backtop


Print 11 comment(s) - last by acase.. on Dec 29 at 12:54 PM

Researchers ramp up in-car systems designed to better protect pregnant women and the fetus

Car makers and scientists are now interested in developing technology to reduce the number of fetal deaths, while making it safer for pregnant women to travel in automobiles.

In future vehicles, researchers hope to create enhanced crash-protection technology, with computer-aided models now being used to aid testing.  The most common death of children in the womb is caused when oxygen to the fetus is cut off, which is normally caused after crash impact rips the placenta from the uterus.

"We can develop restraint systems for any vehicle and any occupant, but we first have to see the injuries themselves, what happens to the placenta and uterus tissues during an accident," said Stefan Duma, Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Scientists researcher, said in a statement to the AP.

Researchers who use CT scans of pregnant women at 30 weeks are then able to study the force of impact on a human body -- and have used uterine and placental tissues -- to learn how auto collisions impact pregnant women.

The government doesn't currently track the overall number of fetal deaths related to auto accidents -- but the estimated number ranges from 300 to a few thousands each year.  Auto accidents remain the largest single cause of death among pregnant women, a startling fact that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) hopes to change in years to come.

Providing better safety features has been extremely important for car makers, especially protecting children.  However, research into developing airbags and impact systems for pregnant women has finally garnered more attention.

Auto makers are pointing out that changes won't be available immediately, but want drivers and expectant mothers to know that research is being done.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

As estimates go....
By chagrinnin on 12/28/2009 10:09:48 PM , Rating: 3
300 to a few thousand is a huge discrepancy. You'd think someone would have been interested in these numbers long before now.

Headline: 300 to 2000 Fetuses Killed in Crashes Every Year (+/- 500)




note another thing
By rika13 on 12/28/2009 11:41:58 PM , Rating: 2
note that it doesn't differentiate between crashes that would kill anyone and those where only the fetus would be killed; since the fetus would be killed if the mother was decapitated or crushed into a chunky paste




RE: note another thing
By Zillatech on 12/29/09, Rating: 0
maybe set some rules
By SunAngel on 12/28/09, Rating: -1
RE: maybe set some rules
By RivuxGamma on 12/28/2009 10:10:49 PM , Rating: 2
Absolutely not. I am always opposed to laws that attempt to inflict common sense. (Helmet laws? Puh-leeze.) The information is there. The woman should decide if it's too risky. It's sad if she loses the child, but nanny laws open the door for more of them to be passed.


RE: maybe set some rules
By Samus on 12/29/2009 12:40:30 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
The woman should decide if it's too risky.


If men let women decide if things were too risky, half of us wouldn't even be here. BAM!


RE: maybe set some rules
By acase on 12/29/2009 12:54:19 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, someone really should have given your mother some better advice.

Love,
Dad


RE: maybe set some rules
By surt on 12/29/2009 1:15:40 AM , Rating: 2
Women who are exposed to domestic violence have hormone surges that tend to lead to miscarriage, so that b-slap is probably higher risk than the driving.


RE: maybe set some rules
By Frallan on 12/29/2009 4:52:40 AM , Rating: 2
Do you think the phisical effects on a body is depending on if the body was sitting in the passenger seat or the drivers seat?

If a woman needs to go to work in a car she will do so and going out buying groceies might also be needed. As for the B-slap i think you need to have a talk to your mother again on how to treat people regardless of sex or age.


RE: maybe set some rules
By tastyratz on 12/29/2009 8:38:43 AM , Rating: 2
Agreed. That is like saying we should just stick pregnamt women in a cave for 9 months and dropping food down in a basket. Any form of transportation is dangerous to a degree, but a necessity of life. Those who can afford to stay home, not go to work, not go get groceries, etc. well kudos to them.

Now to the single mother or mothers living in the real world paying bills? That cutesy notion wont fly.

This stick them in a bubble crap doesn't fly whether its pregnant women or anything else with me. What needs to be done is exactly what is being done... researching appropriately accommodating restraint systems. We don't need any more nanny laws keeping us from weeding out our (bad)dumb eggs.


RE: maybe set some rules
By chagrinnin on 12/29/2009 9:24:40 AM , Rating: 2
Some food and some lotion,... "it rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again." :P


“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki