backtop


Print 43 comment(s) - last by CarbonJoe.. on Nov 4 at 4:51 PM


  (Source: Streets Blog)

UCI neuroscientist Dr. Steven Cramer, with the help of his graduate student, Stephanie McHughen have discovered a link between a genetic variation and bad driving. Approximately 30 percent of Americans have the variant gene.  (Source: Steve Zylius / University Communications)

The bad drivers had a gentic mutation that provided them with less active brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a protein pictured here.  (Source: blogSci)
Next time you're frustrated by the jerk who just cut you off, give him a break -- it might be in his genes

Good drivers can make the road a friendly place for their fellow drivers and milk great gas mileage (or equally great performance) out of their vehicles.  However, for every good driver on the road, there's plenty of bad ones.  According to studies, cell phones play a role in the poor overall quality of driving that leads to many accidents across America.  However, a new study shows the problem may be more complex, pointing to a link between genes and bad driving.

Researchers at University of California Irvine found that people with a specific gene variant performed 20 percent worse on a driving test than those without.  The results were confirmed by a subsequent test.  The scary part?  According to expert estimates, 30 percent of Americans have this gene.

Dr. Steven Cramer, neurology associate professor and senior author of the study states, "These people make more errors from the get-go, and they forget more of what they learned after time away."

The neuroscientists discovered a potential cause for the bad behavior.  When active, people with the specific variant get less functioanlity from a protein called brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) than people with the wild type ("normal") version of the gene.  This is not a good thing, as BDNF helps support communication between brain cells and keep them performing at their peak.  Typically it's secreted in active parts of the brain -- but those with the variant just don't get as much.

Previous studies have shown that those with the mutant BDNF gene recover more slowly from stroke.  That provoked the UC Irvine researchers to question "Could the gene have negative impact on driving?"  Stephanie McHughen, graduate student and lead author of the study describes, "We wanted to study motor behavior, something more complex than finger-tapping.  Driving seemed like a good choice because it has a learning curve and it's something most people know how to do."

The researchers put 22 people with the gene and 7 with the wild type gene in a driving simulator and had them drive laps.  The simulator took the drivers on a race course with sharp curves and turns.  Drivers were penalized for going off the course or over the curves.

Not only did those with the gene do worse on the first test, but they also learned less from their experience and performed even more poorly on the second test, with respect to those with the wild-type gene who learned more from their errors.  Interestingly, researchers note that the gene does have a benefit -- it minimizes mental degradation from Parkinson's, Huntington's and multiple sclerosis.

Describes Professor Cramer, "It's as if nature is trying to determine the best approach.  If you want to learn a new skill or have had a stroke and need to regenerate brain cells, there's evidence that having the variant is not good. But if you've got a disease that affects cognitive function, there's evidence it can act in your favor. The variant brings a different balance between flexibility and stability."

Fortunately, there's no widely available test for the gene, so those that may have it can rest assure their insurance rates won't be rising (yet).  Other researchers working on this intriguing study include Paul Rodriguez, Laura Marchal-Crespo and Vincent Procaccio of UCI and researchers from the University of Florida.  The study was funded by the National Institute of Health and the results are published in the journal Cerebral Cortex.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

the "it" thing to do for scientists/researchers..
By jsonc on 10/29/2009 4:19:14 PM , Rating: 3
it seems like blaming our genes for bad/wierd behaviors is the "it" thing to do for scientists/researchers.




RE: the "it" thing to do for scientists/researchers..
By TSS on 10/29/2009 6:12:27 PM , Rating: 5
You can't blame them. It's in their genes.

.... Easy? Yes. But grabbing opportunity is in my genes ^^


By icanhascpu on 10/29/2009 10:24:37 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
But grabbing opportunity is in my genes


The only grabbing opportunity for me is in my girlfriends genes.


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 10/30/2009 2:03:41 AM , Rating: 5
You should have spelled it jeans.


By Samus on 10/31/2009 5:20:08 PM , Rating: 2
I'm genuinly curious if people with these genes are more likely to buy a Toyota as well. Because most of the time I spot a bad driver, they're driving a Corolla or Camry. But if they're driving one of those they probably have no passion for cars in the first place.


By jonmcc33 on 10/29/2009 8:12:56 PM , Rating: 3
Not really. Blaming your genes is a scientific way of saying that it's the parents fault. I would agree entirely.

Living behind my house is the biggest idiot I have seen on this planet. Unfortunately he procreated and had 2 idiot sons. One was thrown out and banned from school for being such a great big idiot.

It's a wonder how stupid people even figure out how to have sex. They do and unfortunately dumb begets dumb begets dumb.


By EasyC on 10/30/2009 12:19:59 PM , Rating: 3
Brawndo's got electrolytes....it's what plants crave.


By Hare on 11/1/2009 4:03:21 AM , Rating: 2
Evolution is going backwards. Many smart and succesfull people have only one kid if any and the morons are ***** like rabbits.


By marvdmartian on 10/29/2009 9:17:39 PM , Rating: 3
NEWS FLASH!!! Morons behind the wheel cause more accidents! More at 6 and 11!! [/sarcasm]


By spartan014 on 10/30/2009 12:16:51 AM , Rating: 5
The part about the increased insurance premium for those with this gene is surely disturbing..

Gattaca anyone?


Grammar nazi
By bissimo on 10/29/2009 4:01:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Previous studies had showed


The past perfect tense of to show is had shown.




RE: Grammar nazi
By Sazar on 10/29/09, Rating: -1
RE: Grammar nazi
By cocoviper on 10/29/2009 4:26:14 PM , Rating: 2
No had shown is definitely the correct grammar.

And y'all is actually proper English per the rules of the language, it's just fallen into disrepute over the last half century or so.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/y'all


RE: Grammar nazi
By bissimo on 10/29/2009 4:39:20 PM , Rating: 2
I actually do live in Texas and use y'all in every single instance I can. It's a marvelous invention. How other English speakers get by without a second person plural form is beyond me.


RE: Grammar nazi
By Yawgm0th on 10/29/2009 4:50:57 PM , Rating: 5
We need a singular third-person gender-ignorant pronoun more. It's so tiring to say and hear "they" or "one" in reference to a single entity of unknown or hidden gender.

The second person plural pronoun can at least be implied by syntax or additional words without making the sentence ugly.


RE: Grammar nazi
By menace on 10/29/09, Rating: -1
RE: Grammar nazi
By joex444 on 10/29/2009 6:35:41 PM , Rating: 2
As a lab TA, I wouldn't accept "Previous studies had showed..." from my undergrads, but I'd let all of the following pass:

"Previous studies have shown..."

Not only do you have the deplorably unEnglish "had showed" agreement problem, you also are dealing with the plural of study and have to account for that as well.

All in all, pointing out grammar mistakes is frustrating. Those who make the mistakes do not want to hear the corrections. Those who hear the corrections but make similar mistakes will defend the mistake makers. And those who make similar corrections will argue the proposed correction is still a mistake. Ultimately, if you stop making the corrections it will be easier on you but I fear that the cost of not upholding the language is, well, the failure of written text to be decipherable in any context.


It's all genetics
By Yawgm0th on 10/29/2009 4:45:52 PM , Rating: 5
The study proved a strong correlation between having a second X chromosome and driving problems. Likewise, having a Y chromosome had a strong negative correlation with driving problems.




RE: It's all genetics
By Parhel on 10/29/2009 7:55:42 PM , Rating: 2
Damn, you beat me to it. :)


RE: It's all genetics
By piroroadkill on 10/30/2009 8:42:37 AM , Rating: 2
aww, I came here for this


I wonder...
By AEvangel on 10/29/2009 3:52:11 PM , Rating: 2
If the next thing they will be testing for is a gene for internet trolls.




RE: I wonder...
By Adonlude on 10/29/2009 4:05:56 PM , Rating: 5
My guess is you have it.


Only 29 test subjects?
By sonoran on 10/29/2009 4:18:22 PM , Rating: 2
An interesting field of study, to be sure, But isn't 29 test subjects way too small a group to draw any statistically valid conclusions?




RE: Only 29 test subjects?
By randomposter on 10/29/2009 4:42:06 PM , Rating: 5
They started with 93 subjects, but 64 died in horrific road accidents by the time the study concluded.


By ET on 10/29/2009 6:39:51 PM , Rating: 2
Sure, technical ability is an issue, but it's usually enough to be careful. You can know how to drive really well, technically, and still slam the breaks because you missed an exit, or drive when you're too tired, or drink, or race at 100mph not noticing someone coming from the side.




By ClownPuncher on 10/29/2009 7:00:34 PM , Rating: 3
I drink better when I drive.


By hyvonen on 10/30/2009 3:19:47 AM , Rating: 2
What a bad comment. Part of being a good driver is observing the traffic. Bad drivers miss their exits, slam on the breaks, don't follow adjacent cars etc. Stupid drivers race 100mph, but if they are also good drivers, they can get away with it.

Again - and how many times do I have to say it - good drivers drive better drunk than bad drivers sober. Why is it so difficult for bad drivers to accept?

This study shows that there are in fact good drivers and bad drivers. Drinking or using a cell phone reduces your ability to drive somewhat, but if you're a better driver in the first place, you might still be better than the bad drivers.

Same thing with reaction time - alcohol reduces your reaction time, but some people just are naturally quicker... and might end up still having better reflexes than the sober bad drivers. Moreover, good drivers observe traffic better and can anticipate the behavior of other drivers, thus compensating for any impairement they might have.

Bad drivers are the real problem (especially if they are drunk), but leave the good drivers alone.


Scary all right
By 440sixpack on 10/29/2009 4:41:38 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The scary part? According to expert estimates, 30 percent of Americans have this gene.


The scary part is I can't believe the number is that low. ;-)




RE: Scary all right
By walk2k on 10/29/2009 5:14:57 PM , Rating: 2
No the scary part is

30 percent have the gene,
30 percent are on their cell phones,
and 30 percent are just plain stupid.


Why is this surprising?
By Motoman on 10/29/2009 5:44:28 PM , Rating: 4
Some people are better at sports. Some people are better at art. Some people are better at writing. Which is to say, if you turn it around, a lot of people suck at sports...or art, or writing.

Lots of people suck at operating motor vehicles. Some of us are better than average at operating motor vehicles, and some of us excel at operating motor vehicles.

I, for example, grew up racing motorcycles. Started competing when I was 7. From an experience standpoint, that gave me a huge leg up on my peers, many of whom would never operate a motor vehicle until they were in driver's ed. But, talent-wise (nee genetics), I turned out to be better-than-most at motorcycle racing. Pretty good. Not the best. That became clear to me when I went to my first pro race...got my ass handed to me so badly it dawned on me that those guys were way out of my league...even though I was one of the best amateur racers in my area. To be honest, I don't think there's anything I could have done to get any better than I was...no more amount of practice or training was going to make me as good as the pros were. I just didn't have the talent, and that's that.

Driving a car is no different. Everyone has a given amount of proclivity to a given activity, and that's all there is to it. Experience and training will do some good up to a certain point, but push come to shove if you suck at something, you're just simply going to suck at it.




No doubt about it.
By Beenthere on 10/29/2009 4:09:14 PM , Rating: 1
Some people were born S-T-U-P-I-D and you can't fix STUPID !




RE: No doubt about it.
By kb9fcc on 10/29/2009 4:21:47 PM , Rating: 2
Not legally, anyway.

However, they do make good candidates for Darwin Awards.


By maverick85wd on 10/29/2009 4:17:29 PM , Rating: 2
"There are only two ways to truly insult someone. Tell them they are a bad lover, or tell them they are a bad driver."

I knew there had to be an explanation for all the terrible drivers.




Idiots Out Wandering Around
By Spookster on 10/29/2009 5:52:16 PM , Rating: 2
There must be a whole lot of bad genes in Iowa because nobody here can drive. We have many Darwin candidates and award winners here.




An explanation would be nice.
By tech329 on 10/30/2009 4:31:45 AM , Rating: 2
Most everyone is aware there are good drivers and bad drivers. Some have suggested the bad ones are stupid. I don't necessarily agree with that. I know people who are plenty smart but are awful drivers. I've known young adults who take three or four tries before they pass a driving test and get a license. This wide variation in driving skills has always struck me as inexplicable. I have no problem with scientists recognizing that particular skills of people may be tracable to genetic characterisitcs.




Driving license
By AnnihilatorX on 10/30/2009 8:27:02 AM , Rating: 2
They should start genetic tests as part of driving license test and those with genetic defect banned from driving.
That's "artificial natural selection" for you.




car sticker:
By magneticfield on 10/30/2009 9:54:47 AM , Rating: 2
"there's a gene for that!"




Hmmm...
By wutang146 on 10/30/2009 8:13:30 PM , Rating: 2
So... would it be safe to say that this gene is most commonly found in Asian women?




So this explains it..
By spittledip on 11/1/2009 9:18:18 AM , Rating: 2
I live in NC and the majority of drivers here are some of the worst I have ever seen. Genetics would explain the high concentration of bad drivers here :D




Above average drivers
By CarbonJoe on 11/4/2009 4:51:56 PM , Rating: 2
This just in... 85% of all drivers believe that they are "above average" drivers.




AMD/ATI
By uibo on 10/29/09, Rating: 0
"This week I got an iPhone. This weekend I got four chargers so I can keep it charged everywhere I go and a land line so I can actually make phone calls." -- Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki