Samsung Sues Aussie Patent Office; Prospect of U.S. Galaxy S III Ban Grow
June 8, 2012 3:23 PM
Global legal war between Apple and Samsung remains far from over and damage may soon escalate
Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
), the world's largest maker of feature phones and smartphones, remains embroiled in a heated legal battle with Apple, Inc. (
) over features in each other’s phones. Each company claims the other's designs "steal" from their patented intellectual property.
I. Judge Koh -- U.S. Galaxy S III Ban is Possible, at a Cost
In the U.S. Apple is
chasing a ban
of the upcoming
Galaxy S III smartphone
, which will
launch June 21
on all four of America's top networks. A ban could help Apple's
upcoming sixth generation iPhone
get a head start on Samsung in sales, and prevent the reverse scenario -- Samsung beating it to the summer market.
Northern District of California
late Tuesday, Judge Lucy Koh delivered a bit of an ultimatum to Apple, telling it, "I cannot be an Apple v. Samsung judge."
The judge had previously
tried to get the two companies to reach an understanding
at the settlement table, but talks
The remark relates to Apple's last minute decision to file for a preliminary injunction on the Galaxy S III, which it had hoped to tack on to the its request for a ban on the
Galaxy S II
the Galaxy Nexus
. Samsung complained about this tactic, saying it should be to late for such an addition.
Judge Koh partially agreed. She said a preliminary injunction before June 21 was out of the question. However, she said it might be possible for her to hear arguments from both companies on a restraining order on sales, but that the hearing would push the July trial date to August or September.
In other words, in order to have a chance to ban the Galaxy S III, it must sacrifice its chances of having a ban on the Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy S II for the next couple months. Still, that may be a chance Apple is willing to take, given the potential damage to Samsung and its potential gains in sales.
The Samsung Galaxy S III
While its potential to secure a short-term ban, at a cost, remains strong, Apple's long-term prospects of stifling Samsung in court are less hopeful. The
recent federal court ruling
in Oracle Corp.'s (
) Java anti-Android lawsuit, and the
dismissal of Motorola Mobility and Apple's suits/countersuits
, have set a precedent that patent damages must be reasonable.
Samsung's lawyers appear to be latching on to this tact. While to they do not admit to infringement, they point out that patented features like autocorrect likely to not constitute a significant portion of the iPhone's value. Attorney William Price comments, "There is no advertising or marketing on these features at all."
Thus if Samsung is found in infringement, but can successfully argue that the value equation is slender, it could be only on the hook for millions, rather than billions. That means that the financial danger to Samsung is mainly from a potential ban, rather than the actual court outcome.
II. Samsung is Not Happy With Australian Patent Office
On the other side of the globe, in the "Land Down Under" (Australia), Samsung has sued the Australian patent commissioner, part of the nation's federal government. Samsung is looking to force the Australian patent office to review four patents granted to Apple that it considers questionable:
- Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (Granted April 1, 2010)
- Portable electronic device for photo management (Granted May 20, 2010)
- List scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display (Granted February 11, 2010)
- List scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch screen display (Granted July 23, 2009)
Samsung is not necessarily contesting the validity of Apple's invention claims, but rather is questioning the fact that Apple filed for duplicate innovation patent and general patents on these technologies. This is a common problem in Australia because the innovation patent review process is completed much more quickly.
Samsung takes issue with the Australian government's patent granting procedure.
[Image Source: Search Engine Journal]
Mark Summerfield, patent lawyer and senior associate with Watermark, expects the case to be settled quickly and says Samsung has a legitimate case. He comments, "Technically, the patents should not have been granted, so there is a legitimate case for review. On the other hand, the consequences for Apple are fairly harsh ... I think the court will consider itself to have considerable discretion in determining what the legislative intent was in a case like this."
One difficulty facing Samsung, though, is the judge involved -- Justice Annabelle Bennett. In the past she has shown favor to Apple,
ruling to ban
Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet. Her colleagues in a higher court called her justification of the ruling
highly inappropriate and reversed the decision
It remains to be seen if the experience leads her to continue to show favor to Apple or forces her to give more heed to Samsung's arguments. The initial hearing is scheduled for June 25.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is
currently available for sale
in Australia, with the lifting of the ban. However, the trial regarding tablet infringement between Samsung and Apple is ongoing and will conclude in a series of hearings between July and October. Apple has announced its decision pursue a total of 258 claims and 22 patents (including the duplicate patents being challenged).
A finding of infringement could force Samsung to pay damages to Apple and/or modify its products to avoid a ban on the basis of "willful" infringement.
"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs
Apple's Case Against Motorola/Google Dismissed "With Prejudice"
June 8, 2012, 11:00 AM
Apple Looks to Kill Samsung's Galaxy S III and the Rest of Its Family
June 7, 2012, 2:08 PM
Samsung Galaxy S III To Hit all Four Major U.S. Carriers Starting at $199 on June 21
June 4, 2012, 9:48 AM
Samsung and Apple Abandon Talks, Commit to Total "Nuclear" War
May 24, 2012, 3:02 PM
Jury Finds Google Innocent of Java Patent Infringement
May 23, 2012, 3:53 PM
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 – This Chinese Phablet is the Best
February 24, 2017, 7:25 AM
How Apple watch Series 2 differ from the S1
February 18, 2017, 5:37 AM
Can your smartphone make you a safer driver?
February 15, 2017, 6:20 AM
What do you or do not know about Apple iPhone 7 &7+
February 8, 2017, 9:27 AM
February 6, 2017, 6:49 AM
LG Watch Style
February 5, 2017, 8:00 AM
Most Popular Articles
Gigabit Are you looking for an Ultra Compact board?
February 22, 2017, 6:30 AM
Dell XPS 13 Touch – Rose Gold Edition
February 23, 2017, 7:29 AM
ASUS ROG Maximus IX - Among the Best of the Best
February 21, 2017, 7:50 AM
Comparison: Tag Heuer Connected Modular VS Samsung Gear S3
February 20, 2017, 7:20 AM
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 – This Chinese Phablet is the Best
February 24, 2017, 7:25 AM
Latest Blog Posts
How much Ram do you need for gaming?
Feb 27, 2017, 6:00 AM
Interesting News of the Day
Feb 25, 2017, 7:37 AM
AMD and More
Feb 24, 2017, 5:55 AM
Feb 23, 2017, 6:30 AM
Feb 21, 2017, 6:12 AM
Here is how startups are helping new parents in raising children
Feb 20, 2017, 6:45 AM
Around the World
Feb 18, 2017, 5:48 AM
News of Future
Feb 17, 2017, 6:30 AM
Amazon parachutes May Float Packages to Customers
Feb 16, 2017, 8:00 AM
Now you Can Watch Facebook on Your TV
Feb 15, 2017, 7:42 AM
Feb 14, 2017, 5:36 AM
Razer Blade Stealth – Little Kaby Lake Powerhouse
Feb 13, 2017, 7:50 AM
Android 7.0 Nougat 7.0 Update Bring Less Battery Life for Samsung Galaxy S7 & S7 Edge
Feb 12, 2017, 7:45 AM
Apple iPhone 8 – OLED Display & Wireless Charging
Feb 11, 2017, 8:09 AM
Feb 10, 2017, 6:15 AM
Feb 9, 2017, 6:00 AM
Eye catching news
Feb 8, 2017, 6:16 AM
Some World News
Feb 7, 2017, 6:15 AM
Feb 6, 2017, 10:11 AM
Feb 5, 2017, 7:27 AM
Notes and News
Feb 4, 2017, 5:53 AM
Feb 3, 2017, 5:30 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2017 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information