backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 27 comment(s) - last by SiN.. on Apr 22 at 8:39 PM

Who says Earth gets all the life? Scientists look at Saturn's moon Enceladus as a possible hot spot for brewing the Good Stuff

In years past, Jupiter's moon Europa has received much attention for its interesting geological properties. Thought to conceal liquid water oceans somewhere beneath its icy surface, some scientists wish to explore the Luna-sized moon in search of life. At least life similar to what we know.

More recently, Saturn's tiny moon Enceladus has been in warm relations with planetary scientists for its unique geology. The 500 km diameter moon sports a giant geyser, spewing ice and other particles out into space to distances of 1,500 km. The ice spout helps feed Saturn's incredible rings.

There are two very important things to note about geysers made of ice particles. One is that if there's ice, especially water ice, that means there's, wait for it ... water. Similar to Europa, Enceladus may contain liquid or at least some semi-liquid form of water below its solid ice surface.

In addition, the 1,500 kilometer tall geyser indicates there is some sort of geothermal process occurring on the moon.

Enceladus' interesting processes could harbor life in one of the two classic "life begins here" theories; the primordial soup theory and the deep sea vent theory. Primordial soup is probably more familiar to most people. Having been theorized by Charles Darwin and subsequently tested and (somewhat) proven by Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey, the life-goop theory has been taught in most life-science courses for the past few decades. A pool of seemingly innocuous chemicals, in reaction to some sort of catalyst, an electrical discharge is a likely culprit, spontaneously combine to create amino acids, the building blocks of life.

Enceladus' possible sub-surface water could harbor the necessary chemicals for this process to occur, along with the heat to drive chemical reactions. It does seem a little more far-fetched than Earth's life's foundation, but stranger things have been known to happen in the universe.

The deep sea vent theory seems a little more plausible for the Saturnian satellite. Various microbial and bacterial life exists on Earth which is mostly unlike much of the life we're accustomed to. These critters survive in very unique ecosystems, such as the high pressure, super-heated, random mineral filled plumes of debris spewing from deep sea hydrothermal vents, or fracture zones deep within the Earth's crust where no light, oxygen or organic input of any kind can reach them. While vent microbes feed on the various minerals in plumes, the deep earth variety have actually been shown to "eat" the radioactive decay of the rock they live in.

Such unique lifeforms may be more akin to what could exist on Europa or Encaldus. Their existing environments are nothing like what we know of on Earth, though the geo-sciences are theoretically easy enough to understand.

With Russia blasting off for Europa and Cassini granted the first of two possible mission extentions in Enceladus' neighborhood, we may know in the very near future just how possible it is for life to have evolved elsewhere in our solar system. Should traces be found of any such creatures, the idea that life, particularly intelligent life, may exist outside of our own little planetary whirlygig will be a bit easier to grasp.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Moon sized moon?
By Screwballl on 4/21/2008 7:52:43 PM , Rating: 4
a moon sized moon?... thats like saying a planet sized planet... I think a better description should have been a planetary "satellite" the size of our Moon... or something of this sort.




RE: Moon sized moon?
By Malikhan on 4/21/2008 8:32:16 PM , Rating: 5
That's no moon!


RE: Moon sized moon?
By margaritavillejack on 4/22/2008 12:14:37 AM , Rating: 1
that's a playstation.


RE: Moon sized moon?
By erikejw on 4/22/2008 6:50:00 AM , Rating: 1
Yeah well, they thought George Bush was alive too but then the debate about, can there be life with no intelligence and the verdict was reopened ;)


RE: Moon sized moon?
By Enoch2001 on 4/22/2008 2:00:56 PM , Rating: 2
Heheh!


RE: Moon sized moon?
By nugundam93 on 4/22/2008 2:05:11 PM , Rating: 2
we like the moon, coz it is close to us...

we like the mooooooon!...


RE: Moon sized moon?
By SiN on 4/22/2008 8:39:39 PM , Rating: 2
brilliant :D


RE: Moon sized moon?
By 306maxi on 4/22/2008 3:38:23 AM , Rating: 5
It's a trap!


RE: Moon sized moon?
By DOSGuy on 4/22/2008 12:13:16 AM , Rating: 2
It's also not Moon-sized. The Moon has a diameter of 3474 km, compared with Enceladus' diameter of about 500 km (roughly 1/7th the Moon's diameter). The resulting difference in volume is even more significant, but I wasn't able to find Enceladus' volume, which isn't straightforward to calculate because it isn't massive enough to pull itself into a perfect sphere. In terms of mass, the Moon is 679.63 times more massive than Enceladus, but that comparison is exaggerated by differences in composition. Nevertheless, the Moon and Enceladus aren't even in the same class. Relating the Moon and Enceladus to objects we're more familiar with, referring to Enceladus as a Moon-sized moon is almost exactly the same as referring to a basketball-sized baseball.


RE: Moon sized moon?
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 4/22/2008 12:18:02 AM , Rating: 2
That sentence was describing Europa though. In either case, I changed it to Luna-sized moon.


RE: Moon sized moon?
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 4/22/2008 12:19:19 AM , Rating: 2
The subtle differences of capitalization ;)


Eats radioactive decay?
By ADDAvenger on 4/21/2008 7:42:46 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
the deep earth variety have actually been shown to "eat" the radioactive decay of the rock they live in.


What exactly does this mean, and could we use these things for disposing nuclear waste?




RE: Eats radioactive decay?
By wired00 on 4/21/2008 8:44:27 PM , Rating: 2
yeah im also interested in this


RE: Eats radioactive decay?
By Goty on 4/21/2008 9:04:48 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, and it's actually already being done at at least one site (Y-12) in the US where the ground has been contaminated by a water-soluble form of Uranium. Supposedly it works quite well.


RE: Eats radioactive decay?
By 91TTZ on 4/21/2008 10:03:50 PM , Rating: 2
It probably just means that they survive off of the heat generated by radioactive decay.

You can't destroy radiation by eating it (or any chemical process for that matter)


RE: Eats radioactive decay?
By Carter642 on 4/21/2008 10:33:57 PM , Rating: 3
You can, however, have an organism that eats a radioactive element out of the water and then collect the organism off the surface.


RE: Eats radioactive decay?
By DeltaZero on 4/22/2008 11:42:17 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, this sounds more reasonable.
Never heard of bacteria who manage nuclear fission.


one
By conrad13a on 4/21/2008 9:17:31 PM , Rating: 2
I'm sold.
Stuff me in a capsule and ship my ass out. I'll let you know if that rock is cool or not.

So what do you bring with you on a long journey like that? Other than a ton of processing power.

And it goes a little something like this:
1.2 billion km/40,000 kph = 30,000 hr
30,000 hr/24 = 1,250 days
1,250 days/365 < 3.5 years




RE: one
By Connoisseur on 4/21/2008 10:08:58 PM , Rating: 2
Is that assuming direct point to point flight or does it take into account the slingshot distances? If it doesn't take into account slingshotting to save on fuel, then you could easily tack on a couple more years to that timefram.


RE: one
By ViroMan on 4/22/2008 4:44:04 AM , Rating: 3
That and imagine all the food, water, and waste management needed. The thing would also have to carry 3-4 spare parts for anything important. You would need a fairly large ship just to send one person out for 3 years.

Also if you send anyone out for 3 years... they might as well stay out there. They would have been out there too long to even survive earths gravity unless they initiated a rotational spin on the craft but, if your working with sling shot trajectories thats a no no. I suppose they could build a small stationary habitat in earths orbit in the 6-7 years for you to get back that would have a rotational spin and slowly speed it up to get you used to gravity.


RE: one
By Enoch2001 on 4/22/2008 2:06:38 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
1,250 days/365 < 3.5 years


With our current technology I don't think worrying about what you bring would be the biggest issue. That long in deep space wouldn't bode well for you as a human. Besides your muscles atrophying, your very genetic makeup would resemble a fine selection of string cheese after that much exposure to interstellar radiation!


it is SaturNian, not Saturian
By DeepBlue1975 on 4/21/2008 9:56:49 PM , Rating: 3
Makes my eyes heart by just reading that! Please fix that! :D




RE: it is SaturNian, not Saturian
By Sartori42 on 4/22/2008 4:38:26 AM , Rating: 1
If you're going to bust on someone for a spelling error, you should at least make sure your spelling is accurate.


RE: it is SaturNian, not Saturian
By Visual on 4/22/2008 6:16:47 AM , Rating: 2
I(heart)U


By DeepBlue1975 on 4/22/2008 10:31:54 AM , Rating: 2
I made no spelling mistakes on that sentence.
The word "heart" is perfectly spelled there :p

My error was a grammatical one, because there's no way of relating two nouns in a sentence without using something else to connect them and make the whole thing make sense (ie. a verb).

Saying "My eyes heart", though perfectly spelled, makes no sense at all. :)


not quite
By Steve Stip on 4/21/2008 7:53:49 PM , Rating: 3
"Should traces be found of any such creatures, the idea that life, particularly intelligent life, may exist outside of our own little planetary whirlygig will be a bit easier to grasp."

Since mechanisms for transferring life from one part of the solar system to another (eg. meteor impacts) might exist then any life found elsewhere than earth must be shown not to have originated here.

Yes, let's explore every pool of water we find outside earth. The results should be very interesting.




Leonov...
By nugundam93 on 4/22/2008 9:19:27 AM , Rating: 2
"...With Russia blasting off for Europa..."

heywood floyd and the gang onboard? weren't they supposed to head to zagadka? :)




"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki