Print 10 comment(s) - last by JonnyDough.. on Oct 20 at 2:20 PM

In addition to beefing up US government cyber defenses, there is continued talk to try and determine the legality (and feasibility) of cyber attacks on foreign sources

United States Air Force Gen. Robert Kehler, head of the new U.S. cyber command, admitted the legality of government-sanctioned cyber attacks remains an extremely complicated manner that must be appropriately addressed.

If needed, the Department of Defense wants a method in which it can attack credible targets, when needed, while still protecting its 15,000+ computer networks. Government officials previously were weary of trying to militarize its cyber efforts, but wanted the ability to accurately determine if a cyber offensive would be needed. "Is active defense really offense in cyberspace?" Kehler pondered in a statement to the media.

"I would argue that it really is not. It does not have to be, for sure. But those are the issues that we are trying to work our way through."

Cyber security experts agree with Kehler's standpoint, warning that it'd be hard to attack rogue groups often times operating without approval from foreign governments.

However, a solid cyber defense that is able to adjust to changing threats would be ideal to help better protect from hackers and cyber criminals. Continued cyber attacks from foreign sources have created a significant level of urgency among US lawmakers, anxious to protect a still delicate US infrastructure that has been compromised in the past.

The topic of cyber security has become a hot-button political issue, with numerous lawmakers and branches of the US government now paying attention. Also showing a drastic change in cyber discussion, Senate Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va) issued a statement saying the Securities and Exchange Commission's effort for companies to discuss cyber security threats with their shareholders "fundamentally changes" how things are done today.

If the threat of foreign attacks wasn't enough, organized hacker groups continue to plague governments and corporations already cautious of attack. Along with foreign threats from China, Eastern Europe, and organized, government-sanctioned hacker groups throughout the world, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is worried about the Anonymous hacker group attacking industrial control systems helping power the U.S. infrastructure.

Earlier in the year, AntiSec exposed Social Security numbers and passwords of U.S. military personnel, with additional attacks promised in the future.

The US government is finally embracing a digital approach to its defenses -- and possible offensive cyber ability -- but foreign criminals seem to always have the upper hand.

Sources: MSNBC, The Hill

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Reclaimer77 on 10/19/2011 10:22:06 AM , Rating: 2
Don't have a boss. Don't have to file TPS reports. Don't have to consult a 5,000 page SOP before they can do anything. Don't have to sit on committee meetings instead of doing work. Don't have to answer to an "ethics committee" or put up with Human Resources...

Looking at the way the U.S Government operates, it's no surprise that hackers will continue to stay one step ahead. When's the last time the Government could moved swiftly and competently to do ANYTHING?

RE: Hackers...
By The Raven on 10/19/2011 10:59:41 AM , Rating: 2
When's the last time the Government could moved swiftly and competently to do ANYTHING?
When they implemented the TSA? Oh wait... you said competently.

RE: Hackers...
By Reclaimer77 on 10/19/2011 11:01:22 AM , Rating: 2
Argh that's a terrible typo I posted. Ah well, no edit button yet!

And yeah, the TSA lol..ugh

RE: Hackers...
By The Raven on 10/19/2011 11:00:51 AM , Rating: 2
Don't have to answer to an "ethics committee"
Bush and Obama didn't/don't seem to have a problem bypassing this...

RE: Hackers...
By JonnyDough on 10/19/2011 3:12:54 PM , Rating: 2
What's funny is that the U.S. military is constantly toured by other nations and pretty much heads up NATO. As far as aviation goes, the USAF has long been THE leader. We write the books. You'd be amazed at how efficiently it CAN operate when it needs to. :) We all have our specific jobs and are pretty darn good at them. If you had spent any time recently on a military base as a service member you'd be able to speak more accurately on the matter. I imagine you're talking out your buttocks though, as I used to before I joined the service so that I could educate myself. Good day.

RE: Hackers...
By Camikazi on 10/19/2011 4:56:41 PM , Rating: 2
U.S. Military and the U.S. Government are not the same :) the military can be very fast and efficient if allowed, governments on the other hand are not and they usually end up slowing down the military.

RE: Hackers...
By JonnyDough on 10/20/2011 1:37:31 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, it's "process of law" or "due process". You can't just do things, you have to think them through and major changes should not be up to one man. Would you rather that choices were simply made for you? That's why we have representation. Granted, conservative views often seem to limit our freedoms - but you'll have that anywhere.

RE: Hackers...
By JonnyDough on 10/20/2011 2:20:26 PM , Rating: 2
Also, it's the military (Air Force) which will be heading up cyber attacks if we decide to do them. I can't believe we're not already. "Attack" is a bit of a misguidance. "Spying" is more like it. We're not blowing up nuclear reactors. There are too many local manual controls to do something like that anyway I would imagine, and we don't really want to do our enemies harm. We would rather know what they're up to, and try to thwart any plans to do US harm. Despite being a service member in the USAF, and despite any past wars/conflicts/occupations that our leadership has decided that we should engage in - I would like to think that America is NOT a warring nation, but a DEFENSIVE nation. Sadly, our video games, our politics, and to hear people talk about revenge makes me think that we have become a war loving people, and have come to take our relative peace for granted.

By Denithor on 10/19/2011 1:47:09 PM , Rating: 2
I think the government is "wary" not "weary" on this matter.

RE: Typo.
By ekv on 10/19/2011 3:42:47 PM , Rating: 2
I'm wary of them being weary. [E.g. I'm from the government and I'm here to help]

Btw, in a similar vein, it ought to be "extremely complicated matter", not 'manner'.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki