backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 87 comment(s) - last by davidlan.. on Feb 11 at 11:58 AM

Microsoft releases Vista SP1 to manufacturing

With roughly a year under its belt in the consumer space, it's time for Vista to get a tune-up. As was the case with Windows 2000 and Windows XP before it, that tune-up comes in the form of Service Pack 1 (SP1).

Microsoft took great strides to improve application compatibility, driver support, security and reliability with SP1. Other improvements include 50% faster file copying and faster resume speeds.

Microsoft issued a steady stream of beta and release candidate (RC) versions of Vista SP1 over the past six months, but today Microsoft is finally putting its gold seal on the RTM version of Vista SP1. Although SP1 went gold today, it will not be available until March.

SP1 will first be available in five languages (English, French, Spanish, German and Japanese) from either Windows Update or a as a direct download from Microsoft.com. Users who are running systems with problematic drivers will not be offered the SP1 download via Windows Update according to Mike Nash, Microsoft’s Corporate VP of Windows Product Management.

The next phase of the SP1 roll-out will begin in April. “We will begin delivering Windows Vista SP1 to Windows Vista customers who have chosen to have updates downloaded automatically.  That said, any system that Windows Update determines has a driver known to not update successfully will not get SP1 automatically,” said Nash.  “As updates for these drivers become available, they will be installed automatically by Windows Update, which will unblock these systems from getting Service Pack 1.  The result is that more and more systems will automatically get SP1, but only when we are confident they will have a good experience.”

Windows Vista was released to manufacturing on November 30, 2006. Microsoft then followed up with a consumer launch on January 30, 2007. The operating system hasn't exactly won over as many people as Microsoft would like, but sales of Microsoft's latest consumer operating system remain brisk.

The steady sales are due in part to strong sales of notebooks and desktop PCs which more often than not come pre-loaded with Vista.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Synopsis of comments to come
By Aloonatic on 2/4/2008 10:51:13 AM , Rating: 5
Vista is a rubbish waste of money created by the evil M$ to make more money and it doesn't work half the time and is totally unnecessary, I'll stick with XP.

Vista is brilliant and if you can't make it work all the time you are a moron. I have never had any problems because I am a computing genius and therefore, you are a Muppet.

Truth, somewhere in between.




RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By nerdboy on 2/4/08, Rating: 0
By divided421 on 2/4/2008 11:05:24 AM , Rating: 4
I guess you missed the sarcasm.


By retrospooty on 2/4/2008 11:10:37 AM , Rating: 5
I guess alunatic called that one...

Did you read the whole post or just the first sentence?


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By Ringold on 2/4/08, Rating: -1
RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By jtesoro on 2/6/2008 4:59:34 AM , Rating: 1
Hey Mom, you still haven't crashed Vista? You really should email harder, you know. And when browsing, you gotta browse to the limit! Come on now, browse browse browse! I know you can do it! Email again Mom! Again! Again! Try harder!!!


By Blight AC on 2/6/2008 10:31:45 AM , Rating: 2
Everybody to the limit... come on Fhqwhgads.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-WTbGupxbk


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By Shark Tek on 2/4/08, Rating: -1
RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By nwrigley on 2/4/2008 12:55:15 PM , Rating: 5
Actually, with pre-fetch, Vista can be faster on a newer system with plenty of ram. I have 4 gigs and Photoshop loads as fast as FireFox for me now. For systems without much ram, pre-fetch doesn't help and it makes no difference.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By AnnihilatorX on 2/4/2008 1:36:41 PM , Rating: 2
Indeed. After using Vista with my 4GB Ram system for 3 months now, it's indeed faster than XP

Also, I admit Vista requires heck of a work to get it work right, most of the problems are driver and software compatibility problems.
But once you get it up and running, there are a lot of improvements in Vista I am happy about, like the instant start bar search and launch, and document preview panel.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By AnnihilatorX on 2/4/08, Rating: -1
RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By Oroka on 2/4/2008 2:15:00 PM , Rating: 5
Yeah... that could be still said about XP, or any OS for that matter. Often, the problem occurs between the chair and the keyboard.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By TomZ on 2/4/2008 1:44:40 PM , Rating: 1
As they say, "your mileage may vary." On neraly all the machines I installed Vista on, installation was little more than putting in a bootable DVD and letting it run its course. I even found with Vista no need to download and install drivers, since Windows Update did that for me automatically after setup. Installation, at least for me, was easier and faster on all my machines than is/was Win XP.

I only had one install issue with Vista - a BIOS compability problem - that forced me to pre-load a HDD driver during setup. Even that was easy since Vista can pull drivers off of USB flash drives.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By Clauzii on 2/4/2008 2:03:47 PM , Rating: 2
Can You use all 4 GB?


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By Oroka on 2/4/2008 2:17:07 PM , Rating: 2
If he has a 64bit version of Vista he can. I am regretting buying a 32bit copy of Vista Ultimate to this very day.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By Future145 on 2/4/2008 2:56:09 PM , Rating: 2
i thought ultimate comes with both x86 and x64. Unless i heard wrong.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By inighthawki on 2/4/2008 3:25:24 PM , Rating: 2
not in OEM version, which i assume is what he got.


By 80Morphine on 2/5/2008 2:56:06 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/1033/orderme...

I don't think the decision of which bit version to get is always set in stone, as this link shows.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By FITCamaro on 2/4/2008 3:25:48 PM , Rating: 2
You heard wrong since you either buy the 32-bit or 64-bit version. My friend got the 64-bit version.

I don't know why anyone would get the 32-bit version of Vista.


RE: Synopsis of comments to come
By TomZ on 2/4/2008 4:01:29 PM , Rating: 2
Because it's easier to get drivers for all kinds of devices for 32-bit Vista, especially considering you can jam in XP drivers for nearly everything, if necessary. Also, 64-bit has relatively more app compatibility concerns than 32-bit.

And of course, not everyone's hardware is even 64-bit compatible. :o) We've got a bunch of 2.4-2.8GHz P4's here in the office that are just fine for running Vista, but are lacking support for the 64-bit instruction set.

All that said, I agree with you that folks should be choosing 64-bit for new machines.