backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 35 comment(s) - last by MicahK.. on Apr 28 at 2:27 AM

Watch out carbon-based batteries, silicon still has some juice left after all.

While carbon and its extensive uses in various forms like nanotubes, graphene and buckyballs has been receiving scads of research and media time, another element, hydrogen, has made a consistent showing for its use as an alternative fuel. The promise of clean cars and long-lasting batteries has piqued the interest of our electric society. The two together have been shown to hold some incredible promise for powering all sorts of devices.

Carbon has also been threatening to dethrone silicon from some of its greatest conquests, such as the integrated circuit and the transistor. While many argue that carbon computers are years if not decades off, silicon may not be useless to electronics in the future either. Chinese researchers, led by Dapeng Cao, claim that the ultimate hydrogen storage mechanism for use in fuel cells may not be carbon nanotubes as previously thought, but rather silicon nanotubes.

In their simulations, silicon nanotubes absorbed hydrogen molecules more efficiently than carbon under normal fuel cell operating conditions.

Cao's team's calculations are important because carbon-based nanotubes are falling short of the U.S. Department of Energy's hydrogen storage goals for fuel cells. The DoE is looking for something better and silicon may be it. The new calculations will ultimately help determine if silicon nanotubes can meet their expectations.

Though a hydrogen economy is likely still far into the future due to infrastructure costs, recent advances in fuel technology as well as hydrogen production are helping to keep research and development moving forward.



Comments     Threshold


By daftrok on 4/24/2008 1:28:45 PM , Rating: 1
I have been debating this for a while. I think the best solution for the future cars would be to make the car out of carbon fiber as much as humanly possible and run it on electricity. I liked the engine Tesla developed and really think it has applications. For fueling that vehicle, I thought a solar panel on the roof of your house and a couple of miniature windmills that hang off the edge of the roof just in case its too cloudy. What do you guys think?




By AlvinCool on 4/24/2008 1:34:53 PM , Rating: 3
I thought I'd drill a shaft, in my backyard, to the earths core and do geothermal myself. All I need to to is have everyone come out and mark their cables and pipes then get my acme 5000 drill set working.


By MicahK on 4/28/2008 2:27:37 AM , Rating: 2
geothermal is way too expensive to implement effectively... its just not a good solution for a single household... I've looked into it and solar is the way to go


By Pandamonium on 4/24/2008 1:36:56 PM , Rating: 2
Carbon fiber is hideously expensive. Racing shells for rowers have carbon fiber hulls; they start at $30k or so for a tiny amount of material. Sure, a bunch of the cost has to do with the specialization of the shape, etc- but it's far cheaper to go with other hull materials.

You're also never going to change the fact that everyone wants to be in the heavier vehicle in an accident. Unless you make all cars lightweight AND reduce speed limits (good luck on part 2), accident mortality rates will go up.


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 4/24/2008 1:45:52 PM , Rating: 5
Yea, because people want the "peace of mind" of knowing they will kill the other driver and walk away themselves.


By MrBungle123 on 4/24/2008 1:56:52 PM , Rating: 3
now if only we could genetically engineer that self preservation instinct out of people...


By fm2001 on 4/24/2008 8:35:42 PM , Rating: 2
They have figured how to genetically remove a mouse's natural fear of cats. Shouldn't be too difficult.


By 306maxi on 4/24/2008 3:07:56 PM , Rating: 2
Carbon fiber is much better when it comes to absorbing crash damage. For it's weight it's far far stronger than steel. So a lighter carbon fiber made vehicle will inevitably do quite well. Ever seen F1 and the crashes the car has and the driver walks away with pretty much no injuries at all other than a bit of bruising?


By Alexstarfire on 4/24/2008 4:59:39 PM , Rating: 2
That's not all because of the shell you know. It is designed in a way to prevent the driver from taking damage, but it's not just because it's carbon fiber.


By djc208 on 4/24/2008 11:08:23 PM , Rating: 2
That has more to do with the high strength steel tube frame that the driver is wrapped in.


By 306maxi on 4/25/2008 10:39:29 AM , Rating: 3
F1 cars don't have a steel spaceframe. They are purely a carbon fiber monocoque.


By Micronite on 4/24/2008 1:37:55 PM , Rating: 3
I want "Mr. Fusion"!!! (the product, not the guy)


By bupkus on 4/24/2008 3:00:12 PM , Rating: 4
Thanks for the reminder. Time to boot up Mr. Coffee.


By martinrichards23 on 4/24/2008 1:57:15 PM , Rating: 2
I think most would agree with you, the big hurdle (hence the interest in this article's content) is the storage of your energy.

As it has been all but proved biofuels are a waste of time (and probably just a way of sticking two fingers up at OPEC), hydrogen is always going to be the best bet, short of some other scientific breakthrough.


By Alexstarfire on 4/24/2008 5:04:04 PM , Rating: 2
That's only really true for the current methods of getting our biofuels. The ways in which we want to get them are simply not a reality yet. There is no easy way to convert cellulose into ethanol, and we simply aren't using algae to produce biodiesel. Those two methods are highly efficient.


By NEOCortex on 4/24/2008 2:02:06 PM , Rating: 2
Nothing beats a liquid fuel in terms of recharge rates. Sure you can recharge an electric car over night at home, but sometimes that just isn't an option. Chemical fuel based cars are still going to be a popular option because of this.

I'd say electric cars for commuting/short trips and car sharing programs, and diesel/bio-diesel or other liquid hydrocarbon for high compression ICEs for everything else. Eventually fuel cell technology might replace ICEs after significant improvement, but there are many problems to overcome.


By Smartless on 4/24/2008 2:22:49 PM , Rating: 3
Human powered vehicles! That way we take care of the nation's obesity and energy at the same time. Although our cars will probably be made of wood with stone tires and with dinosaurs holding traffic lights.


By FITCamaro on 4/24/2008 2:32:55 PM , Rating: 2
Some environmentalists would like a return to these ways.....


By GaryJohnson on 4/24/2008 6:27:21 PM , Rating: 2
Environmentalists or Arcologists?


By Alexstarfire on 4/24/2008 5:01:18 PM , Rating: 2
Flinstones, here we come.