backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 134 comment(s) - last by DeafMute.. on Oct 2 at 12:38 AM

Copyright infringement monitors are the latest target of a well-organized, motivated hacking group

The group calling itself the MediaDefender-Defenders (MDD) has, as promised, struck again, this time leaking what appears to be the full, uncompiled source code to anti-piracy watchdog MediaDefender’s toolset.
 
MediaDefender's software is used internally on behalf of clients like the RIAA and Sony BMG to control the illegal distribution of copyright movies, music and other media online. One company e-mail, leaked last Saturday, detailed the performance of the company's attempts to poison the distribution of pirated copies of "Spiderman 3" just days after its theatrical release.

“The [leak] is complete for their operations regarding Kazaa, bittorrent, gnutella etc. This system is … released for the public in order to identify the decoys [MediaDefender] set up,” states the leak’s accompanying NFO file.

The leak is a treasure trove of information for anyone seeking to better understand the anti-piracy operations of MediaDefender and its ilk.  Judging by the sheer quantity of different programs written for each network, BitTorrent seems to be MediaDefender’s largest target, with the leak containing 16 different tools target it. In addition to software for creating bogus media files, the leak includes tools for to control the who’s who of filesharing networks: Ares, DirectConnect, eDonkey2000, FastTrack/Kazaa, Gnutella, Kademlia, Overnet, Piolet, SoulSeek and WinMX networks, among others.  
 
Unlike the previous two leaks, MDD claims it received the leaked source code directly from a MediaDefender employee. and the NFO file ends with “a special thanks to the MD employee that gave this to us.”
 
While DailyTech has been unable to verify the authenticity of any of the leaked materials, MediaDefender has indirectly validated them through a series of cease-and-desist notices sent to various BitTorrent trackers earlier this week; the letters admit that “despite security precautions by our client, a person or persons illegally accessed MediaDefender's email and other files,” and that the sites in question “immediately and permanently cease and desist from posting, distributing or otherwise making available MediaDefender's trade secrets and confidential information.”
 
Responses have varied, ranging from compliance to outright mockery. In one case, Meganova.org replied publicly in a profanity-laden tirade against MediaDefender’s legal firm.

MediaDefender’s woes began last Saturday, when almost 700MB of the company’s e-mails hit the underground. The following day, MDD released copies of a VOIP conversation between MediaDefender and the New York Attorney General. In a previous NFO file, MDD promised that there was “more to come,” and it looks like the group will continue to make good on its claim.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Patriots
By Randomblame on 9/21/2007 1:45:35 AM , Rating: 5
It's about time we start fighting back against the RIAA's bullshit. The trouble with these large corporations is they have large customer bases. That makes people feel like their buying decisions do not matter in the long run, they think that boycotting them won't do anything. Thats true, one person can't make a difference unless they are joined by many others. It's time American consumers took control again, it's time we had a say in what we are buying. It's time the corporations FEARED us and RESPECTED us for it is not us that need them but the other way around! I don't know about you all but I'm getting tired of all these new copywright laws designed to protect the corporations, what ever happened to consumer rights? Whatever happened to the freedom of expression and the free exchange of information that was the internet? I say Viva La Resistance! Keep up the good work boys!




RE: Patriots
By ZavyZavy on 9/21/2007 1:58:30 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
Whatever happened to the freedom of expression...


It's not gone anywhere. You got to post, didn't you?


RE: Patriots
By Ard on 9/21/2007 2:24:43 AM , Rating: 5
I think he's referring more so to the concept of the public domain and the free exchange of ideas that copyright, and subsequently the internet, were meant to facilitate.


RE: Patriots
By ZavyZavy on 9/21/2007 5:12:01 AM , Rating: 5
Yes, I understand that.

But, I’m trying to hint that we are slowly using our civil liberties to blur the issue of piracy.

I’m not here to discuss the complexities of intellectual property and its distribution, but I find it interesting that we are cheering for the hackers and pirates who have total disregard for the value of another person’s property, intellectual or otherwise.


RE: Patriots
By Polynikes on 9/21/2007 8:19:29 AM , Rating: 5
It's not about that, it's about fighting a collaboration of corporations which have attacked their own customers. A lot of retail stores tell their employees to just let people go when an employee SEES them steal something. I know a guy who almost lost his job for attempting to chase a thief down. Lowe's policy on people that return items from other stores that they don't stock? No, don't turn them away, accept it, because it's cheaper than processing that "customer"'s complaint. The RIAA and their lapdog company deserve what they're getting right now. Maybe, after all the piracy and hackers messing up their piracy disruption operation, they'll realize that they don't need to force their customers to pay $x for a CD, they need to adapt to the market and find a way to reduce their costs so they don't have to charge as much. That's what every other business does. The RIAA thinks it's immune to market change. Their business model is dated and all they're doing is futilely trying to hold on to it.


RE: Patriots
By Proteusza on 9/21/2007 9:10:37 AM , Rating: 5
Very true.

The RIAA is a dinosaur in the age of the internet - it thinks it needs to maintain control over everything at all costs, and that it knows better than its customers.

I wont have any software on my pc that I dont approve. no rootkits, no copy protection tools. I dont care what game it is, if they subvert my computer's security for their own profit, when I'm a paying customer, then they dont get my money.

if I have to, I will pay for the software and then use a pirated copy, because pirated copies of software are healthier for your system these days (except for windows because of the geniune advantage program, but then again you could just use linux).


RE: Patriots
By grenableu on 9/21/2007 10:22:38 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
A lot of retail stores tell their employees to just let people go when an employee SEES them steal something
But most of them still prosecute shoplifters, so whats your point?

Anyway, most hardcore downloaders aren't customers at all. Go to any college, and you'll find thousands of people who download music continuously, but haven't bought a CD in years.

They're not "customers". They're just pirates, looking to justify their thievery.


RE: Patriots
By Polynikes on 9/21/2007 12:40:23 PM , Rating: 4
Not if they can't identify them. And most stores' policy is simply to keep an eye out for previous shoplifters, so if they come back they're simply escorted out of the store.

The average college student cannot afford to buy all the music they'd like to buy. A lot of them will also buy the albums of the bands they REALLY like, and go see their shows, so it's not like they're letting down their favorite artists. The RIAA isn't losing THAT much money from that demographic, really. Lots of college kids have thousands of albums, which is larger than only the most die-hard hard-copy music fan has. Such a person must also be insanely rich, or they've been buying all those albums over decades. It's impossible for most people to be able to throw down $12+ for every album they want.

I'm not saying it's right, but if people want to listen to music but can't afford it and have an easy, anonymous, relatively "safe" way of getting it, why wouldn't they? If a bank had a back door to their vault unlocked and people found out, would you seriously expect them to stay away from it? I'd say they deserve to have it stolen.

Same goes for the RIAA. They've gotten fat and lazy on top of their mountain of cash, and don't understand that they have to adapt to their customers' desires. If a product is crap, people won't buy it. If it's too expensive, people won't buy it. The company must adapt or fail, and the RIAA is failing miserably.


RE: Patriots
By Treckin on 9/21/2007 1:37:36 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps there's a REASON people haven't bought CD's in years...

ITS OLD TECHNOLOGY, WHICH CARRIES FUCKING BAGGAGE and LICENSE AGREEMENTS custom tailored to the financial needs of the monopolistic recording industry. If there were other options beyond these companies, no one would be complaining. However, with the entertainment industry monolithically controlled as it is, there is no flexibility in which a free market may operate.

The fact that the same few companies control the rights to the content, the distributors, and finally even the consumer creates a market in which these same few corporations may make handshake contracts regarding pricing, medium, or generally anything else, means trouble for the consumer.

FUCK THE RIAA IN THE MOUTH!

I would have hoped honestly that MDD would have wreaked havoc in their servers, deleting and generally maiming every 1 and 0 they could get their hands on.


RE: Patriots
By TomCorelis (blog) on 9/24/2007 2:46:40 AM , Rating: 2
Are you describing CDs, or are you describing DRM-ed downloads from iTunes and the like? CDs are probably the last medium that gives you total freedom... and that's why people need to keep buying CDs.


RE: Patriots
By Hokum on 9/24/2007 8:13:29 AM , Rating: 3
Assuming you are dealing with CD's which dont contain rootkits or kill your CDRW drive...


RE: Patriots
By Pythias on 9/27/2007 6:34:47 PM , Rating: 2
Turn off autoplay, genius.


RE: Patriots
By Locutus465 on 9/21/2007 1:53:48 PM , Rating: 2
Well, since the U.S. government FORCED the RIAA to lower prices because they were found to be a monopoly harming customers through artifically high prices I'm sure they will find that the situation with priacy will have gotten better. I know of many people who downloaded specifically because $20 per CD (average) was absolutly outragous. The current $10/$12 you get off of iTunes or Urge (R.I.P) is much better, and I'm sure over time the RIAA (assuming they don't jack prices back up, and stop with the rootkits/copy protection) will find less of this justified attitude regarding this type of crime (yes, it is a crime).

The moral of the story, if the RIAA would stop attacking their customers for downloading when they're trying to fleace every last penny from them, they would find they have fewer issues, and find that people will defend "theft" of music less frequently. Look at the MPAA for instance... While some do hate the MPAA, I think you'll find that there are fewer who do and that the feelings are less intense. Why? Well while they do attack customers in some cases for downloading, by the same token video technology has gotten reasnobly cheaper over time like it should. You could always buy movies at a reasnoble price, and now (at least with HD-DVD) it seems like the studios are experimenting with tearing down certain DRM barriers (at least in so far as HD-DVDs are not region locked and will even convert PAL to NTSC for you). It's amazing what can happen if you make any copy protection non-invasive and charge reasnoble prices for your product.


RE: Patriots
By mars777 on 9/22/2007 12:53:30 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
thousands of people who download music continuously, but haven't bought a CD in years. They're not "customers". They're just pirates, looking to justify their thievery.


A (digital) pirate is a person who does a copyright infringement, the person who makes profit on others intellectual property.

They often release others software / music / movies under their own label. Like Orion, Heretic, Explosion and others.

The people downloading movies and music at the university are surely not pirates, they are using the stuff and thus not committing copyright infringement (or they do it occasionally to copy the stuff to a friend).

RIAA is persecuting the last ones, and that is a bad thing. These are potential customers (if the first are caught up, and RIAA adopts a new pricing and business model).

By doing it this way they only distance themselves from actual and possible customers. Or at least this is how it should be.

Fight them, they are morally wrong and do nothing to change that!


RE: Patriots
By Pythias on 9/27/2007 6:37:20 PM , Rating: 2
I don't buy that. I know a lot of torrent freaks and they NEVER buy because they can get it for free.


RE: Patriots
By Pandamonium on 9/23/2007 1:20:28 PM , Rating: 2
Wow- what a generalization of the college crowd. I'm two years out, but I assure you that my peers and I spent more via iTunes than we would have at any brick & mortar establishment.


RE: Patriots
By mindless1 on 9/25/2007 4:59:00 PM , Rating: 3
If they're not customers (too), then the RIAA has lost nothing by their MP3 sharing. RIAA wants to claim a pirated song is a loss of sale when we all know the amount of music bought is a function of disposible income, and pricing, not availability.


RE: Patriots
By jp7189 on 9/21/2007 2:39:31 PM , Rating: 2
In reality, RIAA will spend billions to make a new protection system that is more difficult to get a long with(for hackers and consumers alike), and pass the cost on to the consumers.