backtop


Print 11 comment(s) - last by Anoxanmore.. on Apr 28 at 11:08 AM


  (Source: Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.)
New 3D screen needs no glasses to view

The current crop of 3D TVs that are on the market all use glasses to allow the viewer to see the 3D content. Most of the 3D TVs on the market use active rather than passive glasses and the glasses can cost $150 per set or more.

The cost of the glasses and the fact that many find 3D glasses of any type uncomfortable are a couple of the major issues that are keeping users from adopting 3D TVs right now. Thankfully there is a lot of action going on in the 3D TV market with screens that don’t require glasses to view the 3D images.

The Nintendo 3DS may well be one of the hottest upcoming consumer products using a screen that needs no glasses to provide 3D images. Sharp is also working on 3D screens that need no glasses and its screen tech may well be what Nintendo has chosen for its 3DS portable console.

Toshiba Mobile Display (TMD) has announced its own 3D screen that doesn't require glasses. The screen is a 21-inch autostereoscopic HD display that uses multi-parallax technology. The screen uses a "light field" display to produce real 3D images that can be viewed across a wide range of viewing angles. The wide viewing angle is important in a produce like a TV where users will not always be directly in front of the set.

The imaging system used in the TMD screen promises to reduce eye fatigue during extended viewing and uses a multi-parallax design allowing for motion parallax that sets needing glasses can’t provide. TMD reports that using the multi-parallax method allows the production of 3D images that change depending on the viewer's position.

TMD's multi-parallax technology has also overcome previous issues with parallax displays that result in the loss of screen resolution. TMD was able to overcome the screen resolution issue by using low-temperature poly-silicon technology. The screen also has a lens sheet that controls reductions in surface luminance intensity to provide a panel that is as bright as normal 2D screens.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Awesome
By therealnickdanger on 4/27/2010 10:16:11 AM , Rating: 3
I said it when Nintendo announced the 3DS: autostereoscopic displays are perfect for single-user devices. Desktop displays, laptops, netbooks, cell phones, handheld gaming, etc. Large autostereoscopic displays also work OK if you have a couple people sitting within the "sweet spot" (center of the couch), but as soon as people start sitting a few degrees to the sides or vertically, it just doesn't work...
quote:
TMD's multi-parallax technology has also overcome previous issues with parallax displays that result in the loss of screen resolution.

Excellent, if true! We need more pioneering in this field.




RE: Awesome
By Believer on 4/27/2010 10:59:47 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Excellent, if true! We need more pioneering in this field.


Sadly, Pioneer announced to cease manufacture of television sets in March 2010.


RE: Awesome
By Anoxanmore on 4/27/2010 11:05:28 AM , Rating: 2
Huggles her Pioneer Elite 46" 1080p Plasma

What?

I like it.

=^-^=


RE: Awesome
By sweatshopking on 4/28/2010 8:09:19 AM , Rating: 2
wtf. pretending to be a girl on a tech site? GTFO nobody believes you. also, with all the crap in the world. who the F really cares about tv 3d? i dont give a rats ass. cure HIV toshiba, then i'll pay attention.


RE: Awesome
By Anoxanmore on 4/28/2010 11:08:46 AM , Rating: 2
I will always refer to myself when I use third person pronouns in the correct way.

I'm sorry if this upsets your little "intarwebs" balance.

Some of us women do like more than just shopping and cooking.


RE: Awesome
By therealnickdanger on 4/27/2010 11:36:10 AM , Rating: 2
badum-tish ;-)

I <3 my PRO-FD151.


RE: Awesome
By BBeltrami on 4/27/2010 11:09:34 AM , Rating: 5
I agree, viewing angle is huge when it's a device meant to be viewed from around the room. I'm interested in the statement that
quote:
the multi-parallax method allows the production of 3D images that change depending on the viewer's position


Classic 3-D has a pop-up-book look that appears more like 2d layered: The on-screen images may shift in relation to each other to create the feeling of depth, but the on-screen representation didn't change based on your position in relation to it.

For example, in classic 3-D a statue facing straight out from the screen is facing straight at the viewer regardless of their location in the room. The statement suggests that this technology will display the right-side angle of the statue to people sitting left of the screen and vice-versa on the right.

I predict rapid adoption by the pr0n industry.


This is what we've been waiting for!
By Muirgheasa on 4/27/2010 10:16:24 AM , Rating: 2
I haven't been convinced by the prospect of having to wear 3D glasses to watch 3D tv, but I'm pretty sure that if they can get this right they'll be laughing all the way to the bank - who wouldn't want one, assuming it doesn't cause motion sickness etc.?

My one reservation is that current 3D content presumably won't allow for this kind of image (outside of games, that is). I can't imagine how you'd go about creating cameras that would record for this kind of multi-parallax screen (although a multi-camera setup might just be possible?). Creating content that support this is going to be a huge challenge.




RE: This is what we've been waiting for!
By Spivonious on 4/27/2010 10:36:21 AM , Rating: 2
I tried the glasses at hh gregg the other day. Flicker city! They reminded me of the old shutter glasses for computers in the mid 90s.

If the industry can get these "autostereoscopic" displays worked out, I can definitely see 3D catching on.


By theapparition on 4/28/2010 8:22:57 AM , Rating: 2
Agree completely.

My first 3D glasses were on my 1980's era sega system. LCD shutters, played some game for 15min and had to stop due to eye fatigue followed by headaches.

Demo'd some new 3D TVs and it was like they picked up directly from 25years ago. Very disappointing.

3D will never catch on until people don't have to put special glasses on at home.


Video source?
By lightfoot on 4/27/2010 12:06:29 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The screen is a 21-inch autostereoscopic HD display that uses multi-parallax technology.

What type of video source will drive this screen? 3D movies are not multi-parallax.




"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki