backtop


Print 12 comment(s) - last by aguilpa1.. on Nov 18 at 10:19 AM

New filtration method is cheap and effective at removing oil from water

Polluted waterways are not only unattractive to look at but they can also cause significant environmental concerns for animals and people that live nearby. Cleaning pollution and the oily sheen from contaminated water is a complicated process.

An engineer at the University of Utah named Andy Hong has developed an inexpensive way to remove the oily sheen from water by repeatedly pressurizing and depressurizing ozone gas to create microscopic bubbles. The microscopic bubbles have a much greater surface area and are able to chemically react with the oil. The pollutants build up on the bubbles produced and are water soluble.

Ozone is also a very strong oxidant. The oil is dispersed into acids and chemicals known as Aldehydes and ketones. Those two substances then help the oil to clump together were it could be more easily filtered by traditional sand filtering.

Hong said, "We are not trying to treat the entire hydrocarbon [oil] content in the water – to turn it into carbon dioxide and water – but we are converting it into a form that can be retained by sand filtration, which is a conventional and economical process."

Hong's process has several patents pending and he says that the process can be used to treat a variety of pollutants in water and will scale well. The process can be used to treat "produced water" from oil and gas drilling. The process could also treat water from the mining of tar or oil shale among several other uses.

Hong proved his process in experiments using a tabletop version of this chemical reactor and a quart of oily water made by mixing deionized water with crude oil. Ozone was produced by passing air through a high-voltage field. The produced ozone was then pressurized to about 150 pounds per square inch.

The oily water was cleaned most effectively when pressurized and depressurized ten times and then filtered through sand. The water was then put through the pressurization cycle 20 more times. Hong says the resulting treated water was almost as clear as drinking water and the process removed 99% of the turbidity of the "produced water."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

How much ozone is needed?
By trajan on 11/17/2009 10:09:54 AM , Rating: 3
Curious about how much ozone is actually needed to do this large scale. I suppose producing lots of O3 out at sea near an oil rig isn't too worrisome, but ozone is itself a pollutant. I wouldn't want to be dumping any significant amount of the stuff near towns or cities. It's all well and good in the upper atmosphere, but down here it has real health effects on folks.




RE: How much ozone is needed?
By JonB on 11/17/2009 11:43:52 AM , Rating: 3
and the discharged O3 in the water will probably induce asthma in the fish.


RE: How much ozone is needed?
By trajan on 11/17/2009 12:03:23 PM , Rating: 3
We need to alerta PETA, right away.


RE: How much ozone is needed?
By kattanna on 11/17/2009 2:17:44 PM , Rating: 3
how about we test it on them instead.


RE: How much ozone is needed?
By Smartless on 11/17/2009 1:45:33 PM , Rating: 3
I think Billy Mays said Oxyclean only needs one scoop.


RE: How much ozone is needed?
By monstergroup on 11/17/2009 2:25:44 PM , Rating: 2
lol, nice.


RE: How much ozone is needed?
By Amaru on 11/18/2009 1:38:38 AM , Rating: 2
I'm surprised this is mentioned as something ground breaking. I work in the meat processing industry. We are currently one of these machines, obviously on a much smaller scale, to sanitize our equipment after cleaning.
The ozone ruptures the cell walls of the bacteria. It's perfectly safe to wash your hands with and you can also drink it. We run it between a range of 3-9 PPM (Parts per million)
It also wouldn't linger in the water as a pollutant. We are limited at about 125ft from the ozone machine before it dissipates.


so does this mean
By inperfectdarkness on 11/17/2009 7:43:45 AM , Rating: 1
that the exxon valdez scenarios will no longer present such a huge environmental problem?




RE: so does this mean
By teldar on 11/17/2009 8:06:51 AM , Rating: 3
It appears they have to pressurize the water they want to treat. There are going to have to be some specialized ships full of equipment and tanks designed to provide this process if it's ever going to be usable in real-world situations.


RE: so does this mean
By Integral9 on 11/17/2009 8:50:52 AM , Rating: 2
They might be able to get away with using a giant protein skimmer w/ needle wheel and ozonator. Might need a tanker for the collection cup though.

I don't think you need to pressurize the water /air to get tiny bubbles in salt water. Fresh water is different for some reason.


RE: so does this mean
By chmilz on 11/17/2009 10:36:52 AM , Rating: 3
More likely it'll have the potential to eliminate the waste tailing ponds used in oilsands mining in Alberta and elsewhere.

http://maps.google.ca/?ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=12838+65+...


By aguilpa1 on 11/18/2009 10:19:37 AM , Rating: 2
How much energy is required in high voltage to create the needed ozone? per/liter of clean water? Its not an efficient process of it has 20 to 30 steps at least two methods of scrubbing and requires lots of voltage energy.




"I f***ing cannot play Halo 2 multiplayer. I cannot do it." -- Bungie Technical Lead Chris Butcher











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki