Print 21 comment(s) - last by Klinky1984.. on Dec 13 at 8:18 PM

Limited and pricey for first few weeks

Many technology enthusiasts have been eagerly awaiting products supporting the USB 3.0 interface, which has a raw throughput of 5 Gbps. This is ten times that of the older USB 2.0 interface (USB 3.0 is backwards compatible with the older USB 2.0 interface). The ubiquity of USB led to the replacement of floppy drives and Zip disks by USB flash drives.

Super Talent announced the first USB 3.0 flash drives in November. The RAIDDrive USB 3.0 series uses patented “multiple pairs of differential serial data lines technology” for optimal NAND flash performance. It will transfer data at 200 MB/s using a USB 3.0 port,  but it can reach up to 320MB/s using a UAS Protocol driver. However, it will top out around 35 MB/s in older USB 2.0 ports due to interface limitations and even slower in USB 1.1 ports. It uses USB 3.0 chips supplied by NEC.

DailyTech has learned that Super Talent will start shipping the first batch of drives out this week, with availability next week. The company is still ramping up production, so only a few thousand will be available initially. Interest is reportedly strong, with many units pre-sold already.

The first motherboards supporting USB 3.0 and 6Gbps SATA hit the market last month, so there is already a steadily growing market. Most of the early adopters of the new USB 3.0 flash drives are expected to be professionals who rely on their data and carry around large amounts of it.

Only 64GB versions will be available at first, priced around the $400 mark. Although this seems pricey, the first 1GB USB 2.0 drives hit the market five years ago around the $300 mark and were readily gobbled up by enthusiasts. Pricing is not expected to drop for the next couple of months, as NAND flash prices remain high after doubling in the last six months.

Update: We have received unofficial retail pricing information from Super Talent.

Part Number


Unofficial Pricing


32GB SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Drive



64GB SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Drive



128GB SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Drive



Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By jrollins006 on 12/8/2009 10:36:37 AM , Rating: 3
Price is a bit much, but since im building a new computer soon, I think ill be investing in the motherboard with USB 3 support and one of these babies :).

Thank God for technology advancements.

RE: meh
By Jansen on 12/8/2009 10:41:42 AM , Rating: 2
I was one of those guys who spent $300 on a 1GB USB 2.0 flash drive in 2004. I needed it for a course, and it saved me a lot of time and effort, so no regrets.

Right now I'm using an OCZ ATV Turbo USB 2.0 flash drive (one of the fastest available), but I'm hoping for an upgrade soon.

RE: meh
By semo on 12/8/2009 11:46:23 AM , Rating: 2
It’s amazing how little improvements in performance have been made on USB flash drives. OCZ’s turbo drives have been out for more than a year and almost nothing comes close to their spec (there were a few other make and models). Everything these days caters for the mainstream. Big capacity, small (and fragile), 0.x MB/s writes for small files and in pink.... Even OCZ doesn’t care about performance that much in that sector. The diesel sticks are not as slow as the norm but still nothing impressive.

I hope the same doesn't happen to SSDs once the big OEMs start offering them as options

RE: meh
By Souka on 12/8/2009 11:49:53 AM , Rating: 3
Ok, so to utilize the full benifit of this pricey USB device you need: a new MB that supports USB 3.0, this pricey USB device, oh...and a fast hard-drive, preferably an Intel X25-E drive...

Kewl yes...I"m glad to see new technology being pushed out and manufacturers building it.... but for me, I'll wait until I NEED this speed. :)

RE: meh
By geddarkstorm on 12/8/2009 12:17:37 PM , Rating: 5
If it didn't get invented, built, pushed out, and bought by the early adopters, you'd never have the option to buy it when you /needed/.

RE: meh
By Souka on 12/8/2009 12:20:38 PM , Rating: 2

At least it seems with all this SSD and now this USB flash drive, the devices are actually utilizing the bandwidth available to them.

Unlike the old ATA drives of the past...ATA66, ATA100, ATA133, etc... yet at the time the fastest drives barely hit 1/2 that capacity on throughput, with the ocassional burst hitting the limit. Same is pretty much true for SATA, but SATA has many other benifits also! :)

RE: meh
By Silver2k7 on 12/8/2009 3:41:15 PM , Rating: 2
lol what are you going on about, all you need is a controller card for USB3.

of course you could get a new motherboard, but the first gen with USB3 only have 3 ports anyway.. perhaps best to get 2nd gen sometimes 2010.

RE: meh
By Veerappan on 12/8/2009 5:08:25 PM , Rating: 2
I'm know you were half-joking about the expense of the requirements, but I did just want to point out that you could get a PCI Express USB 3.0 add-in card instead of being forced to upgrade your motherboard.

I just saw yesterday an article about a card which uses a PCI-e x4 slot and provides 2x USB 3.0 ports and 2x SATA III 6Gbps internal ports (using the NEC USB 3.0 chip, and Marvell SATA III controller routed through a PCI-e bridge chip). Think it was on

RE: meh
By OCedHrt on 12/8/2009 1:06:05 PM , Rating: 2
Buffalo's had some for a while. I'd say more than a year since I've had mine. Although a quick check now indicates it's not sold in the US anymore.
Fastest at 38mb/s, of course have to see what the reviews actually say.

What I have is 30mb/s

RE: meh
By Klinky1984 on 12/13/2009 8:18:07 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, we've come along way what with USB drives taking over from floppies. No one wants to carry around a CDRW disc, plus those things are fragile. USB sticks have the main purpose of durability & portability, speed is going to play second fiddle. You can get sustained MB transfer rates into the teens on even cheap USB sticks. It doesn't matter if you're transferring at 100KB/sec when you're saving a tiny document. Most people are dealing with large files these days, or multiple images. If you're trying to use a USB stick as your OS boot drive, then you're the dummy.

SSDs already went through some of their growing pains, they were basically the same technology as USB sticks but with SATA/IDE adapters. Now controller tech has matured & so has the NAND memory itself. I don't see the SSD market sliding backwards, nor is the USB stick market sliding backwards either.

I remember...
By Leper Messiah on 12/8/2009 10:37:24 AM , Rating: 3
back in 2003 I bought a 256MB flash drive for 65 bucks or something and it was so awesome. Didn't have to rely on floppy disks for stuff at school, its something that people now take for granted, but man back in the day floppy disks were a pain in the ass.

RE: I remember...
By KingstonU on 12/8/2009 11:35:47 AM , Rating: 2
I remember 1GB was perfect cause it could fit the largest single file I might have dealings with (a 700MB AVI movie) :P Spent $120 on a 1GB Jump Drive USB 2.0, well worth it. Still have it and it's faster then my newest 4GB Cruzer. Hardly use any of them now that I'm out of school though.

RE: I remember...
By Souka on 12/8/2009 11:46:56 AM , Rating: 2
I have a 1GB Memina Pocket Rocket I use all the time... this drive handles small files well and is fast.

Probably paid, errr expensed, $200 back in 2004?

RE: I remember...
By 325hhee on 12/9/2009 3:50:15 PM , Rating: 2
I remember when I paid $100 for a 3.5 floppy drive, the disks were much smaller, and much sturdier than the 5.25 floppies. Man those were a night mare to transport, they were very fragile, and very easy to scratch.

Tech has come a long way since the punch cards, and the reel to reel tapes.

35 Mb/s USB 2.0
By jmke on 12/8/2009 10:37:23 AM , Rating: 2
Does it get 35 Mb/s on USB 2.0 with Write speeds? That would make it the fastest USB 2.0 flash drive on earth ;)

RE: 35 Mb/s USB 2.0
By semo on 12/8/2009 11:36:26 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah this marketing material doesn't mention anything about write speeds (i'm guessing the "transfer" rates listed are for reads).

The writer (or "journalist") of this article should have dug deeper and asked more questions or at least noted his efforts (if any) towards obtaining this spec.

RE: 35 Mb/s USB 2.0
By geddarkstorm on 12/8/2009 12:19:12 PM , Rating: 2
Be patient. We'll have benches by a dozen sites the moment this is available.

By munky on 12/8/2009 3:49:45 PM , Rating: 2
Let's hope these last longer than the last SuperTalent flash drive I bought.

Newegg has USB 3.0 motherboard
By maroon1 on 12/10/2009 2:51:29 AM , Rating: 2
There are already motherboards with USB 3.0 at Newegg

LGA 1156 motheboards with USB 3.0

LGA 1366 motherboard with USB 3.0

By Drag0nFire on 12/9/2009 9:53:50 AM , Rating: 3
I don't think I want "beautifully gift" from you, no matter how avant-garde.

Seriously, can this user/IP be banned? Please?

"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki