backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 20 comment(s) - last by bldckstark.. on Jan 24 at 12:05 PM

2-D barcodes and a compatible cell phone allow consumers to access enhanced content on the web

The humble barcode was first patented in 1952 and became widely used in supermarkets in the early 1970’s. Barcodes are the ubiquitous little rectangles filled with lines of varying degrees of thickness and numbers that are used to track product stock levels at some stores and are used to ring up prices virtually everywhere we do business.

The barcode has been around for decades now and some large retailers in the U.S. are looking at a new type of barcode system that will allow consumers to get more information on a product in an interactive way.

The new barcodes are called 2-D barcodes and the first trial is currently underway with Sears. The unique aspect of these barcodes is that by using a compatible cellular phone with a camera and a downloadable application for the phone, a consumer can launch an applet to get more information on the product.

The process would work something like this. A customer walks up to a product featuring a 2-D barcode and snaps a picture of the 2-D barcode with their mobile phone’s digital camera. An applet launches and the server identifies the product and launches a web page with more information on the product.

Major retailers in the U.S. considering a trial of 2-D barcodes in addition to Sears include Target, Best Buy, Gap and Nordstrom. Best Buy and Target are working with a company called StoreXperience while Sears and others are talking to a company with similar technology called ScanBuy according to eWeek.

The biggest problem with 2-D barcodes currently is that there are a very limited amount of cellular phones that are compatible with the service. While proponents of the service say this will be a short-lived issue, Sears is tackling the lack of compatible phones with their service trial in an interesting way.

Sears has equipped employees with compatible phones and the store employees will scan the 2-D barcode and show customers the data when asked. According to eWeek, in addition to the issue of small numbers of compatible phones, some of the required downloadable applications for the cellular phones to work with 2-D barcodes are sensitive to how the barcode is scanned. eWeek reports that some of the applications won’t function if the scanned barcode isn’t in the center of the LCD screen.

eWeek also says that Nordstrom announced last week that it was shelving plans for its 2-D barcode trial citing the service put too much of a burden on the customer. The fear is that customer’s will either not have mobile web access, or simply won’t be comfortable or interested in downloading the required application to their phones.

Microsoft has plans of its own for a new barcode system that consumers can read with their cell phones. Microsoft called its new barcodes High Capacity Color Barcode (HCCB). The HBBC barcodes have yet to make it to widespread use.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

another way to get product info
By kattanna on 1/21/2008 3:59:27 PM , Rating: 3
is to simply pick up the box and turn it around and read whats printed on it.

thats a far easier and cheaper method

but seriously, this sounds like a solution without a problem to me.




RE: another way to get product info
By Mudvillager on 1/21/2008 5:38:39 PM , Rating: 1
... and the info on the back of the box is never biased </sarcasm>


RE: another way to get product info
By SilentSin on 1/21/2008 6:20:35 PM , Rating: 2
And you think the page that the barcode directs you to won't be? The real problem with this that I see is I would be much more inclined to ask an actual person in the store if I was there myself. That would at least have the chance of being an unbiased description, and the person might actually recommend you something better and tell you the differences right there on the spot. I'd like to see a 2D barcode do that in under 30 seconds.


RE: another way to get product info
By DragonMaster0 on 1/21/2008 8:52:50 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
That would at least have the chance of being an unbiased description
Especially @ BestBuy


RE: another way to get product info
By Screwballl on 1/22/2008 12:44:05 PM , Rating: 2
agreed..... "no you don't want this $40 device, this $200 one (that I get more commission on) will do the job much better"

yeah I tend to do my own research at home first and then go out and get exactly what I need without some kid fresh out of high school trying to pad his own pockets with upsales.


By murphyslabrat on 1/22/2008 12:49:00 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know, I suppose that you could get some fun out of it. Last time I asked someone in store, I was too concerned with getting away from them to think about utterly humiliating them.


By murphyslabrat on 1/22/2008 12:46:18 PM , Rating: 2
I learned that lesson the hard way...


By djkrypplephite on 1/21/2008 8:28:53 PM , Rating: 2
I'd agree. Usually if you can't tell what it is by the box, and you didn't come there to get it, you probably don't need it.


RE: another way to get product info
By Devo2007 on 1/22/2008 4:08:26 AM , Rating: 2
Sounds like the same sort of "Problem" that the ill-fated CueCat was designed for (just at a store level).

No need.


By zsouthboy on 1/23/2008 3:56:57 PM , Rating: 2
++

I can just imagine some suit somewhere:
"People will LOVE to use (*think of buzzword*) internet technology to look up (*don't say "product", it sounds hackneyed*) product (*damn!*) information with their (*think of something high-tech that I was introduced to recently*) cell phones!"

Yeah. People can just Google your product and find out it sucks - they're not going to use your special barcode to be directed to some MARKETING page for your product.


By theapparition on 1/24/2008 8:54:03 AM , Rating: 2
2D barcodes have been in use for quite a while, and the US government is requiring all products to be marked with one. They are also known as UID (Universal ID).

There are many advantages to 2D barcodes over the old ones. The major advantage is that they can hold something like 1000x the information that the 1D codes can.

They are a tremendous value and simplify many things for the manufacturers and distributers. However, the application of using a cell phone to take a picture to get information seems just plain stupid to me.


Not really "new" technology
By gtrinku on 1/21/2008 7:31:34 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe this is new in America, but in Japan this technology has been around for some time.




By Bioniccrackmonk on 1/22/2008 9:27:06 AM , Rating: 2
America is far behind Japan in terms of consumer electronics, like cell phone networks for starters.


Barcodes are already 2-D
By MrBlastman on 1/22/2008 4:09:11 PM , Rating: 2
Last time I checked Barcodes are 2-D and have been for years. Couldn't they think of a better name for this new technology rather than spin or confuse the average consumer?

Regardless - what is to stop stores from having biased websites they send you to? The only thing I can think of is typically the barcodes on a product box are manufacturer specific rather than store/retailer specific unless it is a code off a hangtag or printed label.

This would mean the website would not have to be provided by the stores.

If the website that provided the information were independent of manufacturers influence(and it should be considering the barcode is a non-store specific item), then it truely could be un-biased. Unless, however, the website accepted contributions from the manufacturers to feature their products. There could be some arm-twisting if this were to happen.

Somehow the website would have to make money - which would either be from the phone companies subsidizing it through users paying extra to utilize this technology on their phones or for the phone users subscribing to the website directly - a la consumer reports.

At the end - I don't think I'd trust a source of information I obtained from my cell phone from scanning in a product. I'll still use tried and true avenues - friends I know and people I trust who have used the products in the past.




RE: Barcodes are already 2-D
By theapparition on 1/24/2008 8:52:09 AM , Rating: 2
Barcodes are 1D, meaning the scanner only reads the thickness in 1 direction.


Haven't I seen this before?
By Sulphademus on 1/22/2008 8:32:00 AM , Rating: 2
CueCat Anyone? Seriously.




By Belard on 1/22/2008 7:24:21 PM , Rating: 2
If we're IN THE STORE - have the info on the BOX, or display. It's not ROCKET SCIENCE?!

Why do I or most people want to get out the cell phone and PAY charges to access data that could have simply been printed on the packaging... in bigger and fancier text, rather than a tiny 1.5" screen?




revolutionary
By HexiumVII on 1/23/2008 1:46:05 AM , Rating: 2
Yay, i've always wanted more marketing crap shoved down my throat. And none other than the tech pioneer Sears Robuck! You hardly even see anyone who knows how to use a cel phone shop at sears anymore.




Okay..
By kenji4life on 1/23/2008 5:35:00 AM , Rating: 2
Let's say I have a phone that is probably capable of going onto the internet, such as an MDA, iphone, etc. I would normally have to start my phone's browser, open google, search for the product, and find information. It's really a two step process.

So assuming that you have a phone that can get on the internet anyhow, this only eliminates 1 step. It would be great for the end user, if all this did was auto-google the barcode or whatever, because it'd save me 45 seconds of fiddling with my phone and tiny keyboard or for those who have no keyboard, the dreaded predictive text (which is great for texting, not so much for surfing the net).

So yes, assuming the above; this would be great!

The above is likely not the case:
1. Retailers are investing money in this scheme
2. Retailers and manufacturers only look to gain from this if they can provide biased information. If the product is good, they probably don't need too much convincing of the consumer to sell it.
3. In the end, they probably will profit from this, not from the savvy base of consumers who already know how to google a product using their mobile phone, but from the large majority of people who don't know their ass from their head when they go into a price gouging store like bestbuy in the first place. (BTW, I'm not saying that I never shop at bb, only that I research before I go into the store, to make sure the price I am paying is worthwhile).

That being said, the best way to get a good deal is usually to utilize return policies anyhow. If it's on sale, grab it and think later. Just because it's on sale doesn't mean you can't return it. Take your new toy home and research it. If it's a bad product or you find an even better deal elsewhere, go pick it up and return the more expensive one. Don't open it until you're sure you want to keep it.

This method is tried and true, you can't really go wrong, unless you drove way out of your way to pick it up.

In the end, if people don't want to use this new feature, no one is forcing them to. On the other hand, if they do want to use it, it can't hurt as long as they are careful about how much they trust the site their phone "automatically" takes them to. Any phone that can do that, can probably go on the net anyways, so again what's the point..

Ahh.. I've wasted enough energy thinking about this silly thing.




To Rehash
By bldckstark on 1/24/2008 12:05:19 PM , Rating: 2
Why wouldn't someone just develop a program (in Android?) that automatically searches Google with the barcode? Why would the retailers want to get involved at all? They are just pissing away more of my money on wasted advertisement.




"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen

















botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki