backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 50 comment(s) - last by Penti.. on Jun 27 at 3:01 AM

Yar! Pirates takes a shot at Sweden’s shiny new wiretapping laws

A new, recently-approved Swedish wiretapping law angered The Pirate Bay earlier this week, and the site’s administrators have decided to fight back. The Pirate Bay administrator Peter “brokep” Sunde, writing in his blog, announced that the site will be adding SSL encryption to its list of features for all visitors, and a VPN-tunnel system for Swedish visitors that will soon be rolled out worldwide.

More importantly, however, is The Pirate Bay’s attempt to organize a global internet ban against Sweden.

“Yes, that’s right!” wrote Sunde.  “We want Sweden to be banned from the Internet. The ISPs need to block Sweden in order to protect their own customers’ integrity since everything they do on Swedish ISPs networks will be logged and searched.”

The law in question, approved by Swedish parliament on June 19, allows the FRA (National Defense Radio Agency, In English) to monitor all national phone, e-mail, and web traffic for the purposes of National Security. The bill was passed by a narrow majority – 143 to 138 with 1 abstaining – and became law despite heavy criticism by journalists, bloggers, lawyers, and the Swedish intelligence agency.

“We’re going to help out in any way we can with fighting the law,” wrote Sunde. Speaking in an interview with TorrentFreak, Sunde noted that “we have many aces up our sleeves and we’re gonna use them. No worries.”

“Trust me, this war is not lost,” said Sunde.

“Democracy is reliant on the transparency of power, not the transparency of citizens,” said Swedish Pirate Party leader Rick Falkvinge, speaking in an interview with The Local earlier this month. “All places where the opposite has been the case - where it has been impossible to examine the powers that be, while citizens lack any right to a private life - have been really nasty places to live.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What were they thinking?
By Denithor on 6/24/2008 7:41:39 PM , Rating: 5
I work for a Swedish-owned company and this one has me scratching my head in disbelief. Are they going to keep copies of all email or what? That could be really bad for business as lots of confidential info travels among the different branches inside & outside Sweden every day. How're they going to ensure this info doesn't leak?




RE: What were they thinking?
By kake on 6/24/2008 8:17:09 PM , Rating: 5
Encrypting everything is an obvious solution. However, it is a rather burdensome one especially if there is a lot of data transit.

What a crock they've perpetuated against the good citizens of Sweden.


RE: What were they thinking?
By shockf1 on 6/24/2008 8:39:57 PM , Rating: 5
all i can say is well done to TPB for bringing this to world wide public attention!

its not only bad for the citizens of Sweden, it sets a nasty precedence that other country's may follow with.


RE: What were they thinking?
By mmntech on 6/24/2008 9:25:41 PM , Rating: 5
Keep in mind that the proposed "Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement" has a clause in it that will require ISPs to monitor and disclose criminal activities of their users without warrant. It's not just a Swedish problem if the ACTA gets passed. This is probably the most disturbing part of the anti-piracy measures since it essentially gives the government (through ISPs) a blank cheque to search your browsing habits to make sure you're not doing anything "illegal". It's an invasion of privacy and unconstitutional in my opinion. There's really no different between it and the anti-terrorism wiretapping controversy. Only in this case, it affects pretty much everybody.


RE: What were they thinking?
By Polynikes on 6/25/2008 12:06:34 PM , Rating: 2
I agree, I think we're gonna see a lot of VPN tunneling and other stuff like it if that law is passed.


RE: What were they thinking?
By P4blo on 6/26/2008 9:48:53 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly. They better hope they can get some quantum decryption going really soon or their plans will be pointless.

Alternatively, we must assume then that the next stage is to try and ban the use of security systems? So a global ban on public encryption? That's like a BAN on privacy.

No. In my mind this situation is totally black and white. Intelligence services should only be putting monitoring in place for SUSPECTS. This approach is everyone is guilty until proved innocent where our privacy is concerned. They're all rubbing their hands thinking how easy it will be to police everyone in the modern age.

BZZZZZZZT WRONG ! Get back to proper police work. The liberty of the masses should not be erased because of the few it's just _totally__wrong_!


RE: What were they thinking?
By Donkey2008 on 6/25/2008 3:55:07 PM , Rating: 3
It would only be unconstitutional if this law were passed in the United States. Maybe I am just a dumb, educated person, but the U.S. Constitution doesn't have any relevance in Sweden.

Funny thing is this has already happened in our "Defender of Freedom"(tm) United States, yet no one raises an eyebrow unless it is a Dailytech article. We have the Patriot Act (an oxymoron) to allow law enforcement to monitor any and all data at their leasure (internet, cell phone) without so much as probable cause, reason, or a warrant.

Afterall, none of our fellow irrational, paranoid American citizens want those "pesky" courts or balance of powers mucking up our War on Terror.

Welcome to the club Sweden.


RE: What were they thinking?
By HVAC on 6/25/2008 4:52:24 PM , Rating: 3
Dear Donkey2008,

This is a National Security Letter. You are hereby barred from talking about it with anyone.

We will be knocking on your door ... soon ...

Don't try to call anyone ... we'll know and we won't like it.

Sincerely,

Your Government


RE: What were they thinking?
By Mojo the Monkey on 6/25/2008 1:17:44 PM , Rating: 4
its yet another example of "Well you shouldn't worry if you don't have anything to hide" mentality slowly eroding the personal liberties of people all over the world.

I hope people start seeing this kind of rationale for what it is: a logically-backward excuse.


RE: What were they thinking?
By P4blo on 6/26/2008 9:55:19 AM , Rating: 2
If you give governments too much power and control over the people they're GUARANTEED to abuse it. We had a case in the UK where the Gov. gave local councils certain rights to use CCTV for monitoring of serious criminal matters. We already have a storm of protest because they immediately started using it to fine people who's dogs fouled on the pavement!! They even used it to track a family and ensure that they lived in the correct area to send their kids to a specific school. The gov. wasn't impressed and told them to stop but what better examples do you need?


RE: What were they thinking?
By cane on 6/24/2008 10:06:20 PM , Rating: 2
The only problem is that hey have a lot of processing power... their latest and greatest computer is the 11th fastest computer in the world. Who knows what else they have?
And their not happy yet, they want to buy something more powerful...


RE: What were they thinking?
By PWNettle on 6/26/2008 4:19:25 PM , Rating: 2
You should already be encrypting your email if you deal with anything sensative - otherwise you should never email, and thus digitially document, anything you wouldn't want someone else to read. It's one of the basics of email common sense.

Beyond that - who cares what Sweden does, and even moreso, who cares what the Pirate Bay idiots say, think, or do?


RE: What were they thinking?
By Penti on 6/24/2008 10:36:14 PM , Rating: 2
Well they will keep copies if you email someone in Sweden that is for interest in your company or wise versa, but they are not really allowed to do so with correspondence that's between two parties inside of Sweden. However they will keep records of traffic data, as in who you emails in Sweden, as they will probably don't see it as intruding ones privacy. And they can do that, even if it's encrypted with PGP/GPG and that is really more of value then WHAT you actually write in your emails.

The law has a flimsy formulation that says only external treats against Sweden is to be monitored. Not domestic. But theres a real treat that this organization can be miss used for other purposes. They could probably do the same as they did with our security police in the 90s (and earlier) when they did unlawfully register some peoples political opinions on order from the Government via a secret directive.

The law take affect January 1 2009.


RE: What were they thinking?
By Stasi on 6/25/2008 12:50:11 PM , Rating: 2
They will monitor ALL traffic that passes swedens
boarders! It means that everyones internet traffic
can be monitred, even if you live on the other side of the planet...
I live in sweden and will try to crypt my traffic.


RE: What were they thinking?
By Penti on 6/27/2008 2:40:37 AM , Rating: 2
Well that's the point, to monitor foreign traffic and relations. But most CONTENT will just be filtered out.

Encryption is kinda useless though. The stuff that's most of value to them is who you contact, they can figure out your opinions just from that and your public postings on the web like this one. And they will also register which site you have visited and so on if they think it's important. They don't really need to know the content to map and register your life, friends, business contacts and your interests. To just PGP/GPG-encrypt your emails won't help. If it passes through Sweden on the way to the recipient they would know who you contacted, just not what you wrote. But your social network is more important then what you wrote. If you use services like tor, they could just setup a tor-server which you might use without knowing and monitor the traffic through it. Tunnels might be helpful though. But they still would know who used which tunnel. The next step is to actually infiltrate your network, like the stasi-agents in the GDR. Or cops in the US that ends up just promoting/encourage crime and trying to make people commit them :)

There are reasons for the Swedish Tax Agency having there own spiders crawling the web (there own search engine). Most of the incrimination stuff about you are already publicly available on the web. It's just a matter of collecting and analyzing them.


RE: What were they thinking?
By bongsi21 on 6/26/2008 12:56:18 PM , Rating: 2
This law is unjust. The government exist for the freedom of its people not the other way around. FREEDOM OF SPEECH MUST BE APPLIED!!!

It just means that SWEDEN is just boasting off to the world that they can fully control their citizens internet access unlike other nations.

quote:
The world wide web was created and freely distributed for the people to use and foster.


Enough with the false analogies to the U.S.
By Chaser on 6/25/2008 4:41:25 PM , Rating: 2
If any of you Chicken Littles can present specific verifiable cases where your personal rights have been "intruded and trounced upon" besides the anecdotal tripe you repeat from your talking points, please by all means let us hear all the details for everyone to read.

Otherwise enough with the U.S. bashing please.




By TomCorelis (blog) on 6/25/2008 5:34:26 PM , Rating: 3
It can be difficult to articulate why privacy is such a concern for people. I know this, because I struggle with it myself -- a lot of people are simply willing to submit to surveillance because "I've got nothing to hide," and a lot of the pro-privacy arguments are hopelessly flawed.

In an effort to learn how to better articulate how important privacy is to me, I did a fair amount of internet research on the topic. These links are pulled from my bookmarks:

Schneier on Security - The Value of Privacy
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/05/the_...

Social Science Research Network - 'I've Got Nothing to Hide' and Other Misunderstandings of Privacy
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id...

Somewhat related, but equally important:
Washington Post - My National Security Letter Gag Order
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic...


By lexluthermiester on 6/25/2008 7:37:29 PM , Rating: 2
Tom,

Being one who is a "nothing to hide" person, I myself struggled with the issue for sometime, until my identity was stolen. I then learned the hard and expensive way that a persons private life is just that, private. None need or should be allowed to have access to my life unless it is necessary. My experiences not withstanding, it is still a basic right to hav