backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 68 comment(s) - last by Sythros.. on Jan 7 at 7:27 PM


"In the late 1980s, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory researchers conducted research into superconductors. The ceramic superconductors are made from a material that has only very low alternating-current resistance and thus dissipates less power. Magnetic forces between the magnet and ceramic superconductor provide a magnetic cushion that keeps the magnet suspended above the superconductor. Liquid nitrogen cools the superconductor to about 77 Kelvin, producing the magnetic cushion."  (Source: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)
Scientists observe how superconductivity truly works; advance efforts to find high temperature superconducting materials

One of the greatest mysteries of science is superconductivity.  Superconductivity, a term that entered popular lexicon with the advent of magnetic levitation, is an incredible phenomenon.  At extremely low temperatures certain materials known as superconductors lose almost all resistance to electricity and experience exclusion of the inner magnetic field -- also known the Meissner Effect. 

Traditional electric-conducting materials such as gold or copper have impurities that prevent them from superconducting.  These materials have a discrete resistance, even at absolute zero -- a theoretical point of zero Kelvins, or -273.14 degrees Celsius.  Superconductors experience resistance down to a critical temperature, known as Tc.  Once the temperature drops to this point, the materials begin to superconducting and reach a point of zero resistance.

Superconductors hold tremendous promise as a computer system utilizing a superconducting circuitry loop could exist indefinitely without a power source, and would be far more efficient as it would not output waste heat.
 
Extremely promising research occurred during the last three decades into discovering "high temperature" superconductors.  The first superconductors discovered required tremendous cooling to take them to almost absolute zero before superconduction. 

No room-temperature superconductor has been observed but the field experienced a revolution in 1986 with the discovery of cuprate-perovskite material superconductors, which could superconduct at temperatures in excess of 90 degrees Kelvin.  The highest temperature superconductor currently known is a ceramic material consisting of thallium, mercury, copper, barium, calcium, strontium and oxygen, which has a Tc= 138 K (-135.14 °C).  

These discoveries created materials that can achieve superconduction with mere liquid nitrogen cooling -- a relatively economical prospect. 

One difficulty in discovering higher temperature materials is that scientists did not understand what caused superconducting phenomena on an atomic level.  A great deal of research in quantum physics has gone into this topic, but much confusion remained.  Scientists knew that superconducting materials form pairs of electrons known as Cooper pairs. 
 
Researchers at the University of Tennessee and Oak Ridge National Laboratory led by Professor of physics Pengcheng Dai claim to know the cause of superconductivity.  The team's work, published at Boston College (PDF), details how special subatomic vibrations in crystal latices dubbed phonons bind the electrons together magnetically, and thus allow superconduction. 

Dai claims in University of Tennessee press release, "These findings add to the understanding that magnetism plays a role in creating these important pairs.  This will not end the debate, but it's another step."

Still, this research, if it should withstand the eye of scrutiny of the scientific community, will be one of the most important breakthroughs in the understand of how superconduction works.  This in turn will allow scientists to easily and procedurally derive new high-temperature superconductors, pushing the temperature higher and higher, possibly one day into the room temperature range.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Dammit. Went over my head.
By therealnickdanger on 1/2/2008 11:35:10 AM , Rating: 3
OK, I tried to wrap my mind around it. Are we talking about the possibility of a "perpetual machine" of some kind? If anyone can list some practical applications of this technology, it would really help me out.




RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/2/2008 11:39:09 AM , Rating: 5
In classical physics there is no such thing as perpetual machines. However, superconductive materials reduce friction to practically zero, so you could get pretty darn close to perpetual machines.

You notice all that heat coming off your computer? That's resistance somewhere. If you eliminate that resistance, imagine how fast computers could run -- since we wouldn't be restricted by cooling and other problems that come with resistance.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By Alexvrb on 1/2/2008 1:49:15 PM , Rating: 2
"Superconductors hold tremendous promise as a computer system utilizing a superconducting circuitry loop could exist indefinitely without a power source, and would be far more efficient as it would not output waste heat."

More efficient, less heat, sure. Indefinitely without a power source? I don't think so, Jack.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/2/2008 4:36:23 PM , Rating: 4
A closed circuit constructed with superconducting material would certainly operate indefinitely, assuming you could keep it cold for free.

But if it was to do anything useful, like operate a transistor, you're introducing friction -- which would make indefinite operation not possible.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By lompocus on 1/2/2008 5:50:47 PM , Rating: 1
what if the transistor itself is some sort of super mini superconductor?


By masher2 (blog) on 1/2/2008 5:56:32 PM , Rating: 4
The whole point of a transistor is that it be a switching device, i.e. it controls current. If it were a superconductor (or even a normal conductor) it couldn't do its job properly. The semi-conducting properties are what makes it special.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By billybob24 on 1/3/08, Rating: 0
RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By Jammrock on 1/3/2008 8:52:42 AM , Rating: 3
A perpetual MACHINE and a perpetual CIRCUIT are two vastly different concepts. Please do not confuse them.

A perpetual MACHINE is impossible given our knowledge of physics. There are too many outside factors, such as friction, conservation of mass and energy, etc, that make such a contraption impossible.

A "perpetual CIRCUIT" on the otherhand would be possible IF the circuit could be made using perfect superconductive materials in a closed-loop. The difference is simple. In a perpetual curcuit there are no external forces that are being dealt with, like there are with a perpetual machine, and assuming the energy stored within the circuit never dissipates (which in a perfect superconductive circuit it would not) and/or is not released to any external medium, it would run for ever. This is simple electronics theory, and anyone who has taken college level electronics has studied and built circuits that could be perpetual IF reasonable superconductivity could be made.

In other words, the author is not wrong...theoretically. We can't build superconductive circuits so no one knows for sure.


By sandytheguy on 1/3/2008 11:33:44 AM , Rating: 2
A perpetual machine is not impossible. I have one, and I'll sell you the instructions for say $100.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By geddarkstorm on 1/4/2008 2:58:59 PM , Rating: 2
We do have superconductive circuits, there's one in the lab I work in, takes up it's own room, it's called an NMR spectrometer. NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) works by cooling a mile or more of tightly wound wire down to nearly 2-4 Kelvin (using liquid helium, which then is kept cold using liquid nitrogen), sending an electric current through it which then remains indefinitely, and using that constant current to generate a massive magnetic field which can create bulk atomic magnetic moments (alignment of atomic spins in one direction or the other provided you're dealing with a nucleus that's a spin 1/2, like carbon-13) in say a protein you are studying. Then you can literally deduce the atomic structure and shape of said protein (or any molecule). Of course, there's a lot of other technical stuff that goes on, such as RF pulse sequences and then a lot of mathematical work: but the heart of the machine--that electromagnet--is a perpetual circuit that will never run down, but will always remain at say 16.4 Tesla (this is not completely true as the helium can't keep this kind of wire quite cold enough, so really in about a decade it might drop one thousandth of a percent in power; but on the scale of human time and life, it'll run forever provided it's cared for and refueled regularly).

So no, this is not theory but fact, and the author is completely correct. Given the right material at the right temperature, you can create a current that will last basically indefinitely: and we have those already in real life, known as NMR spectrometers.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By Sythros on 1/7/2008 7:27:52 PM , Rating: 2
Kudos on dumbing down NMR. I myself am a chemist and have used NMR quite a lot. The instrument amazes me still to this day. And to think when it was developed they expected to get nothing but a single peak...


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By Rovemelt on 1/3/2008 12:26:50 PM , Rating: 2
I thought that the resistance is zero indefinitely for DC current, but not AC current in superconductor circuits. AC current creates magnetic fields that can interact with both the superconductor itself (minimally) and with objects that pass through the magnetic flux, which can lead to current leakage.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By Jellodyne on 1/4/2008 10:51:52 AM , Rating: 3
The problem with a closed circuit with no resistance and no inputs, particularly a superconducting one, is that in a very short amount of time the voltage potential is equalized throughout the circuit and the flow of electrons stops. Its only the voltage differential provided by a power source that 'pumps' electrons through the system. So... if you mean 'do nothing' when you say 'operate indefinately' then I agree 100%.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By Strunf on 1/2/2008 1:55:52 PM , Rating: 2
There's more than one way to cut the resistance on your computer, Intel for instance (and probably others) has shown prototypes of circuits that use light instead of electricity to rely information, like fiber optics but on a much smaller scale.

On your first sentence didn't you mix the things up, I mean even if you have some superconducting material at room temperature, how would that allow you make something that moves perpetually, superconductivity doesn't reduce friction.


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/2/2008 4:39:24 PM , Rating: 2
I think a lot of research on the 10nm scale is basically just carbon nanotubes. CNTs are great insulators, but incredibly electrons can "slip" down CNTs very quickly, eliminating a ton of friction. Go figure :)


RE: Dammit. Went over my head.
By masher2 (blog) on 1/2/2008 4:44:51 PM , Rating: 2
Don't you mean great "conductor"? CNTs are supposedly the best thermal conductors known to man.


By ChronoReverse on 1/2/2008 5:04:22 PM , Rating: 2
What about superfluids? I thought those had super conductivity of heat.


By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 1/2/2008 5:34:57 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, I meant insulator, though CNTs are also great thermal conductors.

Some of the new materials I was introduced to by 3M are virtually identical in that they are composites made of CNTs, but depending on the angle of billions of aligned tubes the material can have vastly different properties.

For example, a heatsink announced a few months ago is basically just a bunch of CNTs aligned perpendicular to the base that feathers out up into copper fins.

Now if you take the same material in parallel to the heat source makes a great insulator.