested right there lol and an some large fine he did not know it was illegal, that law is an little hard to prove or find how is useing it unless you daft enough to use you name as the computer name (think vista so not daft just vista :P)

way around that now is just buy an pay as you go 3g card (three network) or goto basically any starbucks, mac, as thay have free Internet nowadays just make sure its WPA/WPA2 (and isolation mode {you cant see other computers on the network its not in isolation mode})if using any thing sensitive (work computers should be using VPN)


RE: I live in Maryland
By Aloonatic on 3/25/2008 11:26:37 AM , Rating: 2
In the UK there have been a few different cases prosecuted using different laws, many not specifically about using someone's interweb for free but obtaining services by deception and that sort of thing. Some involve the illegal extraction of electricity or something, so my policeman friend tells me.

It's great that you can trust your neighbour though.

I wonder how the FBI will take your story that it wasn't you using your connection to view those web sites, it was your neighbour, honest?!

Most wireless routers that people in the UK have are (probably) from their service provider and come with security enabled by default.

Yet whilst I was connecting my girlfriends lap top to my router the other day I noticed at least 1 unsecured access point and that was a SKY router (can tell from the name which they'd left as the default SKYxxxx) who are also my service provider so I know that the default is the security enabled.

I have no idea why people take the security off their network except for laziness perhaps?


RE: I live in Maryland
By Vinnybcfc on 3/25/2008 1:45:27 PM , Rating: 2
Cant understand that - Sky send out a card with the key on as well so you dont have to track it down through the admin software.

I wish they would start to use WPA instead of WEP on their routers by default - although they may have started doing this on the new models


RE: I live in Maryland
By TimberJon on 3/25/2008 11:54:13 AM , Rating: 2
You should bill them like $20 a month dude haha. Slip that under the door.


Wow...
By Joz on 3/25/2008 9:34:45 AM , Rating: 2
Are people realy to stupid to put a decent password on their wireless? or use mac addresses to limit who has access..so easy.




RE: Wow...
By FITCamaro on 3/25/2008 9:41:58 AM , Rating: 5
Yes. And it's great that our lawmakers are among that group isn't it? Just shows you how inept our lawmakers are when it comes to understanding modern technology.


RE: Wow...
By fictisiousname on 3/25/2008 10:57:00 AM , Rating: 3
Ain't THAT the truth?

I can see if the "lawmaker" got upset at himself for being so stupid as to NOT secure his wireless service. Naaah.... He crafts a law difficult/impossible to enforce.


RE: Wow...
By frobizzle on 3/25/2008 9:56:59 AM , Rating: 2