backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 42 comment(s) - last by wordsworm.. on Jan 27 at 10:16 AM

Net being purged of "unhealthy content".

China shut down 44,000 web sites and arrested nearly 900 people last year in a campaign to clean up "unhealthy" web content -- a crackdown the nation's Xinhau news agency says will continue until the end of this year's Beijng Olympics. In addition to those arrested, another 1,000 people received unspecified "penalties" for transgressing the nation’s stiff rules on Internet content.

The government says the drive was directed mostly against "pornography", but rights groups were quick to call it a thinly veiled excuse to crack down on political dissidents. President Hu Jintao called the Internet a threat to the nation's social stability.

Since 2005, China has required websites and even individual bloggers to register with the government. According to Xinhua, 200,000 sites were registered last year and 14,000 were refused approval. Independent sources say the real number of rejected applicants is much higher.

In 2006, Google stirred controversy when it announced it would censor its Chinese version to satisfy stiff rules from Beijing, a practice already followed by its competitors Yahoo and Microsoft. In 2007, China forbade the opening of new Internet cafes. The country employs a network of tens of thousands of human "Internet censors", as well as keyword-based firewalls to police online content.

Last month, China announced a ban on video-sharing websites, and said only state-controlled sites would be allowed to post video content online.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

That sucks.
By Rockjock51 on 1/23/2008 12:01:19 PM , Rating: 3
And people complain about how bad we have it here.




RE: That sucks.
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 1/23/2008 12:29:44 PM , Rating: 2
People who complain here in the states about censorship don't have a clue just how bad it really is right now in other parts of the world.


RE: That sucks.
By murphyslabrat on 1/23/2008 12:29:56 PM , Rating: 5
Yep, just because some have it worse, doesn't mean that we can't have better. As an example, just because some don't have food for months, doesn't mean that I should be satisfied with eating once a week.


RE: That sucks.
By amanojaku on 1/23/2008 12:52:09 PM , Rating: 4
I don't think anyone could have said it better. I would rate you up, but I already posted.


RE: That sucks.
By tdawg on 1/23/2008 1:23:33 PM , Rating: 3
Exactly.

Compared to some if not all Western European countries and Japan, our TV and radio censorship alone is behind, though this can be attributed to the prudishness of the American populous, the "morality" of the government and "morality" watchdog groups (We're coming, Orson!). :)


RE: That sucks.
By masher2 (blog) on 1/23/2008 1:41:05 PM , Rating: 2
Different nations censor different things. Just because you can catch sight of a nipple on TV doesn't mean censorship doesn't exist.

Certainly, censorship in a nation like Germany is worse than it is in the US. Try walking around in Hamburg yelling Sig Heil, or claiming that only 2 million Jews died in the Holocaust, for one. Or examine Canada's laws on "hate seech", for another prime example.


RE: That sucks.
By rivercat on 1/23/2008 2:18:22 PM , Rating: 3
I remember seeing a few crowds at events like the Christmas market in Nurnberg, or Oktoberfest in Munchen, that were shouting stuff like that. They also would yell stuff like "Death to the auslanders!". Of course the Polizei would show up shortly and take them away, sometimes after beating them with a nightstick!


RE: That sucks.
By Polynikes on 1/23/2008 2:59:45 PM , Rating: 3
And people think we don't need the 2nd amendment... I sure as hell won't let the police beat me for voicing an opinion, regardless of how politically incorrect it is.


RE: That sucks.
By tim851 on 1/23/08, Rating: -1
RE: That sucks.
By masher2 (blog) on 1/23/2008 4:46:55 PM , Rating: 4
> "It didn't help the Dixie Chicks, who nearly lost their careers for voicing their opinion "

The Dixie Chicks were not punished by any law or government action. Their rights weren't transgressed in any way, shape, or form.

Their fans simply chose to exercise their right to free choice, and stop buying their albums.


RE: That sucks.
By rivercat on 1/23/2008 5:09:12 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly. It was a free market punishment.


RE: That sucks.
By BladeVenom on 1/23/2008 4:58:26 PM , Rating: 2
I think the Dixie Chicks should have the right to keep and bear arms, the 2nd amendment. Do they agree with that?

I even think they should have the right to free speech, 1st amendment, as long as I don't have to listen to them.


RE: That sucks.
By beepandbop on 1/23/2008 6:08:14 PM , Rating: 3
"Yeah, all is great in America, as long as you're white enough...

The 2nd amendment only (in theory) protects your freedom of speech from government punishment. It didn't help the Dixie Chicks, who nearly lost their careers for voicing their opinion that Bush is a bad president."

Clearly you don't understand anything about America if you think that the 2nd Amendment deals with speech; it deals with the 'right to bear arms.'

Learn something, then talk, kthxbai.


RE: That sucks.
By Adonlude on 1/23/2008 7:32:52 PM , Rating: 3
Exactly. A well armed citizenry is definately less suceptible to having atrocities committed against them. Don't let govt take away your second ammendment rights!


RE: That sucks.
By jtesoro on 1/24/2008 9:27:03 AM , Rating: 2
Interesting that we raise hell every time China does something like censor the internet because it "violates human rights", then turn relatively mute when a more friendly country like Germany arrests people for speaking out like that...


RE: That sucks.
By borowki on 1/23/2008 3:58:29 PM , Rating: 3
Here in Poland you can get arrested and fined for calling the president an idiot. They call it "insulting the dignity of the head of state" or something like that. Journalists and commentators are routinely threatened by politicians with libel suits. It's ridiculous.


RE: That sucks.
By Missing Ghost on 1/23/2008 4:35:57 PM , Rating: 2
Isn't Poland the country that banned Gorgoroth? For "religious offense"?


RE: That sucks.
By CuiBono on 1/23/08, Rating: 0
RE: That sucks.
By lompocus on 1/24/2008 1:34:29 AM , Rating: 1
Ah yes, and I suppose that you must also imagine that 27 people are going to kill all but 1 billion people on Earth and take it over and use us all for their slaves, right?

You know,...some people are just beyond saving. Like cuibono. He is the prime example of this.


Middle finger
By amanojaku on 1/23/2008 12:00:34 PM , Rating: 4
Every country has some form of censorship, which is supposed to protect the people as a whole. How is China's censorship protecting anyone? The government deserves a giant middle finger.

So does Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft for supporting tyranny. There's nothing wrong with making a dollar, unless someone's rights are trampled in the process.