backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 209 comment(s) - last by cathodeflux.. on Apr 24 at 10:52 AM


Smart Fortwo Coupe and Cabriolet.

Smart Fortwo EuroNCAP crash testing.  (Source: EuroNCAP)
Smart's Fortwo proves to be a big hit with consumers

With gas prices comfortably past the $3.00 mark in most regions of the United States, many drivers and auto manufacturers are looking for ways to consume less gas. Drivers are looking to cut down on unnecessary trips and turning their attention to more fuel efficient offerings when it comes time to purchase a new vehicle.

Auto manufacturers -- for their part -- are trying to accommodate the eco-conscious consumers with efficient gasoline engines, turbo-diesel engines, and a vast array of hybrids.

The Smart Fortwo, however, doesn't use expensive turbo-diesel engines or a hybrid powertrain to achieve its fuel economy numbers. Instead, its diminutive dimensions, extremely light curb weight (1,804 lbs), and tiny 1.0-liter (70 HP) engine allow it to return fuel economy numbers of 33 MPG city/40 MPG highway.

The similarly-priced Honda Fit and Toyota Yaris achieve ratings of 28/34 and 29/36 respectively. Those vehicles, however, look like giants compared to the Fortwo. The Smart Fortwo measures just 106.1" from bumper to bumper -- to put this into perspective, the Fortwo would fit within the wheelbase of a 2008 Toyota Camry. Likewise, the vehicle is only 61.3" wide -- five inches narrower than a Mini Cooper.

The diminutive dimensions allow the Smart Fortwo to fit into tight spaces that other seemingly "small" vehicles wouldn't dare venture. Parking space too small? Just park head first up against the curb. The Fortwo makes compact parking spaces at malls look like an exercise in excess.

The Smart Fortwo's small size and miserable performance numbers (60 MPH is reached is achieved in a lethargic 14.1 seconds from a standstill) hasn't stopped people from lining up to purchase the vehicle. Penske Automotive Group (PAG), the U.S. importer for the Smart Fortwo, reports that the vehicle has surpassed all sales expectations. Over 15,000 Fortwos were originally projected to be sold in 2008, but Penske is now on track to receive 25,000 units this year -- all of which are spoken for. Penske says that he could sell 40,000 units if he had the supply.

Buyers are also loading up on options with the average buyer dropping $1,600 on accessories for a vehicle that starts at $14,235 including destination fee.

"This is not a customer who is buying a car because it is cheap," said PAG CEO Roger Penske. "People are interested in its urban friendliness and its fuel economy," he said. "It is the total of what we offer."

Traditional hot beds for "quirky car" sales like New York and Los Angeles have seen booming sales for the vehicle. Cities not typically known for their hip car culture are also seeing lots of interest. "In Pittsburgh and places like that, the dealers are dying for the cars," added Penske.

Drivers used to driving "normal" family sedans or SUVs may balk at the idea of a tiny "tin can" vehicle roaming the streets, but it appears that many buyers are willing to put up with the downsides in order to make a statement.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By therealnickdanger on 3/25/2008 12:09:10 PM , Rating: 2
I just got back from a road trip from Minneapolis to Chicago and my 370HP+ Dodge Magnum averaged 25.3MPG for the whole trip. Cruise at 73MPH the majority of the trip, except for when I was cruising around downtown Chicago or beating up German cars on the highway. I carried two passengers, luggage, a dresser, and a desk on the way down (all inside) and three passengers, luggage, and boxes of stuff on the way back.

I'm very pleased!




RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By Falloutboy on 3/25/2008 12:16:15 PM , Rating: 3
there is a big difference between good highway MPG and good city driving MPG, I bet in stop and go traffic your lucky to break 18 with that car.

These cars have there place but tbh they are too expensive for what they are. They don't get THAT great of gas mileage for what you give up. if they costed 9-10 grand and they brought the Diesel model over which gets significantly better millage they may have something until then we just have another gimmick car like the mini or bug, will sell well for a few years and then sales will die off, after its not the "cool" new thing.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By daftrok on 3/25/08, Rating: -1
RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By jamdunc on 3/25/2008 12:45:23 PM , Rating: 5
Are you completely stupid? Did you do anything other than look at 1 picture?

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/smart_fortwo_2007/30...

Go there and actually look at that. The car is built very well and gives good crash protection. We actually have very stringent standards over here in Europe which is why we have EuroNCAP.

And to be honest, you've more chance of surviving a crash in this at 60mph than a Chrysler Voyager:

http://www.euroncap.com/tests/chrysler_voyager_200...

Funny that isn't it!


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By mdogs444 on 3/25/08, Rating: -1
RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By walk2k on 3/25/2008 1:30:21 PM , Rating: 5
I'd rather avoid the accident in a light and nimble vehicle with stopping distance less than 3 football fields thanks anyway.

Pickups and SUVs have a much higher rate of single-car fatalities by the way (roll-overs, mostly).


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By HrilL on 3/25/2008 9:12:55 PM , Rating: 2
That probably has a lot to do with people doing a lot more daring things in those vehicles then people would do in other cars. I've been hit before and so has my dad's work truck. I have a SUV and the car that hit me was crumpled up and my bumper had a small dent and a scratch. Same goes for my Dad's truck the person had to get a tow truck because they crushed their front into their wheels and my dads back was completely fine nothing even wrong with it. since its already all scratched from rocks and what not since he is a stone mason.

Anyway back to my original point. We are talking about crashing not turning too fast to roll your vehicle over as you have pointed out. In crashes people with Trucks and SUVs tend to survive more.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By zhaltees on 3/26/2008 4:33:48 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah. And SUV's tend to kill pedestrians much more... Though who cares about the pedestrians.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By mkrech on 3/26/2008 11:48:18 AM , Rating: 1
LOL your funny
Tell you what, you stand in front of this little POS and let it hit you. I'll just choose to stay out of the path off the SUV which is much easier to see anyway. Then, I'll send a nice little flower arrangement to your funeral.

Imagine just how hard a NFL linebacker can hit you at a full run. Now, understand that this vehicle weighs at least 6 times as much and is almost certainly traveling faster than the linebacker can run. Even a bicyclist can seriously hurt a pedestrian... the only way to protect pedestrians is to avoid collisions completely. To that end, the SUV is easier to see and so I would expect less injuries and fatalities from the SUV's


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By JAB on 3/26/2008 10:44:23 AM , Rating: 5
SUV owners just don't understand about crumple zones and rollovers. You want the car to absorb the impact instead of your head as it hits the windshield full speed or the undampened energy ramming your chest through the steering column(or vice versa on some American death traps.) I have seen the seats ripped out of the floor when these "big is safe" people failed to notice everyone else had stopped and rammed something at full highway speed.

I work in a trauma center there are just an amazing number of people in SUV's that never even got around to to break when they hit something. I don't consider snarfing down a super sized value meal wile talking on the cell to be daring. Size is no replacement for intelligence - that applies to in design too.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By GlassHouse69 on 3/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By theapparition on 3/26/2008 10:58:45 AM , Rating: 2
Either you have no idea what your talking about, or that this is a stupid troll....

But all else equal, occupants in a heavier car will survive more than occupants in a lighter car. No question.

That is assuming all other factors are equal, so it's not appropriate to compare any two specific cars without actual crash results, since there are so many other factors involved in a crash scenario. But your original assertations are just plain idiotic.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By kenji4life on 3/27/2008 7:44:36 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
But all else equal, occupants in a heavier car will survive more than occupants in a lighter car. No question.


That's all fine and dandy in the land where physics no longer exists as we know it, but here on Earth we have to be realistic.

Truck vs Tree: Winner: Tree
Camry vs Metro: Winner: Camry
SUV vs Pinto (rear end collision ohnoes!): Winner: SUV (if they aren't killed by shrapnel)
SUV vs Semi Truck: Winner: Semi
Semi vs Smart Car: Winner: Semi
Semi vs Train: Winner: Train

Mini Cooper + Ford F-150 vs Wall at 40 MPH: Winner: Wall, Runner Up: Mini Cooper. Honorable mention: Ford F-150... Ford F-150?.. Ford? You there?

OHNOES! http://www.bridger.us/2002/12/16/CrashTestingMINIC...

As you can see, the bigger they come, the harder they fall. When a 300 pound gym jock (no offense gym jocks, I frequent mine as well) hits the cement, it hurts a lot more than the 175 pound gymnast. Although the gym jock could displace more mass, he is burdened by that mass when it's beyond his control.

If you don't understand any of this, you probably would never purchase a Mini, Miata, MR2, or yes, smart car anyhow.

disclaimer: The cars in my driveway are a GMC Sierra 2500, 97 Toyota Landcruiser FJ-60, Honda Civic, Nissan Maxima, Nissan Stanza, 3 Cylinder Subaru Justy, and the occasional japanpdximports.com RHD Jeep Cherokee for those inclined to deliver mail (free plug).. So I know that I'd much rather be in my Maxima than the Justy, and I'd much rather be in the Justy than the pickup truck or the TLC on the highway. Why? I live in Oregon, and when we do have rain (most of the year) or ice (like right now), I feel much safer in a smaller car than a larger one. The inertia of a PU or an SUV will carry you much more swiftly to your death than a smaller car.

That being said, if I were ever driving my Maxima and got hammered from the side, I'd wish I was in the Civic with it's side impact airbags, not either of the bigger rigs which would ensure my head was smashed in neatly by the window.

But enough about me, continue purchasing large SUV's so that you can go about your way lulled into a false sense of security. I wish peace and safety to all of you, and happy journeys in the afterlife shall you embark before you had planned.
I leave you with this:
http://www.autobloggreen.com/2008/03/07/video-who-...


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By kenji4life on 3/27/2008 7:49:21 AM , Rating: 2
*typo* 97 TLC should have been 87, and if you don't know, now you know.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By theapparition on 3/28/2008 12:57:06 PM , Rating: 3
What are you trying to prove? Don't get the intent of your retort at all?

All else equal........did you not get that? All else equal, the object with larger mass will experience less internal stress. Plain and simple, doesn't need an explanation.

Now, all modern safety features can certainly overcome lack of mass and make them safer. But as I originally stated, all else equal....


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By masher2 (blog) on 3/25/2008 1:09:33 PM , Rating: 3
> "you've more chance of surviving a crash in this at 60mph than a Chrysler Voyager:"

Crash tests are performed against a fixed barrier, which negates the mass of the vehicle in the test. Should such a light car be involved in a collision with a much heavier car, however, it's going to sustain a correspondingly higher amount of damage.

In short, no matter how poorly a 4-ton SUV does in a crash test -- in a head-on crash with it, this car will lose, and badly.


RE: HEMI with MDS: 25MPG
By chrnochime on 3/25/2008 1:44:44 PM , Rating: 5
Have you ever seen the crash test between a moving Benz W220 S-class and a Smart? Well in that test the S-class had half of its front crumbled, and while the Smart lost the entire front end, the passenger compartment was not damaged in any way.

Then again saying all this to people who swear by SUVs is really pointless anyway.