backtop


Print 42 comment(s) - last by gstrickler.. on Aug 4 at 4:25 PM

Researchers claim to create a new state of matter never before seen on Earth

Oxford University researchers used a soft X-ray laser to create a new transparent aluminum, though it was transparent for just a fraction of a nanosecond.

Using a FLASH laser able to utilize fast pulses of soft X-ray light, the radiation is said to be ten billion times brighter than other high-power devices.  The energy generated by the FLASH laser could have powered a small city.

The powerful beam caused the aluminum to become transparent for a total of 40 femtoseconds, which is only a fraction of a nanosecond, though is a sign of things to come.  Furthermore, all of the power was directed to a location on the aluminum that had a diameter less than a twentieth of the width of a single strand of human hair.

"What we have created is a completely new state of matter nobody has seen before," according to Oxford University Professor Justin Wark.  "Transparent aluminum is just the start. The physical properties of the matter we are creating are relevant to the conditions inside large planets, and we also hope that by studying it we can gain a greater understanding of what is going on during the creation of 'miniature stars' created by high-power laser implosions, which may one day allow the power of nuclear fusion to be harnessed here on Earth."

Oxford researchers believe it's possible large planets, such as the core of Jupiter, share similar characteristics to the aluminum they manipulated, which means the technology could one day be used in space.  The necessary power required -- and the small area that was transparent -- obviously means it will be many years before it can be used to evaluate other planets, but the technology is a step in the right direction.

It may also be possible to help researchers have a better understanding of the activities inside a miniature star, and may be harnessed for power generation on Earth.

The tests, conducted in Hamburg, Germany, give researchers further hope they'll be able to turn aluminum transparent for a longer duration in future tests.  In similar research, scientists were able to use high-power lasers to manipulate the way liquids flowed on a metallic surface, with that research also expected to continue.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

An important point
By Diesel Donkey on 7/28/2009 9:43:50 PM , Rating: 5
This research is definitely very cool, but I wanted to point out something that Michael omitted. While the aluminum did turn transparent for a very brief period of time, it was not transparent to the visible spectrum. Rather, according to the article on PhysOrg.com:
quote:
This turned the aluminium nearly invisible to extreme ultraviolet radiation.

So this is a very interesting effect to be sure, but Star Trek was still ahead in its depiction of transparent metal.




RE: An important point
By FaceMaster on 7/28/2009 10:08:23 PM , Rating: 2
so in short, they made the aluminium so hot that it turns invisible for a 'while'?


RE: An important point
By Xenoterranos on 7/28/2009 10:13:36 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, And only to light we can't see.


RE: An important point
By Diesel Donkey on 7/28/2009 11:21:26 PM , Rating: 5
Well, not really. They used the laser to knock an inner electron away from the nucleus of each aluminum atom in the small area at which they fired the laser. I'm not sure of the mechanism that allowed for the transparency, but I believe that knocking away this electron killed the ultra UV part of the aluminum's absorption spectrum. In other words, the electron that would normally absorb the energy of the UV light and block it was temporarily gone, so the UV light could pass right through.


RE: An important point
By kyleb2112 on 7/29/2009 1:13:22 AM , Rating: 5
Your post was more informative than the above article.


RE: An important point
By meepstone on 7/29/2009 8:03:30 AM , Rating: 2
no kidding. In 5 paragraghs, i still didnt know how it worked except the research would be useful in another lifetime. Its much more interesting in how it works and not how it will be applied 300 years from now.


RE: An important point
By meyerds on 7/29/2009 9:10:33 AM , Rating: 5
Agreed. These are the kind of details I would rather have DailyTech give in all their articles, versus a generic overview of future uses. I can infer the importance of such developments myself if I know what's behind them.


RE: An important point
By delphinus100 on 7/29/2009 1:26:50 PM , Rating: 2
Hmm. How far does light even travel in 40 femtoseconds?


RE: An important point
By JediJeb on 7/29/2009 5:57:58 PM , Rating: 2
0.00012 meters = 0.12mm

The aluminum must have been very thin for the light to pass through before it lost transparency.


RE: An important point
By flipsu5 on 8/3/2009 5:24:29 AM , Rating: 2
That's a great, succinct summary. I would add what is missing from the discussion is how soon the electrons would return to the atom. Given that when they are removed they have tens of eV in kinetic energy. And I am reminded of the photoelectric effect.


RE: An important point
By inperfectdarkness on 7/30/2009 11:33:34 AM , Rating: 2
"Computer?

Hello computer!

...HOW quaint!!!"

/Scotty


RE: An important point
By gstrickler on 8/4/2009 4:25:37 PM , Rating: 2
We already have "transparent aluminum". Look up aluminum oxynitride (AlON) (That's aluminium for those outside the US).


femtoseconds?
By boobot on 7/28/09, Rating: 0
RE: femtoseconds?
By ggordonliddy on 7/28/09, Rating: -1
RE: femtoseconds?
By Diesel Donkey on 7/28/2009 9:51:37 PM , Rating: 5
Well, if I take you comment literally, then no, it's not. 40 femtoseconds is 0.00004 of a nanosecond. However, if my figure is correct and the deficit is $1x10^12, then Obama's budget cut is 0.0001 of that figure. So no, they're actually not comparable at all. They're different by an order of magnitude.

Somehow I'm guessing that wasn't actually the point you were trying to make, though.


RE: femtoseconds?
By Xenoterranos on 7/28/2009 10:11:22 PM , Rating: 2
I have a new Internet Hero to look up to. Thank you Diesel Donkey.


RE: femtoseconds?
By foolsgambit11 on 7/29/09, Rating: 0
RE: femtoseconds?
By someguy123 on 7/28/09, Rating: 0
RE: femtoseconds?
By lco45 on 7/28/2009 11:05:27 PM , Rating: 2
I think you're on the wrong forum. This is a tech site.

I'm sick of dailytech commenters turning this site into an endless argument of liberals vs conservatives. Ooh Obama's bad, ooh hybrid cars are bad, ooh my big truck is better than a small coffin car, ooh the federal government controlling my mind...

Why not just join the Montana Militia and be done with it.

Luke


RE: femtoseconds?
By InfantryRocks on 7/28/2009 11:22:32 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Why not just join the Montana Militia and be done with it.


Where can I find them?


RE: femtoseconds?
By Motoman on 7/28/2009 11:57:00 PM , Rating: 5
Ummm...I'd start in Montana if I was you. Just a guess there, sparky.


RE: femtoseconds?
By TheEinstein on 7/29/2009 12:36:01 AM , Rating: 2
Lone Wolf or gtfo?

just a thought :P


RE: femtoseconds?
By InfantryRocks on 7/29/2009 1:30:09 PM , Rating: 2
Well, Montana's a pretty big place there, skippy. Just looking for some directions.


RE: femtoseconds?
By parge on 7/29/2009 2:55:10 AM , Rating: 1
Just:

Bahahahhahaaha


RE: femtoseconds?
By boobot on 7/29/2009 11:44:33 AM , Rating: 2
www.starbucks.com

Find your nearest store and relax!


RE: femtoseconds?
By marvdmartian on 7/29/2009 10:03:14 AM , Rating: 4
Let's have Scotty check the computer for that answer. Scotty?

Scotty: "Computer? Hello, computer??" (holding mouse to mouth)


RE: femtoseconds?
By MrPoletski on 7/30/2009 5:53:12 AM , Rating: 2
umm, Just use the keyboard...


Aluminum
By CSQuake on 7/29/09, Rating: 0
RE: Aluminum
By PorreKaj on 7/29/2009 4:27:16 AM , Rating: 4
Not in the US


RE: Aluminum
By meepstone on 7/29/2009 8:04:59 AM , Rating: 4
whats an aluminum falcon?


RE: Aluminum
By menace on 7/29/2009 11:44:39 AM , Rating: 1
You snooty Brits act like you invented the language
8)


RE: Aluminum
By AshT on 7/31/2009 3:17:24 AM , Rating: 3
Yanks take everything and reinvent it as their own.

I'm surprised they haven't taken the Earth and renamed it The United Planet of the United States.

Now we're getting silly? :P


Have you forgot about ALON?
By toyotabedzrock on 7/28/2009 11:19:29 PM , Rating: 5
We already have a transparent form of Aluminum. It's called ALON. http://science.howstuffworks.com/transparent-alumi...

It's made from aluminum, oxygen and nitrogen.




By strikeback03 on 7/29/2009 10:06:44 AM , Rating: 2
That is what I was thinking. A couple of guys from a company working with this stuff gave a presentation at work last year, and I was amazed that they made it through the whole presentation without a single reference to transparent aluminum.


RE: Have you forgot about ALON?
By guacamojo on 7/29/2009 12:55:13 PM , Rating: 2
Aluminum Oxynitride (ALON) isn't strictly Aluminum. It's not an alloy of Aluminum (the metal), but a ceramic with Aluminum as a component.

Alumina (Al2O3), is another common aluminum-containing ceramic which has transparent versions (Sapphire). It isn't generally considered to be aluminum either.


Clear Aluminum
By Aeonic on 7/28/2009 9:50:52 PM , Rating: 5
Cue the return of Crystal Pepsi!




RE: Clear Aluminum
By InfantryRocks on 7/28/2009 11:21:01 PM , Rating: 2
I wish...


Doesn't hotter = higher frequency?
By PhatoseAlpha on 7/28/2009 10:34:31 PM , Rating: 2
At that temperature, shouldn't it be giving off black body radiation in the UV spectrum to such a degree detecting UV coming through it instead of from it is one hell of a feat?




RE: Doesn't hotter = higher frequency?
By Diesel Donkey on 7/28/2009 11:31:09 PM , Rating: 3
I'm not sure, but if it took less time for the energized electrons to fall back into their orbitals than it took to excite any phonon vibrations, then really the sample shouldn't really have been heated at all. It would just re-radiate the energy at lower frequencies, probably after the transparent period. I think the radiated light would have to be of a lower energy than the laser light because a second orbital electron would fill the whole left by the original electron, and the original electron would fall back into an outer shell. So I think the energy would end up being spread out into multiple photons of lower energy than the original.


By flipsu5 on 8/3/2009 5:20:12 AM , Rating: 2
The ionized electrons contribute to heating, through electron-phonon interaction.


A tired false analogy
By menace on 7/29/2009 11:42:25 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
The energy generated by the FLASH laser could have powered a small city.


ANY amount of energy can power ANY size community

Lets say the whole world is powered by 10TW (just hypothetical, I have no idea what the real number is)

Just 1 joule of energy can power the whole world!

Of course it can only do so for 100 femtoseconds.

Stop using these false analogies. If you mean the POWER generated (over the small time period) is enough to POWER a small city ok. By comparing energy to power you are just showing scientific ignorance.




Transparent metals..
By Silver2k7 on 7/29/2009 10:07:56 AM , Rating: 2
Ive read somewhere else about the feasability of transparent metals... there must be more interesting articles about this on the web..




"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki