backtop


Print 52 comment(s) - last by freeagle.. on Mar 31 at 5:59 PM


Origami Shuttle in wind Tunnel Tests  (Source: Boston.com)
Scientists from Japan believe the origami airplanes could make it back to Earth without catching fire

The biggest thing that most associate with the re-entry of a spacecraft into the Earth’s atmosphere is heat and friction. To that end, one of the biggest concerns for the space shuttle fleet is the integrity of the heat shield to allow re-entry without catastrophic failure such as the Columbia suffered.

Japanese scientists have a wild idea that involves the ancient art of paper folding known as origami. A prototype shuttle built from folded paper that was made from sugar cane fibers and sprayed with a special coating has been able to withstand durability tests in a wind tunnel at the Tokyo University Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Ultimately, the researchers want to launch the plane from space and see if it can withstand re-entry.

Project leader Shinji Suzuki is quoted by Boston.com as saying, “It sounded like a simply impossible, crazy idea [origami planes surviving reentry]. I gave it some more thought, and came to think it may not be ridiculous after all, and could very well survive if it comes down extremely slowly."

The researchers believe that if the origami planes enter the earth’s atmosphere at slow enough speed that they would be subject to much less friction and heat than a full-size space craft like the space shuttle. Large spacecraft enter the Earth’s atmosphere at tremendous rates of speed leading to copious amounts of heat generated from friction.

The small origami paper shuttles measure about 2.8-inches long and 2-inches wide. In wind tunnel testing the origami shuttles survived wind speeds of up to Mach 7 and temperatures up to 446 degrees Fahrenheit. These conditions are said to approximate reentry into Earth’s atmosphere from orbit.

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has agreed to fund the project for three years with a grant of $300,000 per year. The program is getting stiff opposition from those who don't understand why money would be wasted on such a proposal.

Opponents ask what’s the point of the study if the planes can’t be tracked to determine if they survived reentry. The origami panes would be launched by astronaut Koichi Wakata by throwing them into the wake of the ISS as it hurtles through its 250 mile high orbit at Mach 20.

Suzuki and fellow researchers plan to write messages of peace on the origami shuttles, the exact number of which would be launched is not yet determined. Messages on the origami shuttles will also request that anyone finding the planes notify the researchers.

The launch of origami planes from the ISS would be a perfect use for the Japanese Kibo lab's open section scheduled to be delivered to the ISS next year. The first section of the Kibo lab was delivered by the space shuttle Endeavor in March 2008.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The future is in notebook paper.
By StormEffect on 3/28/2008 4:21:16 PM , Rating: 3
NASA has been looking in the wrong direction for years! Instead of a massive launch rocket and highly complicated shuttle, rip out a piece of notebook paper and proceed to colonize the solar system!




RE: The future is in notebook paper.
By SlipDizzy on 3/28/2008 4:31:18 PM , Rating: 5
I'm building my own Star Fleet right now! Thank you Staples!


RE: The future is in notebook paper.
By Fnoob on 3/28/2008 8:53:50 PM , Rating: 4
HI! Welcome to Staples! Can I help you!

Ummmm.. . where do y'all keep the asbestos/kelvlar-carbon fiber paper? Comes free with this Lexmark? Kickass.


RE: The future is in notebook paper.
By Screwballl on 3/28/2008 4:43:57 PM , Rating: 2
Can I get a $300,000 grant for making paper airplanes?? I promise it will all be used on notebook paper...... I promise


By VahnTitrio on 3/28/2008 5:26:51 PM , Rating: 2
It would be interesting enough to see if a generic piece of paper taken from a standard ream would survive. This sounds like something I would have done if they ever let me in space.


RE: The future is in notebook paper.
By deeznuts on 3/28/2008 5:32:19 PM , Rating: 5
Sure it might survive re-entry into Earth, but would it survive re-entry into Uranus?


By AToZKillin on 3/28/2008 6:27:58 PM , Rating: 5
With that special coating, Uranus itself might survive reentry of the paper airplane.


RE: The future is in notebook paper.
By InsaneGain on 3/28/2008 7:49:26 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
Sure it might survive re-entry into Earth, but would it survive re-entry into Uranus?


I would think it might survive re-entry into Uranus if that special coating is some kind of high tech lubrication to reduce the friction.


By seamonkey79 on 3/31/2008 5:33:49 PM , Rating: 2
Wouldn't it be more like, surviving entry into Uranus? Since it would have to exit before it could re-enter.


By freeagle on 3/31/2008 5:59:02 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
high tech lubrication to reduce the friction


its Uranus, not anus


By Ajax9000 on 3/30/2008 7:49:23 PM , Rating: 4
Indeed, a nasty thought ... paper cuts ...


RE: The future is in notebook paper.
By MrPoletski on 3/29/2008 8:21:10 AM , Rating: 2
So... exactly what is it about a paper aeroplane tht means they will be able to get it to re-enter the earths atmosphere much slower?

If they can slow the paper one down, why can't they slow the real one down?

I know there would be a hell of a lot less momentum involved but still..


By stirfry213 on 3/31/2008 12:13:45 PM , Rating: 2
Really? You can't see any reason why a piece of paper would generate less heat than the space shuttle?

You have to consider surface area (area of the object subject to heat) to weight ratio. You can cover the entire bottom of the shuttle with less than a reem of paper...

I think thats says enough.


...
By TimberJon on 3/28/2008 5:29:10 PM , Rating: 5
I wanna see the white papers on this project...




RE: ...
By SanLC504 on 3/28/2008 5:42:16 PM , Rating: 4
I'd love to show you to them, but the scientists sent them down from the station and they burst into flames upon reentry. I told them a swan would be better, but noooooo.


RE: ...
By rogerdodger on 3/28/2008 9:10:05 PM , Rating: 5
Sorry. The atmosphere ate my homework.


I call BS on Re-Entry temperatures!
By TimberJon on 3/28/2008 5:01:09 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know a source of the temp those ceramic plates contend with, but a small pot of Resin/Catalyst or similar material can reach temperatures exceeding 500° when it starts to kick. The entry speed and friction of the atmosphere, gases, particulates (if theyre at that altitude), Etc... have GOT to cook the shuttle at higher temps than the 400 or so stated in the article.

Someone here knows the temp rating of the heat shield underbelly of the Shuttle. Perhaps someone knows the rating of the old vs: the new model.




By SanLC504 on 3/28/2008 5:44:02 PM , Rating: 2
Well, if I had to guess, the paper airplane's ignition temperature is very close to the actual temperature that paper burns, or 451 degrees. (i.e. the book Fahrenheit 451).


RE: I call BS on Re-Entry temperatures!
By SiliconAddict on 3/28/2008 5:47:40 PM , Rating: 2
Yah I read somewhere the leading parts of wing on the shuttle gets around 4,000-5,000F....I think....its been a while since I pulled out my space shuttle operators manual :-D


RE: I call BS on Re-Entry temperatures!
By Fnoob on 3/31/2008 11:12:57 AM , Rating: 2
Um, i don't think that these origami shuttles are going to be travelling at ~Mach 25 upon re-entry. Just a guess.


RE: I call BS on Re-Entry temperatures!
By afkrotch on 3/31/2008 4:16:47 PM , Rating: 2
They did say they'll be launching them at the shuttle's orbital cruising speed of Mach 20. So why couldn't it hit Mach 25 on reentry?


By Fnoob on 3/31/2008 5:30:18 PM , Rating: 2
I musta missed that. Then surely these will be some expensive puffs of smoke then.


waste of money
By rodrigu3 on 3/28/2008 6:05:56 PM , Rating: 2
They have nothing better to spend 300K on than to throw paper airplanes from space?




RE: waste of money
By bodar on 3/28/2008 6:13:00 PM , Rating: 4
It's a show of their financial success. They should just drop the money from the shuttle and watch it burn on re-entry. That would at least be funny.


RE: waste of money
By AToZKillin on 3/28/2008 6:32:22 PM , Rating: 4
Really, $300k a year isn't much to invest in a project. This amount actually shows that they're not terribly serious about it, but are at least open to its merits being demonstrated.


RE: waste of money
By 9nails on 3/28/08, Rating: -1
RE: waste of money
By fxyefx on 3/29/08, Rating: 0
RE: waste of money
By rodrigu3 on 3/29/2008 9:58:06 AM , Rating: 1
That's another waste of money - but also a different topic.


RE: waste of money
By root mean sq on 3/29/2008 5:25:26 PM , Rating: 2
hey man, chill. even japanese scientists have slow days.


Groovy Lightshow
By Spyvie on 3/29/2008 1:39:44 AM , Rating: 2
Ever since I was a little kid I've had this dumb idea... The coolest thing NASA could do would be dropping some marbles or other suitable small objects from orbit to give us all a fireworks show.

Copper BBs would be bright green meteors, steel I think would be red, and so on...

Yes, I know this is a superfluous idea, and potentially a disastrous one if the objects were a little too large. Still, I'd love to see it! Of course, I've been known to plan my evenings around iridium flares.




RE: Groovy Lightshow
By emboss on 3/29/2008 3:41:39 AM , Rating: 3
They could even use them for skywriting to subsidise launch costs ...


RE: Groovy Lightshow
By stirfry213 on 3/31/2008 12:20:03 PM , Rating: 2
While this sounds absolutely rediculous, you might be on to something.

I can see it now, next time I peer into the night sky, I this: "Less filling, taste great!"


By uhgotnegum on 3/28/2008 4:54:44 PM , Rating: 5
Which amazing plane design will they be using? I mean, with the Classic Dart, the Arrow, and the Sparrow as staples of the paper plane world, you'd think they'd go with one of those designs.

What if they really took us by surprise and went with a paper frisbee or a helicopter...would we criticize because they are questionable "plane" designs?

Then again, we're talking about rocket-less science here, I think they'll used an advanced design...Perhaps the Dragon Plane, the Sabertooth, or the "no you didn't" Cobra Paper Airplane.

They really have me on pins and needles...I gotta know what design?!

http://www.paperairplanes.co.uk/planes.php and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_airplanes provided all relevant names...If I accidentally used a name without permission, I'm truly sorry...I'll make it up to you with an origami flower http://www.origami-instructions.com/origami-lily.h...




Paper launch
By RaptorZA on 3/28/2008 5:22:01 PM , Rating: 5
This gives a whole new meaning to a paper launch.




Nearly 1mil for paper planes?
By AlphaVirus on 3/28/08, Rating: 0
RE: Nearly 1mil for paper planes?
By bodar on 3/28/2008 6:06:04 PM , Rating: 3
Guess that's why they are treating the paper with a (presumably) heat-resistant coating then. I don't think this experiment is worthwhile either, but at least read before you go off all half-cocked.


By AlphaVirus on 3/31/2008 12:11:20 PM , Rating: 2
From the article
quote:
A prototype shuttle built from folded paper that was made from sugar cane fibers and sprayed with a special coating

From my post
quote:
So $1mil to waste a bunch of paper, sugar, and energy burning these little candy-coated paper planes.


So yeah, at least read before you reply.

quote:
Guess that's why they are treating the paper with a (presumably) heat-resistant coating then.

Waste $1mil direct costs and 3 years on a presumption? I understand this is how thinks usually become, based on ideas, but this is a pretty incomplete idea.


Uh oh.
By marsbound2024 on 3/28/2008 11:47:59 PM , Rating: 2
JAXA's budget problems are getting worse than NASA's!




RE: Uh oh.
By batman4u on 3/28/2008 11:53:11 PM , Rating: 2
i can make the airplanes myself, take 100,000 dlls and throwthem at my Oven and see if they survive..... i think it would even have better research data :P hehe


april fools?
By mm2587 on 3/28/2008 4:44:51 PM , Rating: 3
so I definatlyhad to check to make sure it wasn't april 1st after reading this article. If theres no way to track these things after they luanch them there really seems to be no reason to even bother. An expirement is supposed to have verrifiable results. If theres not even a hope of tracking these down where are your results?




Thanksgiving Theme
By Procurion on 3/29/2008 10:18:18 AM , Rating: 3
Reminds me of the time that they threw the turkeys out of the helicopter as Thanksgiving giveaways on "WKRP in Cincinatti" and discovered that domestic turkeys can't fly. Classic television moment when Les starts crying "Oh, the humanity!".

Nothing new was discovered when the theoretical turkeys hit the ground....I don't think that they will discover anything with paper airplanes either, except to prove that a paper airplanes' terminal velocity is less than its' flash point from friction.




Owww
By Mitch101 on 3/28/2008 4:19:30 PM , Rating: 2
Owwww - My Eye!

And that why you should never throw paper airplanes even from space.




Mach 7?
By Alexstarfire on 3/28/2008 4:53:06 PM , Rating: 2
Ok, I understand that the airplane is going to be going about Mach 20 in space, but how is it going to go Mach 7 upon re-entry? The second particles start hitting it it's going to slow down pretty fast, I would think. I'd be far more concerned about how fast it gets than the heat. If they are trying to make the paper airplanes streamlined then I guess they could fall straight down at that speed, but that'd take a weight or some serious engineering to keep it facing perfectly straight down.

Also, why does it take $300,000 per year? Are they paying a research scientist that much to do this? Reminds me of the grant the US government gave to research that ice melts. And that's not a joke. They spent like $60,000 just to show that ice melts. I don't remember specifics though. I'm also sure that that was tagged on to some bill or something and not just an outright request for a grant. Cause that's just dumb.

They should also test this against some regular paper airplanes. At least that way we can see if there is a difference. I doubt any will get destroyed. They simply don't have the weight to get any kind of speed. No speed, no friction. No friction, no combustion.




Sugar-Cane Bomb
By TimberJon on 3/28/2008 5:04:19 PM , Rating: 2
I think theyre trying to test whether a paper airplane can withstand re-entry so that they can launch larger models carrying non-metallic payloads. Ultra-cheap Bombs using recycled materials.

Scary thought.




Terms that come to mind....
By SiliconAddict on 3/28/2008 5:41:58 PM , Rating: 2
Titanic. . . Spruce Goose

I would love to see someone go to the president in the future. Mr....or Mrs. President. Japan and China are out spending us in the R&D paper airplane division of NASA. We need 2 million more in funding to figure out the most efficient fold on the aft wings and how to stop the paper clips from falling off the nose and hitting the wings on launch.




HEY!!!
By batman4u on 3/28/2008 11:56:16 PM , Rating: 2
If i Find an Airplane of those are we suppose to just give it away..... if i find one it will be no less than 2,000 dlls per plane :P ... dont worry ill be on the look out for the airplanes




Next headlines!
By rsmech on 3/29/2008 12:41:12 AM , Rating: 2
The ISS has been destroyed by hitting hundreds of paper airplanes at Mach 20, The plans were so light that they didn't clear out of the ISS path on it's next orbit.




Not just for laughs
By mahax on 3/29/2008 8:44:31 AM , Rating: 2
I'm sure there's plenty of uses for ultra light vehicles from space. I mean you could drop tiny samples gathered from space or data on .. something like microSD cards. If they can drop the plane, then they'll start designing bigger models with some tracking tech etc.

Or then it's an early aprils joke, hard to say ;)




Are they serious
By 325hhee on 3/31/2008 10:38:45 AM , Rating: 2
What is this really supposed to prove, they said the plane was going to be 2.8 inches by 2 inches. What kind of resistance can something that small take? It's been proven, if you throw a penny off the Empire State building it will not go through a person, and as it falls down, the final impact isn't lethal.

Paper is not an item that can really gather that much resistance or friction upon entry, and the mass is so small it's not even worth mentioning. If they were going to do a test at least lets talk in meters or yards, not 2.8 inches. I guess everybody has a slow day.

I wonder what's next, dropping a feather from space or shooting a rubber band?




Is it going to work at all??
By derek85 on 3/28/08, Rating: -1
RE: Is it going to work at all??
By KaiserCSS on 3/28/2008 9:57:40 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder if I should explain aerodynamics and air resistance and terminal velocity and all that good stuff... nah.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki