backtop


Print 22 comment(s) - last by Googer.. on Feb 23 at 12:10 AM

Vizio reports Q4 2008 sales in stark contrast to many other TV makers

Typically, Q4 sales are big for many retailers and manufacturers of products like TVs and computers. Many companies make a large portion of their yearly sales during the last quarter of the year. However, the poor global economy meant Q4 2008 was significantly down for many companies.

Vizio has announced the results for its Q4 2008 HDTV sales. According to the company, it had recorded setting sales for its TVs and is now the second largest shipper of HDTVs in America surpassing Sony in shipments. Vizio says that its sell through for the holiday 2008 season increased 52% compared to the 2007 holiday season, despite the poor economy.

Total Vizio shipments for the quarter were 1.2 million and its products made up 15% of all flat panel TV shipments in the U.S. for the quarter. Vizio posted year-over-year growth of 15% for Q4 2008.

Vizio VP Laynie Newsome said in a statement, "The demand for VIZIO products has never been stronger. Even during times when tier one competitors drop their prices (and lose millions of dollars in the process) the American Consumer clearly recognizes VIZIO as a preferred consumer electronics brand."

DisplaySearch's Paul Gagnon said, "VIZIO demonstrated 53% Q/Q flat panel TV growth in Q4'08, the strongest among the top 10 brands for all of North America according to DisplaySearch's shipment tracking, climbing from #5 to #3 in total flat panel TV units while basically only participating in the U.S. market. We expect that consumers in 2009 will be especially concerned with getting the most value for their money, which aligns well with VIZIO's product strategy, even in their premium XVT line."

Reuters reports that the top brand in TVs for Q4 2008 was Samsung with a 20.2% share of the market, down from 20.8% in the previous quarter. Sony dropped to the number three spot with a 13.5% share of the market, down from 13.9% the previous quarter. Vizio held 14.3% of all flat panel TVs for the quarter.

Analyst Riddhi Patel from iSuppli said in a statement, "According to our initial analysis and despite the current economic downturn, VIZIO has moved to the number two position in the U.S. flat panel TV market during the critical fourth quarter. The current sales environment is obviously difficult for all television makers due to the slowdown in consumer spending; retaining position and achieving growth in these challenging times is an accomplishment."

Part of the success of Vizio as a brand is an often much lower price than other leading TVs. Vizio also enjoys a prominent position in many Walmart locations around the country. As the economy weakens, many consumers are flocking to discount outlets like Walmart in an attempt to make their money go farther.

Vizio also offers a premium line of HDTVs called the XVT line that offer features not found in the lower-end Vizio sets. The TV maker is also cited as one of the key reasons that plasma TV technology has made a comeback. Sales of the company's 32-inch plasma TV made up the majority of plasma TVs sold in several quarters. However, Vizio announced this month that it would end production of plasma TVs.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Go Vizio...
By quiksilvr on 2/20/2009 11:20:27 AM , Rating: 2
I'm tired of these other LCD TV makers charging ridiculous prices for their LCD TVs. Hopefully now that Vizio is making a rise, other companies will start to wise up.




RE: Go Vizio...
By Adul on 2/20/2009 11:40:30 AM , Rating: 2
isn't Vizio an American company?


RE: Go Vizio...
By poundsmack on 2/20/2009 12:01:58 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, they are located in California.


RE: Go Vizio...
By austinag on 2/20/2009 12:28:37 PM , Rating: 2
They are assembled in America, the parts all come from some place else. Google will direct you to about a thousand articles on the subject.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Spivonious on 2/20/2009 12:50:32 PM , Rating: 2
Name me an "American" company that uses all American-made parts. I'm sure Vizio gets their parts from the same suppliers that Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, etc. get theirs from.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Oregonian2 on 2/20/2009 7:08:16 PM , Rating: 3
You mean they all get their parts from Panasonic?

Panasonic is a component super mega-power (as well as have their own mega plasma screen factories).

I'd rather suspect that Visio gets their parts from third tier Chinese based companies.

Speaking as an electronics design engineer, there are a lot of component manufacturing companies, not just a few that make parts for everybody which many seem to think exist (I suspect the source are stories from sales droids who are selling the cheap junk who are trying to convince people that the cheap junk they sell is as good as name brand because they're made by the same companies). Sometimes it is true, but IMO not generally, especially at the small component level where there are manufacturers up the ying-yang.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Masospaghetti on 2/22/2009 7:47:26 PM , Rating: 1
I'd also venture to guess that they get their parts from a third-tier Chinese supplier rather than the tier-one suppliers that Samsung et al. use.

How else could they undercut everyone on price by so much? Why else would their picture quality also be inferior?

What I would worry more about is the durability of a Vizio panel. I'd bet they won't last as long as a more expensive set because of their inferior parts content.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Hiawa23 on 2/20/2009 1:39:45 PM , Rating: 2
This is pretty simple. They did well for the same reason Walmart is one of the few retailers who are still doing relatively well during economic downturn......Price, price, price. I don't own a VIZIO as I went with Westinghouse for my HDTVs due to lower price, but what the big name guys are charging, although, I don't deny are better quality, I am very pleased with both my westinghouse Tvs, & they were cheap compared to the others, so hats off to Vizio.


RE: Go Vizio...
By spwrozek on 2/20/2009 12:09:23 PM , Rating: 3
Personally I think there is a reason Samsung is #1. They make great TV's that have good picture. I don't know how you could look at a Samsung and Vizio side by side and pick the Vizio. I paid $150 more for a Samsung and it was worth every penny.


RE: Go Vizio...
By rudolphna on 2/20/2009 12:30:12 PM , Rating: 3
maybe some people cannot afford the extra $150... Some people dont care about the best image quality, they just want a bigger, better TV than the 26" CRT tv they had before.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Oregonian2 on 2/20/2009 7:09:26 PM , Rating: 2
I've seen people have their TV's look green as heck but think it looks fine. To each their own.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Spivonious on 2/20/2009 12:49:11 PM , Rating: 2
In my case, the Samsung was $500 more than the Vizio, which came out to an 83% price increase (Vizio was $600, Samsung was $1100). Sure, the picture is better, but it's not worth the extra money.


RE: Go Vizio...
By The0ne on 2/20/2009 12:57:28 PM , Rating: 2
I have a Samsung 72" and love it but I paid a hefty price for it. Vizio are typically a lot cheaper than Samsung. Just head to your local Costco and see the price difference :) My initial experiences with Vizio on their 32" and 42" were pretty bad, but that was just a defective product I got. It doesn't mean the whole lineup is defective :)


RE: Go Vizio...
By Oregonian2 on 2/20/2009 7:13:57 PM , Rating: 2
Wow, a 72" set! I thought my 58" Panasonic Plasma was impressive (the biggest that would fit -- how I chose the size). That one must be awesome.

Visio is known, from what I can tell, to be good for the money even if not great on an absolute scale. This is a good position to be in just now. On the other hand, Olivia was in the same boat but sunk, so good management and business deals matter as well.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Hiawa23 on 2/20/2009 1:44:24 PM , Rating: 2
Personally I think there is a reason Samsung is #1. They make great TV's that have good picture. I don't know how you could look at a Samsung and Vizio side by side and pick the Vizio. I paid $150 more for a Samsung and it was worth every penny.

Well, this is exactly what I was faced with. I had Westinghouse, Sony, Samsung side by side on the shelf & I was basically just looking for a 26" cheap HDTV for my 360/PS3 gaming, & I had absolutely no prob choosing Westinghouse over the other two. I think it was like $200-300 cheaper, & I have been very happy with it, so yeah, apparently alot of consumers made this choice last quarter.


RE: Go Vizio...
By scuba85 on 2/20/2009 5:01:03 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Personally I think there is a reason Samsung is #1. They make great TV's that have good picture. I don't know how you could look at a Samsung and Vizio side by side and pick the Vizio. I paid $150 more for a Samsung and it was worth every penny.


I have a 32" Vizio tv and just by looking through the heat vents I can see one part with the Samsung logo on it...


RE: Go Vizio...
By inperfectdarkness on 2/20/2009 4:58:05 PM , Rating: 2
ditto for all lcd's.

50 PPI tv's have been way overpriced for a LONG time. laptop LCD's have been holding at 100PPI for eons--and the prices haven't fallen either.

meanwhile, there are now some panels boasting 200PPI. but we don't get to buy those...and they're not marketed...because then the price of the other stuff would fall.

and yes, you COULD get 2560x1600 resolution on a 17" laptop...if there wasn't all this price-fixing going on.


RE: Go Vizio...
By Googer on 2/23/2009 12:10:47 AM , Rating: 2
And Vizio's low quality is reflected in it's low price. Just the other day at Costco, they had several 42" Panasonic Plasma TVs for between $600-900 just as cheap as the Vizio sitting next to it but with much higher quality and projected reliability.


picture quality
By mstrmac on 2/21/2009 12:36:58 PM , Rating: 2
You cannot always tell picture quality in stores because there is no standardized viewing.
At the local Walmart they had a Sony Bravia next to all the others and the picture quality on that Sony 32" was dark and saturated. Sure enough the Sony Picture was set on Standard not Vivid.




RE: picture quality
By atlmann10 on 2/21/2009 11:43:48 PM , Rating: 2
Rofl, you can't tell video quality brand vs. brand on a TV in Walmart or most retails stores VS realworld performance at all. Because of there bandwidth in all thos TV's you see at Wally Worlds or most retailers for that matter. They usually have between 1-3 lines in usually as low as they can get with there initial bandwidth and then it's on a splitter. If you get the first hit from the split and maybe 2 tvs down from that is the closest you'll see to realworld. Then many of the TVS were just taken out of the box plugged in and thats it. SO they are almost always never set to any enhanced settings (unless a customer that uses the same brand and can do it without getting caught doe it rofl).


They're cheap, but...
By Noya on 2/20/2009 2:25:40 PM , Rating: 2
They're cheap, but with the economy continuing to tank the price gap is shrinking between Vizio and first tier producers, especially when looking at a one generation older tier one model (discounted) with the same if not better features.

I bought a 42" 1080p Vizio when they came out via a slickdeal for $849. It looks good with 1080i broadcast and even upscaled DVD's. But I caved and bought a 50" 1080p Panasonic Viera plasma during the SuperBowl sales...for $1299. Infinitely better blacks and no motion blur but WOW does it have glare compared to the LCD.




Cost
By Screwballl on 2/20/2009 4:06:16 PM , Rating: 2
Of course Vizio sold more than others... their prices are 10-50% less than those of the higher end competitors, and most people look at price rather than brand/quality.
I myself bought a 720p 32" Vizio LCD a few weeks ago @ $450 because all the reviews and the picture was the same compared to the more expensive brands (using 720p) when showing a bluray movie. Of course the 1080i models had a better picture but those were out of our price range, plus we only watch analog cable TV and P. Scan DVD movies (and the Wii).




"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki