backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 68 comment(s) - last by Diesel Donkey.. on Mar 31 at 8:40 PM

New research into advanced photon data transmission is revolutionary but guaranteed to make your head hurt

Significant news broke yesterday in the field of quantum computing.  The world record for the amount of data sent by a single photon was shattered using some intensely cerebral science. 

The new record for so called "dense coding" in linear optics, set by researchers at the University of Illinois, involves the use of hyperentanglement to achieve "superdense" coding levels.  Paul Kwiat, a John Bardeen Professor of Physics and Electrical and Computer Engineering, explains dense coding stating, "Dense coding is arguably the protocol that launched the field of quantum communication.  Today, however, more than a decade after its initial experimental realization, channel capacity has remained fundamentally limited as conceived for photons using conventional linear elements."

Classical photon coding works like silicon transistor coding in basic principle-- an element, in this case a photon, can convey one of two messages, or one bit of information.  Dense coding takes advantage of quantum mechanics to allow photons to encode up to four messages theoretically, or two bits of information.  Kwiat explains, "Dense coding is possible because the properties of photons can be linked to one another through a peculiar process called quantum entanglement.  This bizarre coupling can link two photons, even if they are located on opposite sides of the galaxy."

However, past efforts have fallen short of the theoretical 4 message limit, due to inherent 3 message limitation placed by the standard entanglement protocol using linear elements.  This means that in the past communication was limited to 1.58 bits/photon as opposed to the theoretical 2 bits/photon.

Kwiat's team took advantage of a more complicated form of entanglement known as hyperentanglement.  By hyperentangling photons, the team is able to cause the photons to become entangled in more ways than one, allowing for the full transmission of data and achievement of 2 bits sent per photon.

The achievement of superdense, 2 bit coding carried out by Kwiat, graduate student Julio Barreiro, and postdoctoral researcher Tzu-Chieh Wei (now at the University of Waterloo) described the results in a paper, which has been accepted for publication in the Nature Physics journal.

The new superdense coding relies on conveying both photon's "wiggle" polarization, and its "twisting", its orbital angular momentum.  In order to do this, spontaneous parametric down conversion is performed on a pair of nonlinear crystals, creating this phenomenon of dual-parameter hyperentanglement.  Data is then transferred from one photon to the other by changing the polarization by applying birefringent phase shifts utilizing liquid crystals. 

Barreiro warns that the method may impractical within the Earth's atmosphere.  Says Barreiro, "While hyper-entanglement in spin and orbital angular momentum enables the transmission of two bits with a single photon.  Atmospheric turbulence can cause some of the quantum states to easily decohere, thus limiting their likely communication application to satellite-to-satellite transmissions."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By Fnoob on 3/25/2008 11:19:13 AM , Rating: 4
"This bizarre coupling can link two photons, even if they are located on opposite sides of the galaxy."

This made my brain hurt.




RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By ksherman on 3/25/2008 11:24:02 AM , Rating: 3
So would that mean we would be able to (theoretically) send data across the galaxy? Is this like the Ultimate WiFi connection?

If not, what does that really mean.


By therealnickdanger on 3/25/2008 11:56:45 AM , Rating: 2
If I understand what I'm reading, the data transmission would only work that way if you had these magical crystals at both sides of the galaxy...

</dunce cap>


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By Guuts on 3/25/2008 11:59:31 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, that's basically what it means, except the transfer of data is instantaneous, and I believe this effect isn't limited to just "across the/a galaxy"...but you can wiki search if you want to verify that.


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By MicahK on 3/25/2008 8:50:08 PM , Rating: 2
Not quite, I thought this too the first time I heard about entanglement. Contrary to what some people are saying here, the laws of physics do hold in the quantum realm, even tho it leads to some crazy and weird conclusions...

Anyways, you can only convey classical information at a maximum of the speed of light. Without getting into too many details...

Say Alice and Bob both hold coins that are entangled in such a way that when one is heads so is the other. Say Alice observes a head, then Bob will observe a head, regardless of the distance separating them and instantaneously!

But Alice has no way of knowing what she will observe before she has observed it. Thus she cannot piece together a message in this way.

And Bob has no idea if his observation is random, or a result of Alice's measurement, UNLESS, she somehow communicates that to him, which defeats the whole purpose in the first place...


By Comdrpopnfresh on 3/25/2008 10:30:02 PM , Rating: 1
When someone is talking to me, I have no clue what they are saying until I hear it...

If two particles are entangles, and one is kept in a manner where it's state will not change- the system works flawlessly. If bob puts his coin in a glass-sealed vacuum, it will changes whenever alice's does-

Technically nothing is traveling, so the speed limit doesn't apply here. I don't see what the problem is- you say not quite, and then you go on to explain what you just said not quite to...

If you are saying that the observer with the coin that is used to display the resultant states cannot get a message because they don't know what form it is being sent in- hot air. Then why are we doing things like SETI? I'm sure if intelligent life out there is communicating to use, they're not doing it in binary let alone windows messenger and the like. I believe the idea would be to start with a sequence and establish a frame, and rate of transfer. So x changes in y amount of time is a frame packet. Use prime numbers, or the elements to get across some meaning (hell, any sequence with repeats) in what would most likely be math, and eventually something could be worked out.


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By MicahK on 3/26/2008 3:42:44 AM , Rating: 2
A - SETI is based on using EM waves to communicate... These are bound at the speed of light. It would take 4 years to send a message to the nearest star and another 4 to hear a reply back.

B- I suggest you do some reading on quantum mechanics, its just the way it is, no matter how hard you argue otherwise...


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By SlyNine on 3/26/2008 4:11:25 AM , Rating: 1
We will never fly. No what's that you say, Oh well then. We will never go faster then the speed of sound, Oh we have. Well then, We will never travel to the moon. What we've done that too.

Well we will certainly never travel faster then the speed of light or be able to analyze a subatomic piratical/wave( whatever they really are).

I find it amazing that we keep on saying this even though we don't even know the nature of light, electrons or how they even manage to travel threw space and yet act like a wave, If they do travel threw some sorta medium in space we have no clue what that is.


By theapparition on 3/26/2008 8:35:42 AM , Rating: 2
While I admire your optimism, your initial observations are a bit misleading.

We will never fly, even though man has seen birds flying since the dawn. Never go faster than speed of sound, even though man had observed other phenomenon "breaking" that rule. Etc.

But we've never observed anything that can go faster than the speed of light (quantum tunneling phenomenon aside). So far, all theories reguarding light have been verified. While travel to distant worlds seems like an insurmountable challenge right now, I hold out hope that we will discover a breakthrough that lets us go "warp speed ahead". But that's all it is now......hope.

The original explanation is pretty valid, though. You can't hold that coin in "some neutral state" unless you know what that neutral state is supposed to be, which takes communication between parties.


By MicahK on 3/26/2008 3:25:39 PM , Rating: 2
I wasn't saying that one day we won't be able to... I hope I see some major breakthroughs like that in my lifetime!! I'm just pointing out that THIS particular breakthrough doesn't mean instantaneous communication, although it is progress towards secure quantum communication!


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By Sanity on 3/25/2008 1:24:17 PM , Rating: 2
Sounds like the beginning of an Ansible. I first heard that term from reading Orson Scott Card's "Enders Game". It allowed instantaneous communication across light years of space. I've read other articles on this site that refer to two particles having some mysterious relationship that transcended all distances instantly, but nothing that mentioned harnessing that property. This would make a huge impact on space exploration. Sure, it would take 60 years for a probe to get to the nearest star, but it would relay information instantly back home, instead of having a 4 year lag. Hell, if we sent one now, I might even be alive when it got there!

If you couldn't build an FTL ship that would take people to other stars, I'd think instant communications across light years of space would be the next best thing.

I guess what I can't figure out from this article, is whether or not they are using photons to sent information due to their entanglement relationship, or if they're actually sending a photon from one place to another via something like fiber optics, but with a higher bit rate.


By Ajax9000 on 3/25/2008 9:26:48 PM , Rating: 2
I was going to say "No, it was Ursula K. Le Guin", but Wikipedia notes Orson Scott Card, Vernor Vinge, and others borrowed the term from her writing.


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By charliee on 3/26/08, Rating: -1
By jajig on 3/26/2008 11:01:58 AM , Rating: 2
Why must you quote the bible in every (almost?) post?

I don't care that you do, it's just makes me think WTF.


By Steve Guilliot on 3/25/2008 5:14:19 PM , Rating: 3
Not really, but sort of. You can't link two photons from opposite sides of the galaxy, so we couldn't use this tomorrow.

However if you had two friends, each 10 lightyears away from you (example), you could send them a linked stream of photons. 10 years later when they start receiving the stream, they could start communicating with each other across the 20 lightyear void. They wouldn't be able to communicate with you at all, just each other.

I doubt it will ever be possible, but if we had a way to indefinitely store and retrieve photons without losing their quantum state, we could send one linked stream, store the other, and communicate with anyone anywhere. Of course, you still have to wait for the photon stream to arrive at the other end. Across the galaxy would require ~100,000 years. At the end of the ~100k year wait, you could communicate for as long as you sent (and stored) the linked stream.


By jlips6 on 3/25/2008 5:39:51 PM , Rating: 2
I've done a little research on quantum mechanics, and I understand them, in the vague sense that an ant can understand there is more above him than just a foot. Apparently, quantum doesn't need to follow the rules of physics. They have made some particle (I forget whether it was atom or photon or electron.) Be in two places at the same time. It was not moving at the speed of light, it was in two places at once. This might be what they are talking about. The laws of physics are almighty, but quantum is just weird as hell. This is about all I could understand before my head exploded, but I don't think it's sending information at the speed of light....


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By hcahwk19 on 3/25/2008 11:24:32 AM , Rating: 2
As a law student, I am used to reading convoluted language, but this is ridiculous. I can usually figure out what is going on in these kinds of scientific articles, but I totally feel retarded after attempting to read this. My head hurts now.


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By odessit740 on 3/25/2008 11:44:29 AM , Rating: 5
Am I the only one that finds this pretty straight forward. Guys, for the layman, the details are not important, because you're not a specialist in the field. It is the overall product which is important, and that is achieving the theoretical limitation of sending information via photons. (At least that is considered to be the limit as it is agreed upon today)


RE: I rode the short bus apparently, because...
By Tsuwamono on 3/25/2008 11:49:25 AM , Rating: 2
I was able to read it pretty easily as well. A few things were alittle confusing but i get the basic idea.

The thing I don't understand is if it would be possible to use this type of communication for space ships as they are always moving.