backtop


Print 46 comment(s) - last by rtrski.. on Jun 16 at 8:44 PM


Google's backgrounds proved tremendously unpopular and were pulled within 14 hours.  (Source: Google)
Google pulls the plug on failed experiment after vast outcry

Those following Microsoft Europe's Twitter account may have spotted this piece of snarkiness which aired this morning: "We've lost our background image, if found please return to bing.com ;)"

Peter Bale, Executive Producer of MSN UK, added, "How intriguing to see friends at Google borrowing the Bing homepage #photography idea."

The tweets were referring to Google's ill-fated attempt to introduce background images to its famously spartan page.  Google had announced last week that it was adding the ability to have a custom homepage image as part of its search page revamp, which included a page-look makeover and new Caffeine indexing engine.

On Wednesday night, though, it made the curious decision to force users with compatible browsers signed into a Google account to use the background images.  A blog on the topic was largely missed by the company's users.  To make matters worse, according to Google Designer Marissa Mayer, a "bug" deleted the link to the blog post explaining the colorful images.

By mid-day, the seventh most popular topic on Google was "remove google background".  Embarrassed, Google pulled the plug on the default backgrounds after only 14 hours of action.  It's unclear whether the ability to have custom search-page images will be making a return at some point.

For Microsoft it was a rare opportunity to gloat.  According to market researcher firm Net Applications, Microsoft's Bing search engine holds only 3.24 percent of the market, versus Google's 84.8 percent.  However, Microsoft did enjoy a good month in may, with both Bing and partner Yahoo reversing their slide in market share and actually posting small gains.

Updated: June 11, 2010, 12:52 p.m.-

It appears that the option to set your background image is now restored.  It disappeared for us as of late yesterday and popped up on the bottom left hand side of the screen as of around 11 a.m.  (Note: We were logged in our Google account during this time period.)

The crucial difference is that Google is no longer enabling a background image by default, for those who haven't opted in to the setting.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I'm confused
By Ristogod on 6/11/2010 11:42:53 AM , Rating: 3
I must be missing something. I set the background image on my google and it seems to work fine.




RE: I'm confused
By Phenick on 6/11/2010 11:52:55 AM , Rating: 5
That's because this article is completely wrong. They did not remove the feature from Google they removed the forced nature of it. It was intended not as a permanent feature to force the images but as a demonstration however the explanation of this was somehow lost and no one saw it and so they assumed it was just the new homepage.

You can still opt in to use the feature.


RE: I'm confused
By Mitch101 on 6/11/2010 11:55:39 AM , Rating: 2
In the bottom left corner is the option to change the background image. Its still there just not forced it seems.


RE: I'm confused
By Smilin on 6/11/2010 1:21:53 PM , Rating: 3
But you MUST have a google account and sign in before you can change it.

During the forced google background you were basically stuck (unless you wanted to create an account).

It was pretty asinine

I use Bing anymore these days anyway. They have much better images and somehow still make the interface seem very clean.


RE: I'm confused
By mcnabney on 6/11/2010 1:50:23 PM , Rating: 2
Ha Ha

You admit to using Bing!


RE: I'm confused
By Mitch101 on 6/11/2010 2:30:06 PM , Rating: 2
I use bing also and Im proud. :)

To me google is still the top search engine but bing is more of an application website. The images and travel information are top notch. Im sad though Bing Cash Back will end soon. :(


RE: I'm confused
By Nekrik on 6/11/2010 3:24:47 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed, better maps and better tools, especially the travel tools, very happy with Bing. Web searches are a wash for me as I can pretty much find whatever I want on either. Besides, Bing is the underdog, isn't it the cool thing to root for the little guy who is just trying to make it :)?


RE: I'm confused
By Mojo the Monkey on 6/11/2010 5:10:11 PM , Rating: 2
the Bing Cashback is AMAZING! I feel foolish for having not given it any real evaluation until just last week. Now that I realize its power, its ending. Just my luck.


RE: I'm confused
By BansheeX on 6/11/2010 11:54:10 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I only used it a few times but it was pretty reliable.


RE: I'm confused
By rtrski on 6/14/2010 11:07:44 AM , Rating: 2
Also sorry to see it go. I think I've netted about $350 back so far. Might sneak another lens purchase in on ebay before it expires and bump that up a bit more.

Still got about $20 sitting on account right now. And since they're ending it they'll waive the 'minimum withdrawal' they used to have in place (I think it was $5) so people who never really did much will still get their promised money.


RE: I'm confused
By Smilin on 6/14/2010 11:57:43 AM , Rating: 2
woot, just found this.

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/downloa...

Bing images at full rez.


RE: I'm confused
By rtrski on 6/16/2010 8:44:40 PM , Rating: 2
You may never see this as I'm commenting so late - but thanks, sincerely! I haven't checked the theme page in quite some time and those backgrounds are really nice.


RE: I'm confused
By djcameron on 6/11/2010 3:37:03 PM , Rating: 2
Heck, I haven't used google in ages. I found that the search results are at least as good on Bing, the maps, the image search, and the shopping features are better.


RE: I'm confused
By Smilin on 6/11/10, Rating: 0
RE: I'm confused
By mfed3 on 6/11/2010 12:29:19 PM , Rating: 4
What do you expect when Jason Mick writes an article


RE: I'm confused
By Flunk on 6/11/2010 12:35:59 PM , Rating: 3
A high standard of journalistic integrity and good source checking.


RE: I'm confused
By Flunk on 6/11/2010 12:36:19 PM , Rating: 5
Just kidding.


RE: I'm confused
By Sazabi19 on 6/11/2010 12:43:46 PM , Rating: 2
just gave him cudos last week for an article well done, it was short lived:(


RE: I'm confused
By ebakke on 6/11/2010 12:53:31 PM , Rating: 4
Gosh he sure gets a lot of flak from the DT readers (myself included at some times). Generally speaking, I'd say he does a better job than a lot of people give him credit for. And this is coming from someone to contacted DT a few years back to complain about Jason's article quality. Don't get me wrong, there are certainly times for legitimate gripes, but it also seems like there are plenty of people here who decide before reading it that a Mick article is garbage, and out come the insults.

That being said, it wasn't clear in the article that Google simply removed the forced nature of the images.


RE: I'm confused
By Ammohunt on 6/11/2010 3:30:08 PM , Rating: 3
His "news" only lacks Objectivity...


wow
By zmatt on 6/11/2010 11:43:16 AM , Rating: 5
To be completely honest it was a stupid idea. Google works because the page isn't loaded down and busy. Yahoo, MSN and even Bing are far more busy and crowded. i think that has a lot to do with their lack of popularity. Google has a search bar, and links to images maps etc. That's all it needs and will ever need. Don't try to copy your failed competitors.




RE: wow
By Spivonious on 6/11/2010 12:00:41 PM , Rating: 5
Bing's image works because it's different every day and contains linked to related searches. Google's was just a useless static background image.


RE: wow
By Smilin on 6/11/2010 1:25:01 PM , Rating: 3
Bing also works because they keep the interface clean looking even with the images. The layout in bing follows "rule of thirds" from photography and naturally draws your eye to the search textbox.

Google was popping it smack center with a massive fullpage image that gave the *appearance* of making the page load very slow.

Bing photos also rock.


RE: wow
By TomZ on 6/11/2010 5:24:50 PM , Rating: 2
Bing also works because I don't have to log into the site in order to see the image. "It just works."


RE: wow
By alanore on 6/11/2010 12:43:27 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah it wasn't the best idea. I don't think google is a good looking website, I don't think it was even good looking back when I started using it. Google has a minimal design and its all about the information.

I think Bing is a lot better looking, but the reason I keep using Google is it ease of use and its better search results.


RE: wow
By micksh on 6/11/2010 12:58:01 PM , Rating: 3
I'm fed up with Google experiments and I have switched to Bing when this background thing happened. 3 years ago Google also made an experiment - black background on main page in order to "save energy". That was very annoying and stupid too - it didn't save energy on my LCD monitors.

3 years ago they didn't have much competition but now Bing works equally well. I disabled Bing background image and it looks minimalistic as well.
I don't miss anything except probably store ratings in shopping searches. Need to figure that out.


By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 6/11/2010 12:44:06 PM , Rating: 5
Figure Balmer to forget that. Bing swiped it from Ask. Like MS and Apple swiped mice and cursors from Sparc. Ask is nicely configurable.




By The Raven on 6/11/2010 1:57:06 PM , Rating: 2
To my knowledge, Ask also was the first to let you customize the BG. So both Google and MS stole from Jeeves! Ah-Ha!


Never happens
By VoodooChicken on 6/11/2010 1:32:15 PM , Rating: 2
I never see Google's default page since I started using iGoogle. I missed Pac-Man Day!




RE: Never happens
By terrigan on 6/11/2010 2:03:52 PM , Rating: 2
www.google.com/pacman

Live it up!


RE: Never happens
By Lazarus Dark on 6/11/2010 11:10:31 PM , Rating: 2
I actually use the google.com/firefox page, so I never saw this either. the firefox home doesn't have the background option that I can see.


That photo of Ballmer
By superstition on 6/11/2010 2:29:03 PM , Rating: 3
As a gay man I am thinking of going toward women after seeing that. Goodbye lunch.




RE: That photo of Ballmer
By AstroCreep on 6/12/2010 12:18:38 AM , Rating: 3
There are a million horrible pictures of the man out there (seriously, not much to work with) but this is the ABSOLUTE WORST. It makes small children cry, and makes me cringe every time I see it.

I've asked once, and I'll ask again "Please quit using that picture, DT!" It's F*cking horrible! I want to vomit every time I see his fat, sweaty dome and that disgusting, glistening tongue!

...there is no God.


Copycating each other
By THX on 6/11/2010 12:47:13 PM , Rating: 2
This is silly. Bing copied Google's top navigation bar. They all copy and build off of each other




RE: Copycating each other
By The Raven on 6/11/2010 1:58:45 PM , Rating: 2
Yes it is plain to see that you can't patent an idea. The courts in Germany can learn from this.


Picture of Steve Balmer
By wardww on 6/12/2010 11:14:43 AM , Rating: 2
Hey Dailytech, please don't post this type of picture of Steve Balmer on your site. I can barely bring myself to look at a a normal pic of him without wanting to vomit, but this pic with the tongue out has caused me to put last nights pizza all over the floor. I just wish the incompetent fool would do the right thing now that Apple have surpassed MS. Fall on your sword Steve please, and make it bloody and gory.




RE: Picture of Steve Balmer
By spinning rust on 6/15/2010 11:55:35 AM , Rating: 2
is it just me, or does he look like the boomer from L4D2?


Tongue Fetishists?
By qdemn7 on 6/11/2010 4:42:21 PM , Rating: 3
Why does Daily Tech have to constantly use that gross picture of Balmer sticking his tongue out? Is that the only picture you have of him? Or are you a bunch of tongue fetishists?




ugh
By webmastir on 6/11/2010 12:12:24 PM , Rating: 2
i'm glad i wasn't the only one annoyed with this. i couldn't set it back until late yesterday. the fade in of it was awful. so unnecessary!




Muh
By damianrobertjones on 6/11/2010 1:32:19 PM , Rating: 2
"snarkiness"

?

From the commments you referenced, I so nothing of the sort. Is this another article to create something thats not there?




google.com/ig
By JonnyBlaze on 6/11/2010 3:41:09 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know how long its been since I have seen the normal google page.




Ex
By Uncle on 6/11/2010 5:15:59 PM , Rating: 2
Every time this picture of Ballmer shows up I have to keep my ex from seeing it. She says whats protruding from his face gives her goose bumps and brings back memories of the good old days.




mystery solved
By chromal on 6/11/2010 5:25:27 PM , Rating: 2
Ah, this explains why loading the Google search pageviews were TRAUMATICALLY SLOW yesterday when I was telecommuting to my office workstation via RDP. THANKS GOOGLE. MAYBE ASK FIRST NEXT TIME, MKAY?




By ShaolinSoccer on 6/12/2010 12:48:45 AM , Rating: 2
A web browser that has a little box in the top right corner that you can set to be google or bing or whatever you want and not ever see a silly 'search engine home page'! .......




Gee I wonder why...
By jimbojimbo on 6/14/2010 3:34:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
However, Microsoft did enjoy a good month in may, with both Bing and partner Yahoo reversing their slide in market share and actually posting small gains

There seem to be more and more apps these days that by default set the default search engine to Bing or something other than Google. A large majority of the population then has no idea how to change it back.




LOL!
By mindless1 on 6/11/2010 4:17:07 PM , Rating: 1
LOL @ Steve "I has a bucket" Balmer pic.




"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki