backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 227 comment(s) - last by rtrski.. on Feb 26 at 2:10 PM


Euro Ford Focus 5-door, 1.6 liter gasoline engine (42.8MPG combined), 1.8 liter diesel engine (54.3MPG combined)
When it comes to fuel efficiency, America comes up way short

When it comes to high mileage vehicles available on the U.S. market, we come up short compared to vehicles available in other countries. Recent research put forth by 40mgp.org shoes that while 113 vehicles available overseas manage to maintain a combined fuel economy rating of 40MPG or higher, only two vehicles made the list in the U.S.

The two vehicles available in the U.S. that crossed the 40MPG threshold were both gasoline-electric hybrids: the Toyota Prius and the Honda Civic Hybrid. In many European countries, vehicles achieve a 40MPG or higher rating by using small, ultra-efficient gasoline or diesel engines.

Research by 40mpg.org also showed that over 38 vehicles available outside of the U.S. were able to achieve 50MPG. Of those 38 models researched, 34 used "clean diesel" technology.

Other interesting tidbits brought to light include the fact that the number of vehicles achieving 40MPG or higher outside of the U.S. has risen from 86 in 2005 to 113 in 2007. Likewise, the number has decreased from five in 2005 to two in 2007 for the U.S. In addition, the number of vehicles achieving at least 35MPG outside of the U.S. has risen from 129 in 2005 to 161 in 2007. That number has fallen from nine to six in the U.S.

"We have to face the unpleasant facts here: America is needlessly losing the race to develop the best fuel-efficient technology and then deliver it to the American consumer, which wants these cars and other vehicles that would use less imported fuel and create less global-warming pollution," said Pam Solo, President of the Civil Society Institute (CSI). "The Europeans, Japanese and Chinese are already committed to far more aggressive MPG standards than we are in the United States. Congress needs to show some leadership now and insist on a 40 miles per gallon standard now - not 10 years from now when it will be too late to save Detroit from its worst impulses."

The interesting thing to note is that the vast majority of the vehicle available overseas that achieve such high mileage ratings are made by U.S.-based companies like General Motors and Ford as well as foreign automakers like Nissan, Toyota and Volkswagen – all three of which are very familiar to American buyers.

However, until these automakers are given a reason to introduce more fuel efficient models here in the U.S. (i.e. higher government-mandated fuel economy standards), we'll likely continue to see a dearth of affordable, highly fuel efficient vehicles.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By Shoal07 on 2/16/2007 10:45:09 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
In many European countries, vehicles achieve a 40MPG or higher rating by using small, ultra-efficient gasoline or diesel engines.


Why do American companies build gas efficient vehicles and then sell them overseas? Two reasons:
-Americans like big cars/trucks
-Americans like horsepower

Would the average American drive a car that has absolutely horrible acceleration, no trunk, and barely seats 4 moderate sized people? Unlikely. Americans are big people (and not just fat, taller and broader as well) plus we have a desire for speed. Speed and fuel-efficient are, at least right now, the opposite of each other. Congress can mandate all they want; your giant SUV that seats 7, can hold 3 picnic tables, and tow a yacht will never get 40mpg with a simple redesign. You’ll also not see these cars in Europe or most other overseas places, they simply want smaller, lighter and (as a side effect) efficient cars.

American cars stand out from the rest of the world in their style. We have an American car style that’s been built in to our culture. This isn’t going to change overnight. I know that I won’t buy a car that says “goes 0-60... eventually” on the sticker. Would you?




RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By therealnickdanger on 2/16/2007 10:57:37 AM , Rating: 2
I rated you up, but it should be noted that you can have the best of both worlds. There are several full-sized, sub-6 second German Autoban-destroyers that are capable of achieving over 35MPG. Twin-turbo diesels are extremely efficient and very powerful. The problem is that they are very expensive.

This will progress as it always has: more power, more features, more safety, more efficiency. It just takes time.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By jkostans on 2/16/2007 2:49:11 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, we're are also cheap. Cheap horsepower means cutting corners, and efficiency is on the top of the list of corners that are acceptable to cut.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By Wonga on 2/16/2007 10:57:48 AM , Rating: 2
While I agree that people in Europe often like smaller cars (which of course really depends on what you want a car for), the real reason for choosing a particular vehicle is now very often down to efficiency. It isn't really a side effect at all.

Obviously people don't care about how light a car is (they aren't exactly lifting it into a parking space), but they do care about all the benefits that comes with that.

Thanks to the rises in oil costs recently, I know of several people who have ditched their high speed Jaguars and bulky Land Rovers and switched over to standard mid-range diesels which can manage 50MPG. I can only see this trend continuing as oil supplies get more strained and biofuels take over at higher price points.

Since the EU keeps moving the bar up for CO2/km, I guess cars will just keep getting more efficient and everyone will reap the benefits. Of course, that won't stop people complaining about the extra £500 on the price tag, no matter how much money they are really saving over the lifetime...


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By StevoLincolnite on 2/16/2007 11:32:55 AM , Rating: 3
Alot of People may have moved from Petrol to Effiecent Diesel based cars, Here in Australia at least the Government has released a rebate scheme on LPG conversions, So instead of people selling they're cars etc for more effiecent ones, They instead get they're cars converted to LPG gas. (I never get over Other people calling petrol gas... :P)
Not only is LPG around 50% the cost of Petrol, (Sometimes allot less if you take shopping vouchers off).
But it is also allot more clean to burn.
In my VN SS Commodore V8 1990 model, I get 570KM's on a tank of LPG, Where on duel it was 610KM's Yet when I had my Old VN Commodore, which was a V6 And petrol only I was getting on average 520KM's to a 60 litre tank. (The tanks are the same size in my old VN and the SS) So What that came down to was the Power to weight, Both Vehicles had equal weight being same model, chasis etc. (The V8 probably weighed slightly more for the much larger motor) But because you don't have to Put your foot down as hard in the V8 the motor doesn't have to rev as high to get up to its required speed, thus conserving fuel. (In my theory anyway...)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holden_VN_Commodore

I think a better alternative to Fuel Economy is different fuels, More cleaner burning ones at that, And trying to keep about the same economy featured in cars as present.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By Ringold on 2/16/2007 11:41:49 AM , Rating: 2
LPG is one of those things advanced by environmentalists (I guess) but really is impossible on a significant scale.

Why? Take a look at the natural gas market. It's price swings are downright violent. I don't trade in it (Can we say 'Amaranth'?) but I keep an eye on it and I think I saw it make an 8% swing in one day. Supply is tight, storage capacity is tiny (and always will be), and demand inflexible but also funky (spikes and troughs). Try to expand it to power even a fraction of the auto-market, and it'd only get worse. Filling up a tank on a Monday may cost you 20% more or less than on the following Wed on occasion.

It's fine for its tiny applications, but countries that want to mandate it for widespread use do so at their own risk.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By Ringold on 2/16/2007 11:44:24 AM , Rating: 2
http://www.wtrg.com/daily/oilandgasspot.html

If those spot price shifts dont make you mess your pants then I don't know what would. As a consumer would you want fuel prices to double or triple in a Jan and then, say by March, be 1/3 the cost, and then by May be at a new record high?

Never will happen.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By StevoLincolnite on 2/16/2007 11:06:00 PM , Rating: 3
Price shifts on LPG? I only know about South Australian Conditions, I have never ever seen LPG more than 55-60% of the cost of Petrol. At the moment its 40% of the Price of petrol, And as long as there is a huge price difference? Who cares? Your still getting it cheaper, And the Australian Government basically gives you the LPG conversion for free.
Currently LPG is sitting on 63.9 Cents per liter. Multiply that by 3.785 which in turn is 2 dollars 41 cents a gallon.
Where as Petrol here is currently 125.9 a liter when converted into the American formats is: 4 dollars 76 cents a gallon.
LPG is readily available, Is mass produced here, Is cleaner Burning, Is almost as economical as petrol. (In most cases) And Plus its cheap. The Price has remained the same for months now, In fact a few weeks ago dropped 1 cent. (Yay).


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By xsilver on 2/18/2007 4:28:41 AM , Rating: 2
steve,
LPG is only 46 cents here in melbourne - you're getting ripped off over there in SA! :P

also did you know the the aus government is going to start introducing a new tax on LPG in '08/'09?
its going to close the margin a bit on the price difference but yes you're right about the current situation in aus.
I made a comment below about how it may not be totally suitable for the rest of the world though.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By sxr7171 on 2/18/2007 2:24:46 AM , Rating: 2
There could be ways around it, like setting up contracts that price your supply annually based on a monthly usage range that you and your supplier have agreed to. It's done with gas utilities where they price you based on anticipated use patterns. It's still a lot of hassle for a consumer to commit to a minimum annual usage and usage that doesn't vary too much month to month. I'm sure there'd be penalties for using too much gas in January for example. Anyhow, your basic point stands in that a wholesale switch to gas would really drive prices up and increase volatility. But the energy trading firms love to make money handling volatility.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By xsilver on 2/16/2007 5:13:29 PM , Rating: 2
here in australia our market/demand is so low, LPG is a viable alternative - but yes your right in that it is not viable as a world solution.

but the OP was just highlighting that in order for things to change technology should be developed on both a small scale and ALSO a paradigm shifting scale.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By ZoZo on 2/16/2007 10:58:15 AM , Rating: 2
Well then I guess that the Americans should stop living so luxuriously, stop eating so much, and start thinking about the environment more than their bulging stomachs and pompous lifestyle. Geez...


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By therealnickdanger on 2/16/2007 12:03:50 PM , Rating: 1
No thanks. I've seen how the rest of the world lives and I've worked damn hard to live how I live. I will always prefer to have the freedom to make that choice for myself without undue government regulation driving up costs and stifling innovation.

A life of excess can be unhealthy, but removing the option would be worse for everyone.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By lucyfek on 2/16/2007 12:43:03 PM , Rating: 4
just to remind you that while your parents "worked damn hard to live how I live", we just waste the resources and live on credit (aka 700+ billion trade gap just for last year alone). we'd better lower our insane apetite or someone else does it for us (on less favorable conditions).
it always hurts to fall.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By mindless1 on 2/16/2007 8:55:06 PM , Rating: 3
I always love that idiotic lie "I"ve worked damn hard".

Bullsh!t, there are plenty of millions of people in this world that work similarly hard in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world countries, it wasn't working hard that got you were you are, and it isn't in itself some justification for wasteful living relative to someone outside the US.

Work hard < work smart
Smart is recognizing that needs and happiness don't actually depend on excessiveness.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By Moishe on 2/19/2007 12:33:32 PM , Rating: 2
Work is work. Some work pays more, some pays less. That is usually determined by the market.

But his comment is pretty spot on. People work so that they can enjoy the fruits of their labor. The benefits for working harder may just be food to live on, or a nice car, or a new TV. Either way people should be rewarded for working.

What you call excess, I call the benefit of having skill and a good job. It shouldn't be up to you or some government to tell me what is and is not excess. Freedom means you can go overboard if you can afford it or you can live like a monk even if you're a millionaire.

Your attitude is pretty common and it indicates that you think your opinion about excess is worth forcing on others. This sort of thinking goes in all directions though. If you can tell me that my car is excess, I can tell you that the food you eat is excess. It goes on and on and eventually, you're just a slave to other people's whims with no freedom to choose.


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By sxr7171 on 2/18/2007 2:30:27 AM , Rating: 2
No one's telling you that you can't have your gas guzzler, just that you'd have to pay more for it. So keep working hard(er).


RE: Big Cars, lots of Horsepower
By bob661 on 2/16/2007 1:19:34 PM , Rating: 2
1. America is a democratic society where we have freedom of speech and expression.
2. It's MY money. Not yours and not societies. I don't work to better society. I work to better MY and MY families life. A side benefit is that OUR society continues runs because we all work.
3. In OUR society (not yours), we buy stuff. Buying stuff keeps people employed. There's all kinds of side benefits from being employed. See #2 for one benefit.
4. We make some damn good money compared to the rest of the world as a whole society. See numbers 1 and 2 for why that is.
5. Because of #4, we like to live good. We also are very generous and give in the billions (look it up). But why would we give away most of what we make? Where is the incentive to work harder? Where is the incentive to create? Where is the incentive to raise our children with good work ethics? There HAS to be personal benefit. Giving away most of your money does not benefit the person.
6. Not all of us are fat. My entire family including in laws are very healthy, eat well and exercise. You watch too much TV if you think it's different. Americans are generally healthy. Just because we're bigger doesn't mean we're fatter.
7. If you don't like what I've said, stay in your country where things are how you like it to be. And I'll happily stay in mine. And trust me, if I had my say, our military wouldn't step foot outside of our waters. And there are plenty of Americans that believe in that philosophy. Too bad we don't care about politics to change it.