backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 31 comment(s) - last by William Gaatje.. on Feb 26 at 11:17 AM

Researchers in Taiwan claim to have proven another link between teenage aggressiveness and Internet addiction

Teenagers addicted to the internet are more prone to aggressive behavior than normal teenagers, Taiwanese researchers recently announced.

Researchers studied 9,405 Taiwanese teenagers, and found that all who were said to be addicted to the internet were more likely to be aggressive towards their peers -- more likely to admit to hitting, shoving or threatening their peers within the past 12 months.

Of the 9,405 participants, 25 percent of male teenagers and 13 percent of female teenagers were believed to be official internet addicts.  Thirty two percent of all males and 13 percent of girls admitted to engaging in aggressive behavior, though 37 percent of participants with internet addiction also engaged in aggressive behavior.

"Online chatting, adult sex Web viewing, online gaming, online gambling and [surfing the] Bulletin Board System were all associated with aggressive behaviors," as teenagers would create the opportunity to "observe, experience and try aggressive behaviors [on the internet] resulting in positive outcome, [such as] identification in a group, being a hero or winning in games," researchers observed in the study.

Researchers published their findings in the Journal of Adolescent Health, but will be met by certain levels of criticism and doubt among other researchers.  Despite the findings of the Taiwanese researchers, it seems U.S. researchers aren't quite ready to blame the internet for aggressive behavior among adolescents.

Aside from the fact it's unknown how internet addiction was officially defined, there are numerous other factors that could have come into play, other researchers said.  Chinese researchers have created some guidelines towards the official definition of internet addiction, but a global definition has not been created and agreed upon.

"It could be that using the internet causes people to behave more aggressively or it could be that aggressive people seek out the internet," according to Brad Bushman, University of Michigan psychology professor.  "Or some other third factor could cause both -- people with poor social skills don't have any friends, so they spend a lot of time on the internet and can't resolve conflicts in non-aggressive ways."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

In a Single Sentence...
By clovell on 2/25/2009 5:42:22 PM , Rating: 5
Why are children who are addicted to the internet overly aggressive compared to their non-addicted peers?

Because fists can't reach through computer screens.




RE: In a Single Sentence...
By Steve1981 on 2/25/2009 5:56:20 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
Because fists can't reach through computer screens.


Yet!


RE: In a Single Sentence...
By clovell on 2/25/2009 6:14:14 PM , Rating: 5
I just had a vision of Chuck Norris as Obama's Internet Czar.

... I've never seen so much blood.


RE: In a Single Sentence...
By tastyratz on 2/26/2009 9:05:58 AM , Rating: 3
I will be rich the day I invent the STAB YOU IN THE FACE button for keyboards, you just wait.


RE: In a Single Sentence...
By HostileEffect on 2/25/2009 5:57:16 PM , Rating: 1
I think that almost sums it up right.

Lack of maturity and parenting, combined with the simple fact that fists can't reach though screens.

If you ever take the internet away from someone, I don't think they will try harder, more like see one will see himself without anything to work for and cease to try. Things might get ugly from there.


RE: In a Single Sentence...
By PrinceGaz on 2/25/2009 8:00:01 PM , Rating: 4
Not just that, but if most of your "friends" are on Facebook (and you have several hundred or even thousands of them), you are probably missing out to some degree on direct inter-personal skills that allow you to deal with most situations.

You can't get a thump in your face through your monitor, but you also don't get that instant real-time interaction where you subconciously learn to read and send body-language to others. A chat with a webcam is a poor substitute for being with someone in the same room, and leaving messages for them to read later isn't proper interaction at all.

Being around people is the only way to learn how to get on with them and deal with every situation. If you spend most of your time staring at a computer screen, you're going to find it more difficult once you go out your front-door, and are more likely to get into fights as a result.


RE: In a Single Sentence...
By William Gaatjes on 2/26/2009 10:56:25 AM , Rating: 2
Perfectly spoken ! I agree fully.

And for the solution minded : Internet cafe's ?


Social ineptitude..
By Steve1981 on 2/25/2009 5:59:24 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
people with poor social skills don't have any friends, so they spend a lot of time on the internet and can't resolve conflicts in non-aggressive ways."


Bingo. The interweb is home for many of the socially inept.




RE: Social ineptitude..
By HostileEffect on 2/25/2009 6:04:05 PM , Rating: 2
Are you socially challenged?


RE: Social ineptitude..
By Steve1981 on 2/25/2009 6:05:42 PM , Rating: 1
Depends on who you ask.


RE: Social ineptitude..
By OblivionMage on 2/25/2009 10:14:31 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
The interweb is home for many of the socially inept.


While the basketball court is the home for many of the intellectually inept?


RE: Social ineptitude..
By ViroMan on 2/26/2009 3:44:52 AM , Rating: 1
no... football is the home for most of the intellectually inept. All them concussions sure don't raise your IQ but, at least your get plenty of gold stars... and all the other colored ones too.


Poppycock
By GeorgeH on 2/25/2009 8:04:10 PM , Rating: 4
Pathetic research noobs; do the gene pool a favor and kill yourselves. Extra points if you use psychic zombie space kittens, five lollipops, and a flamethrower.

Sidebar: The tacit implication of this study is that "aggressive behavior" in kids is by definition a bad thing. I would disagree - in fact, if any junior-high school aged teenager (those the study found to be most "affected") manages to go much more than a year without any "hitting, shoving or threatening" of their peers, I pity them.




RE: Poppycock
By William Gaatjes on 2/26/2009 11:17:41 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Sidebar: The tacit implication of this study is that "aggressive behavior" in kids is by definition a bad thing. I would disagree - in fact, if any junior-high school aged teenager (those the study found to be most "affected") manages to go much more than a year without any "hitting, shoving or threatening" of their peers, I pity them.


True. All children exhibit extreme agressive behaviour up till 3 years of age. And this is pure physical agression because babies do not really have any other way of communicating then crying. Between being born and 3 seems to be the most frustating period of life for anybody.
After that it's just creating boundaries for yourself and expressing them while interacting with other people. That can get rough at some times.



Huh?
By Dharl on 2/26/2009 10:31:32 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
"Online chatting, adult sex Web viewing, online gaming, online gambling and [surfing the] Bulletin Board System were all associated with aggressive behaviors," ...


So let me get this straight:
1: Online gaming
2: Online chatting
3: Online gambling
4: Browsing Forums
5: Pr0n

These were all considered aggresive behavior for this study? All because they would:

quote:
... "observe, experience and try aggressive behaviors [on the internet] resulting in positive outcome, [such as] identification in a group, being a hero or winning in games," researchers observed in the study.


So you are considered aggresive if you go online for the above 5 reasons and it results in:

1: Making friends with an group of others online.
2: Being a hero and/or winning in a video game.
3: Being positively encouraged

Studies like this pain me... if this were true you'd have to mark not only teenagers, but I'd guess more than 80% of everyone who uses the internet as aggresive.




RE: Huh?
By William Gaatjes on 2/26/2009 11:09:11 AM , Rating: 2
Being assertive is the mild and accepted form of being agressive. Being assertive is considered a positive trait.
Maybe it is an translation error ? :) :)


My thoughts
By unclesharkey on 2/25/2009 5:57:06 PM , Rating: 2
My thoughts are that maybe teens who spend a lot of time on the computer/internet spend less time socializing with their peers and therefore lack the skills of interacting appropriately with their peers. Plus you have to consider all the other influences in the child's life like their parents, friends, school, social outlets....etc......This is probably something that they learned from a young age. These same kids might also spend a lot of time at home alone, or watching a lot of TV instead of socializing. How many of the homes had domestic violence going on in them? Drugs, mental health problems etc.......




RE: My thoughts
By dragonbif on 2/25/2009 6:42:05 PM , Rating: 2
First of all this is Taiwan we are talking about. I would say a good 90% of the parents both work and leave kids at home alone. Yes I did pull the 90% out of my butt but I would say it is close. In order of them to make the money then need both have to work and that is just how it is. They do go to school longer then us 9-10hrs a day 6 days a week so they do get lots of time with other people but they must not socialize vary well.


Yeah, which is it really?
By A Stoner on 2/25/2009 6:54:26 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe aggressive people are just addictive personalities. Maybe the people who are willing to be fucking studied are assholes. Maybe the research is accurate. Then again, maybe it is just a bunch of fucking numbers tailor fit to some cock sucking media whore who has an agenda to push. Once again, here is study that crunches some numbers, comes up with a conclusion that was likely looked for, and it is reported as science. These people are not scientist, they do not follow scientific protocol for coming up with their results. Nothing they tell you is believable. Study does not equal science. Study does not prove anything.




RE: Yeah, which is it really?
By mindless1 on 2/25/2009 8:13:23 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe it's because hanging out on the internet isn't as rewarding psychologically as we hoped it would be, that at least when one is young they need to get out in real life and realize more how normal people act when they aren't hiding behind a keyboard... remembering these kids for the most part have not seen much of society till they live on their own for awhile, till then in the semi-sheltered institutions we built to control their minds for better and worse.

Maybe it's the porn too, deep down inside, no pun intended :),the girls dont' want the boys oogling over an impossible standard and the guys want the girls to act like porn stars at least once in a while? Not that I'm advocating irresponsible underage sex in some cases, but regardless of our good intentions if someone goes through puberty years before they're ready to have a family it can cause some angst. Even moreso as our society moves further towards needing lots of education to get a good job and this in a recessed economy.

Naturally, none of this is science, just casual observations that seem true a lot of the time. That people often mimic what they see on TV and act politically correct often throws a wrench in these kinds of behavioral responses.


Surprised nobody has linked this yet....
By slashbinslashbash on 2/26/2009 12:45:36 AM , Rating: 2
By LumbergTech on 2/26/2009 12:57:54 AM , Rating: 2
that doesnt prove a damn thing

what that proves is that that poor kids parents are a bunch of pathetic fools for leaving him with his brother

there is something much worse than internet addiction going on with that kid


This just in...
By Schrag4 on 2/25/2009 5:33:09 PM , Rating: 3
All addictions result in more aggressive behavior. When you're addicted to something, simply having to interact with those around you is annoying (since it's not satisfying your addiction) and you're more likely to be aggressive toward them. What does this have to do with the internet?




By quiksilvr on 2/25/2009 5:41:13 PM , Rating: 2
I'm so sick of this nonsense. Drugs are bad. Harlem isn't safe at night. Smoking causes cancer. Drinking and driving is bad...NO SH|T! STOP WASTING OUR MONEY! The economy is bad we need the money.




By CurseTheSky on 2/25/2009 8:12:31 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
"Online chatting, adult sex Web viewing, online gaming, online gambling and [surfing the] Bulletin Board System were all associated with aggressive behaviors," as teenagers would create the opportunity to "observe, experience and try aggressive behaviors [on the internet] resulting in positive outcome, [such as] identification in a group, being a hero or winning in games," researchers observed in the study.


So basically, they're trying to say that Internet games, chatting, etc. teaches kids that if you are aggressive rather than passive or submissive, you may be rewarded. Rewards are a good thing, so they expand their aggressive behavior to other things in life...

What about sports then? I haven't seen many high school basketball teams win many games by letting the other team walk all over them. I also haven't seen many teachers encourage students to sit silent during a class-wide debate or mock trial. And why is it, as parents, that we yank our kids abruptly out of one line and into a new, quickly-filling line when a new register opens at the supermarket?

Isn't aggressiveness encouraged just about everywhere we go?

The issue here isn't that games and whatnot encourage aggressiveness; rather, it's that so many of these kids don't have guidance as to what's right and what's wrong, how to respect others, and when / how much aggressiveness is appropriate.




Much Ado about nothing.
By just4U on 2/25/2009 10:40:14 PM , Rating: 2
These studies are a waste of time and money if you ask me. Trying to place blame on activities that are new to this generation of children is BS. I mean really, think about it. Have kids changed all that much? No. Sure their activities have as we have become more advanced but still.. Their really no different then they have ever been. It's not rocket science. They really do have to put this all into perpsective and look at underlying causes of abnormal behavoir as that's the ticket right there No matter what generation you happen to have hailed from.




What?
By Alexstarfire on 2/25/2009 11:15:46 PM , Rating: 2
Internet addiction does not make me more aggressive.

*Resumes punching nerd in the gut*




Very poor research...
By roostitup on 2/26/2009 3:29:36 AM , Rating: 2
So only 25% of males and 13% of females within their study were actually "addicted" to the internet and showed "aggression"? So, if half the participants were male and half female, 4,702 participants for each gender. 1,175 males and 611 females were "addicted" & "aggressive" of 9,405. I would like to know the average % of individuals that are excessively aggressive without internet addiction, I bet it's damn close to these results. I highly doubt that internet addiction causes excess aggression, if anything it's more likely to be a social issue with or without the internet. I also would like to know how many of these "aggressive addicts" had siblings to put up with. Quit blaming your social problems on the internet and do some better research.




Let's think about this...
By Motoman on 2/26/2009 9:49:05 AM , Rating: 2
...I think that there are all kinds of valid points that can be made here.

First is that it is at least implied that "addiction" (however that is defined, or isn't defined) to the internet *causes* anti-social behavior. Rather than perhaps persons who are naturally predisposed to anti-social behavior tend to gravitate to the internet. People who watch TV almost always own and use shoes - shoe ownership and use can not be said to cause you to watch TV.

quote:
"Online chatting, adult sex Web viewing, online gaming, online gambling and [surfing the] Bulletin Board System were all associated with aggressive behaviors," as teenagers would create the opportunity to "observe, experience and try aggressive behaviors [on the internet] resulting in positive outcome, [such as] identification in a group, being a hero or winning in games," researchers observed in the study.


...this is one of the dumbest statements I have ever seen. They are supporting their thesis that internet usage promotes antisocial behavior by showing that internet users search for "psotive outcomes" such as "identification in a group, being a hero or winning games?" Holy crap! I had no idea that the internet could promote such inethical goals! Let alone that internet usage would prompt users to seek "positive outcomes" when we all know people should be seeking negative outcomes in everything they do.

Is not the point of chatting, online or otherwise, a social function in which one finds friends, and therefore becomes identified as part of a group?

Isn't the point of playing any game, online or not, to win? Wouldn't we be rather concerned if our youth started engaging in games (online or not) with the intent to lose them?

Online gambling, like offline, is a game. You play to win. Same as above.

Surfing the BBS (I reckon they mean chat rooms and forums)...again is a purely social activity - people do that explicitly *in order to* interact with other people.

...and as for "online sex viewing" - oh no, don't tell me that kids of today have finally discovered teh secks. Oh, the humanity.

What a bunch of retards.




A professor ?
By William Gaatjes on 2/26/2009 11:03:37 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
"It could be that using the internet causes people to behave more aggressively or it could be that aggressive people seek out the internet," according to Brad Bushman, University of Michigan psychology professor. "Or some other third factor could cause both -- people with poor social skills don't have any friends, so they spend a lot of time on the internet and can't resolve conflicts in non-aggressive ways ."


That kind of sum's it up. Nobody want's to be alone. And the internet is an easy way to communicate.

But maybe we also have to look at the taiwanese culture and social structures.




Right.
By fuser197 on 2/25/09, Rating: 0
"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments









botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki