backtop


Print 7 comment(s) - last by sorry dog.. on Jan 7 at 2:11 PM

Verizon is receiving certain AWS and PCS spectrum licenses in exchange for the A-Block spectrum

T-Mobile and Verizon have swapped airwaves in an effort to gain spectrum where the two U.S. carriers need it most. T-Mobile paid Verizon $2.365 billion USD in cash for certain 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses. In exchange, Verizon is receiving certain AWS and PCS spectrum licenses from T-Mobile worth approximately $950 million USD. 
 
On T-Mobile's end, the new licenses will fill in the gaps in its network coverage. More specifically, it will provide T-Mobile with low-band spectrum in nine of the top 10 markets across the U.S.
 
“This is a great opportunity to secure low-band spectrum in many of the top markets in America,” said John Legere, President and CEO of T-Mobile. “These transactions represent our biggest move yet in a series of initiatives that are rapidly expanding our already lightning fast network and improving its performance across the country. We will continue to find ways to advance our customers’ network experience just as our bold Un-carrier moves have shaken up the wireless industry to benefit consumers.”
 
This could make T-Mobile look even more appealing in a takeover deal. Just last month, it was reported that SoftBank Corp. -- which already acquired U.S. carrier Sprint last summer for $21.6 billion USD -- is in talks with banks like Credit Suisse Group AG, Mizuho Bank Ltd, Goldman Sachs Group Inc and Deutsche Bank AG in an effort to acquire a majority stake in T-Mobile. The deal has been valued at around $20 billion.
 
Some reports say T-Mobile could continue filling in its coverage gaps by looking to other owners of A-block spectrum, such as U.S. Cellular Corp. But nothing has been confirmed in that area yet. 
 
T-Mobile raised approximately $4 billion USD last year in an effort to buy new spectrum licenses and expand its network. 
 
As for Verizon, its new AWS and PCS spectrum licenses from T-Mobile will help relieve wireless network congestion in cities with heavy traffic (which affects performance). These key cities are Los Angeles, San Francisco, Dallas, Detroit and Atlanta. 
 
The deal is expected to close by mid-2014.

Source: Business Wire



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Great news for TMobile.
By elkinm on 1/6/2014 4:17:00 PM , Rating: 2
Having moved from Verizon to TMobile, I find that in the Chicago area TMobile is far more reliable than VZ ever was. However VZ does have better coverage away from major cities.
I wonder if this will help TMobile in these areas, and if so than this is simply fantastic news for me and any current or future TMobile customers. I wonder how long until we can see the deal in effect.




RE: Great news for TMobile.
By Rukkian on 1/6/2014 4:25:29 PM , Rating: 2
I would love it if it would help in areas outside of cities, as the coverage in Iowa is pretty much edge/partner only outside of Des Moines. Unfortunately, it seems this is only in big markets (21 of the 30 biggest markets). It seems it will help with penetration inside buildings around you and other big cities, but does not seem to help at all outside the metros. Where this might help, is that their handsets would now be capable of the 700mhz bands, and they may be able to get roaming agreements, or buy spectrum from other regional carriers to cover other areas, where right now, their current handsets would not even allow it.

As far as I know, the lower frequencies do not travel as far, but penetrate structures better. Higher frequencies typically go longer distances, but will be cut off much easier trying to get through structures.

I really like what T-Mob is doing, and would love it if they got better coverage.


RE: Great news for TMobile.
By extide on 1/6/2014 7:28:23 PM , Rating: 2
Almost right. Lower frequencies both penetrate better and go farther, while higher penetrates worse and doesn't go as far.


RE: Great news for TMobile.
By Mathos on 1/7/2014 12:26:11 PM , Rating: 2
Lower frequencies Carry farther, and penetrate structures more easily.

Higher frequencies generally have a higher data throughput though. Kind of a trade off.


RE: Great news for TMobile.
By sorry dog on 1/7/2014 2:11:44 PM , Rating: 2
Yup.

For 1900 spectrum more towers may be required, but that is probably less of a problem for Verizon. I'm guessing their network of tower leases is much stronger than Tmob's.

I wonder how much of the ATT merger cash Tmob has left?


Why?
By Guspaz on 1/6/2014 3:14:39 PM , Rating: 2
This is great news for T-Mobile, but why would Verizon ever give up any 700MHz spectrum at all? That stuff is the most valuable spectrum available for mobile use. Up here in Canada, we're getting ready for our 700MHz auction, and all the companies are fighting tooth and nail to get as much of it as they can for themselves. The incumbents even sued the government to make the auction rules more favourable to them so that they could get a bigger chunk.




RE: Why?
By DanNeely on 1/6/2014 7:51:54 PM , Rating: 3
They agreed to sell their A block spectrum in order to get approval for the acquisition of AWS spectrum from cable companies needed to give them national AWS coverage. Previously they only had significant amounts of AWS spectrum on one side of the country; and adding a band that only worked on one side of the Mississippi valley (roughly speaking) would be problematic at best; meanwhile build out deadlines meant they needed to start doing something with what they had fairly soon or be forced to hand it back to the govt. As a side note, the initial AWS auction resulted in really messy ownership: Only tmobile had coverage nationwide; which was why only they and a few smaller carriers built anything out on it at the time.

The reason they were willing to sell ATT their 700mhz B block spectrum and to TMobile 700 mhz A spectrum instead of giving up AWS to get more 700 mhz or PCS (aside from convincing someone to sell it to them anyway) was that because getting radios to place nicely with both its nationwide C block and the regional A/B blocks simultaneously was proving more difficult than expected because the C tx and A/B rx frequencies were too close together. (A cynic might wonder if they had a better idea of the technical risks involved than they stated publicly; but felt that playing keep away to prevent ATT from having nationwide coverage initially was worth it even if they knew they'd probably have to sell the A/B blocks eventually.)


"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki