backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 19 comment(s) - last by masher2.. on Jan 23 at 10:54 PM


First image stored and retrieved from a single photon

Diagram of the encoding device
New technique stores and retrieves entire image from a single photon

Researchers at the University of Rochester are detailing a breakthrough in optics that allows them to encode an entire image's worth of data into a photon, slow the image down for storage, and then retrieve the image intact. This development could allow the storage of massive amounts of information in very small spaces.

The article titled “All-Optical Delay of Images using Slow Light,” submitted November 2006, was published today. The abstract reads:

Two-dimensional images carried by optical pulses (2 ns) are delayed by up to 10 ns in a 10 cm cesium vapor cell. By interfering the delayed images with a local oscillator, the transverse phase and amplitude profiles of the images are shown to be preserved. It is further shown that delayed images can be well preserved even at very low light levels, where each pulse contains on average less than one photon.

The image “UR” (for the University of Rochester) was made using a single pulse of light. To produce the UR image, researchers simply shone a beam of light through a stencil with the U and R etched out. This is similar to the way shadow puppets work, but the research team turned down the light so much that only a single photon was all that passed through the stenci).

While the initial test image consists of only a few hundred pixels, the team believes that a tremendous amount of information can be stored with the new technique – as many as a hundred of these pulses can fit at once into a four-inch cell, opening the door to storing information as light. The buffered pulse is essentially a perfect original; there is almost no distortion, no additional diffraction, and the phase and amplitude of the original signal are all preserved.

 “It sort of sounds impossible, but instead of storing just ones and zeros, we're storing an entire image,” says John Howell, assistant professor of physics and leader of the team that created the device. ”It's analogous to the difference between snapping a picture with a single pixel and doing it with a camera—this is like a 6-megapixel camera.”

Howell has so far been able to delay light pulses 100 nanoseconds and compress them to 1 percent of their original length. He is now working toward delaying dozens of pulses for as long as several milliseconds, and as many as 10,000 pulses for up to a nanosecond.

“Now I want to see if we can delay something almost permanently, even at the single photon level,” says Howell. “If we can do that, we're looking at storing incredible amounts of information in just a few photons.”

 “You can have a tremendous amount of information in a pulse of light, but normally if you try to buffer it, you can lose much of that information,” says Ryan Camacho, Howell's graduate student and lead author on the article. “We're showing it's possible to pull out an enormous amount of information with an extremely high signal-to-noise ratio even with very low light levels.”

Storing information as light is a particularly hot field right now because engineers are trying to speed up computer processing and network speeds using light, but their systems bog down when they have to convert light signals to electronic signals to store information, even for a short while.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Quantum probability?
By bobsmith1492 on 1/22/2007 11:05:12 PM , Rating: 2
So, probability is used to predict where photons actually are since you can't measure directly, right, or was that only for electrons? So, is the camera picking up the probabilities of the photon passing through or striking the image at all points simulaneously? Does that say something new about physics on the small scale as we know it or is there some other explanation all laid out?




RE: Quantum probability?
By thilanliyan on 1/22/2007 11:45:38 PM , Rating: 1
That's electrons I believe.


RE: Quantum probability?
By Goty on 1/23/2007 12:12:28 AM , Rating: 2
The uncertainty principle applies to all particles.

Depending on how large the stencil was, the wavelength of the photon could be large enough to capture the entire stencil.


RE: Quantum probability?
By masher2 (blog) on 1/23/2007 10:28:30 AM , Rating: 2
> "wavelength of the photon could be large enough to capture the entire stencil..."

In theory, the quantum wavelength of a particle with zero momentum spans the entire universe.


RE: Quantum probability?
By lukasbradley on 1/23/2007 11:56:10 AM , Rating: 3
That's just because of a divide by zero error. :)


RE: Quantum probability?
By Diesel Donkey on 1/23/2007 9:43:55 PM , Rating: 2
The momentum of a photon is Planck's constant divided by its wavelength; that is, it is not zero. Perhaps you were referring to a different particle with zero momentum, though.


RE: Quantum probability?
By masher2 (blog) on 1/23/2007 10:54:30 PM , Rating: 2
I was referring to fermions actually...but its true for photons as well. To see this, just rearrange your equation from p=h/l to l=h/p. A photon with zero momentum would indeed have an infinite wavelength...and thus span the entire universe.

The result is a little more exciting for fermions though-- electrons, protons, etc, as while we can't really visualize "light" as having zero momentum, we can easily think of matter at rest as having none. But a physical object with zero momentum has an infinite de Broglie wavelength.


RE: Quantum probability?
By scrapsma54 on 1/23/2007 1:50:49 PM , Rating: 2
No, photons make up all forms of light. Its odd because they are storing information on a particle that makes up light. Electrons have little to do with photons.


Unlimited Data?
By AggressorPrime on 1/23/2007 1:15:27 AM , Rating: 2
Considering a photon occupies no space and consists of no mass, wouldn't you be able to store an unlimited amount of information on any size space and hold the ability to transfer that information at the speed of light (which from point a to point b in which a to b = 0 distance made possible by the 0 volume of a photon is instantaneous computation). If so, photon computation holds no physical limitations.




RE: Unlimited Data?
By SurJector on 1/23/2007 9:30:55 AM , Rating: 3
While a photon is usually considered to have no mass (because otherwise it would have infinite kinetic energy) it does occupy some space. As a first approximation, you can consider that a photon occupy a sphere of diameter its wavelength.

Additionally, there is some energy in a photon and you cannot but as much energy as you like in a box, otherwise bad things happen (tm) -- usually, but not always, something like an explosion.

SurJector


RE: Unlimited Data?
By masher2 (blog) on 1/23/2007 10:31:30 AM , Rating: 2
> "While a photon is usually considered to have no mass ..."

A photon has zero rest mass. Technically, it has relativistic mass...though that terminology has gone out of favor since I left college.


RE: Unlimited Data?
By jak3676 on 1/23/2007 11:11:57 AM , Rating: 3
sorry, meant to mark you "worth reading", not the opposite. Finger slipped on the track pad. Someone please mark this back up for me - his information is correct.


My Professor
By srawal on 1/22/2007 10:04:56 PM , Rating: 3
That goofy looking guy in that picture (Professor Howell) taught me Physics 121 (General Physics) my freshman year!!!

He is an awesome guy, and really smart. He would tell us in class all the crazy things he would do in his free time (like make rail guns).

Awesome!




Doom3 all over again
By scrapsma54 on 1/23/2007 9:22:06 AM , Rating: 3
Is it just me or Doom3 had a video on photonic storage? Great now I am going to have nightmares again.




Wooo!
By Goty on 1/22/2007 10:06:57 PM , Rating: 2
Wave-particle duality FTW!




I call Bull Shit
By Shadowself on 1/22/07, Rating: 0
RE: I call Bull Shit
By AnnihilatorX on 1/23/2007 7:13:01 AM , Rating: 2
Man learn some quantum physics

It's entriely possible. Photons are both particle and waves. 1 photon doesn't means it can only store 1 bit of information. Interference pattern from its wave literraly means it can store much more than that.

Study up on particle-wave duality


*Rubs hands with excitement*
By encryptkeeper on 1/23/2007 10:19:48 AM , Rating: 2
Today...photon pictures. Tomorrow, photon torpedoes! HA HA HA HA HA!!!




Article correct?
By masher2 (blog) on 1/23/2007 11:06:43 AM , Rating: 2
I read the source article, and it clearly says the image is being rasterized over multiple pulses. So even though each particular pulse has on the average <1 photon, I don't believe its correct to say an "entire image" is being encoded onto a single photon.




"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments









botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki