backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 154 comment(s) - last by Frances.. on Apr 26 at 4:57 PM


The WMO attributes La Nina currents for cooling world temperatures  (Source: NASA)
Cooling Trend expected to continue throughout most of year

Earlier this year, DailyTech ignited a firestorm of debate with a pair of articles that demonstrated global temperatures had dipped sharply, along with predictions from scientists that the trend would continue.  The stories were picked up by hundreds of other news agencies and blogs; some even accused us of chicanery and fraud.

Now, the United Nations World Meteorological Association has somewhat ruefully weighed in to agree with what climate researchers have been saying all year: global temperatures have indeed dropped, and are expected to continue to do so throughout most of 2008. The cool spell means global temperatures have been on the decline for a full ten years, since early 1998.

WMO Secretary-General Michel Jarraud chalks up the cooling to La Nina effects, and says it doesn't mean global warming isn't a serious problem. "When you look at climate change you should not look at any particular year," he said. "You should look at trends over a pretty long period and the trend of temperature globally is still very much indicative of warming." Adam Scaife, lead scientist at the UK's Hadley Center for Climate Modeling, says he's confident that "within a few years" a new record temperature will be set.

However, some are calling the UN's stance nothing but spin control. Paleoclimatologist Bob Carter of James Cook University says the IPCC is in "full panic mode" and positioning themselves to "explain away" declining temperatures. Lord Monckton of Brenchley, science advisor to the Thatcher administration and a regular commentator on climate issues, tells DailyTech none of the IPCC's computer models can explain a decade of cooling.

Monckton, who considers the reporting on global warming to be the latest in a lengthy list of "needless and scientifically unjustified" environmental scares, says warming "may resume in future years [but] is self-evidently less than official forecasts, and very likely to be harmless."

Regardless of the cause, many are hoping the cooling ends soon. The past year saw dozens of nations struggle through record low temperatures and massive amounts of snowfall. If the trend doesn't reverse quickly, next year will be even more bitterly cold.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

slick
By TheDoc9 on 4/5/2008 8:15:24 PM , Rating: 4
Now the UN is trying to ease us over into Climate Change instead of Global Warming since they can't explain a damn thing. I guess it'll be icy in hell before they admit they were wrong.




RE: slick
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 4/5/2008 8:37:31 PM , Rating: 3
That's pretty normal for the UN. They will never admit they were wrong.


RE: slick
By B3an on 4/6/2008 2:39:27 AM , Rating: 2
So exactly the same as the US government then.


RE: slick
By lompocus on 4/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: slick
By Ringold on 4/6/2008 4:09:07 AM , Rating: 1
Well, to be fair, NATO allies have peacekeepers in a lot of places, and some times they manage to not make things worse and actually accomplish something, however small.

And the African Union has troops in various places, same story.

Of course, neither can hope to ever accomplish as much as we could if we were doing the same task, but better then nothing.


RE: slick
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 4/6/2008 10:17:45 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Well, to be fair, NATO allies have peacekeepers in a lot of places, and some times they manage to not make things worse and actually accomplish something, however small.

As long as their objectives are clear from the start yes. NATO has problems when politicians start calling the shots and adjusting the mandates, just like the U.S. (See Iraq/Afghanistan)

quote:
And the African Union has troops in various places, same story.

The only reason they have troops anywhere is because the UN and old Koffi put them there. Frankly they don't measure up next to real troops of most other countries.

quote:
Of course, neither can hope to ever accomplish as much as we could if we were doing the same task, but better then nothing.

Politics in one country trying to accomplish something militarily is difficult. Involving several (NATO) makes it far worse if they don't have a fire lit under them. Due to U.S. power projection we haven't had to fight a war in our back yard in a very long time. This helps us correctly by keeping our civilians and infrastructure out of dodge but causes a detachment from the battles the military fights. This leads to all these peace type movements that have no place in the modern world. Peace is something the world is not ready for, and will not be ready for anytime soon.


RE: slick
By lompocus on 4/6/2008 12:42:29 PM , Rating: 2
It's good to promote peace, and to promote living so as to promote peace everywhere, but what is NOT acceptable for any power is anti-war movements in the middle of an ongoing war. Pulling out of war is essentially like, I dunno, investing 3 months into a Crysis SP map and then deleting the file before the turn in date.

You're right on every other point, unfourtunately. That's what happens when the military isn't allowed to totally obliterate it's objective. The job still gets done, I guess...it just takes way too much more time than it should need.

Remove politicians from any military venture for the US and tada world peace in 10 years!


RE: slick
By Manch on 4/6/2008 11:59:50 PM , Rating: 1
Yeah it's pretty sad about how politics and their lawyers have undermined the current operations and some of the more previous ones.

Pretty much anytime you have any kind of OP going their is a lawyer appointed whose sole purpose is to determine whether or not it violates LOAC or ROE.

Unfortunately more often than not they do not understand enough of WTF is going on. Also because of the current political climate their are a lot of knee jerk reactions over nothing and the delays and bullshit get in the way of getting the damn job done.


RE: slick
By Ringold on 4/7/2008 7:17:29 PM , Rating: 1
I'm no valiant defender of multi-lateral left-wing feel-good group-hug peacekeeper missions that accomplish little (like the UN peace keepers in south Lebanon that will only get in the way the next time shooting starts), but I was really trying to get to the idea that other people asides from ourselves have at tried to do good in their own neighborhoods, and some times they've even been half successful. I agree with you on all points.


RE: slick
By lompocus on 4/6/2008 8:35:09 PM , Rating: 1
lol, so funny, this post started with a rating of 2 and went down to 0. Isn't funny how anything saying the opposite of a previous post, and when providing a small amount of information regarding teh subject matter (The US does not suck), it gets rated down, but when its any non-us country it's rating goes sky-high! How funny.


RE: slick
By sweetsauce on 4/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: slick
By Jim28 on 4/7/2008 11:04:05 AM , Rating: 1
That is quite funny let me know when you find weapons of "math death". I doubt you find them but I always hated math anyway!.
If you are European, it is quite astonishing out how short your memories are. I guess Europeans did no wrong eh? If you think so how about read some history for once, instead of opening your mouth to spew hot air.
If you are an American, god help you.


RE: slick
By Spuke on 4/7/08, Rating: 0
RE: slick
By Spuke on 4/7/08, Rating: 0
RE: slick
By phattyboombatty on 4/7/2008 1:19:44 PM , Rating: 1
I think you get automatically rated down for the use of certain language.


RE: slick
By Maluno on 4/7/08, Rating: -1
RE: slick
By Maluno on 4/7/2008 8:52:31 PM , Rating: 2
Huh... Doesn't appear to be the case. o_o.


RE: slick
By lompocus on 4/8/08, Rating: -1