backtop


Print 36 comment(s) - last by heulenwolf.. on Nov 30 at 2:49 PM


  (Source: Calling the Shots)
Talking on your phone while walking could turn deadly, study says

We love our cell phones, but they just don't seem to always love us back.  To top off the possibility of cancer, infertility, and cell phone elbow, cell phone use (or abuse) has also been implicated in turning people into worse drivers.

Now a pair of new studies by the University of Illinois reveals yet another risk of cell phone use -- you're more likely to be hit by a car.  The studies, conducted by psychology professor Art Kramer, psychology professor Jason McCarley, and postdoctoral researcher Mark Neider, had participants cross a virtual street and measured whether their responses put them in danger.  The patients walked along the virtual street using a treadmill device.

Music was found to be perfectly safe for pedestrians; participants listening to music were found to perform no worse than standard (unencumbered) pedestrians.  However, those talking on hands free headsets showed possibly deadly mistakes.  And those talking directly into their cell phones were even more careless.

Overall, the results indicate the same conclusions cell phone driving studies have -- directly talking into your phone greatly raises your distraction, but talking into hands-free headsets also raises distraction to a lesser extent.  Describes Professor Kramer, "Many people assume that walking is so automatic that really nothing will get in the way. And walking is pretty automatic, but actually walking in environments that have lots of obstacles is perhaps not as automatic as one might think."

The first study examined a college age population of test subjects.  It found that participants were more likely to dally in crosswalks, not crossing in the allotted 30 seconds.  The cell phone talkers, in fact took 25 percent longer to cross the street than their undistracted peers.  Each participant encountered the same number and speed of cars.

That study was published in the journal Accident Analysis and Prevention.

A new study, not yet published, looks at the effects of cell phone use on elderly pedestrians.  It gave the patients 60 and older the same task, including some who had a history of falling.  It found that the elderly were at an even greater risk of traffic fatality when chatting on their phone.  There was a broader gap between those not talking on the phone and those talking on the phone than in the younger population, as well.

Describes Professor Kramer, "Older adults on the phone got run over about 15 percent more often" than those not on the phone, he said, and those with a history of falling fared even worse. So walking and talking on the phone while old, especially, appears to be dangerous."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By rudolphna on 11/25/2009 9:11:29 AM , Rating: 5
Another USELESS study that anyone with half a brain could have figured out on their own. All the money saved by banning useless studies would keep every poverty stricken person in the US living in some comfort for the rest of their lives.




RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By fatedtodie on 11/25/2009 9:28:24 AM , Rating: 3
Not exactly worthless.
While it should be common sense, the fact is studies like this can lead to people to take distractions more seriously and if they do, maybe it won't take the insurance companies having a new question to ask before insuring people like they do for drinking and smoking.

People assume alot about how much control they have of their daily lives and if a simple device takes away that control even using hands free, that is good to know isnt it?

While I understand your frustration at the obvious, if you really think giving that money to the poor would help anything you are misguided. a good portion of the poor aren't poor due to lack of funds. It is a lack of DRIVE or a disability or whatever they claim. I can speak on this because 2 times i was homeless and both times I caused the problem and I got MYSELF out of it. If the rest of the poor can't they deserve to be there.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By Spivonious on 11/25/2009 9:37:26 AM , Rating: 2
I'm waiting for the study about talking on your cell phone while bicycling. I see this almost every day, some cyclist meandering left and right and holding up traffic because she's on her cell phone.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By Truxy on 11/25/2009 10:38:27 AM , Rating: 3
Oooooh, how about texting while riding bicycles... that'd be a juicy one. I want to know if this would be dangerous or not, and if more dangerous, then by what percentage?


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By 306maxi on 11/25/2009 9:44:41 AM , Rating: 5
Yeah but..... if someone does realise these simple things then perhaps we're diluting the gene pool by going out of our way to point out the things that should be obvious. I have no problems with pedestrians walking across the road with phones. It's natural selection at work and represents a very limited risk to me so I'm not bothered.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By Ratinator on 11/25/2009 10:06:11 AM , Rating: 2
Give this guy a medal. :-)


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By kattanna on 11/25/2009 11:37:37 AM , Rating: 2
yep, i would have thought that this would be a self correcting problem.


By IcePickFreak on 11/25/2009 2:58:19 PM , Rating: 2
When I read the title of the article my initial thought was "Good!" If you really need an article to point out that not paying attention while crossing a road may result in you being ran over, you probably should. I thought people learned this at age 4 or 5 when you're taught to look both way before crossing a street?

Since there are quite a few interest groups that want the government to tax everything that doesn't fit into their interest these days, I want to be the first to propose an "idiot tax" on cell phones that will pay for car repairs required due to some idiot on a cell phone. I'm not saying everyone that uses a cell phone is an idiot, but the current trend is for everyone to pay for the lowest denominators.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By grath on 11/25/2009 4:19:12 PM , Rating: 3
New study suggests that doing anything, anywhere, in any way increases risk of death. The study recommends we all stay home curled in the fetal position surrounded by pillows while praying and hugging a fire extinguisher.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By satinspiral on 11/25/2009 9:39:00 AM , Rating: 3
Until you have a number of studies to verify your "common sense," it is not part of the body of scientifically acquired human knowledge. It's harder to shape policy and legislation around "common sense." For many people, "common sense" indicated the world was flat. We need to prove all things and hold fast to that which is true.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By Oregonian2 on 11/25/2009 2:27:23 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder if they've studied whether talking to the person next to you while crossing makes a difference. Perhaps even looking at the walking-partner while waving hands as part of the talking (with traffic coming from the backside).


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By heulenwolf on 11/30/2009 2:49:12 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sure that talking to the person next to you can increase risk. That risk is mitigated, however, by the increased probability that one of the two will stop talking to observe their environment before crossing. If you're deeply engaged in talking with someone to the extent that you don't notice oncoming traffic, you're probably going to stop walking when they do, too. Cell phones, on the other hand, don't look out for you. I would guess that they increase distractedness over talking to a live person because of the lack of visual cues, requiring more concentration from the caller.

But then, those statements are just conjecture, not the result of any kind of scientific study.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By PlasmaBomb on 11/25/2009 4:50:57 PM , Rating: 2
You are confusing "common sense" with religion...

For many people "religion" indicated the world was flat.

Scientists (philosophers) knew that the earth was round before Christ was born...


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By TSS on 11/25/2009 9:02:20 PM , Rating: 2
Common sense is the average of all empirical knowledge one has attained in his life until the point he lives in. The "most likely of events to occur" if you will.

The only problem of common sense is, the accuracy of it is determined by failure. The more stuff you do wrong, the more "common sense" you will aquire.

An example: It's common sense not to stick your hand into a naked flame. A child does not have this knowledge, sticks it's hand in a candle, finds out it burns and never does it again. Common sense is not a static thing, it's as dynamic as science.

"common" in "common sense" doesn't refer to the collective knowledge of several people, it refers to average knowledge of a single person, the same as "commoner" refers to a single person, beeing liken the average person.

Science hasn't proven anything yet, the only thing it's proven that it's been consistently wrong about stuff. Even einsteins theories don't hold up in the inside of a black hole. That means their still an aproximation, a very good one, but one none the less. Don't forget, newton's calculations where enough to take us to the moon, but he was still *wrong*.

The problem of science today is that it's big business, that's all. science is funded, and in order to keep funding, they need to keep producing science. That's how a business works. What kind of science, relevant or not, isn't even an issue.

As soon as money becomes involved, common sense get thrown out of the window and science gets abused. Or do i first need to pay somebody else to tell you that?


By Alexstarfire on 11/25/2009 10:27:02 AM , Rating: 2
Yea, I think it's useless too, but only because it points to a very specific problem. All of these cell phones studies cover the issue of cell phones just being a distraction. It's much like saying, in individual studies, that a microwave can cook chicken, boil water, and thaw frozen foods. Or you could simply say that a microwave heats things, in very simple terms mind you.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By akugami on 11/25/2009 10:34:05 AM , Rating: 2
This is one of those articles/studies that should be on Fark.

I can see it now. Pedestrians with cell phones not paying attention. Drivers with cell phones not paying attention. What could go wrong?

I'm not going to exclude myself from this stupidity. I've talked on a cell phone and not paid attention to where I was going and bumped into things but I'm a little more careful when I'm in an area where there are cars though.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By Reclaimer77 on 11/25/2009 11:33:57 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah the whole anti-cell phone/texting agenda is getting really stupid. I'm tired of it. First if you drive and use a cell you will die ! Now if you walk with one you'll get run over. What's next ??? Oh I forgot, they can also give you brain tumors or ear cancer right ? LOL.. give me a break.

Look people. These devices are NOT going away. They have been around for years. And the world is still turning.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By IcePickFreak on 11/25/2009 3:46:46 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think he was saying cell phones are the problem. Rather some of the operators of said phones are the issue. Fortunately, as this article states, some of those problematic operators are going away.


RE: New from USELESSSTUDIES INC.
By Reclaimer77 on 11/25/2009 10:54:24 PM , Rating: 2
The problem with this "study" is that people KNOW they are not in danger, so honestly, why should they act as if they are ???


Study also finds...
By RedemptionAD on 11/25/2009 10:06:51 AM , Rating: 4
...that AT&T customers that can talk and text at the same time are almost guaranteed to meet an untimely end via hit by a car or other accidental death.




RE: Study also finds...
By kattanna on 11/25/2009 11:14:02 AM , Rating: 2
and if they do make it home safe and sound, upon opening their monthly statement, then wished they HAD been hit.


RE: Study also finds...
By GodisanAtheist on 11/27/2009 1:40:23 PM , Rating: 2
New Verizon Ad:

AT&T customers have the highest vehicular related death-rates due to their tendency to wander in search of 3G connectivity...


This just in...
By XZerg on 11/25/2009 9:37:07 AM , Rating: 2
People doing anything else instead of focusing on what they are supposed to do will feel the pain one way or another...

Damn anyone with half a brain would have figured that out. Must have been one of those annoying guy/girl who thought it was a "brilliant" on-the-trend research to help shape the future. They do not realize this only ups their annoyance to another level.




RE: This just in...
By fic2 on 11/25/2009 12:41:21 PM , Rating: 2
Headline: Pedestrians who don't pay attention more likely to get killed

Brought to you by the department of duh.

You don't have to have a cell phone to be an inattentive idiot. I nearly ran over a guy with my bike a couple of years ago that stepped right out in front of me. He wasn't on his cell phone. Just didn't pay attention in 2nd grade when they told him to look both ways before crossing the street.


Publicity stunt!
By nafhan on 11/25/2009 9:50:07 AM , Rating: 2
Look our universities name is in the news!
This appears to be a complete waste of time and money, but it does appear to be drumming up a bit of publicity. Although, I'm not sure if the "any press coverage is good" maxim applies to research institutions...
Also, if they were trying to be thorough, they needed to include pedestrians talking to other pedestrians and pedestrians reading newspapers while walking. I see those two scenarios quite often.




So don't blame the hybrid's
By Souka on 11/25/2009 11:38:39 AM , Rating: 2
I can't believe nobody has mentioned hybrid in the comments yet.

Soon as I read the title...and that's all I've done...I only could think of all the studies that want to make hybrids noisier so that peds can hear them.

Non-distracted peds can hear/notice the hybrids, whereas distracted peds don't.

Anyhow...thought to toss that idea into the ring.




I'd like funding
By Totally on 11/25/2009 12:31:48 PM , Rating: 2
for research, to see if there is any correlation between choking deaths and talking on a cell phone.




WAIT Last minute, this just in!!!
By jvillaro on 11/25/2009 1:42:20 PM , Rating: 2
A study says that you are more likely to burn yourself with hot water than with cold water!




brilliant!
By muhahaaha on 11/25/2009 2:36:19 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Talking on your phone while walking could turn deadly, study says


There's a word for that...

Duh!!!




Interesting Timing
By brshoemak on 11/25/2009 8:15:07 PM , Rating: 2
Does anyone else find it interesting that this study is coming out on the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin's 'Origin of Species where he proposes NATURAL SELECTION?

Walk around with your phone, oblivious to the rest of world, get hit by car......well, we didn't need you peeing in the gene pool anyway.




CAUTION:
By bigboxes on 11/25/2009 8:32:03 PM , Rating: 2
Natural selection at work... there's an app for that.




I agree 100%.
By Dean364 on 11/26/2009 11:45:17 AM , Rating: 2
This actually happened to me. I was crossing the street while texting and I got hit by a car. Almost died. Live and learn.




By rburnham on 11/30/2009 8:37:58 AM , Rating: 2
Love the picture. Cell phones have become a kind of Darwinian testing tool. The way people use cell phones really separate the dunces from the pack.




It these guys fault
By hiscross on 11/26/2009 12:32:37 PM , Rating: 1
Apple for making the iPhone and W because blaming the other guy is easier than fixing what you (Barry) you would do.




New study: *$!! stinks
By Murloc on 11/25/09, Rating: 0
"We shipped it on Saturday. Then on Sunday, we rested." -- Steve Jobs on the iPad launch














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki