backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 80 comment(s) - last by DragonMaster0.. on Sep 23 at 7:55 PM


Universal and SpiralFrog are dancing to a different tune...and it's not playing on an iPod  (Source: elsevier.nl)
Spiralfrog.com launched its free ad-supported download service today, and there's some interesting quirks

Spiralfrog.com launched today, providing music fans with a legal avenue to download some free music.  The only catch -- the music is supported by the site's advertising revenues, so your clicks keep those tracks downloading.

Chairman and founder of New York-based SpiralFrog Inc., Joe Mohen announced "We believe [SpiralFrog] will be a very powerful alternative to the pirate sites, with SpiralFrog you know what you're getting ... there's no threat of viruses, adware or spyware."

The site, which has been beta tested for months, currently carries about 800,000 tracks and 3,500 music videos available for free download.  You must sign up for a free account and provide demographic information in order to gain access to the media.  You must also use your account each month in order to keep it active, which is intended to prevent users from simply downloading and not returning to the site.

The site intends to have over 2 million tracks available within the next several months.

Most of the media on the site is from Vivendi SA's Universal Music Group, the largest record company in the world, and the only music label to currently have jumped at SpiralFrog's business plan.

In July DailyTech reported that Vivendi had jumped ship from Apple's iTunes service, declining to renew their contract, deciding to seek revenue from alternative sources.  Now it appears that one such alternative source is SpiralFrog.

An interesting detail has emerged.  Files from SpiralFrog are digitally protected and can be played on mp3 players, but cannot be burned to CDs.  There is another minor detail, though -- the files cannot be played on Apple's wildly popular iPod MP3 players -- nor the less popular Microsoft Zune. 

SpiralFrog's frequently asked questions section states, "Songs and video files that you download from SpiralFrog are not compatible with Apple’s range of iPods or Microsoft’s Zune."

The move to not allow its content to be played on iPod's appears to be a clear snub by the Universal Music Group, similar to NBC's recent move of its television content from iTunes to Amazon.com.  Apple has not commented on this development.

For many, though, SpiralFrog.com presents an intriguing new business model that may present a legal alternative to file sharing or spending large amounts of money on CDs or paid download services, such as iTunes.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

huh?
By phatboye on 9/17/2007 10:22:54 AM , Rating: 2
Is is spiralfrog or leapfrog or are they both the same?




RE: huh?
By darkpaw on 9/17/2007 10:27:11 AM , Rating: 3
I'd think the leapfrog reference might be an error. Leapfrog is a company that makes many loud, annoying children's toys.


RE: huh?
By JasonMick (blog) on 9/17/2007 10:28:28 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry, typo, its LeapFrog--thanks for pointing that out, its being fixed. The weblink first listed is correct.

I think LeapFrog is a line of childrens Edutainment products if I remember right...thats what happens when I have too many product names stuck in my head.


RE: huh?
By JasonMick (blog) on 9/17/2007 10:29:51 AM , Rating: 2
It is Spiralfrog . LeapFrog is a line of children's products, I mean


RE: huh?
By Mitch101 on 9/17/2007 11:16:12 AM , Rating: 3
LOL. I can see how you could easily be confused as Spiral frog doesn't make any sense as a name for a music vendor and you must have kids like me or are bombarded with those commercials.

Unfortunately all the good internet names are now taken. My bank ran into this problem and their website is http://www.ClownFart84523.com


RE: huh?
By RW on 9/17/2007 12:05:09 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
There is another minor detail, though -- the files cannot be played on Apple's wildly popular iPod MP3 players.

Take that Apple your iPod becoming useless


RE: huh?
By headbox on 9/17/2007 12:14:05 PM , Rating: 1
The reality is not the iPod becoming "useless," but competitors going out of business. Apple has sold over 3 Billion songs and 2 million movies now. No one even comes close. If major heavyweights like Microsoft and WalMart can't compete, yet another new contender like FutileFrog is going to die quickly.

Just because you hate Apple so you can fit in your geek club doesn't mean iPod + iTunes is a bad product. It became #1 because it's a great product.


RE: huh?
By Spivonious on 9/17/2007 12:59:02 PM , Rating: 4
It became number one because Apple marketed it to death. The devices are now called iPods instead of MP3 Players. Similar to how tissues are called Kleenex (or in the older generation, how vacuum cleaners are called Hoovers).


RE: huh?
By AraH on 9/17/2007 1:12:31 PM , Rating: 5
the ipod is number one because people are fashion whores


RE: huh?
By otter111 on 9/17/07, Rating: -1
RE: huh?
By AraH on 9/17/2007 2:40:42 PM , Rating: 4
so you don't deny what i said?

the first step is admission, this is a step in the right direction...


RE: huh?
By Oregonian2 on 9/17/2007 2:46:00 PM , Rating: 2
I won't go for brown turd ones (like the "Chocolate" colored things that companies seem to be making now, for no reason I can imagine). Including Zune's. Having things look good isn't a negative IMO. A brilliant smart woman isn't bad if she's also blond and voluptuous.


RE: huh?
By afkrotch on 9/17/2007 6:59:17 PM , Rating: 5
Well, if you want to compare the ipod to a woman, here's what she'd be.

She'd be a white racist women, who happens to look good, with average intelligence.

White = ipods are white
racist = only itunes
looks good = looks good
average intelligence = average file format support


RE: huh?
By Oregonian2 on 9/17/2007 8:51:07 PM , Rating: 2
I dunno. My iPod before it "disappeared" and my wife's iPod (both the 60Gb 5G version) are both black! I think the Blacks look a lot nicer and sexier than the white iPods. Just don't like the "Chocolate" versions. Would perhaps like a Cobalt Blue as well, but haven't seen one.

But in any case, you're still distorting my posting. The iPod's looking good still isn't, IMO, something to dislike the iPod for.


RE: huh?
By theapparition on 9/18/2007 7:29:48 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The iPod's looking good still isn't, IMO, something to dislike the iPod for.

Quite right. In fact, looking good is the only exemplary thing the iPod does. Everything else is mediocre at best.

In interest of disclosure, I have a 30GB 5th gen, 80GB 5.5gen and Zune. Zune is hands down much better in every aspect except looks.


RE: huh?
By rbuszka on 9/18/2007 6:01:24 PM , Rating: 2
The other thing the iPod does really well: sound very good. It has an impressive DAC and output stage, which is why Wilson Audio (maker of > $100,000 high-end loudspeakers) chose to use an iPod to demonstrate the fact that the loudspeaker is generally the weakest link in the audio chain, even weaker than supposedly 'average' sources like portable music players.

If the Zune was a PlaysForSure player, I'd buy one. For now, however, the Zune isn't an option since I use Napster's subscription service.


RE: huh?
By goku on 9/19/2007 3:10:14 PM , Rating: 2
I bet the idiot used a 128Kb/s Mp3 or AAC file to "demonstrate" this fact..


RE: huh?
By UNCjigga on 9/19/2007 3:35:21 PM , Rating: 2
Apparently you haven't heard of Apple's Lossless Audio Codec which has been around since iTunes 4.7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Lossless


RE: huh?
By Oregonian2 on 9/21/2007 1:46:45 PM , Rating: 2
But maybe he won't use the iPod touch. It's audio quality is reported to be a step down from the 5.xG's.