backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 18 comment(s) - last by Clauzii.. on Sep 20 at 9:51 PM

Samsung's purchase offer is a 93% premium on SanDisk's stock price

Samsung sent a letter to SanDisk’s Board of Directors this week that sought to reiterate its willingness to acquire SanDisk for $26 per share in cash. SanDisk notified Samsung that its Board of Directors had unanimously turned the purchase offer down.

In a letter, Samsung said that it was deeply disappointed in SanDisk’s rejection. Samsung said that over the four months of discussions in both Seoul and San Francisco, SanDisk continued to cling to its unrealistic expectations.

Samsung reiterated in its letter than it still wants to purchase SanDisk for $26 per share amounting to $5.8 billion in cash. SanDisk for its part maintains that the Samsung offer grossly undervalues the company and represents a discount of 55% when viewed against the 52-week high trading price for SanDisk stock.

Samsung, on the other hand, maintains that its $26 offer, representing a 93% premium over SanDisk's closing price on September 4, is more than fair. SanDisk's letter to Samsung stated that when talks first began with Samsung on May 22, Samsung had said it might be willing to pay a significant premium to the 52-week high trading price.

Samsung is very eager to acquire SanDisk for several reasons according to the Wall Street Journal. The purchase would eliminate the approximately $354 million per year Samsung pays SanDisk in licensing fees and royalties.

The purchase would also possibly allow Samsung to cut NAND production costs, a contributing factor to the performance woes of the NAND industry overall. The purchase would also give Samsung a much larger retail outlet for its NAND chips in devices like flash drives, media players, and SSDs.

The Wall Street Journal reports that any deal that SanDisk and Samsung found acceptable among themselves would face significant scrutiny from regulators in the U.S. and Europe. Samsung accounts for about 27% of NAND production and SanDisk accounts for about 17% of the production. A combination of the two firms could raise significant concerns.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Nice title!!
By EntreHoras on 9/17/2008 12:36:16 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
SanDisk Pulls a Yahoo

With only this title, the reader knows 90% of the history.
Good One!




RE: Nice title!!
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/17/2008 12:50:18 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, that was quite the clever title. /hats off


RE: Nice title!!
By SpaceRanger on 9/17/2008 12:52:40 PM , Rating: 2
Yahoo is now a verb as well. You know you've entered special company when you become a verb.


RE: Nice title!!
By dagamer34 on 9/17/2008 3:04:20 PM , Rating: 4
Google might not like having others intruding into its space.


RE: Nice title!!
By Clauzii on 9/17/2008 3:11:05 PM , Rating: 5
Hmm, in 50 years we will speak like this:

"Toyota IBM IBM Yahoo Universal Linksys?"

"Volkswagen audi audi, pfeizer, viacom apple apple!"

"Walmart??"

"Disney gm disney dodge dodge!!"


RE: Nice title!!
By Alpha4 on 9/17/2008 6:04:18 PM , Rating: 2
Memetics all the way!

I mean...

Memetics Blizzard Sony Ikea!


RE: Nice title!!
By AstroCreep on 9/17/2008 9:19:30 PM , Rating: 2
I assume then that by saying "IBM" it's something relating to The Holocaust or Godwin's Law.


RE: Nice title!!
By althaz on 9/19/2008 3:46:15 AM , Rating: 2
According to an old friend of mine, IBM stands for "I Bum Myself".

Make of that what you will.


RE: Nice title!!
By DeepBlue1975 on 9/18/2008 9:51:36 AM , Rating: 3
ROTFLMAO!

Instead of a language, we'd have a Trademarkguage, and to be able to speak, everyone should know, at every moment, everything about buyouts, sellouts, megers and so on.

You could say "I Nvidia Norton Azalia you!" meaning: I imagine you are infected because of the sound of your voice.
But if Intel buys Nvidia, Norton gets merged with google, and Azalia becomes a trademark of the CNN, because then the meaning would change to:
"I am processing an intensive search on your public activity"


RE: Nice title!!
By Clauzii on 9/20/2008 9:51:06 PM , Rating: 2
ROFL! Xactly :D


RE: Nice title!!
By nomagic on 9/17/2008 12:59:36 PM , Rating: 2
Right. However, the story has just begun, and the situation is a little different, so we cannot say for sure what will happen in the end. From what I understand, SanDisk seems to have more bargaining power than Yahoo did. (Being a hardware company and having licensing agreements...etc...)

Of course, I could be wrong like I often was. Feel free to correct me. I am alway eager to be educated. :)


RE: Nice title!!
By Runiteshark on 9/17/2008 1:16:19 PM , Rating: 3
In AD 2008 war was beginning?


RE: Nice title!!
By LordDamion on 9/17/2008 2:28:56 PM , Rating: 2
CEO: What happen?
Board: Somebody set up us the bomb.


SanDisk board are idiots...
By quiksilvr on 9/17/2008 1:31:54 PM , Rating: 2
Do you realize how rare it is to have your company bought at 93 freaking percent?! It's more of a compliment rather than an insult, especially when considering the fact that their sales have been lagging these past months. What is it with this pride company nonsense? It clouds people's judgment.




RE: SanDisk board are idiots...
By hosps on 9/17/2008 2:15:54 PM , Rating: 5
You do of course realize that SanDisk's book value is $22/share. That would mean that Samsung is offering only a 17% premium for them which is nothing. With the Patents and Licensing agreements that SanDisk has, not to mention their market share, SanDisk's Board is doing the right thing by not accepting it.


RE: SanDisk board are idiots...
By Oregonian2 on 9/17/2008 2:17:27 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, their income statement shows a decent sized loss in their last reported quarter (although still profitable for the 12 month period) and their stock has been tanking for the last couple years. I presume this is the result of the oversupply and tanking prices for flash. Still, the outlook is better for Sandisk than for Yahoo. Supposedly the oversupply is supposed to be caught up by demand next year (although if economies droop that'll get moved out) plus the coming of SSD's should increase the demand side quicker if they catch on, they use a lot of flash chips apiece. Should those happen as some of the market predictors predict, their outlook is upwards -- unlike Yahoo's. So their stance (like International Rectifier (who make very nice power FET trannies) that Vishay is trying to suck up) may be good for their stockholders in the long run, and this is their job.


RE: SanDisk board are idiots...
By GoldenSteve on 9/17/2008 5:14:39 PM , Rating: 2
You are right...the stock market is crashing and they reject an unbelievable offer....irrational greed does a number on people.


RE: SanDisk board are idiots...
By PandaBear on 9/18/2008 9:17:01 PM , Rating: 2
In August, when stock price was $28 a share. Samsung come over and offer "a substantial premium" over the then current stock price. What it mean is, if you accept this offer, we can stop the patent licensing renewal. But, we want to look at your trade secret first, and by the way, we won't offer a guarantee fund in case we change our mind and do not want to buy you.

Within a month Samsung come back and say, we will offer you $26.

What would you do if you were the shareholder? Ignore it of course? SanDisk still has a lot of cash (not as much as Samsung, but still in the billion dollar range in the bank) and can most likely ride it through. It has the 3bit per cell memory in the pipeline ahead of everyone else in the industry, and that is not licensed to anyone else at the moment (other than its fab partner Toshiba).

Samsung want to divide and conquer SanDisk/Toshiba partnership and stab Toshiba in the heart by buying SanDisk, it want the brand of SanDisk and have them use up all those excessive NAND supply from Samsung (SanDisk do not buy from Samsung), it want to save $300-400M a year in the patent royalty.

SanDisk is 81% institution own, so someone need cash and was selling for cheap, but I don't think everyone will sell at such a price when it was $50+ less than a year ago.


"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki