backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 144 comment(s) - last by Mojo the Monke.. on Oct 13 at 7:26 PM

Univ. of Tenn. student turns himself in

Federal officials indicted University of Tennessee student David Kernell today, on charges of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for allegedly breaking into Alaska Governor Sarah Palin’s private Yahoo email account.

Kernell, who is the son of Tenn. Representative Mike Kernell, turned himself in to the FBI late Tuesday afternoon. A local news report described Kernell entering a federal courthouse for his arraignment Wednesday morning in shackles, and then leaving an hour and a half later on supervised release – free without bond to continue his life as a student, but only under a number of conditions: he may use a computer only for email and schoolwork, and is forbidden from leaving the Eastern district of Tennessee without court’s written permission, among others.

According to reports, Kernell allegedly broke into two of Gov. Palin’s Yahoo email accounts mid-September, after successfully guessing answers to the “secret” questions presented by Yahoo’s password recovery system. Kernell allegedly posted details of the attack to internet imageboard 4chan.org, including screenshots of her account and, later, an explanation of the hack:

“…after the password recovery was reenabled, it took seriously 45 mins on wikipedia and google to find the info, Birthday? 15 seconds on wikipedia, zip code? well she had always been from wasilla, and it only has 2 zip codes (thanks online postal service!)

“the second was somewhat harder, the question was “where did you meet your spouse?” did some research, and apparently she had eloped with mister palin after college, if youll look on some of the screenshits (sic) that I took and other fellow anon have so graciously put on photobucket you will see the google search for ‘palin eloped’ or some such in one of the tabs…”

The explanation continues with a follow-up, posted under the name “rubico”:

“…I read though the emails… ALL OF THEM… before I posted, and what I concluded was anticlimactic, there was nothing there, nothing incriminating, nothing that would derail her campaign as I had hoped, all I saw was personal stuff, some clerical stuff from when she was governor…. And pictures of her family…

“…Earlier it was just some prank to me, I really wanted to get something incriminating which I was sure there would be, just like all of you anon out there that you think there was some missed opportunity of glory, well there WAS NOTHING, I read everything, every little blackberry confirmation… all the pictures, and there was nothing, and it finally set in, THIS internet was serious business, yes I was behind a proxy, only one, if this shit ever got to the FBI I was fucked, I panicked…”

Bloggers later connected the handle “rubico” to an email address belonging to a University of Tennessee student.

A data dump of Palin’s Yahoo email account later appeared on Wikileaks.

While Kernell’s indictment only mentions a single felony count under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, it appears that federal officials invoked the Stored Communications Act in order to elevate charges – which would ordinarily have been a misdemeanor – to felony status.

If found guilty, Kernell could face up to five years in prison, a $250,000 fine, and three years’ “supervised release”   – however Wired’s Threat Level notes that it is far more likely that he will receive probation, or six months’ confinement, if he has a clean record and was found to have inflicted minimal damages.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Prey for this kid
By Regs on 10/9/2008 9:34:09 AM , Rating: 2
He will need gods help now to find a job.

*wink wink*




RE: Prey for this kid
By FITCamaro on 10/9/2008 9:40:05 AM , Rating: 3
So that means Obama will hire him. I mean since he is the second coming after all....


RE: Prey for this kid
By Regs on 10/9/2008 9:59:03 AM , Rating: 2
I was not trying to imply anything....but, hah, I know what you mean.


RE: Prey for this kid
By FITCamaro on 10/9/2008 10:18:35 AM , Rating: 2
I know it was a joke....somewhat.


RE: Prey for this kid
By Screwballl on 10/9/2008 10:42:22 AM , Rating: 2
"That one" will likely hire him on as an information specialist for his campaign... why not, he hangs out with known terrorists (Ayers), pushes for known liberals in the debates, not to mention the earmarks he made sure got passed for his family, out of the taxpayers pockets:

quote:
According to Judicial Watch, the documents were obtained under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton notes the documents reveal that Obama really took care of his friends and family members with taxpayer money.

"Twenty-five thousand dollars to his wife's cousin, $100,000 to a garden project in Illinois that went nowhere and was wasted, $100,000 to the radical Catholic Priest Father Pfleger, $75,000 to an organization called FORUM, which is run by a group of people that, after they got the grant, gave him thousands of dollars in campaign contributions," Fitton recounts.

He adds that Judicial Watch also recently obtained records detailing the nature of Obama's controversial relationship with domestic terrorist William Ayers and convicted felon Tony Rezko.

From Judicial Watch http://www.judicialwatch.org/

or some more serious problems:

quote:
Two of the top ten priorities of an Obama Supreme Court would be to find that there is a constitutional right to taxpayer-funded abortions, and to order all 50 states to "bless" homosexual "marriage."

"Ten Commandments would be removed all over the place. 'Under God' would be removed from the Pledge of Allegiance. The death penalty would be banned," says Levey. "There'd probably be constitutional rights to all sorts of new things like human cloning and physician-assisted suicide. Racial preferences would proliferate."

from "Committee for Justice" http://www.committeeforjustice.org/


RE: Prey for this kid
By ZmaxDP on 10/9/2008 11:42:46 AM , Rating: 4
Seriously, enough with the Ayers thing. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to dislike Obama's policies without bringing up some tenuous link to someone who was ONCE a terrorist but is now just an extremely liberal professor at a university. I'd remind you that there are quite a few republican legislators and businessmen in Chicago that are on the same boards with Ayers as Obama was. Are they now a bunch of terrorists too? Give me a break. Bringing this up as if it were a reason to not vote for him just makes you look foolish. It is almost as stupid as the whole Muslim rumor.

As for the pork research, whoopty doo. So did every other stinking politician in the house and senate. I don't mind people bringing up these facts to call him out on his claims of being above those influences, but to imply that this is somehow different from a vast majority of his contemporaries is just misleading.

As for the Judicial Watch information, I'll make only a brief comment about the extreme bias on that site. In regards to the issues you bring up, unless Obama manages to find a loophole that allows the executive branch to unseat a member of the supreme court, none of these things will happen. There is a young republican majority on the supreme court that will likely last through Obama's presidency. You're making it sound like were Obama to be elected these things would happen. We have these things called checks and balances, and you're really just fear-mongering at this point.

Now, if people would pull their heads out of their rectums and stop voting party politics straight tickets and actually vote for the best people for the job you wouldn't end up with a part majority across multiple branches of the government. If that happened, the checks and balances work even better. Then again, I'm a strong believer that a government that doesn't get anything done is doing a good job. They only screw things up when they manage to pass a bill...


RE: Prey for this kid
By sinful on 10/9/2008 11:44:21 AM , Rating: 3
Not only will Obama do all that, he'll impregnate your wife while you aren't looking!

Seriously, if you're going to repeat that tripe, why let things like "facts" and "honesty" and "integrity" get in your way?


RE: Prey for this kid
By FATCamaro on 10/9/2008 12:23:16 PM , Rating: 2
And Sarah Palin uses govt money to help transfer her brood from place to place. Big deal. These aren't issues that will affect you or me. We need to think about policy. Not this nonsense trial through association or tracking campaign contributions.

Do you know how much money Obama has raised? He couldn't possibly have had connections and favours lined up with all these people. Just give it a rest and think about issues and let Barack Hussein Obama be (haha!!)


Security?
By Spivonious on 10/9/2008 10:16:23 AM , Rating: 3
Does Yahoo seriously just make you answer some questions to get into the account? That's not very high security. And why was Palin using her Yahoo account for government business? Doesn't she have some government email address?




RE: Security?
By kelmon on 10/9/2008 10:30:20 AM , Rating: 2
Indeed she does and this is just a sneaky (but apparently dumb) way of conducting unmonitored communications. I have limited sympathy. Put another way, I have sympathy for those people whose contact details were exposed by this and no sympathy for her.

With any luck this saga will help dissuade people from voting for the mad bitch.


RE: Security?
By Screwballl on 10/9/2008 11:11:59 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
With any luck this saga will help dissuade people from voting for the mad bitch.


Don't worry, I won't vote for the mad bitch Obama...

these emails show that Palin has nothing to hide... yet Obama has been a part of all sorts of bad an illegal activities: contracting with known terrorists, placing earmarks in state bills in IL to go towards family, using advisers that helped cook up the Clinton administration's plan that ended up screwing our economy we see today...

I guess some people don't like honest straight forward people like Palin so they have to follow the corrupt Obama/Biden. Anything out there about Palin is either a straight out lie or opinion. Not hard and real facts like what faces Obama.


RE: Security?
By Spivonious on 10/9/2008 11:25:29 AM , Rating: 1
I'd just like to point out that while the Weather Underground guy was setting bombs, Obama was 8 years-old. I'm voting for McCain, but just wanted to clear that up.


RE: Security?
By FITCamaro on 10/9/08, Rating: 0
RE: Security?
By kelmon on 10/9/2008 12:14:55 PM , Rating: 2
So, no meetings with Nelson Mandela then? The whole story just sounds ludicrous to the outsider. Forgive and move on.


RE: Security?
By tallcool1 on 10/9/2008 11:39:10 AM , Rating: 2
I think he was referring to Hillary...

Or he is just furious that no real dirt was found. Kind of unheard for a political figure these days...


RE: Security?
By kelmon on 10/9/08, Rating: -1
RE: Security?
By Regs on 10/9/2008 3:20:15 PM , Rating: 2
This is proof that people decide who they're going to vote for 5 minutes after their introduction.


Posting Pics
By bobcpg on 10/9/2008 9:34:46 AM , Rating: 2
I find it very surprising that sites reporting on this matter are posting pics of her emails and contact lists. I would assume this could/should lead to some trouble? Or maybe I'm missing something.




RE: Posting Pics
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 10/9/2008 9:38:29 AM , Rating: 2
They've been publicly available for quite some time:

http://wikileaks.org/wiki/VP_contender_Sarah_Palin...


RE: Posting Pics
By FITCamaro on 10/9/2008 9:40:55 AM , Rating: 1
That doesn't make it right. Honestly I don't see how they're allowed to keep the photos up.