Print 11 comment(s) - last by bupkus.. on Nov 9 at 4:02 PM

Senate Armed Services Committee  (Source:
The Senate Armed Services Committee said mixing fake electronic parts with authentic ones could potentially build faulty systems that could place the lives of soldiers in danger

A Senate Armed Services Committee hearing yesterday has pointed out that counterfeit weapons have become a serious issue as of late -- and China is mostly to blame.

The U.S. is already in a cyber war with China, where China uses freelance hackers as well as official hackers to attack government servers and international businesses to obtain useful information. China was suspected to be involved in several cyber attacks in the past year alone, such as the Lockheed Martin hack in May and the Gmail accounts hack in June. In August, the U.S. got its first glimpse at a hack being conducted by the Chinese government in a leaked video, which also bragged about China's hacks on the U.S.

Now, the issue of selling fake electronics to the U.S. military is just another problem to add to the pile between the U.S. and China. At the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, it was said that mixing fake electronic parts with authentic ones could potentially build faulty systems that could place the lives of soldiers in danger.

"The failure of a single electronic part can leave a soldier, sailor, airman, or Marine vulnerable at the worst possible time," said Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), chairman of the committee. "A flood of counterfeit electronic parts has made it a lot harder to have confidence that won't happen."

According to the semiconductor industry, counterfeiting results in a $7.5 billion loss in revenue annually as well as a loss of 11,000 U.S. jobs. The Pentagon mentioned that no lives have been lost and no missions have failed due to counterfeit electronics yet, but the potential is there.

The committee said there have been 1,800 cases where counterfeit electronics were sold to the Pentagon, and the total number of parts involved in these cases was over 1 million. Company executives, a government investigator, a Defense Department official, and a representative of the semiconductor industry were present to testify at the hearing about the potential harm of counterfeit electronics being placed in "multimillion-dollar" aircraft and missile systems.

According to the Senate Armed Services Committee, China is mostly to blame, and even mentioned that a representative from China was missing from the hearing despite the panel writing to the ambassador to send someone to testify.

The Government Accountability Office even created a fake company in order to buy electronic components from China over the internet, and managed to purchase 13 parts. When investigating seven of these parts, none were found to be genuine.

The U.S. has decided not to sit on this matter. In fact, the Defense Department said it is training 2,000 personnel to learn to identify fake electronics in a quality assurance process.

China's Foreign Ministry has responded to the accusations, saying that it too places importance in "fighting fake and shoddy goods with competent authorities of other countries" and that it has "actively promoted cooperation" in doing so, and "such efforts are well known to all."

"We do not want to be in a position where the reliability of a $12 million THAAD interceptor is destroyed by a $2 part," said Army Lt. Gen. Patrick J. O'Reilly, director of the Missile Defense Agency.

Source: Associated Press

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Foundry Services
By Tryek25 on 11/9/2011 10:23:30 AM , Rating: 2
I am confused. The article mentions that according to the semiconductor industry we are loosing 11,000 and putting lives at risk. Since when is the semiconductor industry so easy to get into that just about anyone can start up their own foundry and pump out low cost, low quality parts???

This sounds more like a sourcing problem for a much simpler kind of electronics, where the military is simply writing checks to the lowest bidder and hoping to get top notch quality for the average parts.

Whoever called the semiconductor industry rep to the SAS committee meeting is trying to pull the wool over their eyes... Hard.

RE: Foundry Services
By homebredcorgi on 11/9/2011 12:41:01 PM , Rating: 4
Believe it or not, they are obtaining old (often used or obsolete 1980's and 1990's vintage) chips, sanding them down and re-labeling them as brand new. We aren't talking Intel or AMD CPUs, but much lower level ICs.. The military tends to use very old designs as they are proven reliable, tend to be less susceptible to EMI and remain compatible with even older designs.

Part of the problem is our supplier model. Prime contractors hire other companies who in turn hire other companies to design/build small components. It's part of our wonderful world of globalization and cost cutting - that and China's penchant for stealing anything that isn't nailed down and then copying the design for half of the things that are nailed down. Why we continue to allow their blatant theft of IP, I'll never understand.

In summary, having complete control over the supply chain is apparently too expensive - even for military hardware.

RE: Foundry Services
By FaaR on 11/9/2011 12:51:30 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, where the hell is the military sourcing their components from to end up with so much shoddy goods? You'd think they'd take extra care when purchasing stuff either directly or via their sub-contractors, considering the precise nature of their business, but obviously they can't be very particular at all if they experience so much counterfeited stuff.

It's not the Chinese's fault as much as a US military fail for not observing sufficient diligence and doing their jobs properly.

Made in the USA
By Lord 666 on 11/9/2011 10:24:51 AM , Rating: 3
Nothing else like it. Having complete control of your own supply chain along with the accountability that comes with it for military functions.

RE: Made in the USA
By kattanna on 11/9/2011 3:20:21 PM , Rating: 2
except no company can be profitable making such low end chips here in the US

In other news
By borismkv on 11/9/2011 11:00:49 AM , Rating: 3
Water is wet, Ice is cold, and the kettle is black.

RE: In other news
By Dr of crap on 11/9/2011 11:18:26 AM , Rating: 2

By Beenthere on 11/9/2011 11:00:20 AM , Rating: 2
How difficult is it to qualify defense suppliers? I mean really one of the clowns they caught importing defective parts from China and selling to defense contractors was a frigging alleged meth addict. People need to be held accountable and we as a country need to stop buying Chinese crap goods at the store

Not just China, us too!
By The0ne on 11/9/2011 1:56:34 PM , Rating: 2
Trust me we're no different. While I wouldn't encourage the use of "fake" parts or parts from China in military products I'm also reminded that we (previous aerospace companies I use to work for) also make shtty parts and product and am no different. Bidding for the lowest contract manufacturer usually is a bad decision.

This is just stupid
By seraphim1982 on 11/9/2011 3:05:48 PM , Rating: 2
They blame China... as usual...
They should be blaming their internal procurement for not getting quality parts. You'd think they would go straight to a major chip manufacturers...rather than go to no name ppl.

China vs. China
By bupkus on 11/9/2011 4:02:24 PM , Rating: 2
Is the only way we can afford to defend the U.S. against China is to buy weapon components from China?

We suddenly have the dilemma of profiteering to preserve an American upper class smacking us in the face.

"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki