backtop


Print 41 comment(s) - last by Veerappan.. on Nov 2 at 9:40 AM


Toyota's genetically modified blooms soak up pollution, and help make up for the company's dirty manufacturing process.  (Source: Drive)

2010 Toyota Prius  (Source: CNET)
A rather unusual way of rectifying manufacturing emissions has been developed by the world's leading automaker

Are you overcome with guilt about how much carbon, sulfides, nitrides, and other emissions goodies were pumped into the atmosphere in the making of your new Toyota Prius?  Do you feel dirty?

Well, Toyota has just the thing for you.  It has genetically engineered two new species of flowers that soak up air pollution.

If you're left scratching you're head about this one, here's a bit of background.  Toyota, while offering industry-leading fuel economy in its 2010 Toyota Prius hybrid has a much maligned manufacturing process that's been characterized as anything but green, compared to competitors.  According to critics, the production process produces more CO2 gas than that of production of normal gas vehicles, nullifying the CO2 savings over the life of the Prius.  Toyota disputes these numbers, claiming it makes up the difference in the first year of vehicle life.  Whether the criticisms are true or not, the accusations mar the Prius's reputation as an environmentally friendly vehicle.

So Toyota engineered two species of flower than absorb heat and nitrogen oxides (both common pollutants from the Toyota lines) from the atmosphere.  Toyota's new flowering genetically modified organisms are derived from the cherry sage and gardenia and leave behind only water vapor after soaking up the potentially harmful nitrogen compounds.

Drive, who first aired the story, also points out, "The sage derivative's leaves have unique characteristics that absorb harmful gases, while the gardenia's leaves create water vapour in the air, reducing the surface temperature of the factory surrounds and, therefore, reducing the energy needed for cooling, in turn producing less carbon dioxide (CO2)."

Apparently Toyota will be adding the GMO blooms to the landscaping outside its factory in Toyota City, Japan.  Other green initiatives at the plant include roof-mounted solar panels, photocatalytic paint on exterior walls, reflective solar tubes that provide interior light and slow-growing grass that only needs to be mowed twice per year (perhaps they should pull a Google, and just get goats?).  Still other initiatives include bathroom lights that automatically turn off, and reduced air conditioning in the plant (employees are ordered to wear short sleeves and no ties to keep cool).

And just in case those initiatives weren't enough, Toyota planted 50,000 trees since 2008.

Toyota insists that the initiatives are response to the criticism it has received.  It says it's just trying to do its best to protect the environment.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

GMO??
By pelouse on 10/30/2009 8:23:22 AM , Rating: 2
I am looking forward to see how the people typically driving Priuses (enviro bumper stickers and all) react to the knowledge that (*gasp*) genetically-modified organisms will be used to offset the extra environmental damage their supposedly-so-green cars inflict. Typically this crowd opposes such, in favor of local, organic, etc...

(Note I avoid GMOs myself, but I also don't think driving a car that goes through almost 1,000 pounds of highly toxic batteries in its lifetime - which will wind up in a landfill - is so great either. High-efficiency diesel... cheap, clean, fewer parts, easier to refine, less manufacturing impact.)




RE: GMO??
By Boze on 10/30/2009 8:27:08 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
Typically this crowd opposes scientific progress of any kind, especially if its way outside their realm of understanding afforded them by their liberal arts degree.


Fixed that for you.


RE: GMO??
By mdogs444 on 10/30/09, Rating: -1
RE: GMO??
By WoWCow on 10/30/09, Rating: -1
RE: GMO??
By SoCalBoomer on 10/30/2009 2:44:33 PM , Rating: 4
You do know the difference between "Liberal" as in political leaning and "Liberal Arts" as in a broad-based education. . . ?


RE: GMO??
By CyborgTMT on 10/30/2009 3:19:16 PM , Rating: 4
No, he/she doesn't. Sadly mdogs and others have been turning DT into a right-vs-left playground since the Nov election. It's pretty bad when I've started to miss the AMD/Intel/Nvidia fanboy fights over this kind of nonsense.


RE: GMO??
By jhb116 on 10/30/2009 9:16:42 PM , Rating: 1
hehhehahhaaaahaaaheaaa

ROL
ROL


RE: GMO??
By jhb116 on 10/30/2009 9:17:23 PM , Rating: 1
Rol
ralph

Toooo funny.


RE: GMO??
By Schadenfroh on 10/30/2009 9:14:54 AM , Rating: 5
Indeed, I thought GMOs involved evil Republican technology, sorta like why we cannot build nuclear power plants (another evil Republican technology that is not naturally organic).


RE: GMO??
By 91TTZ on 10/30/2009 10:08:32 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
High-efficiency diesel... cheap, clean, fewer parts, easier to refine, less manufacturing impact.)


I keep hearing about these "clean" diesels but every time I see one of these "clean" diesels they're anything but clean. They still smell much more strongly than any gasoline car.


RE: GMO??
By wolrah on 10/30/2009 11:53:45 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
They still smell much more strongly than any gasoline car.


Hint: What your nose can sense doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the substances being targeted by environmental regulations. Diesels are all but universally cleaner in terms of total emissions over X amount of driving than their gasoline counterparts. Unfortunately, the fuel smells a lot stronger, the exhaust smells a bit stronger (I disagree on much, stand behind a modern VW, BMW, or Mercedes diesel, then stand behind a gasser. A 330d barely smells, I'd actually argue my 325i smells stronger at idle), and when cold (or tuned too rich) they'll shoot a bit of soot.

Unfortunately in the US we still have a ton of the population that thinks diesel means clattery things spewing black out the tailpipe, rather than realizing that the Jetta that just rolled by quietly was burning #2 Diesel. Granted, some of the big truck crowd don't help this by running open exhausts and tuning specifically for soot (I have to admit it looks cool as hell at the drag strip), but diesel does not mean what many Americans think it does.


RE: GMO??
By Strk on 10/30/2009 12:08:12 PM , Rating: 2
I remember Honda bragging about how they could put a white cloth in front of their newest diesels and it would remain white.

Another big issue is the fuel source. One of the biggest issues with ethanol (for use with gas engines) is the sources kind of suck or cost too much (cellulose is awesome, but pricey), but diesel can use some pretty cheap, reusable sources, but even with all the latest technologies, I think at best, most manufacturers only allow up to B20 before you void your warranty.


RE: GMO??
By Veerappan on 11/2/2009 9:30:51 AM , Rating: 2
Wasn't that a set of VW web-spots a while back? I didn't think it was Honda.


RE: GMO??
By Zoomer on 10/31/2009 10:25:41 AM , Rating: 2
Please see european diesels. Overall, american engines kinda suck as compared to theirs.


RE: GMO??
By Calin on 11/1/2009 10:28:58 AM , Rating: 2
US diesel had high sulfur content, and was unusable in "high-tech" european turbo diesels. Also, using high sulfur diesel made the cars pollute more.
On the other hand, I think US has now diesel fuel with low sulfur content, perfect for a low pollution engine.

On the other hand, diesel engines (high compression, high temperature) produce nitrogen oxides (NO, NO2, NO3) usually called NOx. Those things might link to the H2O in the exhaust and create H2NO3. So, you win some, you lose some.


RE: GMO??
By bhieb on 10/30/2009 10:59:36 AM , Rating: 2
GMO's big woop. Don't all plants use Nitro and CO2? I'm sure these do it ever so slightly better, but any plant will use up nitrates and CO2.

Just another publicity stunt.


RE: GMO??
By thelostjs on 10/30/2009 8:00:56 PM , Rating: 2
only certain plants can fix nitrogen in a gaseous state...
and even then, it would be the nitrogen fixing bacteria that coexist with the plants root system. probably, since the article doesn't say


RE: GMO??
By Calin on 11/1/2009 10:32:47 AM , Rating: 2
The beans are the only common plants that fix nitrogen from air (with some bacteria living on the roots, I think). So, planting beans tends to enrich the soil, while (for example) planting corn or wheat or whatever tends to ruin it.


RE: GMO??
By MozeeToby on 10/30/2009 1:57:14 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I also don't think driving a car that goes through almost 1,000 pounds of highly toxic batteries in its lifetime
As upposed to the additional 16000 lbs of gas that a non-hybrid would have burned. To be fair you did say high efficiency diesel so the number would be lower.


RE: GMO??
By Reclaimer77 on 10/30/2009 7:05:53 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
As upposed to the additional 16000 lbs of gas that a non-hybrid would have burned.


Point ?

That burned gas simply feeds the trees and grass and plants. The batteries hang around forever and poison the water supply and god knows what else.

Your analogy fails.


RE: GMO??
By Gurthang on 10/30/2009 3:35:44 PM , Rating: 5
"Note I avoid GMOs myself, but I also don't think driving a car that goes through almost 1,000 pounds of highly toxic batteries in its lifetime - which will wind up in a landfill"

I'm trying not to be too nit-picky but the Prius traction battery pack weighs only about 100 pounds of which about 65 pounds is actual battery module. And according to Toyota is recycled by them, in fact they offer a $200 bounty on recovered Prius traction batteries. I would also argue that conventional lead-acid batteries are more toxic, more common, and far more likely to be dumped in a landfil.

In the end the Prius is an icon of transitional technologies. Overly complicated, dubious value to most customers, and a lightning rod for critics. Love it or hate it may yet birth the next generation of cars.


RE: GMO??
By Reclaimer77 on 10/30/2009 7:03:47 PM , Rating: 1
This is just so absurd.

So I guess the Liberals would be fine with us burning as much coal as we want, driving whatever the hell we want, and heating and cooling our houses as much as we want as long as we plant special flowers where we do it right ?


RE: GMO??
By thelostjs on 10/30/2009 7:52:32 PM , Rating: 2
"This is just so absurd.
So I guess the Liberals would be fine with us burning as much coal as we want, driving whatever the hell we want, and heating and cooling our houses as much as we want as long as we plant special flowers where we do it right ?"

isnt that just a stereotype?

just like we can have a war on terror as long as we plant a democracy when were finished blowing everything up.

darwin would be ashamed


RE: GMO??
By Reclaimer77 on 10/30/2009 8:14:18 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
isnt that just a stereotype?


Cap and Trade ? "Smart grids" ? Ever higher MPG and emissions requirements ? Cash for Clunkers and the continuous war on SUV's and trucks ? Ummm pretty much ever regulation coming out of California ( terminally Democratic state ) ? Making Americans suffer higher gas prices to pursue "clean energy" instead of domestic drilling ?

And the list goes on. Honestly, exactly what party again is at the forefront of these issues ? So I don't know, is it a stereotype, you tell me.


RE: GMO??
By thelostjs on 10/31/2009 10:39:55 AM , Rating: 2
well maybe, i honestly dont know where my tax dollars go


RE: GMO??
By Veerappan on 11/2/2009 9:35:12 AM , Rating: 2
Who does...

I saw a chart breaking down the federal budget a while back, and the sheer number of hands in that cookie jar is astounding.


Flower power!
By bradmshannon on 10/30/2009 8:03:21 AM , Rating: 2
Can't wait until we see Priuses (Priuii?) flower powered...lol




RE: Flower power!
By englisboa on 10/30/2009 8:07:26 AM , Rating: 2
That would be groovy :)


RE: Flower power!
By jadeskye on 10/30/2009 8:52:49 AM , Rating: 2
holy crap we've gone full circle back to the 60s!


RE: Flower power!
By chunkymonster on 10/30/2009 9:53:28 AM , Rating: 3
Please no! I don't think I can take another 30+ years of failed social engineering. It's bad enough GenX, GenY, and the current generation of youth has to live with the failed legacy of political correctness.

I for one am happy that the hippy liberal touchy feely types are getting too old to influence popular culture and politics.

As to the article, cheers to Toyota for at least doing something about offestting their pollutants as opposed to just buying carbon credits.


RE: Flower power!
By Reclaimer77 on 10/30/2009 5:30:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I for one am happy that the hippy liberal touchy feely types are getting too old to influence popular culture and politics.


Yeah except the problem is they had kids, and raised their kids to be dumbasses too, just like them.


RE: Flower power!
By thelostjs on 10/30/2009 7:56:29 PM , Rating: 2
even if they only did these things to lower their cost of production? but i'll have to agree, cheers toyota, pass on the savings!


RE: Flower power!
By FITCamaro on 10/30/2009 8:51:27 AM , Rating: 1
Just a matter of time before it gets a flower pot holder like the bug.


hmmmm
By mattclary on 10/30/2009 8:25:47 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
while the gardenia's leaves create water vapour in the air


Funny. Water vapor is a much more effective greenhouse gas than CO2. ;)




RE: hmmmm
By FITCamaro on 10/30/09, Rating: 0
RE: hmmmm
By kattanna on 10/30/2009 12:25:37 PM , Rating: 2
LOL, glad im not the only one who caught that.


RE: hmmmm
By JediJeb on 10/30/2009 5:39:23 PM , Rating: 2
Just wait until they start regulating H2O vapor emissions. You won't be able to take a shower unless you turn the thermostat in the bathroom down to 50F so it all condenses before escaping.


RE: hmmmm
By ElFenix on 10/31/2009 12:32:05 PM , Rating: 3
I'm wondering what happens when the flowers die and decompose. Do the chemicals just go back into the air?


Absorb heat?
By mindless1 on 10/31/2009 6:34:58 PM , Rating: 2
Unless I am mistaken it is simply impossible for a plant to absorb heat. Even a proper air conditioning system doesn't absorb heat it just moves it.




RE: Absorb heat?
By Veerappan on 11/2/2009 9:40:10 AM , Rating: 2
Dark colors absorb light/heat, so if the flower is dark in color, it could absorb heat, instead of reflecting it back into the atmosphere (or towards the factory).

Although conversely, if the plant is light in color, it would reflect light directed at it, causing the plant to stay cooler, and keeping the ground around the plant cooler...

Not sure which effect is happening here, but your statement about a plant being unable to absorb heat isn't quite right.


Prediction
By silverlion on 10/31/09, Rating: -1
"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki