backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 121 comment(s) - last by Fnoob.. on Oct 22 at 9:46 AM


The NSSO states that it would be possible to capture energy equivalent to all remaining oil resources in a year of solar power.  (Source: NSSO/Pentagon)

The current design of the Space Solar Panel (SSP).  (Source: NSSO/Pentagon)

Artist's redition of an SSP power plant in action, beaming energy to Earth.  (Source: ©Mafic Studios, Inc.)
The Pentagon has some advanced solutions for the world energy crisis.

The Pentagon has never shied from developing expensive and controversial plans for new military technologies.  Over the past few decades it has engaged in many research programs, including the controversial strategic defense initiative/missile shield, which is finally seeing some measure of success according to a recent article by DailyTech's Michael Asher.

Now the Pentagon has issued a new report that calls for a technology effort, which may leave some scratching their heads, while raising many a cheer from some space flight advocates.

The Pentagon seeks to eliminate U.S. dependence on foreign oil, including imports that come from the conflict laden Middle East -- something which it sees as a critical "strategic energy vulnerability."  In order to eliminate this dependence, it proposes a radical alternative energy strategy.

The Pentagon's National Security Space Office (NSSO) proposed collecting solar rays in space and beaming it back to Earth.  It stated in the report that it feels that this is a "near-term" solution, which could be realized very quickly.

Such a move it says in the report, would allow U.S. forces deployed around the world to eliminate the long logistic chain needed to deliver fuel to vehicles and other generators, by beaming power directly where needed.  The NSSO labels the technology Space Solar Power (SSP) and has issued a press release (PDF) on a blog it is publishing with the Space Frontier Foundation.

The plan also states that by developing SSP, the U.S. Armed Forces can reduce the risk for large scale commercial development of the technology.  What this means, if the plans succeeds, is that industries may eventually see the technology at an affordable price, while the military will pay a premium to become the early adopter.

"The business case still doesn't close, but it's closer than ever," Marine Corps Lt. Col. Paul E. Damphousse of the NSSO states in the report.

Charles Miller, CEO of Constellation Services International, a space technology start-up, and director of the Space Frontier Foundation, hopes that the government chooses to follow the report and adopt the technology.  By installing a power plant in geostationary orbit, the government can effectively "buy down" the risk for industry start-ups such as his company, he says.

Such a move could allow the U.S. and its allies to commercially eliminate oil dependence, and meet the energy needs of the developing world, ushering in an era of clean energy.

John Mankins, president of the Space Power Association and technical expert in the field of SSP, had this to say on the proposal, "This is not a 50-year solution--the kinds of things that are possible today say a truly transformational demonstration at a large scale is achievable within this decade."

Mankins points to how solar cell efficiency has increased from once having a goal of 20-25 percent efficiency, to having successfully achieved efficiency rates of over 40 percent.   Mankins suggests using the International Space Station (ISS) as a possible platform to build the power plant around.  He says that Japan's Kibo module, set to launch in the first half of next year, would be the perfect place to test exotic materials for the solar cells, and eventually to begin mass construction of a solar array.

The panel of experts which helped publish the report suggests that the Pentagon front the costs of the technology to industry.  It also suggests aggressive tax breaks and other policies to encourage SSP development and adoption.

Lt. Damphousse also indicated that SSP development could give a boost to other space industries.  He stated in the report that development of a reusable launch vehicle was critical to making SSP viable.

While this report certainly indicates an interesting proposal from the Pentagon, it is questionable how much funding or serious attention it will receive.  Then again, from some of the other expensive and outlandish technologies such as laser pulse and strobe light weapons, which the Pentagon has been developing, nothing should be ruled impossible.  SSP may soon provide a new alternative energy option.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Simcity
By darkfoon on 10/15/2007 11:25:01 AM , Rating: 5
Am I the only person who is reminded of the "Microwave" power plant in Simcity 2000 by this?
Anybody remember the disaster involving it, too?

That makes me wary of this technology. But its hilarious that it might become a viable tech.




RE: Simcity
By Proteusza on 10/15/2007 11:51:29 AM , Rating: 2
Ha ha, imagine if maxis patented the idea!

Seeing as the documentation for the manual states the same idea, and it was pubilshed in 2000, wouldnt that mean Maxis thought of the idea first?

On second thought, seeing as Maxis is now owned by EA, the Pentagon should use the new technology to "accidentally" vaporize the offices of EA.


RE: Simcity
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 10/15/2007 12:19:13 PM , Rating: 5
I always win a little inside when science fiction becomes reality.


RE: Simcity
By OrSin on 10/15/2007 1:47:54 PM , Rating: 1
Any one else missing how this would power vechicles. Most of the electric power we use is from coal and nature gas, not oil. So how would this really help our dependance on gas.


RE: Simcity
By JBird7986 on 10/15/2007 2:47:09 PM , Rating: 2
I was thinking the same thing.


RE: Simcity
By roastmules on 10/15/2007 2:49:53 PM , Rating: 5
Battery power and charging stations.
Set up a charging station at your base camp, or even a field camp for all vehicles. Send a request to the power distribution center, and ask for a beam of x' in diameter at a certain coordinates.
With this, the only issue then becomes how many beams of power can be sent...

The US military currently is jumping on the hybrid vehicle bandwagon as the technology can reduce transport costs to fuel distance vehicles as well as provide near-silent recon or assault vehicles.

BTW, it can cost as much as $100 total cost to get 1 gallon of fuel to a remote unit.


RE: Simcity
By Alexstarfire on 10/15/2007 3:15:37 PM , Rating: 2
Well, I just kind of assumed that they would tie this in to our very aged power grid. The power grid would probably need to be revamped or something, but that's going to have to happen eventually anyways. Once it's tied into the power grid then it can basically go anywhere. We may even set up a global power grid, who knows.


RE: Simcity
By goku on 10/17/2007 7:09:50 AM , Rating: 2
Too bad they removed this feature from the newer Sim Cities, I liked the more diverse power plant options that were in Simcity 2000.


RE: Simcity
By lompocus on 10/18/2007 11:01:57 PM , Rating: 2
ever heard of the TESLA tower? By tesla himself?

In the 1920s he tried to set it up. He almost had it finished until the depression hit. He couldn't pay up, and it was eventually recycled for scrap.

Basically, the tower was huge, and it would basically shoot power into the Earth's body which would vibrate around there for a helluva long time, longer than we would care. Another Tesla tower could later pick up the energy whenver it wanted and however much it wanted and disperse it among everyone in the area. The stupid contractors and business prevented this great thign from happeneing.

Then again, turning each tower 'on' once would completely ionize and utterly obliterate everything in a 5 mile radius. So...we'd have a lot of little holes around the world lol.


RE: Simcity
By PrimarchLion on 10/15/2007 4:25:23 PM , Rating: 2
I thought it was published in like 1993.


RE: Simcity
By 3kliksphilip on 10/15/2007 11:59:29 AM , Rating: 2
I love the idea. It's just like something out of a James Bond film. 'If we concentrate the beam, it can become a powerful weapon!'


RE: Simcity
By Proteusza on 10/15/2007 12:01:57 PM , Rating: 2
Incidentally, I think Die Another Day had exactly that in it.


RE: Simcity
By Bladud on 10/15/2007 12:29:05 PM , Rating: 6
The oldest use of the idea I ever saw was in a story by Asimov circa 1940 ("Reason"; the one with the robot who thinks he is Mohammed). I imagine it is a lot older though.


RE: Simcity
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 10/15/2007 1:21:43 PM , Rating: 2
It was 1941. I think Asimov still is credited with the first mention of it though. It took another 30 years for someone to get a patent. And people wonder why I'm an Asimov nut :)


RE: Simcity
By Sahrin on 10/15/2007 4:31:42 PM , Rating: 1
You mean there are people who aren't Asimov nuts?


RE: Simcity
By Sahrin on 10/15/2007 1:28:59 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sorry I can't personally give this post a 6. You deserve a cookie for getting the reference right - these poor kids who think that the technology was thought of by Maxis 7 years ago need to do some reading.

That story rocked - and the idea of space-based solar power using microwave beams to return it to Earth is older than most people alive today.


RE: Simcity
By Fnoob on 10/22/2007 9:46:15 AM , Rating: 2
the robot who thinks he is Mohammed.

is there anyone who isn't an Asimov nut?

Um, Muslim extremists?


RE: Simcity
By 3kliksphilip on 10/15/2007 2:44:37 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah it does! (And the Eden Project, which I live several miles away from). No wonder the Army's interested in this product. Perpetual ion cannon!


RE: Simcity
By Verran on 10/15/2007 1:24:17 PM , Rating: 2
I actually thought of "Real Genius" myself :)


RE: Simcity