backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 106 comment(s) - last by johnsonx.. on Apr 30 at 2:01 PM

Blu-ray Disc sales growing, but home video revenues are still down

The future of home video is thought to be set now with Blu-ray Disc emerging as the victor in the high-definition format war, but things aren’t quite so rosy in the present market.

Blu-ray Disc sales have jumped considerably in 2008, particularly following Toshiba’s surrender of the HD DVD format. In December 2007, 63 percent of high-definition movies were sold on Blu-ray Disc, and in March 2008, that number moved up to 81 percent, reported one analyst firm.

According to Reuters, 4.9 million high-def movies were sold, 3.8 million of which were Blu-ray – already well ahead of the pace in 2007, which saw total sales of 9.8 million.

Strong sales of Blu-ray Disc are not enough to make up for sagging sales of standard DVDs, which have been declining over the last two years. In 2006, movie studios generated $25 billion in revenue for home video releases. That number fell to $23.1 billion in 2007, with a further fall to $21.4 billion expected for this year, figured Citigroup analyst Jason Bazinet.

Unlike the changeover from VHS to DVD, analysts appear less optimistic about consumers upgrading their machines and libraries to higher resolutions.

Analyst Michael Nathanson at Bernstein Research believes that uptake of Blu-ray Disc movies are behind the adoption curve set by DVD during its introduction to the market. At the end of last year, 3.5 million Blu-ray Disc players were on the market, though the majority of them were PlayStation 3 consoles. Some may have purchased the console for the purpose of playing games rather than movies.

Furthermore, consumers may not immediately see the benefits of upgrading to Blu-ray Disc, which mainly provides increased quality of picture and sound. Features such as chapter skip, multiple language tracks and lack of rewinding tape are already present on DVD.

Nathanson also points to price as a significant barrier, with the price of Blu-ray Disc players sitting at just below $400. It’s not until the $200 mark that Americans will begin to adopt the new technology, experts believe. Sony Electronics CEO Stan Glasgow said in March that such a price point won’t be possible until 2009 at the soonest.

“I don't think $200 is going to happen this year. Next year $200 could happen,” said Glasgow. “We'll be at a $300 rate this year. $299 will happen this year.”

Although movie studios are looking towards the higher prices of Blu-ray Discs, which hover around $10 to $15 premium over the standard DVD to help return revenue levels back to the heyday of DVD.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

the guy is right
By anoitos on 4/24/2008 8:51:15 PM , Rating: 5
Actually I think the first guy IS RIGHT, the companies complain about piracy but do not lower the prices, for some reason all of us have accepted that 20-30 bucks to watch a movie is ok, but in reality it isn't if you adopt this stance, then in a few years when you see lolly pops been sold for $20 a piece you'll feel ok... the bottom line is everything is unreasonably expensive ... way too much ...




RE: the guy is right
By pomaikai on 4/24/2008 9:04:09 PM , Rating: 4
Actually if most people thought it was ok to spend $20-30 than sales would be better. They have already dug there grave and are slowly crawlinjg into it.


RE: the guy is right
By ET on 4/24/2008 10:24:46 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. I gravitated more and more towards buying mainly DVD's which are on sale or have a low price to begin with. It's possible to buy most movies at sub-$10 prices. The high prices are for new releases or special editions, i.e., for enthusiasts.


RE: the guy is right
By jimbojimbo on 4/25/2008 12:31:37 PM , Rating: 2
I still buy movies as well but wait until they're on sale. Usually less than a year after a movie comes out on DVD you can find it on sale for $10 every now and then. There is also no way I'd pay $30 for a movie unless I know for sure it's good enough to watch over and over.


RE: the guy is right
By Salisme on 4/25/2008 10:29:16 AM , Rating: 2
I agree about you agreeing!!

Seriously though, I have no intentions of upgrading from my CRT TV and cheapo DVD player. Why? Because I watch maybe 10 movies a year. I only have the basic channels from TW, I upgrade to the next tier for Hockey. And even with hockey, I have to mute the sound and tune into the local radio ( and deal with possible delay) because network announcers suck.

I cannot justify investing $3000-4000 on a home entertainment system when I watch a movie maybe once a month. To rent a movie is $4, that is ~$40 a year I spend on movies. Owning movies? No way, I watch a movie two or three times and I'm bored. It is just is not a sound investment for us run of the mill folks. And there isn't exactly quality movies coming out, there hasn't been a movie in years that made me say: "Oh I gotta see that!".


RE: the guy is right
By gospastic on 4/25/2008 11:22:41 AM , Rating: 3
How did you come to the conclusion that you represent the majority?

DVD's growth didn't come from consumers like you, and neither will Blu-ray's.


RE: the guy is right
By Pjotr on 4/28/2008 4:20:47 AM , Rating: 3
I didn't see any such conclusion from him? All I saw was a lot of "I" in his post...


RE: the guy is right
By adiposity on 4/25/2008 11:27:06 AM , Rating: 5
I'm still using my walkman for all of my media needs! I mean who needs ipod players that cost $300 a pop when you can get a walkman for practically free at the flea market? And cassettes are dirt cheap and can record from any analog output! I'm talking free music FTW, man! I mean I maybe listen to 7 songs a year (and forget about video--the picture show is so overrated!) so no WAY can I justify spending a few thousand dollars on audio/video equipment when the stuff clearly doesn't even interest me! I mean, that would be asinine! It's amazing I even bother to comment on a market which clearly doesn't even have me as a potential target consumer. I mean, who cares, am I right!?

-Dan


RE: the guy is right
By LyCannon on 4/25/08, Rating: -1
RE: the guy is right
By wallijonn on 4/25/2008 3:16:04 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I have no intentions of upgrading from my CRT TV and cheapo DVD player. Why? Because I watch maybe 10 movies a year. I only have the basic channels from TW


I 'Hollywood Video' rent about 10 movies a week. Rabbit ears for my plasma. PS3 & HD-DVD owner.

Now that I know what HDM looks like I don't buy newer DVD releases. But I also refuse to pay $30 a movie. I've already spent $20 to watch the blockbuster in the theatre. So I'll buy DVDs for the stuff that doesn't come out on BD. But the stuff that I wished was out on BD I won't buy either. Which usually means that I won't pay more than $9.99 for a new release. But I also don't want to pay more than $19.99 for BD. That is my sweet spot. ymmv.

The studios "lost" millions by selling their BDs for $10 each (BOGO sales). While that is in unrealised sales, the plain fact is that the actual costs of BD pressings were minimal (as opposed to Toshiba taking a loss on actual hardware and making HD-DVD owners pay what BD is now charging ($30 to $40 a movie.))

But when some BD releases are barely better than up-converted movies, (and some plainly inferior to SD) why bother? BDs have been recalled for a reason - usually an inferior product.

Then there is the "problem" of extras (unrated, extended, director's cuts, alternate endings, commentaries, artwork, bloopers, deleted scenes, music videos, etc.) only being available in SD, making BD feel like unwanted orphans.

If the studios throw in WS and FS versions on the same disc, then the SD quality suffers, perhaps to the point that no one would want to buy it.

BD won the war because of the BOGOs. But the people want $100 players. And they want the old prices.

But the reality is that people would rather put $30 towards a tankful of gas than a disc.


RE: the guy is right
By loosescrews on 4/26/2008 2:33:09 AM , Rating: 2
You are quite correct regarding the piracy issue.
Here in India, a company by the name of Moser-baer has started selling original Hindi movie DVDs for Rs. 49 (That is about $1.23) without region locking too. I feel that is the best way to beat piracy. I just need to wait a month or so for the new movies to be available on DVD.
Hollywood studios need to to learn a thing or two from Indian companies to battle piracy. When Indian film companies can reduce their rates of movies to such a level, why can't Hollywood studios do the same
Other companies in India are following gradually by lowering their prices from Rs.400 to Rs. 69 ($1 = Rs.40)
I would rather spend my money on cheap original DVDs rather than pirated stuff.

Please don't flame me because I'm a newbie at posting. :)


4.6 million discs
By Elementalism on 4/24/2008 9:49:10 PM , Rating: 2
While considerly up compared to last year is a drop of water in a lake compared to DVD. DVD moved 1.6 billion discs in 2006. I am curious what effect services like netflix and online content is cutting into dvd\blu-ray right now. There was an article about 2 weeks ago that talked about online movie delivery is expected to be a 5 billion a year industry by the end of 09. I dont know what Blu-Ray will be but in 07 it and HD-DVD combined for about 270 million in sales.




RE: 4.6 million discs
By OPR8R on 4/25/2008 12:12:32 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I am curious what effect services like netflix and online content is cutting into dvd\blu-ray right now.


My guess is lots. How many of Netflix's 8.2 million subscribers also buy DVD's regularly? I only buy them when they're part of a boxed-set I want, and that's rare. Even when I have a Netflix DVD I love, I just keep it until I'm done. For me, and I'm guessing lotsa others, there's almost no reason to buy DVD's...


RE: 4.6 million discs
By MScrip on 4/25/2008 3:08:22 AM , Rating: 2
Exactly. I remember buying DVDs back in the late 90s. Then, video stores started filling their stores with DVDs. Then Netflix came... end of story.

There's very little I need to "own" anymore. I can wait a few days for Netflix to ship it to me. And it's been months since I sat on a couch and watched a full movie anyway.


RE: 4.6 million discs
By LyCannon on 4/25/2008 1:40:36 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
There's very little I need to "own" anymore. I can wait a few days for Netflix to ship it to me. And it's been months since I sat on a couch and watched a full movie anyway.


Especially when 'on-demand' is becoming more popular. It has a way to go yet in terms of selection (speaking of Netflix only), but in perhaps a year or two, it could replace rentals completely.


RE: 4.6 million discs
By Spuke on 4/25/2008 1:42:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
And it's been months since I sat on a couch and watched a full movie anyway.
I remember sitting on the couch and watching movies on Friday evenings. Now, if I want to watch a movie, my wife and I either go to the theater or watch it in the morning on a weekend while eating breakfast.


RE: 4.6 million discs
By Gyres01 on 4/25/2008 3:50:30 PM , Rating: 3
I stopped buying movies a year to two ago. I was the guy who was a Target every Tuesday to get the new releases for 15 bucks.......I have about 200 dvd's and realize I don't even watch half of them......so no more.....Netflix for me and am totally happy !!


ok
By anoitos on 4/25/2008 8:09:49 AM , Rating: 4
Everything has started going wrong since we applied science to everything.. A bunch of Economists begun running corporations based on business models that only they understand and that they predict that to get that kind of profit increase you must do this and that.. utter nonsense....
They are based on the completely wrong assumption that profits must go up every year... and I ask why ??? How many stuff can the consumer buy...
their model does not take into account the very basic reality that there are not infinite consumers and the finite set of consumers has a very finite set of needs....
that is why every thing is so expensive these days...




RE: ok
By masher2 (blog) on 4/25/08, Rating: 0
RE: ok
By Procurion on 4/25/2008 12:35:53 PM , Rating: 2
Lice are crunchier than popcorn and much better for you!


RE: ok
By 1prophet on 4/25/2008 12:56:18 PM , Rating: 3
Actually the science they apply is that developed by a man called Edward Bernays nephew of Sigmund Freud. He showed corporations how to use peoples own desires to br