backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 15 comment(s) - last by whiskerwill.. on Sep 9 at 10:06 PM

Samsung looks to SanDisk to strengthen its lead in NAND flash

When those in the tech industry think of flash memory, names like Toshiba, Samsung, and SanDisk often come to mind. NAND flash memory is used in numerous devices ranging from cell phones to digital cameras to burgeoning netbook market.

With the production of NAND flash ramping up and prices on the way down, manufacturers are looking for ways to not only gain more market share, but also to lower costs across the board. Samsung, the leader in NAND flash, is looking to acquire SanDisk in order to further strengthen its position in the marketplace according to Reuters.

A Samsung spokesman declined to give completed details and only provided this statement to Reuters, "We are looking at various opportunities regarding SanDisk, but nothing has been decided yet."

Samsung has become increasingly interested in SanDisk as it watched the company's stock price fall from over $33 in May to $13.46 yesterday. The purchase of SanDisk could also significantly reduce the licensing fees that Samsung pays to its competitors -- Samsung currently pays about $354 million USD per year to SanDisk in licensing fees.

"By acquiring SanDisk, Samsung could also reduce expenses related to royalties, and use SanDisk's marketing presence to establish itself in the flash-based computer market," said Daewoo Sec analyst James Song.

The big loser in a SanDisk acquisition would be Toshiba. Toshiba has plans to bulk up its flash capacity courtesy of a joint venture with SanDisk. The move would also effectively erase the inroads that Toshiba has made in its efforts to chip away at Samsung's lead in the marketplace.

DailyTech reported in early July that hard drive manufacturer Seagate was interested in acquiring SanDisk in order to jumpstart its efforts with solid-state drives (SSDs).



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The stock price dropping so much is amazing
By Staples on 9/5/2008 1:58:00 PM , Rating: 3
I am pretty sure that Sandisk is the biggest retail seller of flash cards and USB sticks. I am surprised their stock could have taken such a big hit this year.




By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/5/2008 4:10:52 PM , Rating: 2
Flash is not as lucrative as it once was. The margins are pretty thin these days.


By xsilver on 9/6/2008 11:13:13 AM , Rating: 2
Plus I would be interested to learn what kind of affect counterfeit products have because a lot of people might be thinking they are buying sandisk products when they actually arent. A company like microsoft can take the hit because the majority of their sales come from OEM mass certificates but I would suspect the majority of sandisk's revenue comes from super high volume cheap memory cards sold at $2 shops where counterfeiting can be rife.


By gipper51 on 9/5/2008 5:42:33 PM , Rating: 3
Great...another small American owned company sold to a foreign conglomorate.


similar names
By JoshuaBuss on 9/5/08, Rating: -1
RE: similar names
By amanojaku on 9/5/2008 12:53:55 PM , Rating: 2
I've been happy with products I've gotten from both companies. If they do merge I hope the quality stays the same or improves, instead of the usual trend of lower quality or discontinued models.


RE: similar names
By JoshuaBuss on 9/5/2008 1:03:30 PM , Rating: 2
agreed. i can't think of any samsung or sandisk product i've used that hasn't been satisfactory at worst, and pleasantly well-designed at best.


RE: similar names
By Proxes on 9/5/2008 1:12:43 PM , Rating: 2
Wish I could say the same. I use Sandisk CF cards and never had any problems with them. Samsung on the other hand; I've had Samsung products that made me really bitter.


RE: similar names
By Solandri on 9/6/2008 2:07:18 AM , Rating: 2
I've had no problems with their memory products. In fact I usually go out of my way to buy Sandisk cards.

But do not trust their rebates. The company they hired to process their rebate claims is very flaky. The photo boards are full of stories of people who didn't get their rebates until they made an inquiry. If you forgot about the rebate, you never would've noticed you weren't paid.


RE: similar names
By whiskerwill on 9/9/2008 10:06:55 PM , Rating: 2
I've had no problem with their memory products, but their MP3 players are total crap. Three dead, all in the exact same way: start freezing up, and just gets worse until they're totally fried.


RE: similar names
By jgvandemeer on 9/5/2008 1:28:35 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
a lot of people get the two companies mixed up anyway..
Yeah one's a massive Korean conglomerate with a bright blue logo, that's in finance, ship building, heavy machinery, consumer electronics, and a dozen other areas.

The other is a small American company with a bright red logo that makes nothing but memory.

I can see how that can happen.


RE: similar names
By therealnickdanger on 9/5/2008 1:44:58 PM , Rating: 2
Wait, slow down... which one is which again?


RE: similar names
By cochy on 9/5/2008 1:28:58 PM , Rating: 2
How on Earth can you mix up SanDisk and Samsung?


RE: similar names
By JoshuaBuss on 9/5/2008 1:32:45 PM , Rating: 1
i don't know, but lots of people call sandisk mp3 players "samsung"..


RE: similar names
By RyuDeshi on 9/7/2008 10:44:39 AM , Rating: 3
I work in retail and I have never had that mix-up.

Most people don't even pronounce SanDisk right, they say Scandisk, lol.. and I just think back to older versions of windows :P.


"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki