backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 14 comment(s) - last by Gul Westfale.. on Aug 8 at 10:43 PM

SoundExchange may be overstepping their mandate in demanding DRM in return for relaxed webcast royalties

Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Ron Wyden (D-OR) issued a statement last week warning SoundExchange to keep DRM requirements out of their negotiations with webcasters:

“We sponsored the Internet Radio Equality Act because the Copyright Royalty Board's decision to dramatically increase royalties and apply what we see as unfounded minimum rates threatens to devastate the Internet radio industry,” stated the release. “Now we are hearing that the recording industry is attempting to use this aspect of the CRB decision to force webcasters to adopt recording restrictions far in excess of the controls that have governed broadcast content for decades. While we strongly support a negotiated solution, we will not allow the minimum fee issue to be used to force an agreement that mandates DRM technology and fails to respect the established principles of fair use and consumer rights.”

The warning comes as a response to SoundExchange’s intentions to cap small webcasters’ per-channel fees on condition that they provide detailed listening information and, more importantly, implement features to combat streamripping. Presently, the only way to do so seems to be through the forced use of DRM; such a move would force users into walled gardens consisting only of approved players and platforms. Users of noncompliant players would be left out.

DRM requirements also trample on fair use, denying consumers the ability to lawfully record broadcasts for later consumption. This privilege has been enjoyed by consumers and protected by the courts since its incorporation into Copyright Act of 1976.

An unidentified source told Ars Technica that this is not the first time that SoundExchange has expressed interest in net radio wrapped in DRM, but that it is the first time that made the intent has been included as a requirement for negotiations with webcasters.

SoundExchange, a non-profit organization, collects and distributes royalties for certain digital, non-interactive broadcasts, including satellite and internet radio. Originally started in 2000 as an arm of the RIAA, the organization was eventually separated into an independent organization in September 2003. Since January 1, 2003, SoundExchange has been the only entity designated by the U.S. Copyright Office to distribute royalties under sections 112 and 114 of the Copyright Act.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Yeah right...!!!
By spartan014 on 8/7/2007 11:20:38 PM , Rating: 5
Quote:

SoundExchange, a non-profit organization, collects and distributes royalties for certain digital, non-interactive broadcasts, including satellite and internet radio.

Tell me about it...




RE: Yeah right...!!!
By quiksilv3r on 8/8/2007 12:56:50 AM , Rating: 4
Bribes aren't considered profit. ;)


RE: Yeah right...!!!
By Rotkiv on 8/8/2007 7:57:50 AM , Rating: 3
SoundExchange is the mask for the IRAA .


RE: Yeah right...!!!
By FITCamaro on 8/8/2007 2:15:55 PM , Rating: 1
International Recording Asshole Army?
Irish Republic Amateur Army?

I thought it was the Recording Industry Association Army....err....of America.


This is scary
By Misty Dingos on 8/8/2007 7:53:19 AM , Rating: 3
Senators actually helping people? This is unsettling to me. I am not used to it. I am sure that they won't make a habit of it so things should be OK in the long run. I just don't know what I would do if congress started helping people all the time.




RE: This is scary
By Gul Westfale on 8/8/2007 8:01:02 AM , Rating: 3
"Every once in a while, declare peace. It confuses the hell out of your enemies." - Ferengi Rule of Acquisition Number 76


RE: This is scary
By AlexWade on 8/8/2007 8:19:51 AM , Rating: 2
You ain't kidding. Senators who are actually more in favor of helping the consumer and not lobbyist? A solar eclipse happens more often than this. What's next, repealing the accursed DMCA. I hope so.


RE: This is scary
By Oregonian2 on 8/8/2007 2:06:35 PM , Rating: 2
Actually this is typical for Ron Wyden (from my state). I'm not a Democrat, but I do very much like him and he does a lot of good work for "the regular guy". He's a good guy even if sometimes philosophically misguided (although not on this subject). :-)


blackmail
By Gul Westfale on 8/7/2007 10:58:16 PM , Rating: 2
this is really quite stupid of soundexchange. they must certainly know that if you wanted to steal music then you could do so using a P2P program, rather than trying to rip songs from an internet radio station. it's much more convenient.

so i think the only reason they mention forced DRM here is because they also know that people wouldn't really go for it- i wouldn't want to download a new player, possibly pay for it, and let them get detailed stats on who i am, where i live, and what i listen to. it's not that i listen to britney or anything ( i swear lol), but it's a matter of privacy and these guys completely overstepping their boundaries here.

so they threaten the little stations, who cannot or don't want to pay huge licensing fees, with DRM, a surefire way of ruining their business. they mus be hoping that the stations will pony up the money, or stop broadcasting. that is blackmail, and i think soundexchange ought to be punished for it, maybe fined a couple million dollars or so.




RE: blackmail
By ezacharyk on 8/8/2007 8:44:53 AM , Rating: 2
It's not blackmail. It's extortion. Blackmail is when you have dirt on someone and you tell them to pay you or you will tell people about the dirt. Extortion is when you threaten to hurt someone unless they pay you. This is extortion.


RE: blackmail
By Gul Westfale on 8/8/2007 10:43:34 PM , Rating: 2
true, my bad.


Holy crap
By Polynikes on 8/8/2007 10:52:03 AM , Rating: 2
Wow, this is really surprising. In a world where Republicans are more likely to give in to lobbyist pressure than protect the consumer, these two guys are like shining beacons. I wonder if they do this kind of stuff regularly.




RE: Holy crap
By CKDragon on 8/8/2007 12:25:13 PM , Rating: 2
First off, the article lists both a Republican and a Democrat making the same stance, so I really don't think we need to bring partisanship into the conversation.

Second, and this is just speculation on my part, Brownback is trying to drum up support for his presidential bid so he's attempting to appeal to every demographic possible. Personally, I think he's wasting his time with the analytical tech crowd considering his "intelligent design, no evolution" beliefs.


RE: Holy crap
By Oregonian2 on 8/8/2007 2:07:44 PM , Rating: 2
It is a "normal" thing for Wyden though.


"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki