backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 18 comment(s) - last by spartan014.. on Mar 22 at 12:13 AM


Two of Velev's diode "vehicles," equipped with LED lights, were able to move in opposite directions by virtue of their electrode polarity.
Diode power could fuel microbot's "fantastic voyage" through the human body

A propulsion system small enough to let microscopic robots navigate inside the human body has been designed by a group of researchers in North Carolina.

The absence of a workable means of propulsion had been a major stumbling block to developing microbots for this purpose, because of the limitations in miniaturizing motors that require onboard fuel or batteries for their power. However, the answer could lie in a simple electronic diode, according to Orlin Velev at North Carolina State University in Raleigh.

Working in conjunction with scientists from the University of Hull in the U.K., Velev's team recently conducted an experiment in which a diode floating in a tank of salt water was exposed to an alternating electric field. By inducing a current within the diode, an electric field was created between the diode's electrical contacts to produce locomotion.

The propulsion occurs as the current in the diode accelerates ions in the surrounding fluid. Those ions push in one direction, allowing the diode to move in the opposite direction. In fact, the "particle-localized electro-osmotic flow" even provides a steering mechanism of sorts. The flow can be direct toward either the cathode or the anode, depending on the surface charge. Velev reported in an interview with New Scientist that the microdevices were able to achieve speeds of several millimeters per second.

The theory has excited the research community, but a great deal of work remains to be done to recreate the feat on a true nano scale. Velev's devices can be measured in millimeters, making  them an order of magnitude too large for working inside the human body.

Velev's work, "Remotely powered self-propelling particles and micropumps based on miniature diodes," was recently published in the journal Nature Materials. Co-authors included Suk Tai Chang, Vesselin Paunov, and Dimiter  Petsev.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Alternating field???
By alienbibin on 3/21/2007 6:56:50 AM , Rating: 2
If these things require an alternating field to induce currents and in turn propel them, then how are they planning to give this alternating field on a human body! How powerful field will be required is another concern as prolonged exposure to such fields may cause some other problems, right?




RE: Alternating field???
By Misty Dingos on 3/21/2007 8:55:36 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe, just like standing in an X-Ray machine for a week will kill you. Just like drinking water till your so hydrated your body can't function right. Just like taking too much Tylenol will damage your liver. Just like drinking too much alcohol will kill you. Just like chemotherapy can make you vomit and lose your hair. Some time cures (like this is anything but a curiosity yet anyway) are painful and even life threating but they are better than the disease. Oh if you are really worried about these alternating fields don't drive under any high voltage transfer lines. You can light up a florescent light bulb with the field from them.


RE: Alternating field???
By Spivonious on 3/21/2007 9:45:33 AM , Rating: 1
It's been shown that living near high-voltage power lines has no effect.

quote:
standing in an X-Ray machine for a week will kill you. Just like drinking water till your so hydrated your body can't function right. Just like taking too much Tylenol will damage your liver. Just like drinking too much alcohol will kill you.


quote:
Some time cures...are painful and even life threating but they are better than the disease.


These two quotes don't make sense together.


RE: Alternating field???
By Misty Dingos on 3/21/2007 2:48:03 PM , Rating: 4
I was not aware that it had been decided that living under the power lines had no long term effect. Not that I doubt you although "alienbibin" might disagree with you.

My point was that there seems to be a group of people that no matter what the technology is they are more concerned of any perceived negative consequences of the use of said technology. It is almost as if they live in fear of new technology. They see a new technology and their first reaction is one of suspicion or outright dread. They can be categorized this way. And I am sure that the list can't be inclusive.

1. The Fear Monger. Common statements include. "You will just shoot your eye out with that." Or "That can kill, maim, hurt, or distress people."

2. The Freedom Paranoid. Common statements include. "The government will just spy on us with that." Or "They know what you are doing online everyday all day and the FBI keeps a log of it." Or "This is just one more way to keep the little guy down."

3. The Pacifist. Common statements. "All any technology is used for anymore is to kill." Or "Everything that man makes he uses to destroy with. Military research should be banned."

I would call these groups Neo-Luddites but they probably would not get the slight. Some how I thought people that read and post to a technology web site would be at least moderately pro-technology. I also think that Neo-Luddites should be met on the field of ideas and defeated if we are ever to succeed as a species.


RE: Alternating field???
By spartan014 on 3/22/2007 12:13:58 AM , Rating: 2
Nothing is said about the strength of the alternating EM field required to propel this thing.. I guess it will be very low, since speed is not the priority here. Its not like " hey, you bot, reach this guy's left ventricle in 10 seconds....!!"

With enough research and studies, it may be possible that these things can function using a field comparable to or lower in strength to what our cellphones emit..


RE: Alternating field???
By brshoemak on 3/21/2007 10:35:20 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
If these things require an alternating field to induce currents and in turn propel them, then how are they planning to give this alternating field on a human body!


Initial testing has been approved to begin in Texas prisons within 5-6 years.


RE: Alternating field???
By creathir on 3/21/2007 11:49:47 AM , Rating: 3
Hey hey hey.... we use the humane way of killing our criminals... lethal injection.

It USED to be humane in Ohio too... not anymore though...

- Creathir


RE: Alternating field???
By kingpotnoodle on 3/21/2007 11:56:41 AM , Rating: 2
Hopefully it doesn't... cos what would be cool is if you could have an injection of these little critters every few weeks and buy a machine which powers them, you can sleep next to it and every night they restore you to health - super sleep ;-)


RE: Alternating field???
By Sasuke on 3/21/2007 5:18:56 PM , Rating: 2
so are we talking 9v battery style tickle or jaming your todger into a light socket style jolt here?


RE: Alternating field???
By Cincybeck on 3/21/2007 7:52:49 PM , Rating: 1
No offense but, I don't think it can be that harmful, or I doubt they would consider it a feasible propulsion method. I think that is the whole point of the research they're doing is to find away to make these lil' bots work inside the body. =D On one note though, I wonder how it will effect people with pacemakers and other embedded electronics.


Minor error
By THEREALJMAN73 on 3/21/2007 10:00:07 AM , Rating: 2
answer could lie in

should be

answer could lay in

:)




RE: Minor error
By xzc145 on 3/21/2007 10:34:12 AM , Rating: 2
Er I'm fairly certain the article is right....

It would be 'lay' if the statement was definitive i.e "The answer lay in the diode".

Hooray for dt pendantry :p


RE: Minor error
By THEREALJMAN73 on 3/21/2007 10:42:03 AM , Rating: 2
lol typing before coffee is bad.

I have a java tool that reads my company's web site and corrects for error. I leave it on all the time and for some reason it didn't like that article at all and spat out an error.

The script isn't perfect that's why I review everything it points out. Apparently I am not perfect either.

I will be quiet now.


hurry up with the nano-bots already..
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 3/21/2007 10:09:41 AM , Rating: 1
I can feel the blockage in my veins, my heart pumping harder, the pain building in my joints, the pain in my back.... I just want them to finish making these nano-bots so I can have few hundred or thousand of them (have no idea how many would be used on a person) put inside me to help improve my health...I'd clean my veins myself but that's a little difficult :)

Hmmmm...guess I have to import a nano-bot resort, homes, health club, day care, and fair work-week hours. I'd hate to see them revolt.




RE: hurry up with the nano-bots already..
By FITCamaro on 3/21/2007 12:11:18 PM , Rating: 1
Or you could, you know, exercise.


By bldckstark on 3/21/2007 12:37:10 PM , Rating: 2
Sacrilege! No self respecting tech-geek exercises! If they make my puter pedal powered, then maybe. Until then pass my Twinkies and Red Bull!


By Seemonkeyscanfly on 3/21/2007 12:40:54 PM , Rating: 1
hmmmmm...Tried that for over 22 years of my 36 years, to much work. :) It's also why I have pain in my joints (knees) and back :)
So, naa, I'll take the nano-bot option. I want my Nano-bots, I was promised nano-bots, were are my nano-bots....
I might add at this time, I want my data jack in the back of my head. This way I can down load information that would take hours, days, years to learn in just minutes or seconds. I don't think I'm asking for tooooo much. :)


Electro-hydrodynamic Drive
By goz314 on 3/21/2007 1:06:27 PM , Rating: 2
Hey! It's the hunt for red october... in miniature! :)




"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson











botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki