backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 62 comment(s) - last by mindless1.. on Jun 26 at 8:24 PM


G-Wiz: A Special Kind of Ugly
Dyson Digital Motor being eyed by company founder for electric car use

When many hear the name Dyson, they think of expensive and rather cool looking vacuum cleaners. However, if Dyson namesake Sir James Dyson has anything to say about it, the Dyson name will in the future be synonymous with electric cars.

According to The Independent, Dyson and his design firm are working on a lightweight but powerful electric motor that would be ideal for use in electric cars. Dyson told The Independent, “They're (electric cars) quiet and they're pollution free.”

Dyson believes that electric cars could overcome their current drawbacks of limited range and low speeds. Dyson says that there are fantastic opportunities to make electric cars lighter. Making the car lighter would help to increase both its speed and its range.

Dyson foresees future electric cars being recharged form solar panels on the roof rather than hooking to the power grid for charging. The Dyson company has an extra-strong digital motor that is half the weight of normal motor, which would presumable help increase the range of an electric vehicle using the motor. The Dyson Digital Motor spins at 10,000 RPM and has so far only been used by the company in two vacuum cleaners and the Dyson Airblade hand cleaner.

What Car editor Steve Fowler told The Independent, “Dyson certainly has a history of producing innovative electrical products. But there's a fair difference between producing electric motors for vacuum cleaners or washing machines and cars.”

It would be interesting to see what sort of design Dyson would come up with for his electric vehicle. Hopefully the Dyson electric car would be much more attractive than the G-Wiz -- Britain’s most popular electric car.

Perhaps Dyson could design something with looks more along the lines of the undeniably sexy Tesla Roadster that is now in production.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Dislike him
By Suntan on 6/25/2008 1:42:41 PM , Rating: 5
Personally, I’d rather see all life as we know it heat up and die from global warming than give that smug Douche something else to talk about in his commercials.

-Suntan




RE: Dislike him
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 6/25/2008 1:44:39 PM , Rating: 1
LOL, yeah -- there's just something about him in those commercials. I normally don't take notice of commercials like those, but his just rub me the wrong way for some reason.


RE: Dislike him
By Ringold on 6/25/08, Rating: -1
RE: Dislike him
By 67STANG on 6/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: Dislike him
By tastyratz on 6/25/2008 2:17:58 PM , Rating: 3
he does.
I know some people who swear by Dysons but I am sure you can probably get better for less. I agree too

Every time I hear a dyson commercial I secretly hope he dies in a fire


RE: Dislike him
By sprockkets on 6/25/2008 3:30:52 PM , Rating: 5
yeah, he sure is smug, since he has a UK accent because he, oh wait, he lives in the UK.

You can also thank him for bringing bagless tech to the world, since he was originally going to sell the patent to Hoover but they only wanted it just to make sure the tech never made it to market, so Hoover and others could make money off their crappy bags.

Hoover's bagless vacuums are so piss poor; they clog only after a few uses, leaving you to bang the HEPA filter clean and getting dirt all over. At least, the Dyson requires just letting it come out the container. Although, they do have a filter you have to clean out.

Eh, whatever. The build quality is typical. The build quality of Miele is top notch.


RE: Dislike him
By rollakid on 6/26/2008 5:42:46 AM , Rating: 3
My Miele's 19 year-old and it still sucks like day one... no sign of a new vacuum in house for maybe another 10 years.


RE: Dislike him
By Suntan on 6/26/2008 1:35:04 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
and it still sucks like day one...


Wish I could say the same thing for my wife. :(

-Suntan


RE: Dislike him
By rudy on 6/25/2008 4:03:55 PM , Rating: 2
Its popular to hate him, and alot of the vacuum is hype. Such as the clear housing and the instructions to vacuum with your old then the dyson and see how much junk is in there. Well if you vacumed twice with even the same vacuum you would probably see that. But Dyson is good for the business. Cause he gets the old standby companies to get off their butts and work a little harder. He comes in as the underdog so he wants to invent and try new ways to do things to climb up, same as toyota in the US. And that forces the old players to step up their game. Also alot of people believe that vacuums have been changed to purposely break down when they used to last a long time. Bringing a new player in the market who has nothing to lose could get them to fix up their business tactics. Basically the competition he brings is good over all in the end.


RE: Dislike him
By JonnyDough on 6/25/2008 6:08:47 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, it doesn't force manufacturers to step up their game. It forces marketing departments to step up their game.

The vacuum cleaner itself has been around for a long time, and has yet to be improved upon by any large means. The best vacuums you can find are high priced and last and work, but you have to do research online.

Many people would be surprised at how many good vacuum companies are out there that they've never heard of. Rainbow only got big because of...yep. Marketing. Door to door.

Dyson got big because of support from Wal-Mart and Target. The junk Hoover and Dirt Devils you buy today are not the quality vacuums that your parents bought when they were first married.

Wal-Mart forces the hand of manufacturers. They want affordability and they WANT it to be junk so they can sell you a new one every 3 years.

My parents still have the canister Electrolux they bought nearly 30 years ago, it's had a few repairs but has more sucking power than any vacuum I've used and it's not any louder. It isn't even heavier, it just appears to be because it's not an upright. If you want a decent vacuum, don't shop at a big retail store. Spend extra and get a good one. I think you'll find that it's well worth it.


RE: Dislike him
By omnicronx on 6/26/2008 10:46:47 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
The vacuum cleaner itself has been around for a long time, and has yet to be improved upon by any large means.
Am I the only one here that has bought a vacuum within the last 5 years? 10 years ago every vacuum that could be had for a decent price had a bag. Now you can go to Walmart and get a bag less vacuum that works 10 times better for 50 bucks.

Seems like you guys are just complaining for the sake of it, or you really hate the U.K. Either way, vaccums have come a long way in the past 10-15 years, and you can partly thank Dyson for that, as they helped pioneer the bagless vaccum cleaner which in turn brought us cheaper brands that do exactly the same thing.


RE: Dislike him
By Spuke on 6/26/2008 1:15:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Seems like you guys are just complaining for the sake of it, or you really hate the U.K.
It has nothing to do with his country of origin. But everything to do with his smugness. Reread the comments. I, personally, could care less about the guy.


RE: Dislike him
By Reclaimer77 on 6/26/2008 11:49:29 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
. My parents almost bought a dyson, but they read that same consumer report on it, they bought an overpriced rainbow instead...


The Rainbow is actually an awesome vac ! Yeah, they are really expensive though. But its amazing to see how much dirt and crap they pull into the water.


RE: Dislike him
By Spivonious on 6/25/2008 2:35:23 PM , Rating: 1
My wife got to use it while working at Linens n Things and she concurs that it doesn't do a very good job.

We just got the Bissel Pet Hair Eraser vaccuum and it is fantastic. Our dog sheds a lot and ended up completely mucking up our old vaccuum (it would clog every ten minutes and eventually the motor just gave out). So far after a month with the new vaccuum, no clogs and the stuff it gets out of the carpet...*shudder*.


RE: Dislike him
By rikulus on 6/25/2008 2:59:55 PM , Rating: 4
I'm not sure what you think you read in the consumer reports review, but it certainly didn't say the Dyson's had insufficient suction. "Didn't hold a particular advantage" in terms of suction, hardly translates to "insufficient suction."

I know several people personally who have been extremely happy with their Dyson purchases, myself included, and never met anyone who purchased or tried out a Dyson and wasn't impressed by it's suction.

I would say the DC17 "Ball" vacuum isn't all it's cracked up to be, yeah it's easier to turn while vacuuming, but hardly a big enough improvement to warrant the price premium over the DC14. It's a shame the Consumer reports review only seemed to consider the DC17, which IS a very high priced vacuum I wouldn't recommend either. The DC14 at $370 is a great vacuum.

To say: Miele or Electrolux are way better, is jumping up another level in price (and then waging a debate for which is truly better.) I haven't seen anyone suggest a vacuum that would actually outperform a Dyson in the same price range or less.


RE: Dislike him
By Oregonian2 on 6/25/2008 3:30:27 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I haven't seen anyone suggest a vacuum that would actually outperform a Dyson in the same price range or less.


Possibly not. But it's probably not hard to find one that works as well for a lot less money. We've one (forget the brand, we've someone who comes in now days to do the cleaning who uses it) that works tremendously well.

Dyson's do look tremendously well in a geeky sort of sci-fi way.


RE: Dislike him
By bighairycamel on 6/25/2008 5:06:28 PM , Rating: 2
You are certainly right. It actually gave the Dyson vacuums a "very good" rating, it's just that there were a lot of other "very good" options that were much cheaper.


RE: Dislike him
By mindless1 on 6/26/2008 8:24:19 PM , Rating: 2
Bingo! People who pay that much for a vacuum are retarded and would have to not vacuum very often to see any difference in performance enough to matter. It's not which vacuume one chooses that matters, it's whether the owner lets a lot of crud build up and lives in that nasty state of flooring. Think back years before Dysons existed, where everyone's floors covered with crap? No.

Also, ever notice how many Dyson refurbs there are? Apparently they have at least their share of malfunctions.