backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 33 comment(s) - last by Clauzii.. on Jun 28 at 10:26 PM


When excitons exit an electrical circuit and recombine, they create a flash of light which could be harnessed for optical communications.  (Source: Leonid Butov, University of California at San Diego)
Quasiparticle based circuits could break down the electro-optical communication barrier.

One of the bottlenecks in current electro-optical communication systems is the need to convert electrons into photons. While optical interconnects maybe be amazingly fast and efficient, the conversion process still chews up precious time.

This May, Harvard researchers showed a new technology that could be used to build LEDs directly into an integrated circuit. Last week, University of California at San Diego scientists published work in the journal Science using a more direct approach at converting electricity to light on the fly.

Excitons are an interesting type of particle. They are created when photons enter a semiconductor, exciting the electrons it contains. An excited electron forms an electron-hole pair, which in this case, is called an exciton. What makes excitons useful for optical ICs is that when the electron-hole pair recombines, they emit a flash of light.

The key to creating an electro-optical IC in this case is the ability to control the exciton, preventing it from recombining too early. To accomplish this, the UCSD scientists used a special semiconductor made of gallium arsenide, very low temperatures (less than 40 degrees Kelvin), and a special type of exciton that separates the electron and hole pair by several nanometers, confining them to their own quantum wells.

Using voltage to control the excitons, they can be held in place or allowed to flow. Once they flow to the end of the circuit, the electrons and holes recombine, creating photons that can be captured by optical circuitry for use in interconnects or other communication devices.

The group, led by Leonid Butov, a professor of physics at UCSD, has already created several types of exciton-based transistor switches. The switches are quite fast and are able to be manipulated at about 200 picoseconds so far. The exciton circuits are no faster than standard electrical circuits, but removing the clumsy electro-optical conversion allows a much greater data transmission rate between optically connected devices, thus speeding up the process on the whole.

The circuits, operating at 40 degree Kelvin, are far from ready to be used in mainstream applications. Further work will be necessary with other types of semiconductor materials to bring the operational conditions of the exciton circuits to a usable level.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Nice :)
By Clauzii on 6/23/2008 3:53:28 PM , Rating: 4
They made a Light Show for ants :)




RE: Nice :)
By thornburg on 6/24/08, Rating: 0
RE: Nice :)
By Clauzii on 6/24/2008 9:52:53 AM , Rating: 1
It's like smiling: We use few muscles to smile, a lot more to be angry/sad/negative etc.

I used one line to make someone smile, while You had to use five or six to say how 'stupid' it was.

Get my point?


RE: Nice :)
By thornburg on 6/25/2008 8:41:44 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I used one line to make someone smile, while You had to use five or six to say how 'stupid' it was.


Actually, I used two lines to say it was weird, not stupid, and I got downrated anyway.

I just didn't think it was funny. I could have downrated, but I chose to post a comment instead.


RE: Nice :)
By Clauzii on 6/28/2008 10:26:55 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, I'm cool with that :)


RE: Nice :)
By Adonlude on 6/24/2008 1:51:02 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
They made a Light Show for ants :)

The light show will have to be at least... 3 times bigger than this!!!


Actually...
By murphyslabrat on 6/23/2008 2:55:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The circuits, operating at 40 degree Kelvin, are far from ready to be used in mainstream applications.

I've always wanted a reason to use a refrigeration cooler.




RE: Actually...
By amanojaku on 6/23/2008 3:03:12 PM , Rating: 3
Overclocking not good enough? ;-)


Dolts!
By HVAC on 6/23/2008 4:22:12 PM , Rating: 5
200 picoseconds gets you about 6GHz switching speed, I think.

Anyway, as stated before, this is NOT intended as an efficiency exercise. Nobody cares how much power is needed to get the device down to 40 Kelvin. The idea is that we would not need very many of these devices to get blazingly fast internet backbone optical connections. Think national and world level connection speeds, not speed within an optical desktop processor chip.




Excitons?
By geddarkstorm on 6/24/2008 1:35:08 PM , Rating: 2
It's awesome someone finally started using such a simple idea.

It's all well and good for trying to dumb things down, but "excitons" are not a particle, or a quasi-particle--nor is an "electron hole" an actual thing (just as darkness is not actual things, but the absence of light). All this "exciton" thing is, is an excited electron pushed to a higher atomic orbital by the absorption of a photon. When the electron falls back down into its standard, original energy shell, a photon is emitted (but at a lower wavelength than what was absorbed due to energy loss to other quantum processes like heat, transmittance, and quenching) in a process called fluorescence. This is the most basic of physics, so why all this crazy extra terminology that makes it sound like we're dealing with something otherworldly? Excite an electron with a photon, it falls back down and emits a photon--simple! Heck, this process is used to generate X-rays in most X-ray machines, except the excitation comes from high voltage.

Anyways, I bet the reason this is at 40 kelvin, is to address how to keep an excited electron in its excited state, and then actually flow it through the semi-conductor along with the rest of the normal electrons till where you want it to fluoresce. A process that must be done if this is to be used in a circuit. No easy task, but lower temperatures can help "freeze" the excited electron in place it seems. Also, the semi-conductor may have different fluorescent properties at different temperatures, or be unable to do it coherently at all at something above 40K.




40 degree Kelvin?
By kattanna on 6/23/08, Rating: -1
RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By Chudilo on 6/23/2008 3:20:48 PM , Rating: 1
In full vacuum


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By Carter642 on 6/23/2008 3:30:33 PM , Rating: 5
Huh? Where did they say anything about saving energy?

You do realize that the materials used in this experiment are used because they're proven and easy to work with in the lab and arn't destined for production. There are these things called proof of concept demonstrations that are kind of popular.

This isn't going to go replacing your Gb ethernet, it's going to find a home on the backbone routers. Even if they need to have the conversion occur at 100K it would still be feasable to cool the very small volume required by these transistor scale parts. Given the advantages in data rate it would certainly be worth the cooling costs.

Seriously, who said anything at all about this being "green" technology!? Science has been after a direct electro-optical conversion for the last 40 years, this is huge like the memristor, quit being an uninformed reactionary.


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By Clauzii on 6/23/2008 3:51:14 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, Huge!

Probably when they get it up to normal temeratures and then into normal chips, the optical CPU's etc. will be very close to reality.


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By BladeVenom on 6/23/2008 4:11:29 PM , Rating: 2
They've yet to get superconductors working at any where near room temperaturem and that's relatively old technology.


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By zsdersw on 6/23/2008 6:00:30 PM , Rating: 4
Since when do past and present failures speak authoritatively about future potential successes?


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By Clauzii on 6/24/2008 1:21:03 AM , Rating: 3
They need to get superconductivity at higher temperatures, yes, but not nescesarily at room temperature. There are relatively cheap means of achieving -40 deg. like peltier. Also here, newer technoligies are possible. One step at a time.

Guess it leaves time to think :)


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By achintya on 6/24/2008 3:47:43 AM , Rating: 3
Erm, its 40K not -40 degree (either F or C). -40K does not exist as far as we know(according to the laws of thermodynamics). And achieving 40K (-387.67 degree F or -233.15 degrees C) is not an easy task.


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By Clauzii on 6/24/2008 9:59:23 AM , Rating: 2
Oh, -40 deg. Celsius/Fahrenheit, not Kelvin. I know that Kelvin stops at 0. I'll remebmber it next time :)


RE: 40 degree Kelvin?
By Clauzii on 6/24/2008 10:04:21 AM , Rating: 2
Which is 233 Kelvin, btw. I use the term Celsius/Fahrenheit because that's what a Peltier element is rated at.