backtop


Print 13 comment(s) - last by freedom4556.. on Jul 10 at 2:31 PM

The automaker also said that it would spend a consolidated 890 billion yen on environmental technology development in the fiscal year ending March 2014

It's a good day for Toyota and electric vehicles (EVs) in general as the Prius has managed to hit 3 million sales total. 

Toyota announced that its full hybrid electric Prius passed the 3 million worldwide cumulative sales mark at the end of June. The automaker also said that it would spend a consolidated 890 billion yen on environmental technology development in the fiscal year ending March 2014. 

It also plans to make consolidated capital expenditure investments of 910 billion yen, with about 440 billion yen invested in Japan. That's a 7 percent and 9 percent increase respectively year-on-year.

The Prius first went on sale in Japan in 1997 and the U.S. in 2000. The current Toyota Prius received an EPA-rated 51 MPG city/49 MPG highway, which is a 22 percent boost from the last generation.


Last November, reports started circulating that Toyota was readying the fourth generation Prius -- and that it would achieve 60 MPH

Toyota is also working to make sure that it stays on top of the green car game. Back in May of this year, it announced that it would build a new production line for about 20 billion yen ($194 million USD) in an effort to increase lithium-ion battery production to 200,000 per year. 

At that time, Reuters reported that Toyota's Prius line accounted for 70 percent of the 5 million gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles the company has sold since they launched in 1997. 

In January of this year, Toyota's Prius was named the best-selling vehicle in California with 60,688 units sold. 

Source: Toyota



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

error!
By CaedenV on 7/5/2013 5:44:51 PM , Rating: 3
The Electric, not Hybrid prius hit the 3Mill mark

The next gen prius is expected to hit 60MPG. If it was only expected to hit 60MPH we would be having issues




RE: error!
By FaaR on 7/5/2013 7:19:27 PM , Rating: 2
DT writers have never proofread their posts in the past before submitting them, don't expect them to start now. ;)


RE: error!
By Krotchrot on 7/5/2013 11:05:09 PM , Rating: 3
There isn't an "electric" Prius. There is a plug in hybrid. The 3 million mark is for the hybrid Prius since they are all hybrids.


RE: error!
By Basilisk on 7/6/2013 11:52:43 AM , Rating: 2
Per the article linked:
quote:
as of the end of June, worldwide cumulative sales of the iconic Prius gasoline-electric hybrid vehicle passed the 3-million mark
... so what is your correction trying to imply?

DT's craftsmanship is falling further and further, lacking sanity proof-reading far too often. Seems as if spell-checking is the only requisite for posting, leaving me reading fewer and fewer articles. So it goes....


RE: error!
By Basilisk on 7/6/2013 11:54:35 AM , Rating: 2
(My comment was on the first reply, not the two subsequent ones entered as I was typing!)


Creating a new shape.
By drycrust3 on 7/6/2013 2:17:36 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Toyota announced that its full hybrid electric Prius passed the 3 million worldwide cumulative sales mark at the end of June.

The Prius is quite popular with taxi drivers here in New Zealand, even though it is an expensive car. I guess things like lower running costs are a major factor in its worldwide popularity.
It wouldn't surprise me if Toyota release a "Prius" with a larger interior, because the Prius does look, at least from the outside anyway, like it is a little cramped inside.
My thinking is the "Prius shape" is a much better shape than that of most compact type cars, and even the traditional saloon car because it is much more aligned with shape of gliding birds like petrels, gulls, and albatrosses. For example, when you look at a car speeding down the motorway on a wet day you can see a cloud of spray that sort of hangs in the air and is travelling at the same speed as the car, so that car is dragging along maybe several kilos of air behind it all the time, which isn't part of the payload and is wasting fuel. I think a car which has a roof that slopes towards a tail would have less air being dragged behind it, thus it would be more fuel efficient.
Whether this is real or just perceived, the "Prius shape", especially the "sloping towards a tail" roof, is becoming more popular and is now appearing in other brands and car types.




RE: Creating a new shape.
By chromal on 7/6/2013 4:49:05 PM , Rating: 2
The prius 'shape' is optimized for low aerodynamic coefficient of drag. This is a major component of fuel economy. When you consider that all cars are being held to higher fuel economy standards (CAFE, etc), it's only natural that they all allow low-drag emphasis to influence their designs. There aren't all that many solutions to a low-drag body design, and so it is only natural there's a confluence of roof shape/lines across new 4-door car body designs.


RE: Creating a new shape.
By Solandri on 7/6/2013 4:58:27 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
For example, when you look at a car speeding down the motorway on a wet day you can see a cloud of spray that sort of hangs in the air and is travelling at the same speed as the car, so that car is dragging along maybe several kilos of air behind it all the time, which isn't part of the payload and is wasting fuel. I think a car which has a roof that slopes towards a tail would have less air being dragged behind it, thus it would be more fuel efficient

That's true at high speeds. At low speeds, the extra drag from air along the skin of the tail exceeds the drag from dragging the air behind it if you don't have a tail, and additional losses due to the weight of the tail. (Note that "speed" in these flow regimes is proportional to body length. So even though an albatross doesn't move as fast as a Prius in mph, it's "faster" in that it moves more body lengths per second.)

If the car is designed right, the air you're dragging behind you acts almost like a real tail would. That's why pickup trucks get better mileage with the tailgate up than with it down. With it up, a vortex forms in the bed which causes air to flow smoothly over the cab to the tailgate. With the tailgate down, no vortex forms, and the air does a steep drag-inducing dive the moment it clears the cab. The back of the cab is much bigger than the back of the tailgate, so there's more drag with the tailgate down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDfgCkBEluA

quote:
Whether this is real or just perceived, the "Prius shape", especially the "sloping towards a tail" roof, is becoming more popular and is now appearing in other brands and car types.

As you can guess, the shape is much older than the Prius. For optimal airflow, you don't want the air running over any sharp corners. In traditional boxy cars, where the hood meets the windshield is an internal corner, and where the windshield meets the roof is an external corner. Both are detrimental to smooth airflow. Internal corners cause air to slow down, external corners cause air to speed up.

Aerodynamicists have long known that a smooth continuous surface from nose to roof minimizes drag. It's just that until recently, energy prices were low enough that it didn't really matter. Glass costs (the windshield ends up huge if you slope it like on the Prius) and structural integrity also made the traditional boxy front windshield easier and cheaper to design.


RE: Creating a new shape.
By Dorkyman on 7/9/2013 11:50:50 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Aerodynamicists have long known that a smooth continuous surface from nose to roof minimizes drag.


Yeah, but there's more to it than that.

A golf ball has dimples because it was discovered long ago that inducing turbulent flow in the boundary layer served to greatly reduce the "dead air" zone behind the ball as if flew through the air. Those guys at Mythbusters took a small car a few years back and discovered that if it was similarly dimpled, the drag at highway speeds was greatly diminished, just like the golf ball.


RE: Creating a new shape.
By Flunk on 7/8/2013 2:13:33 PM , Rating: 2
They actually do make a bigger Prius, at least for the US market. It's called a Prius V, there is also a smaller Prius C.


so?
By talikarni on 7/8/2013 4:18:03 PM , Rating: 2
So what? There are several gas or diesel only non-hybrids that have gotten 50-60+ mpg highway over the past 2 decades without the need for hybrid technology. And the stated city/highway ratings for the prius are way overstated, which is why for 2014 they will have dropped to the more realistic numbers (~40 mpg hwy).
When you really look at it, there is no reason to spend 20-30% more for a vehicle that get same or worse mileage than others AND the manufacturing process puts out massively more pollution for the extra electronics and batteries completely negating the "green" eco-friendly push for these vehicles.
Adding the pollution created by the manufacturing of the batteries and electronics, plus lifetime pollution created by driving the vehicle, it is safer, and less overall pollution driving a 15mpg full size SUV.




RE: so?
By RU482 on 7/8/2013 4:54:59 PM , Rating: 2
you are comparing apples to bananas. those past cars are much lighter due to less safety and creature comfort features, less safe by design, and more polluting than cars of today


RE: so?
By freedom4556 on 7/10/2013 2:31:30 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
and [are] more polluting than cars of today
The real truth of the matter. The environmentalists don't really care how much we spend on gas or any nonsense about energy security. It's really all about the emissions, and more specifically, the carbon dioxide. Other emissions from traditional gasoline cars have been reduced to the point of near non-existence. Carbon dioxide is non-toxic. It is safely used without a warning label as a propellant in a large variety of products. We breath it out when we exhale. You notice that there is no credibility given to the nut cases that say nobody should breed or that we should institute planetary compulsive birth control. So why is it bad that cars do what humans have been doing for eons, except on a much larger scale?

Climate change is what they'll say. I'm not denying that it is happening, and I won't go into any discussion of its potentially anthropogenic causes. However, the climate of the Earth is always in a state of flux. I ask this of the environmentalists: when is it that we should have stopped the climate from changing? 1950? 1800? The middle ages? The pleistocene period (just after the last ice age)?

This planet will change.

We need to accept that.

Whether or not we humans are the ultimate cause of the change is irrelevant. We need to stop telling others what to do with all these green regulations and restrictions just out of nature worship and human self-loathing. Carbon taxing and trading systems are just scams to make the rich richer. Most of the car-cutting gas-reducing proposals are class warfare, pure and simple. The people who use the most energy are those who can't afford to get more efficient technology. They still farm by hand in Africa. Why? They cannot afford the tractors and fuel to do it the modern, productive way. The poor drive 20 year old SUVs because that is what they can afford. Because they are the least desirable and thus cheapest vehicles.

Ugh, I just felt like a rant today. At least I feel better.


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki