backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 26 comment(s) - last by Dologan.. on May 23 at 1:15 PM

Modern day Icarus flies at 186 MPH

The power of flight is something that has intrigued humans going back to Greek times. Icarus and his wax wings are one example of the freedom people saw in the power of flight. A Swiss man named Yves Rossy has become the modern day equivalent of Icarus with one supreme difference -- Rossy didn’t fall to his death.

One other minor difference between Rossy and Icarus is that Rossy’s wing was made from carbon and rather than flapping his arms like a bird, Rossy used a jet engine strapped to his back. Rossy’s contraption didn’t allow him to take off from the ground like the fabled Icarus; rather he was dropped from an airplane at an altitude of about 8,000 feet over the Swiss Alps.

Rossy jumped from the plane equipped with a parachute and his folded wing. During his freefall Rossy unfolded his wing, ignited his jet engine and proceeded to blast into the record books as the first person to fly with nothing but a wing and a jet engine.

Rossy reportedly reached speeds as high as 186 MPH and performed some basic aerobatics like barrel rolls for the crowd (most of whom probably expected to witness an Icarus-like crash). Rossy told Reuters after his flight, “Happiness, an extraordinary sense of fullness to have once again been able to fly and mostly to show it, because it's one thing to do it on one's own, but to be able to share it live like today, that's extraordinary."

According to Rossy this wasn’t his first attempt at flight. In March of 2003 Rossy says he tried and failed at a similar flight using an inflatable wing. His latest ridged wing made of carbon coupled with his jet engine allows him a flight time of 5 minutes and 40 seconds. After running out of fuel for his jet engine Rossy parachuted to a landing at the Bex airdrome.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Badass
By FITCamaro on 5/16/2008 1:33:15 PM , Rating: 3
But I'm going to stick to sitting in a plane seat when I want to fly.

It's definitely gotta be a rush though.




RE: Badass
By amanojaku on 5/16/2008 2:12:30 PM , Rating: 2
I'm buying one of these if they allow cell phones on planes. I'd rather plummet to my death or burst into flames than listen to teenage girls, walkie-talkie thugs, and self-important businessmen yap-yap-yapping all the way from NYC to Europe!


RE: Badass
By arazok on 5/16/2008 2:32:13 PM , Rating: 5
"Like, oh my god! I just totaly saw a rocket man outside the window!"


RE: Badass
By Talon75 on 5/16/2008 2:43:17 PM , Rating: 2
Shut! Up! Like no way! Seriously?


RE: Badass
By arazok on 5/16/2008 3:20:07 PM , Rating: 2
I'm totaly serious! He like, had all these jets, and was like totaly hot.


RE: Badass
By KaiserCSS on 5/21/2008 12:11:36 PM , Rating: 3
Ok... you guys took this waaay too far. I'm starting to worry haha.


RE: Badass
By jlips6 on 5/17/2008 12:20:14 PM , Rating: 2
hey, whut-it-do homie!? some G wit a pimp rocket on his ass gone' and just smoked our plane!
Whut!? let's jack this bitch, and run his rocket ass down!

(lol, walkie talk thugs.)


RE: Badass
By jahinoz on 5/19/2008 12:44:49 PM , Rating: 2
"Pimp My Jetpack"


RE: Badass
By HaZaRd2K6 on 5/16/2008 9:20:15 PM , Rating: 1
Somehow, I don't think you'll be getting much cell service over the North Atlantic.

Just a hunch.


RE: Badass
By Griswold on 5/22/2008 5:58:32 AM , Rating: 1
Unless... the plane comes with its own cellphone network. Which ist what most carriers are actually going for - and not only for safety reasons. $$$


Aerial Insertion
By xxeonn on 5/17/2008 3:02:16 AM , Rating: 3
Soldiers could jump out of a plane a few miles from the LZ and use this to reach to get there virtualy undetected. All they would have to do is improve the range and decrease the sound output.




RE: Aerial Insertion
By Hare on 5/17/2008 2:23:24 PM , Rating: 5
It has already been done. It's called hang gliding :)


RE: Aerial Insertion
By Shining Arcanine on 5/18/2008 5:31:12 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, but this would enable rapid response, with a lower chance of being shot. Unfortunately, leaving these things in enemy territory would allow the enemy to capture them and reverse engineer them, so they would gain similar capabilities.


RE: Aerial Insertion
By Griswold on 5/22/2008 5:59:40 AM , Rating: 2
Two words: Self-destruction!


Something to get During Retirement
By KessGarrido on 5/16/2008 2:42:29 PM , Rating: 2
I'm going to make sure I get one of these sometime in the future... ^_^




By NEOCortex on 5/16/2008 5:49:30 PM , Rating: 3
Now if they could only combine this with that exoskeleton mentioned in the other article. A man can dream.......


By Griswold on 5/22/2008 6:02:23 AM , Rating: 2
Keep your body in excellent shape if you want to use that thing at retirement age - not like you just hang under this thing and fly, you gotta steer (and prevent becoming a peg) with your entire body. ;)


OMG! Mommy look it's...
By Etern205 on 5/17/2008 10:34:35 PM , Rating: 2
Buzz LightYear!




RE: OMG! Mommy look it's...
By Polynikes on 5/18/2008 8:44:16 PM , Rating: 2
To infinity, and beyond!


RE: OMG! Mommy look it's...
By murphyslabrat on 5/19/2008 11:32:06 AM , Rating: 3
After the fuel ran out, you could re-enact Buzz's balcony scene.


Harrier version
By Rob94hawk on 5/19/2008 3:32:19 PM , Rating: 2
If he can somehow create software to rotate the jet engines 180 degrees and take off like a harrier jump jet then I'll have a new way to get to work!




RE: Harrier version
By BZDTemp on 5/19/2008 5:00:19 PM , Rating: 2
Taking off vertical takes a lot more power than just flying and that means a bigger engine which needs more fuel and so on.

The Harrier may be a VTOL aircraft but just like the other VTOL's it will take of as a normal plane when possible as it save a lot of fuel. The British air craft carrier has no catapult like the US ones but instead they have a jump hill which lets the Harrier take of "normally" - clever and ugly in true British tradition :-)


Ouch
By kyleb2112 on 5/16/2008 4:34:09 PM , Rating: 3
The only drawback? Landing on your package.