backtop


Print 7 comment(s) - last by herbstemple.. on Aug 8 at 6:29 PM

VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V are most popular hypervisors according to Veeam Software

Virtualization is a popular buzzword around enterprise circles these days. Many enterprise and SMB entities are embracing virtualization in an effort to reduce costs and streamline their operations.

Now, according to Veeam Software, the penetration rate for virtualization in enterprise environments is 39.4 percent, meaning that nearly 40 percent of all physical servers within an organization are virtualized. However, Veeam Software found that nearly 92 percent of all enterprises use at least some form of virtualization. 

Also noteworthy is the fact that average consolidation ratio for enterprise customers is six virtual servers per host.

Not surprisingly, when it comes to the actual hypervisors used by enterprises, VMware is the leader with 84 percent adoption. Microsoft Hyper-V and Citrix Xen are used in 61 percent and 53 percent respectively of enterprises.

“While the results show that virtualization has become a standard technology in most enterprises, it is clear that there is still room for increased penetration. We would expect to see consolidation ratios increase over time as organizations look to magnify the ROI they get from virtualization,” said Ratmir Timashev, President and CEO of Veeam. “As the significant cost, power and efficiency benefits of virtualization accelerate its position within the enterprise, so the potential of all IT infrastructures to be based on virtual estates increases."

The increased use of virtualization across the board led to a huge Q2 for VMware. The company yesterday reported year-over-year revenue growth of 37 percent while EPS growth came in at 183 percent. Overall revenue and net income came in at $921 million ($465 million in license revenue, $456 million in services revenues) and $220 million respectively for Q2.

Microsoft's earnings report is due to come out tomorrow, so we'll have to wait until then to see how Hyper-V is doing for the software giant. However, all signs point to it making significant gains in the marketplace. VMware’s new licensing model for vSphere 5 could also drive more customers to Hyper-V in the future

Microsoft is also looking to pack in a next generation version of Hyper-V into Windows 8 Server reports Paul Thurrott.

But as virtualization adoption increases, so does this need for more robust security procedures for enterprise customers. The New Mexico Human Services Department is nearly 100 percent virtualized according to PC World, and has taken a multi-tiered approach to virtualization security following a recent security breach. The department added two-factor authentication, installed HyTrust, and now uses the Juniper vGW Series firewall to fight off unwanted intrusions into its network.

 



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Thats what
By icanhascpu on 7/20/2011 2:12:15 PM , Rating: 3
she said.




RE: Thats what
By TheSev on 7/20/2011 7:42:19 PM , Rating: 2
I guess that's better than "FIRST".

Note to self: Look into virtualization during the course of my IT career training.


Security
By Jeff7181 on 7/20/2011 11:50:21 PM , Rating: 3
I'd just like to say that any company that doesn't put at least the same security measures in place for virtual machines as they would physical machines deserves to be compromised.




RE: Security
By lelias2k on 7/21/2011 7:38:51 AM , Rating: 2
Think about what you wrote for a second. "Deserves"???

If people were honest and had better values they would understand that one shouldn't break into other people's property.

Nobody "deserves" to be a victim of theft, be it physical or virtual. Period.


Wait...What?
By wrekd on 7/21/2011 9:17:28 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
meaning that nearly 40 percent of all physical servers within an organization are virtualized.


This just does not compute to me. Physical servers virtualized? Are we talking Hypervisor virtualization or VMs on a host OS? If you're doing P2V then the P is usually recycled for parts or just decommissioned afterwards.

The more I read that quote the less I understand what was trying to be said. Can anyone decipher for me? Is it an incorrect statement, poorly worded, or am I missing something?




RE: Wait...What?
By 91TTZ on 7/21/2011 5:33:28 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe they mean that almost 40 percent of physical servers are being used to host VMs.

For instance, here at work instead of installing Windows 2008 R2 directly on the servers, we usually install ESXi on the physical servers and then load Windows 2008 R2 VMs.


This ain't news...
By herbstemple on 8/8/2011 6:29:33 PM , Rating: 2
This is almost a given to virtualize. Even if you are not after consolidation, abstracting the hardware to ensure future portability of the application is a highly valuable deliverable in of itself.

The few exceptions I've encountered in provisioning either a physical or virtual machine is the rate in which an application might consume resources. Only a few applications I've dealt with will suck up memory and CPU quickly enough to cause concern with a hypervisor in the middle. Other than this it seems foolish not to virtualize all servers as the benefits are numerous and risks are dissipating with each release from the various solutions.




"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki