backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 42 comment(s) - last by Tsuwamono.. on Jun 18 at 8:49 AM


Rows of banks of the Roadrunner supercomputer.  (Source: LeRoy N. Sanchez, Records Management, Media Services and Operations)
IBM & Los Alamos supercomputer might be as fast as your brain.

Not even a week after the new Roadrunner supercomputer was juiced up and put to work, scientists are hard at work trying to push the machine to its limits. Housed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the primary goal of the supercomputer is to model the safety of the United States' aging nuclear weapons stockpile. At over a certified petaflop, the machine renders calculations in a day that would take every person on Earth a calculator and 46 years to accomplish.

A supercomputer of this power will be incredibly useful for modeling things other than nuclear decay and global climate. At over a quadrillion – a million billion – calculations per second, Roadrunner is the only computer on Earth that can keep up with one of the few things more amazing than itself: the human brain.

Los Alamos researchers are putting this power to work with a program dubbed PetaVision. The program was created to model neuron and synapse interaction in the visual cortex of the human brain. The brain uses over a billion neurons and trillions of synapses alone to process the visual information it receives and is one of the most complicated processes known to exist in grey matter.

Supercomputers like Roadrunner bring new possibilities for modeling human recognition systems, and the advances are not likely to stop there. In the past, computers have been unable to flawlessly perform cognitive tasks that the human brain does easily; tasks like picking out a face in a crowd, or detecting oncoming vehicles in traffic. Such a large step up in processing power may enable scientists to breech this difficult wall in mimicry.

The researchers used PetaVision to set a processing record with Roadrunner, spinning up to an astonishing 1.144 petaflop/s. "Just a week after formal introduction of the machine to the world, we are already doing computational tasks that existed only in the realm of imagination a year ago,” explains Terry Wallace, associate director for Science, Technology and Engineering at Los Alamos.

The supercomputer's architecture is based on a hybrid node system. Each node contains two AMD Opteron dual-core and four PowerXCell 8i processers. The PowerXCell CPUs are derived from the same Cell processor used in the Sony Playstation 3 and act as computational accelerators for the Opterons.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

lol
By TheDoc9 on 6/16/2008 11:58:29 AM , Rating: 3
A massive room filled with wall to wall processors and the combined power requirements of a small city - all to mimic the abilities of a single human brain.




RE: lol
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 6/16/2008 12:16:22 PM , Rating: 5
Amazing isn't it? The amount of computing power locked into that mushy little thing in your skull. Shame so few people these days seem to be able to turn it on ;)


RE: lol
By AnnihilatorX on 6/16/2008 1:27:32 PM , Rating: 2
Well our brain is practically a chemical computer. Using a solid state computer to model a chemical computer is like using emulator on a PC to play Playstation 3 games. There would be a huge computational efficiency loss, unfortunately.


RE: lol
By stirfry213 on 6/17/2008 2:18:31 PM , Rating: 2
You guys are leaving a part out.

All this processing power just to replicate a PART of the brain, the visual cortex.


RE: lol
By Sulphademus on 6/16/2008 2:18:56 PM , Rating: 2
Makes me think: So how many FLOPS can it do after a 8 rounds of tequila shots? Last time I did that my 'supercomputer' wasnt running too quick.


RE: lol
By FITCamaro on 6/16/2008 2:23:55 PM , Rating: 2
That's a future study. Simulating the drunken college student mind.


RE: lol
By root mean sq on 6/16/2008 4:56:24 PM , Rating: 2
we don't need roadrunner for that. i'm sure a monkey with a laptop will suffice.


RE: lol
By Integral9 on 6/16/2008 4:38:39 PM , Rating: 2
I brk'd my brain in college.


RE: lol
By Integral9 on 6/16/2008 4:39:09 PM , Rating: 2
I brk'd my brain in college. ECE firmware update didn't take.


RE: lol
By Spookster on 6/17/2008 1:36:16 PM , Rating: 2
They are turned on but unfortunately they are still running Windows95.


RE: lol
By Tsuwamono on 6/18/2008 8:49:26 AM , Rating: 2
Someone Needs a 6.


RE: lol
By geddarkstorm on 6/16/2008 1:08:50 PM , Rating: 2
Not to be a kill joy, but it doesn't mean they even modeled it right or completely :P. It also is only trying to investigate one billion of your 100 billion neurons in a pretty straight forward sensory information processing center, nevermind the higher thought centers! What's most interesting is how PetaVision was used to stress test the machine and how well the beast performed--staggeringly so.

The headline to this article is misleadingly sensational as the human brain was not mimicked: only one sector modeled. We don't even know how the program was modeling that sector either, or what state or ensemble of states were included. What exactly is it modeling? Data flow, order of neuron firing, speed of firing, end output, all or none of that? What sort of verifiable predictions does this program make?


RE: lol
By Sulphademus on 6/16/2008 2:23:15 PM , Rating: 2
Very good point.

Roadrunner may be able to accurately model global warming or earthquakes or the human brain... but its all crap if the programming isnt astonishingly accurate and the models used spot on.

"Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?"


RE: lol
By PKmjolnir on 6/16/2008 2:39:44 PM , Rating: 2
Nothing is ever modeled right. The house you live in was built based on inaccurate models. Luckily they represent reality quite well. And whoever made the blueprints and built it are probably quite happy with the results.

Whoever wrote up the code for the petavision experiment probably knew what to look for that would indicate a good simulation. And judging from the articles they found it, otherwise they wouldn't do such bold statements as

quote:
"Based on the results of PetaVision's inaugural trials, Los Alamos researchers believe they can study in real time the entire human visual cortex"


RE: lol
By Sulphademus on 6/16/2008 2:51:55 PM , Rating: 3
I just don't want Congress enacting laws based on models this thing did on global warming and 10 years, $2trillion, and 3 civil liberties later we find that someone had put a decimal point in the wrong place.


Disney?
By AlvinCool on 6/16/2008 11:44:57 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe after the roadrunner figures out how the brain really stores information they can thaw out Walt Disney's head and attach it. Then he could indeed live forever, or until a really bad power outage.




RE: Disney?
By FITCamaro on 6/16/2008 11:51:36 AM , Rating: 3
That's ok we really don't need evil Walt Disney running around the depths of Disneyland eating Cuban children.


RE: Disney?
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 6/16/2008 2:43:28 PM , Rating: 2
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,367203,00.html

Elian Gonzalez Joins Cuba's Young Communist Union

He's still alive, Walt did not get him. However, he join the communist party.... Would have been better off if Walt Disney eat him up.


RE: Disney?
By UppityMatt on 6/16/2008 12:04:30 PM , Rating: 5
Scientist: [Scientist unfreezes Walt's body] Welcome Back,Mr. Disney
Walt Disney: Are the Jews gone yet?
Scientist: Uhh,no...
Walt Disney: Put me back in!
[Slams the crynogen chamber shut]


RE: Disney?
By UppityMatt on 6/16/2008 12:21:16 PM , Rating: 3
Your going to rate me down? Do you not watch Family Guy?? Wow im amazed right now.


RE: Disney?
By KaiserCSS on 6/16/08, Rating: -1
RE: Disney?
By UppityMatt on 6/16/2008 12:41:47 PM , Rating: 4
Worse then the comment about eating children?


RE: Disney?
By Schrag4 on 6/16/2008 2:18:18 PM , Rating: 2
...and that was a Robot Chicken. Seriously, lighten up people.


RE: Disney?
By mmntech on 6/16/2008 1:19:10 PM , Rating: 3
I disagree, both comments were hilarious.

A computer as smart as a person? On May 25th, 2008, Roadrunner became operational. Daisy, daisy... Am I the only one reminded of that movie when I read this article.


RE: Disney?
By DASQ on 6/16/2008 1:56:50 PM , Rating: 1
Apparently you think Walt Disney loved Jews.


RE: Disney?
By FITCamaro on 6/16/2008 2:22:49 PM , Rating: 2
Get a sense of humor.


RE: Disney?
By AlvinCool on 6/16/2008 4:22:28 PM , Rating: 1
And where would one purchase said sense of humor? Our HR manager can't tell a joke to save his life. Thought I might buy him one so we can stop attempting to laugh at his horrible punch line deliveries. Can you buy rhythm there too??


RE: Disney?
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 6/16/2008 5:19:22 PM , Rating: 2
hmmmm.... Here the problem. Just because he can not tell a joke does not mean he does not have a sense of humor. It just means he sucks as a comic.


Civ4
By sporr on 6/16/2008 1:55:05 PM , Rating: 3
I wonder how many games it could complete of Civ4 on AiAutoPlay mode...




RE: Civ4
By HVAC on 6/16/2008 2:15:21 PM , Rating: 2
None. The emulated brain became bored with endless logistical micromanagement before it could finish the first one.

Supposedly it asked a single question before doing the computer equivalent of a moody teen: "What, no Portal?".


RE: Civ4
By Smartless on 6/16/2008 3:04:47 PM , Rating: 2
For some reason I see a Dilbert joke coming on this one. Like:

Dilbert: "We've developed a computer that can mimic the human brain."

Pointy-Haired-Boss: "I'll buy 50 of them and fire all of you. So... how do I get it to do what I want now."
-hires 50 engineers.


Bet this helps AMD
By rudolphna on 6/16/2008 1:08:12 PM , Rating: 2
Must be good for AMD to have their name as the primary computational units of the worlds fastest computer. Not to mention the thousands of CPUs they sold to these people. The fact that they chose AMD over Intel just shows how much better the Opteron is at data intensive tasks than intel, thanks to intels aging FSB.




RE: Bet this helps AMD
By BruceLeet on 6/16/2008 1:19:36 PM , Rating: 2
That was my first thought when I read the article, Intel nowhere to be seen or heard of. I guess it all came down to price, another company needs to put thousands of Nehalems together. And compare bills lol


RE: Bet this helps AMD
By heeros1 on 6/17/2008 11:00:29 AM , Rating: 2
I think the reason why they chose AMD processors is because they can handle memory bandwidth intensive tasks better (at least until nehalem is released) because of their HT bus.


Skynet??
By jhb116 on 6/17/2008 1:38:25 AM , Rating: 2
Am I the only one worried that this isn't Skynet in disguise?




RE: Skynet??
By MBlueD on 6/17/2008 3:19:25 AM , Rating: 2
You're worried it isn't ?


RE: Skynet??
By PKmjolnir on 6/17/2008 4:27:59 AM , Rating: 2
Don't worry about that. Skynet is british, and quite badly disguised.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet_%28satellites%...


Call me...
By HVAC on 6/16/2008 2:25:14 PM , Rating: 3
Call me when it can successfully emulate and predict the behavior of the human female. I just want to know what to say to my wife that will not end up with her frowning and pointing at the couch at the end of the day.

On second thought ... never mind. I'll just sleep on the couch, content in the knowledge that computers can solve problems of logic, not capriciously random noise.




RE: Call me...
By Sulphademus on 6/16/2008 4:51:12 PM , Rating: 2
Quantum computing... at least.


computational accelerators?
By ahodge on 6/16/2008 12:04:41 PM , Rating: 2
So, the cell procs are computational accelerators for the Optys? Eh?




RE: computational accelerators?
By DASQ on 6/16/2008 1:58:40 PM , Rating: 1
Co-processors, or acting as glorified interface processors between the nodes themselves.

Like your own motherboard, just scaled up a lot. Like a super chipset.


Subject
By Howard on 6/16/2008 6:55:41 PM , Rating: 2
How are you today, Mike?




"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




17 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki