backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 27 comment(s) - last by teohhanhui.. on Mar 14 at 4:00 AM


ThruVision's T5000 terahertz camera can see through clothes without x-rays, but also obscures the body of the observees  (Source: DailyTech)
T-ray camera can see under clothes to find bombs and other weapons

Since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 airport security in the U.S. and abroad has been tightened significantly. Airport security has gone from something you never really thought about before that date, to one of the biggest concerns for many Americans and frequent travelers.

Current airport security takes advantage of metal detectors, X-ray machines and many other types of security to ensure no weapons are smuggled onto aircraft. British company ThruVision has developed a new T-ray camera that can see through clothes to detect objects hidden underneath. The camera is called the T5000 and is the first T-ray camera that can be used both indoors and outdoors.

The camera uses T-rays, or terahertz electromagnetic rays, to passively detect objects by reading the natural waves that everything produces. The camera is sensitive enough to identify objects underneath clothing from up to 80 feet away and is effective even while people are moving.

ThruVision claims its technology has roots in projects funded by the European Space Agency and STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory to study dying stars.

Dr Liz Towns-Andrews, Director of Knowledge Exchange at STFC said, "Astronomers use T-ray cameras that can see through dust and clouds in space, revealing what lies beyond. ThruVision uses them to see weapons hidden by clothing. This is a first-class example of how fundamental scientific research can be applied to benefit the whole of society."

The camera doesn’t show the actual form of the body so operators don’t get a voyeuristic glimpse at what people look like in the buff as they do with a security system in place in Amsterdam. Rather the camera produces a silhouette that would appear as a body shape with areas of different intensities.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

plane jacking
By pxavierperez on 3/11/2008 5:40:41 AM , Rating: 2
plane jacking (is that the right term?) has been happening even in the early 80s. I am not disapproving the increase measure in security but the sudden exponential leap within a few years is interesting. From a simple Q&A at the custom booth to eye scanning at airports is quite a jump.

Europe was a hot bed of terrorists attacks before 9/11 but it never placed security measures amounting to the type applied now. I recall some streets in Paris, they merely replaced public trash bins with see through plastic bags after terrorist bombings from the early 90s and 80s. I wonder what amount of security would result if that would happen on the public street in the US?

Is it true they have armed GIs positioned at subway stations now in New York?




RE: plane jacking
By Polynikes on 3/11/2008 7:08:19 AM , Rating: 2
I doubt it, but I haven't been to NYC for some time.


RE: plane jacking
By rodrigu3 on 3/11/2008 7:46:28 AM , Rating: 2
From what I can see, they only have them stationed in high-density areas, where it doesn't really make sense to put them. They don't station them at small stations, but at places like grand central and penn station, you might see 1 or 2 in the main lobby. Doesn't make sense for them to carry this large gun though - they wouldn't exactly be able to fire it during rush hour; it can seem like a sea of people sometimes.


RE: plane jacking
By FITCamaro on 3/11/2008 8:44:59 AM , Rating: 5
The idea isn't to have soldiers "firing" it. You put it at all the entrances to a subway, airport, etc and hook it to a computer that has the profiles of weapons, explosives, and other dangerous substances/devices cataloged. It then alerts a human operator of anything it finds. And this thing is capable of scanning multiple people at a time.

It's basically an x-ray machine you can walk through but without the negative health effects.

I think its a great invention that can only help increase security. Privacy advocates can suck it. This thing doesn't invade your privacy any more than the x-ray machine at the airport does. Sorry but keeping public places safe is far more important than you keeping some embarrassing item a complete secret. And its not like the guy running the machine is going to start pointing and laughing.


RE: plane jacking
By Misty Dingos on 3/11/2008 9:53:17 AM , Rating: 2
As much as it pains me to say this. I agree completely with you. This camera has a real capability to detect dangerous objects as much as 80 feet away. This is a huge asset to keeping the looneys and terrorists out of the airport.

What bothers me about the story and this seems to be the mantra anywhere this has been reported is the ability to see through clothes. What a joke! How many of you take off your shoes, belt, jacket, wallet, watch, pens, coins and hell just about anything else you can just so you can get through security faster at the airport? I know women that won’t wear an underwire bra when they fly for fear of setting off the metal detectors. Going to the airport is never going to be the way it was on September 10th 2001 and before. For that matter anywhere people congregate for any purpose get used to the idea that people are watching you. It isn’t Big Brother watching it is vested self interest. Has Great Britain taken the surveillance camera too far? I think so. But we aren’t taking about public streets we are talking about airports, subways, train stations and other places the public gathers. Buy a bunch of these cameras and put them to use.

And while we are talking about airports and travel in general.

Hey here is a wake up call to you people that think that when you walk into the airport you have the inherent right to act like a jackass. You know the people. The students from MIT that wear flashing electronics. The dumbasses that say they have a bomb when they are drunk in the terminal or on the airplane. The person fed up with the service on the flight and gets into a fight with the flight attendants and the plane is diverted to some place you don't want to be and you miss your connecting flight. The ones diagnosed with a contagious disease and still fly from country to country. You know these people. They are idiots. It is time to accept that flying is a form of public transportation and the public has every right to know that the people they are traveling with are going to behave appropriately. If you don’t behave appropriately I am thinking a lifetime ban on that form of travel is in order and a year or so picking up trash along the roads of the country wearing an orange jump suit with inmate on the back. This will also make it much simpler to deal with the real threats to our safety when traveling.


RE: plane jacking
By FITCamaro on 3/11/2008 10:11:49 AM , Rating: 2
Thank you. Heck judging by the picture of the camera in use, I would say it doesn't invade privacy at all since the picture of all those people doesn't even show things like cell phones, keys, etc. In fact it shows so little detail other than the people themselves that I'd question its accuracy. Unless that was a staged scene where all the people were devoid of any common items a person might be carrying.


RE: plane jacking
By Souka on 3/11/2008 11:32:06 AM , Rating: 1
Ok, based on that picture of a crowded airport, with people moving at various speeds (usually fast) and many directions...

What will security do if they see a gun?

I would assume shut down the airport and begin person 2 person search...woo hoo


RE: plane jacking
By Hulk on 3/11/2008 11:46:23 AM , Rating: 3
No if they saw a gun they'd let him/her go for fear of people like you making fun of them for trying to catch the person.


RE: plane jacking
By kkwst2 on 3/11/2008 12:02:57 PM , Rating: 2
That's why version 2.0 will have a taser mounted to the camera.


RE: plane jacking
By xRyanCat on 3/11/2008 4:24:49 PM , Rating: 2
They would have another normal vision camera mounted from the exact same position as the T-Ray camera, so they would be able to look through the feed of the normal camera at the exact point they noticed a weapon with the T-Ray camera. The visual camera would show the exact same scene but with visual light so they could identify the person, then tack him, not let him on any planes, tell security to not let him out, etc...

Simple really.


RE: plane jacking
By smitty3268 on 3/11/2008 12:39:09 PM , Rating: 2
Wow. Someone sounds a little bitter, there.

Is anyone complaining about this? Speaking as someone who found the previous see-you-naked-scanner a little creepy, this seems like a great technology here.


RE: plane jacking
By teohhanhui on 3/14/2008 4:00:55 AM , Rating: 2
I thought they were discussing about GIs stationed at subway stations carrying big guns?


RE: plane jacking
By dluther on 3/11/2008 8:02:39 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
plane jacking (is that the right term?)


No, the correct term is "skyjacking"


RE: plane jacking
By Integral9 on 3/11/2008 11:16:07 AM , Rating: 2
They did the same in DC and I never saw soldiers and not anymore. Shortly after 9/11 there were a few SWAT (Speacial Weapons And Tactics) Unit police officers stationed in front of each subway entrance in inside the city. Suburban stations were not patrolled to my knowledge.

They'd take away our trash cans and they already did around major buildings and landmarks in DC. Besides, we don't worry about trash cans blowing up in DC. We have manholes that blow up instead.


RE: plane jacking
By gsellis on 3/11/2008 12:57:34 PM , Rating: 2
I have seen many automatic weapons on the military in the airport, in Madrid. And that was pre-9/11. It was still more obvious than what I have seen in the US. Slung Uzi style machineguns with banana clips. In the middle of the concourse. Probably 1998?

The game also changed on 9/11. Before that, highjackers usually released the crew and plane and a couple people might be killed (and the highjackers). 9/11 changed that formula dramatically, so therefore very different tactics. It is not a couple people at risk anymore, it is thousands. Hence, the exponential leap in security measures being looked at.

I have been patted down before boarding a domestic to international flight in Japan too. Pre-9/11.

The funny twist to all of this was the sign on the plane in the Phillippines in the 60's. "Please check your guns with the flight attendent." My parents loved that one. I got a kick from a story I heard from a flight attendent. During Desert Storm, flight attendents were having a bit of fun with "Please put your weapons in the overhead bin" during troop transport flights.


RE: plane jacking
By pxavierperez on 3/11/2008 2:07:31 PM , Rating: 2
While I was in the Philippines in the 80s, entering almost every department store you had to go through a metal detector. It's true also in Bali after the bombing there.

My rant here is not against the extra security, I do understand the need. But it just annoy me as hell feeling in some way that the terrorists have achieved what they were out to accomplish, instilling terror and fear.

And why even with some of the most advance technology on earth the US possessed they still can not get to Osama. I mean, come on, please fry the guy already.


RE: plane jacking
By Ajax9000 on 3/11/2008 9:00:17 PM , Rating: 2
Went through Bangkok domestic terminal in October 2001. They had red-and-white 44-gallon drums half-filled with sand at the gate lounges with a sign saying (roughly) "please unload handguns and discharge into drum before boarding flight".


Skynet is coming to an airport near you
By leidegre on 3/11/2008 3:01:36 AM , Rating: 2
Love things starting on the letter T, like T5000 or T1000, or maybe a counter terrorist T101...




By WayneG on 3/11/2008 3:37:06 AM , Rating: 2
"Get dowuun!!!!!" he has a laptop!
Sorry couldn't resist an arny quote....


By 306maxi on 3/11/2008 12:08:06 PM , Rating: 2
Yes but skynet is software. This is hardware.


jokes...puns...funnies...
By jadeskye on 3/11/2008 1:59:20 AM , Rating: 2
The potential for this story in the humour department is overbaring...




RE: jokes...puns...funnies...
By James Holden on 3/11/2008 2:01:23 AM , Rating: 2
Passive observence that speeds up my time in the line at airports.

I'll take four


hmmm
By omnicronx on 3/11/2008 12:31:30 PM , Rating: 4
But can they detect a disassembled box cutter? Correct me if I am wrong, but when was the last time a plane was highjacked with an actual weapon that could be detected by this system?




Ow! My Sperm...
By jhinoz on 3/11/2008 2:05:43 AM , Rating: 3
Seriously though, good extra protection, but, you still gotta take your laptop out your laptop bag, run that through another scanner, line up in the immigration queue etc etc.

Schiphol has it right with their security, never had any issues there and it's plenty fast to get through especially with online checkin etc.




finally
By kyleb2112 on 3/11/2008 8:44:27 PM , Rating: 3
Finally a way to show off my massive blue smear.




Total Recall, anyone?
By uhgotnegum on 3/11/2008 10:52:14 AM , Rating: 2
This made me think of two things from that movie. The first, and most relevant, is the part where Gov.Arnold is walking past that screen that shows the skeletons and the gun (which then made me think of the fat-woman-head-bomb scene, which made me think of the pulling-the-tracking-orb-out-of-Arnold's-nose scene, etc.).

The second (or 4th now), involves females and 3 anatomical "bulges" where there should only be 2...I need to blockbuster online that movie now...




Ghosts
By Ammohunt on 3/11/2008 2:46:05 PM , Rating: 2
This would be a great tool for Ghost hunting.




"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki