quote:
I fail to see how exclusivity arrangements between cell phone manufacturers and cellular providers implicates the same concerns as traditional monopolies. The market that the AT&T/Apple agreement covers can hardly be considered large enough or important enough to warrant regulation: AT&T is not the only cellular provider in the country, and the iPhone is not the only smart phone in the market. Even if I were to concede that the iPhone is the only "smart phone" (I think "luxury phone" would be better terminology), it isn't something as important, as say, energy, or, you know, having a job, to justify regulation. And it isn't as if there is something peculiar about the "luxury phone" market that prohibits other companies from manufacturing an alternative version of the iPhone (compared to the peculiarities of the energy market - the infrastructure costs I mentioned above).