 Lockheed Martin F-35C prototype
 (Source: Lockheed Martin)
Lockheed warns that a cut could have serious impact
The
major projects under way for new combat aircraft for the U.S. Air
Force are facing some serious issues on many fronts. The tanker
bidding process is still anything but final after years of fighting
between bidders and people in Washington. The F-35 program is also
facing some significant issues (one variant, dubbed the F-35B STOVL,
has been delayed due to issues
with subcomponent failures).
The major issue for the
program continues to be delays and cost overruns. Defense
News reports
that the U.S. Senate is seeking to cut
ten of the aircraft from the 2011 defense spending bill for
the fourth delivery of the low-rate initial production program
(LRIP-4) for the aircraft. The number for the delivery was initially
set at 42 aircraft, but the Senate wants that number cut to
32.
Lockheed's Tom Burbage, the executive VP for the F-35
program has stated that the cut could have a "very serious"
impact on the program. A cut on the delivery will drive up the cost
for all nations involved in the purchase of aircraft. Defense
News
reports that the cut in the order comes after intense negotiations
between Lockheed and the Pentagon over the price of the aircraft
during the key LRIP-4 buy. The LRIP-4 purchase is a key indicator to
determine if Lockheed will be able to deliver the aircraft on
budget.
Burbage said that at this point the reduction in the
number of aircraft for the order isn’t final. He stated, "If
the final decision is to support that position, it has a very serious
impact on the program. We're trying to bring it online at a ramp rate
that allows us to hit high production rates, we have partner
countries that are part of that buy, and when you make large
adjustments in quantities of airplanes it has an impact on
everybody."
Lockheed has maintained that it could deliver
the aircraft at about 20% under the Pentagon's estimate of about $76
million per aircraft.
The
DOD has already stated that the F-35 program could ultimately
cost $382 billion.
"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller
|
Most Popular ArticlesHigh School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM Seawater Cooling Saves Data Center Big Bucks, Energy, Despite Jellyfish Issues May 17, 2013, 3:23 PM U.S. Federal Traffic Board Wants to Make Drunk Driving Threshold Far Harsher May 15, 2013, 11:32 AM Newegg Legal Chief: "We don't Feed the Trolls"; Defeats Bell Lab Shell Comp. May 17, 2013, 10:11 AM
|