backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 101 comment(s) - last by MisterModder.. on Jun 25 at 3:21 PM

Attacks mistakenly targetted legitimate BitTorrent tracker

Jim Louderback, CEO of internet TV network Revision3, is considering legal action against anti-piracy firm MediaDefender after an internal investigation revealed it to be the source of a Memorial Day weekend Denial of Service attack against Revision3’s computer network.

“Interestingly enough, whoever was sending these SYN packets wasn’t shy. Far from it: it’s as if they wanted us to know who they were,” wrote Louderback in a blog post dated Thursday. “Instead of some shadowy underground criminal syndicate, the packets [came from] our home state of California. In fact, we traced the [attack] to a public company called ARTISTDirect. Once we were able to get their internet provider on the line, they verified that yes, indeed, that internet address belonged to [MediaDefender].”

Revision3 runs a private BitTorrent tracker that it uses to distribute shows produced in-house. MediaDefender may have been trying to exploit a security hole in its server, said Louderback, and when Revision3 administrators locked MediaDefender out, the company might have automatically launched a DoS attack in retaliation.

After speaking with MediaDefender Vice President of Operations Ben Grodsky, Louderback says that MediaDefender admitted to “abusing” Revision3’s servers, by “injecting a broad array of torrents” into the company’s BitTorrent tracker.

“We’d noticed some unauthorized use of our tracking server, and took steps to de-authorize torrents pointing to non-Revision3 files. That, as it turns out, was exactly the wrong thing to do. MediaDefender’s servers, at that point, initiated a flood of SYN packets attempting to reconnect to the files stored on our server. And that torrential cascade of ‘Hi’s brought down our network,” said Louderback.

MediaDefender did not respond to requests for comment from DailyTech.

Grodsky said that his company didn’t do “anything specific” to target Revision3, and the attack – which Grodsky characterized as an attempt by MediaDefender bots to contact Revision 3 “every three hours” – was unintentional. “We didn’t do anything to increase traffic,” he claimed.

“Our own logs show upwards of 8,000 packets a second,” said Louderback.

“Revision3 suffered measurable harm to its business due to that flood of packets, as the attacks on our legitimate and legal Torrent Tracking server spilled over into our entire internet infrastructure. Thus we were unable to serve videos and advertising through much of the weekend, and into Tuesday – and even our internal email servers were brought down.”

Revision3’s legal department is examining its options, and the FBI is “looking into the matter.”

MediaDefender gained a reputation in 2007 after eagle-eyed observers spotted inconsistencies in a dragnet site the company set up, located at Miivi.com. This discovery attracted the attention (and wrath) of a group calling itself the “MediaDefender-Defenders,” who leaked over a gigabyte of the company’s e-mail and fileserver contents onto the internet. The resulting black eye sent MediaDefender’s business into a dive, with reports indicating that damage control cost ARTISTDirect more than $800,000 as of last March forcing the company to seek restructuring with management firm Salem Partners LLC.

“They saw us as a “distributor” – even though we were using BitTorrent for legitimate reasons. Once we shut them out, their vast network of servers were automatically programmed to implement a scorched earth policy, and shut us down in turn,” wrote Louderback.

“All I want, for Revision3, is to get our weekend back – both the countless hours spent by our heroic tech staff attempting to unravel the mess, and the revenue, traffic and entertainment that we didn’t deliver.”

UPDATE 6/4/2008: MediaDefender claims Revision3's tracker saw over 296,000 illegitimate uploads by outsiders, and says it wasn't aware of the tracker's legitimate use. You can read MediaDefender's response here.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Perfect
By Eugenics on 5/31/2008 10:33:06 AM , Rating: 5
This sounds like an excellent excuse to execute anyone who works for MediaDefender.

Top 3 evils in the world atm:
1. Pedophiles
2. RIAA + MPAA and anyone who sides with them
3. Al Queada




RE: Perfect
By djkrypplephite on 5/31/2008 11:54:18 AM , Rating: 2
You know I think you're actually spot on.


RE: Perfect
By Noya on 5/31/2008 1:39:29 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Al Queada


First, learn how to spell it.
Second, get real.

The US propping up shieks/dictators/etc. in the Arab world is the whole reason they hate the West. Tit-for-tat.


RE: Perfect
By Reclaimer77 on 5/31/2008 7:28:32 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
The US propping up shieks/dictators/etc. in the Arab world is the whole reason they hate the West. Tit-for-tat.


Silly me. I thought they hated us because of the Koran, which was written in the 8'th century. Were we " propping up " dictators back then ?

Your attempting to use rational reasoning for why radical Islamic extremist behave the way they do. People who advocate murder/suicide, I suggest to you, are not rational or using reasoning.

You can only blame the West for so much. Hey, I hate my dad for leaving mom 26 years ago, but I haven't strapped a bomb to my chest yet.


RE: Perfect
By Kaleid on 6/1/2008 4:38:42 PM , Rating: 2
They certainly are motivated because of religious fundamentalism but it is too simplistic to say that it is the reason.

The reasons can be found by reading the fatwas. For instance, The Israel / Palestine issue, which is stupidly overly supportive for Israel and barely recognizes the Palestinians (this is widely shared view in the middle-east + the fact that US selectively supports oppressive non-democratic muslim regimes)
Second, something that even Wolfowitz pointed out: US military presence in the "holy land" (IMO "holy" is BS) Saudiarabia.

If you have time and interest, begin by reading here:
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/searchResults.j...


RE: Perfect
By Reclaimer77 on 6/1/2008 7:03:36 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
They certainly are motivated because of religious fundamentalism but it is too simplistic to say that it is the reason.


I'm sure they think they have many valid reasons. The problem I have with this line of thinking is the people who support it have a double standard. For example, legal action taken by the military leads to civilian casualties and it causes an uproar. Suicide bomber blows himself and 20 other people up, and its no big deal. There must be a REASON for it. There must be a way to blame this on somebody else, usually the U.S. Well I'm sick of it.

quote:
If you have time and interest, begin by reading here:


Honestly, I don't. Any attempt to legitimize or explain away radical terrorist behavior is a thinly veiled attempt to garner sympathy to their causes. I don't have the stomach for it anymore. You don't think I'm aware of the excuses they use and others cook up to explain it ?

I know its complicated. I know its not always black and white. But at some point we just have to realize we're not going to change things overnight, but we have to take a stand and draw the line somewhere. This behavior of theirs cannot be excused or explained away any longer.


RE: Perfect
By Strunf on 6/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: Perfect
By gmw1082 on 6/2/2008 8:32:45 AM , Rating: 4
"It was radical terrorists that made the US "

Yes because people like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson loved to strap bombs to their chest and blow up innocent civilians.


RE: Perfect
By Strunf on 6/2/2008 1:51:26 PM , Rating: 1
Osama doesnt do it either... about blowing up civilians it depends were the natives civilians or were they insurgents by default?...


RE: Perfect
By rhuarch on 6/2/2008 10:42:02 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
It was radical terrorists that made the US


You have got to be kidding me! The men who fought in the revolutionary war were nothing of the sort. We made an official declaration of war and only attacked military targets. The closest we came was with the American irregulars, but they still only attacked the British military, and the British army had their own irregulars as well. Come to think of it the only reason they were considered irregulars was because they didn't conform to the stupid practice of lining up on a field and taking pot shots at each other. The fact that you would compare the American revolutionaries to Islamist fundamentalists like Al qaeda just demonstrates your fundamental lack of understanding both of past events and current.


RE: Perfect
By Strunf on 6/2/2008 1:58:35 PM , Rating: 2
The only difference between the two is the tactic used to achieve their goal.


RE: Perfect
By theapparition on 6/2/2008 2:43:51 PM , Rating: 4
Well duh.....

Isn't that the point.
Let's see.

Tactic 1:
A militarized war where targets are only other military targets. Civilian casulties are discouraged and merely collateral.

vs.

Tactic 2:
A coward blowing himself up in a coffee shop, not letting innocent civilians know that they are in danger.

Glad you see the difference.

OK, no more feeding the trolls....


RE: Perfect
By Strunf on 6/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Perfect
By gmw1082 on 6/3/2008 8:38:08 AM , Rating: 2
"I'm not sure that if some foreign nation had taken over yours you would still see the civilians that took possession of your land really innocent."

So when the US attacked Iraq and occupied the country it became acceptable for terrorists to kill the Iraqi civilians?


RE: Perfect
By theapparition on 6/3/2008 10:19:12 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
TextInnocent civilians ? In the eyes of who? maybe yours but not in the eye of many... besides I'm not sure that if some foreign nation had taken over yours you would still see the civilians that took possession of your land really innocent.

Gee, your right.
Guess children should now be classified as "enemy combatants". People with no knowledge, or power to enforce change, are being killed. That's the difference.

Your shear ignorance is outstanding that you can't see the difference. As another point.......the whole "civilized" world tends to agree on the definition of "terrorism". But I guess your sooooo much smarter than the other 8billion people here.


RE: Perfect
By Strunf on 6/3/2008 5:08:02 PM , Rating: 3
Since you couldn't hold much ground with "innocent civilians" you come with children... give me a break will ya, it's not like the US hadn't killed innocent civilians, children included on this war and others.And I don't see you calling the US terrorists, even if a lot of people do...

Cause you asked to those 8 billions their opinion... most people walking on this earth don't care for whatever happens outside their country, they see it in the news with shock and awe and 10 seconds later they forget everything about it. Your civilized world is the one that also brought a war based on WMD that are yet to be found, that even supported Saddam and others dictators through history, that still has the death sentence, practices torture... the list is long.


RE: Perfect
By theapparition on 6/4/2008 9:34:52 AM , Rating: 3
Yes the US has killed children in the Iraq confrontation. Why is that?

Because the "noble" freedom fighters (as you would put it) set up base camps in schools, or close to civilian areas. When the US miliatary is fired upon, strikes are ordered and the area is taken out, but, ooops, it's a school. Who's fault is it then?

They use civilians and children as shields, using terror as a means of control. "You will do what I want or we'll kill your family and rape your daughters". Thier tactics are nothing more than "gang" mentality. They are murderers in every sense of the word.

The US could wipe them out in a heartbeat, but that would cause an un-imaginable amount of collateral damage. Instead, since the US actually cares about the Iraqi people, they try to police the area, rather than be soldiers.

There's nothing more the US wants than to leave, and thiers nothing more the insurgents want than the US to stay. Armed conflict gives them power, and without that they are nothing, since only through fear do they leverage any sort of control.

I'm Done.