backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 18 comment(s) - last by HighWing.. on Jan 29 at 6:03 PM


The QTrax Homepage looks pretty swank. It has a banner claiming 25 million legal downloads, a hot picture of Lily Allen...the only thing that's missing is the client, which was supposed to be released at midnight.
QTrax is shaking up the world of online music with big claims -- but are its platinum hits really just fool's gold?

Support from all major record labels?  Check.  Entirely free tracks supported by advertiser revenue?  Check.  These are among the claims made by QTrax which was reborn as a legal online music service today.  The news and the press buzz around the release have left many wondering if QTrax is a savior for downloaders and the online music community or a false messiah of epic proportions.

New York-based QTrax's basic premise is to offer a new face to an old piece of software.  The original QTrax was a Gnutella-based P2P client which allowed users to trade music.  It gained a modest following during the days of Napster.  Its use would certainly be classified as illegal copyright infringement by the RIAA.

LTDnetwork is reviving the dead brand name and hoping to transform it into a household name to rival iTunes.  The new QTrax is headed by CEO Allan Klepfisz, who says that the site will provide users with a better service and what they're expecting:  free music.  He says, "You can't change the attitudes and habits of what is now probably amounting to two generations who believe that music ought to be free on the internet.  Those people are not going to be discouraged by Supreme Court decisions, they're not going to be discouraged by technological interference. Ultimately, what will discourage them is a demonstratively better service."

QTrax utilizes a unique form of digital rights management (DRM) called .mpq, which reportedly took several years to develop.  This content management will protect the song from illegal distribution and allow the song to be played in the QTrax client/player, supported by revenue from ads streamed to the player.  The service will encourage users to pay for the track either by buying it outright, or by paying for a monthly subscription service, which will provide DRM-equipped Windows Media files. 

The biggest claim by QTrax is that it has the support of all four major record labels:  EMI, Warner, Universal Music Group, and Sony BMG.  The service also claims to offer 25 million tracks; more than iTunes which only has around 6 million songs in its catalog.

Furthermore, QTrax makes even bigger claims stating that while its tracks are not currently compatible with the iPod, it will soon be releasing a "fix" to bypass Apple's Fairplay DRM scheme and "put songs on an iPod without any interference from FairPlay."  CEO Klepfisz says that they cracked the scheme themselves and that "Apple has nothing to do with it."  He says the capability may come in March.  However, Apple, quick to release updates to block exploits, may try to close any backdoors that QTrax is hoping to use via its iTunes update service.

If QTrax lives up to its lofty promises, it may provide a digital revolution.  However, early signs make its claims seem slightly tenuous. 

First, UMG and Warner Music both went public that negotiations were not finalized with QTrax.  UMG said that they did have prior experimental contracts with QTrax, but that these contracts had expired.  It stated that they were in ongoing discussions QTrax, but nothing had been finalized.  Warner simply said it never had a contract with QTrax, despite ongoing negotiations.  A spokesperson stated, "Warner Music Group has not authorized the use of our content on Qtrax's recently announced service."

An EMI spokeswoman made a similar announcement to UMG's, stating, "EMI Music had an initial agreement with QTrax, essentially a license designed to help them experiment with this ad-supported model had licensed songs to QTrax.  QTrax didn't launch the service during the period of the agreement -- I think we initially did this two years ago.  We're now in talks with the company about a possible new deal, but as of today, they don't have a license with EMI Music."

With three of its four contracts apparently not in place, what exactly QTrax will offer is uncertain.  Worse yet, the client was supposed to be available for download at midnight this morning, and it currently still is not available for download.

How exactly the noisy and misinformative launch (or lack thereof) pans out remains to be seen.  If QTrax can indeed wrangle new contracts with the majors, get its client up and running, and provide a working iPod hack perhaps it will become the next phenomena.  Until then its claims seem increasingly unbelievable.

Despite a much lower profile launch, similar ad-driven music download service SpiralFrog may have more lasting success then QTrax.  It launched with solid support from UMG, and met its reported release date and had content ready.  QTrax, despite big claims is appearing more and more to be nothing but a bunch of hot air.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

IMO - DOA
By HighWing on 1/28/2008 4:21:06 PM , Rating: 4
As someone else already pointed out, without the iPod support, atm this is just another Rhapsody clone. Which I don't see much of a future for. Then, even if they do launch and successfully roll out the iPod feature, they still have to convince all the iTunes users to use their service with the overhead danger of Apple constantly blocking it. Furthermore, what about all the "OTHER" players out there like the Zune, Creative, etc, etc,? With no support for other players, they are really only targeting iPod users, which lets face it are not always the brightest people when it comes to computer changes. So that's already amounting to a steep climb for this app to overcome. Finally, it seems there is still the possibility that not all their contracts will come through.

So considering all this, I would be surprised if this service is still around in a year. IMO it's already DOA.




RE: IMO - DOA
By AlexWade on 1/28/2008 10:39:31 PM , Rating: 3
Even if they could convince people to use their service, there is still the obstacle of the RIAA labels. You see, their thinking is deprecated and outmoded, so a revolutionary idea like this is beyond their grasp. The big labels rather cling a dying model than embrace change. The internet changed everything, except that some groups forgot to adapt and instead are trying to repeatedly force a square peg in a round hole while wondering why people think they are stupid. They alienate their future fan base, put out the same old junk, and overcharge for it all the while wondering why sales are falling. Meanwhile, a monkey in a lab can see why the labels are failing, which is very very sad.

In short, the labels will only embrace kicking and screaming anything different than what they've done in the past. This is different. This is original thinking. This is something they force out of their artists because they hate originality.

So the two hurdles to clear are stupid users and stupid labels.


RE: IMO - DOA
By kelmon on 1/29/2008 5:10:29 AM , Rating: 2
Given all the hoohaa over the non-launch of the service and the suspicion that this is just vapourware, take the following with a pinch of salt:
quote:
"We've had a technical breakthrough which enables us to put songs on an iPod without any interference from FairPlay," Allan Klepfisz, Qtrax's president and chief executive, told the Associated Press. Although the exec declined to give specifics on how Qtrax will make its audio files compatible with Apple devices, he noted that "Apple has nothing to do with it."

Qtrax says iPod compatibility could arrive as early as March. It's unclear, however, whether Apple will attempt to circumvent Qtrax compatibility in order to maintain the strong bond between the iTunes Store and its digital media player line.


Source: AppleInsider (http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/01/28/free...


RE: IMO - DOA
By HighWing on 1/29/2008 6:03:49 PM , Rating: 1
Yes I think thats the best thing to assume at this point. Just another vapourware press release


Would be nice, but...
By ninjit on 1/28/2008 2:27:32 PM , Rating: 2
for this to work, the record labels will be expecting at least as much revenue as they get from, say Rhapsody.

Rhapsody is one service I've seriously considered paying for, but the limited ability to use it on portable players is a deal-breaker for me.

From the description, it seems that Qtrax is aiming to be something similar, but with their revenue generated from ads, vs. monthly subscription fees. But I find it hard to imagine they can raise enough money through ads alone to satisfy the labels.

For one thing, I'm sure Real media looked at this model themselves extensively for the Rhapsody service, but they seem to have decided it wasn't viable.




RE: Would be nice, but...
By IcY18 on 1/28/2008 4:14:24 PM , Rating: 3
Well if it's free can you imagine how much more traffic it would get than a service you have to pay for? While it still may not offset its going in the right direction.


Hail Xenu!
By BMFPitt on 1/28/2008 2:29:21 PM , Rating: 2
This has about as much chance of being the savior as Tom Cruise does...




RE: Hail Xenu!
By Desslok on 1/28/2008 2:34:12 PM , Rating: 2
But according to the video he did for Scientology he cares so much he never takes a vacation!


HOT PIC!
By kattanna on 1/28/2008 2:10:56 PM , Rating: 3
could really care less about online music.. but thats an awesome pic

buddy christ!




If it works...
By Some1ne on 1/28/2008 5:00:34 PM , Rating: 3
If their service actually works as promised, I'll be breaking out my streamripper. No matter how sophisticated their .mpq format is, I'm sure it'll be no match for it.




B-b-b-bull*$*$!
By Chiggs on 1/28/2008 8:26:03 PM , Rating: 3
retards
By Gul Westfale on 1/28/2008 4:54:02 PM , Rating: 2
they took several years (as the article claims) to develop something that no one in their right mind would pay to use... and they expect to make money from it. i wonder if teh investors they fleeced were the same as teh ones who backed eth best video game console since the time of abraham, the magnificently awesome PHANTOM, and its equally as scrumtrilescent LAPBOARD, which cost only somewhere around $5m to develop.... suckers.




Picture of a bird
By busterTI on 1/28/2008 5:48:42 PM , Rating: 2
Anyone else notice that person giving us the bird in the center of the picture? Kinda funny




SpiralFrog
By loomis2 on 1/28/2008 8:53:25 PM , Rating: 2
I've been using SpiralFrog since the day it started a few months ago and it is exactly as advertised. It is only backed by one of the four labels, and because of that they don't always have everything, but you find a nice nugget every so often. Beck? Check. Nine Inch Nails? Check. Queens Of The Stone Age? Check. Weezer? Check. And all free and legal.

I have been able to download the program, so it is up, but I haven't been able to register. After reading this article I might put that off a bit more to see how this all pans out.




so is it?
By Manch on 1/28/2008 11:07:08 PM , Rating: 2
so is it like pop up ads or is it more like radio ads where they make it play in between every 4 or 5 songs on your list? If that was the case it would be similar to the regular radio but you get to choose your own sound track.




D2
By djkrypplephite on 1/29/2008 2:39:33 AM , Rating: 2
Who remembers .mpq files from Diablo 2? Anyone?




DRM?
By iFX on 1/29/2008 6:40:43 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
QTrax utilizes a unique form of digital rights management (DRM)


Not interested.

Attention media nazis. People don't want DRM. People like me aren't going to buy it (with cash or with adviews).

Next.




Zunepass
By Alphafox78 on 1/29/2008 12:22:34 PM , Rating: 2
for everyone who didnt allready know, you can get a zune pass and download almost any song for $15 a month. I have been using it for a few months now and its perdy sweet. you can play them on your pc or sync it with a zune as I do and listen on the go. if you dont renew it or sync the zune in 60 days the music will expire, but then again you dont REALLY own your music anyways, if you want to get legal about it.




"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki